Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R220XY426AK
Maritime Shrub Low Flood Plain
Last updated: 6/05/2025
Accessed: 09/23/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 220X–Alexander Archipelago-Gulf of Alaska Coast
The Alexander Archipelago-Gulf of Alaska Coast area consists of a narrow arc of islands and lower elevation coastal mountains in the Southern Alaska Region. This area spans from the Alexander Archipelago in southeastern Alaska, north and west along the coast of the Gulf of Alaska and Prince William Sound, and further west to the southern tip of the Kenai Peninsula and the northeastern islands of the Kodiak Archipelago. The area makes up about 27,435 square miles (USDA 2006). The terrain primarily consists of low to moderate relief mountains that are deeply incised. Throughout the area glaciers, rivers, and streams have cut deep, narrow to broad valleys. The broader valleys have nearly level to strongly sloping flood plains and stream terraces. Alluvial and colluvial fans and short footslopes are common in the valleys along the base of the mountains. Rocky headlands, sea cliffs, estuaries, and beaches are common along the coast.
This area includes the Municipality of Juneau, Alaska's capital, and a number of smaller coastal towns and villages. Federally administered lands within this MLRA include Admiralty Island National Monument and part of Misty Fjords National Monument, Tongass National Forest, Chugach National Forest, and Glacier Bay, Wrangell-St. Elias, and Kenai Fjords National Parks and Preserves. The southern terminus of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline is in Valdez.
During the late Pleistocene epoch, the entire area was covered with glacial ice. The numerous fjords of the Alexander Archipelago and Prince William Sound were formed chiefly as a result of glacial scouring and deepening of preglacial river valleys. Most glacial deposits have been eroded away or buried by mountain colluvium and alluvium, which cover about 90 percent of the present landscape. The remaining glacial and glaciofluvial deposits are generally restricted to coastal areas. During the Holocene epoch, volcanic activity within and adjacent to this area deposited a layer of volcanic ash of varying thickness on much of the landscape in the southeastern and northwestern parts of the area. Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Lower Tertiary stratified sedimentary rocks and Cretaceous and Tertiary intrusive rocks underlie much of the area and are exposed on steep mountain
slopes and ridges (USDA 2006).
The dominant soil orders in this MLRA are Spodosols, Histosols, and Entisols. Soils in the area typically have a cryic soil temperature regime, an udic moisture regime, and have mixed minerology. Spodosols are common on mountains and hills having been formed in gravelly or cobbly colluvium, glacial till, and varying amounts of silty volcanic ash. These Spodosols commonly range from shallow to deep, are well to somewhat poorly drained, and typically classify as Humicryods or Haplocryods. Histosols that are poorly to very poorly drained occur on footslopes, discharge slopes, and valley floors. These wet histosols commonly classify as Cryosaprists, Cryohemists, and Cryofibrists. Histosols that are well drained occur on steep mountainsides. These dry Histosols commonly classify as Cryofolists. Entisols are common on flood plains, stream terraces, and outwash plains having been formed in silty, sandy, and gravelly to cobbly alluvium. These Entisols are generally deep, range from well to somewhat poorly drained, and commonly classify as Cryaquents and Cryofluvents. Miscellaneous (non-soil) areas make up about 23 percent of the MLRA. The most common miscellaneous areas are avalanche chutes, rock outcrop, rubble land, beaches, river wash, and water.
This area represents the northern extent of the Pacific temperate rainforest and is characterized by productive stands of conifers. Western hemlock and Sitka spruce are the dominant trees on mountains and hills at the lower elevations. Due to warmer temperatures, western red cedar and Alaska cedar are more prevalent in the southern part of the area. Black cottonwood and mixed forest types occur on flood plains. Areas of peat and other sites that are too wet for forest growth support sedge-grass meadows and low scrub. The transition to subalpine and alpine communities typically occurs at elevations between 1500 to 3000 feet (Boggs et al. 2010, Carstensen 2007, Martin et al. 1995), which characterize the vegetation of the Southern Alaska Coastal Mountains area.
For many decades, logging, commercial fishing, and mining have been the primary industrial land uses throughout much of the area. In recent years, changes in public interests, land use policies, and timber economics have contributed to a significant decline in the timber industry. Commercial fishing continues to be an important industry and most communities support a fleet of boats and fishing related facilities. A number of mines operate in the area and others have been prospected and proposed. Tourism and wildland recreation are becoming increasingly important. Subsistence hunting, fishing, and gathering provide food and a variety of other resources to local residents and remain the principal economy for residents of remote villages.Ecological site concept
This site occurs in river valleys and coastal plains on low flood plains adjacent to a river or stream channel. These low flood plains are frequently to occasionally flooded . Soil textures are stratified silt loams to loamy sands, often with lenses of gravel and sandier textures in deeper soil horizons. Relatively small, closed depressions occur on these low flood plains and often have very deep peat deposits as a result of long duration ponding. Drainage class ranges from very poorly drained on streambanks and depressions to moderately well-drained on elevated flood plain steppes.
This site supports a reference state composed of two communities that reflect a disturbance regime of high-intensity flooding. An open tall shrub community with abundant herbaceous understory plants is typical following severe flood events. In the absence of severe flooding, shrub abundance increases, herbaceous productivity decreases, and the community becomes a closed tall scrubland comprised dominantly of alder and willow.Associated sites
F220XY427AK Maritime Forest Gravelly High Floodplain
Site F220XY427AK occurs adjacent to this site on the high floodplains of large rivers and tributaries, just upslope from this site.
Similar sites
F220XY427AK Maritime Forest Gravelly High Floodplain
Both of these sites occur on the floodplains of large streams and tributaries, but R220XY427AK occurs on the high floodplain and supports mature trees, while this site occurs on the low floodplain and does not support mature trees.
R220XY425AK Maritime Shrub Drainageway
R220XY425AK is associated with small drainageways that flood less frequently than this site.
R220XY444AK Maritime Scrub Gravelly Steep Drainageways
R220XY444AK is associated with steep small drainageways that flood less frequently than this site.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub (1) Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata
(2) Salix sitchensisHerbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This site occurs in river valleys and coastal plains on low flood plains adjacent to a river or stream channel. These low flood plains are frequently to occasionally flooded, and may include some closed depressions where water ponds on the surface for long durations. The water table depth increases with elevation above the stream channel, but is typically within 30 inches of the soil surface. Slopes range from 0 – 3% with elevations generally up to 500 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Coastal plain > Flood plain
(2) River valley > Flood plain
(3) Coastal plain > Flood plain > Closed depression
(4) River valley > Flood plain > Closed depression
Runoff class Medium Flooding duration Brief (2 to 7 days) to long (7 to 30 days) Flooding frequency Occasional to frequent Ponding duration Brief (2 to 7 days) Ponding frequency None to rare Elevation 0 – 500 ft Slope 0 – 3 % Water table depth 0 – 30 in Aspect W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Runoff class Medium Flooding duration Brief (2 to 7 days) to long (7 to 30 days) Flooding frequency Occasional to frequent Ponding duration Very long (more than 30 days) Ponding frequency None to frequent Elevation 0 – 1850 ft Slope 0 – 5 % Water table depth 0 – 60 in Climatic features
Cloudy skies, moderate temperatures, and abundant rainfall characterize the temperate maritime climate of this site. Frequent winter storms may consist of snow or heavy rainfall. Moderate to strong winds from the south and southeast are common before and during storms throughout the year. Annual precipitation ranges from 44-94 inches, and annual snowfall ranges from 30-70 inches along the coast and up to 200 inches at higher elevations (USDA 2006). The average annual temperature at lower elevations ranges from about 38-43 degrees F (3-6 degrees C). The frost-free period ranges from about 90-140 days, and the freeze-free period ranges from about 125-180 days.
Table 4 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 100-140 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 150-180 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 60-150 in Frost-free period (actual range) 80-170 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 120-220 days Precipitation total (actual range) 40-170 in Frost-free period (average) 120 days Freeze-free period (average) 170 days Precipitation total (average) 100 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) GUSTAVUS [USW00025322], Gustavus, AK
-
(2) GLACIER BAY [USC00503294], Gustavus, AK
-
(3) YAKUTAT STATE AP [USW00025339], Yakutat, AK
-
(4) SKAGWAY AP [USW00025335], Skagway, AK
-
(5) HAINES AP [USW00025323], Haines, AK
-
(6) SELDOVIA AP [USW00025516], Homer, AK
-
(7) MAIN BAY [USC00505604], Valdez, AK
-
(8) CORDOVA M K SMITH AP [USW00026410], Cordova, AK
-
(9) SITKA AIRPORT [USW00025333], Sitka, AK
-
(10) JUNEAU INTL AP [USW00025309], Juneau, AK
-
(11) ANNETTE ISLAND AP [USW00025308], Metlakatla, AK
-
(12) PETERSBURG 1 [USW00025329], Petersburg, AK
-
(13) KETCHIKAN INTL AP [USW00025325], Ketchikan, AK
-
(14) PELICAN [USC00507141], Hoonah, AK
">Influencing water features
The hydrology of this site is characterized by frequent freshwater flooding during spring runoff and other large storm events. High-intensity flooding events periodically remove vegetation, resulting in high cover of alder and willow with very low tree cover. Closed depressions on the flood plain are frequently ponded for long durations.
Soil features
The soils of this site formed in deep alluvial deposits on low flood plains by freshwater rivers and streams. Soil textures are stratified silt loams to loamy sands, often with lenses of gravel and sandier textures in deeper soil horizons. A thin organic layer is common on the soil surface. Relatively small, closed depressions occur on these low flood plains, and often have very deep peat deposits as a result of long duration ponding. Drainage class ranges from very poorly drained on streambanks and depressions to moderately well-drained on elevated flood plain steppes. This site has an aquic or udic soil moisture regime.
Figure 7. Typical soil profile associated with Puffin soils in AK692.
Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Alluvium
(2) Organic material
Surface texture (1) Silt loam
(2) Gravelly silt loam
(3) Very fine sandy loam
(4) Loamy sand
(5) Peat
Family particle size (1) Coarse-silty
(2) Coarse-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal
(3) Sandy
Drainage class Very poorly drained to moderately well drained Permeability class Moderately slow to rapid Soil depth 60 – 0 in Surface fragment cover <=3" Not specified Surface fragment cover >3" Not specified Available water capacity
(0-10in)1.1 – 2.7 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)Not specified Clay content
(0-20in)2 – 10 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)Not specified Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)Not specified Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)4.5 – 7.3 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-60in)0 – 30 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-60in)0 – 3 % Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class Very poorly drained to moderately well drained Permeability class Moderately slow to very rapid Soil depth 60 – 0 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 – 15 % Available water capacity
(0-10in)0.2 – 3.9 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)0 – 4 % Clay content
(0-20in)0 – 10 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 2 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)0 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)3.5 – 8.4 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-60in)0 – 75 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-60in)0 – 15 % Ecological dynamics
This site is associated with flood plains of large rivers and tributaries along the Gulf of Alaska. Until about 10,000 years ago, this area had many continental-scale ice sheets that advanced and retreated many times over millennia (Chapin 1994). The final advance of these glaciers occurred during the Little Ice Age, which peaked about 1750 AD. Since then, many glaciers have thinned and retreated inland, while numerous tidewater glaciers still exist in the area (Lawson 2015). The 250-year glacial retreat is attributed to less regional snowfall in the mountains, rising winter temperatures, and decreased cloud cover and lower precipitation during the growing season in summer (Hall et al. 2003).
During the past 250 years of glacial retreat, meltwater transported and deposited a large amount of silt and sediment via numerous short, high-gradient rivers. Alluvial and colluvial fans and long footslopes are common in the valleys along the base of the mountains. The flood plains in this area are generally broad and braided with a high gradient, and feed into the tidally influenced estuarine areas.
Ecological site R220XY426AK supports a reference state composed of two communities that reflect a disturbance regime of frequent flooding for extended periods. An open tall shrub community with abundant herbaceous understory plants is typical following severe flood events. In the absence of severe flooding, the abundance of shrubs increases, herbaceous productivity decreases, and the community becomes a closed tall scrubland comprised dominantly of alder and willow. If flooding becomes even less frequent, balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera) seedlings and saplings may establish but do not dominate on this site.
Browsing by moose on willow species was observed on this ecological site, but it does not appear to affect the ecological processes enough to alter the communities.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
SWAPAEHState 1 submodel, plant communities
1.1a - High intensity flood events remove vegetation 1.2a - Lack of high-intensity flood events leads to increased alder and willow shrub cover State 1
Reference State
The reference state has two associated community phases that transition along reversible pathways related to flooding frequency and intensity.
Resilience management. This state has been observed to be resilient and/or resistant to current disturbance drivers, lacking alternative states and at-risk communities.
Dominant plant species
-
Sitka alder (Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata), shrub
-
Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), shrub
Community 1.1
Sitka alder-Sitka willow
Community 1.1 is characterized as closed tall scrubland. The canopy is primarily a dense thicket of shrubs. Common shrubs include Sitka alder, Sitka willow, and salmonberry. Balsam poplar and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) are common, but primarily occur as seedlings with low cover. The vegetative strata that characterize this community phase are tall shrubs (greater than 10 feet in height) and medium shrubs (between 3 and 10 feet in height). The soil surface can be bare soil, or covered with herbaceous litter, rock fragments, and/or bryophytes. Common bryophytes include goose neck moss (Rhytidiadelphus spp.), Ceratodon moss (Ceratodon spp.), and Schreber’s big red stem moss (Pleurozium schreberi).
Dominant plant species
-
Sitka alder (Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata), shrub
-
Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), shrub
-
salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), shrub
-
feltleaf willow (Salix alaxensis), shrub
-
squashberry (Viburnum edule), shrub
Table 7. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover 0-0% Shrub/vine/liana basal cover 0-0% Grass/grasslike basal cover 0% Forb basal cover 0% Non-vascular plants 10-40% Biological crusts 0-0% Litter 20-90% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0-30% Surface fragments >3" 0-40% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0-90% Community 1.2
Sitka alder-Sitka willow/dwarf fireweed
Figure 8. Typical plant community associated with community 1.2.
Community 1.2 is characterized as an open tall scrubland. Common shrubs include Sitka alder and various willow (most commonly Sitka willow). Common forbs and graminoids include dwarf fireweed, marsh grass of Parnassus , and tufted hairgrass. The vegetative strata that characterize this community phase are medium shrubs (between 3 and 10 feet in height), medium forbs (between 4 and 24 inches in height), and medium graminoids (between 4 and 24 inches in height). The soil surface may have any combination of herbaceous litter, rock fragments, bare soil, and moss.
Dominant plant species
-
Sitka alder (Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata), shrub
-
grayleaf willow (Salix glauca), shrub
-
undergreen willow (Salix commutata), shrub
-
Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), shrub
-
Barclay's willow (Salix barclayi), shrub
-
dwarf fireweed (Chamerion latifolium), other herbaceous
-
marsh grass of Parnassus (Parnassia palustris), other herbaceous
Table 8. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana basal cover 0% Grass/grasslike basal cover 0% Forb basal cover 0% Non-vascular plants 0-60% Biological crusts 0% Litter 10-30% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 10-60% Surface fragments >3" 10-20% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0-30% Pathway 1.1a
Community 1.1 to 1.2
Sitka alder-Sitka willow
Sitka alder-Sitka willow/dwarf fireweedEcological process: tall shrub cover is mechanically reduced by force of floodwaters, resulting in higher resource availability for herbaceous species, including light, heat, and space. Indicators: flood indicators, such as lodged debris, soil scouring, fresh sediment deposits, and open plant community structure.
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.1
Sitka alder-Sitka willow/dwarf fireweed
Sitka alder-Sitka willowEcological process: tall shrub cover increases due to natural succession, such that strong competitors (alder and willow) reduce the availability of light, heat, and space for herbaceous understory species. Indicators: dense shrub cover, litter build up, closed plant community structure and lack vegetation changes.
Additional community tables
Table 9. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 1.1 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height ft Canopy cover (%) Diameter in Basal area (square ft/acre) Treebalsam poplar POBA2 Populus balsamifera Native – 1-10 – 0 Sitka spruce PISI Picea sitchensis Native – 0-2 – 0 Table 11. Community 1.1 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (ft) Canopy cover (%) Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)reedgrass CALAM Calamagrostis Native – 0–2 smallawned sedge CAMI4 Carex microchaeta Native – 0–1 water sedge CAAQ Carex aquatilis Native – 0–1 Forb/Herbbride's feathers ARDI8 Aruncus dioicus Native – 0–10 common cowparsnip HEMA80 Heracleum maximum Native – 0–5 sidebells wintergreen ORSE Orthilia secunda Native – 0–5 liverleaf wintergreen PYAS Pyrola asarifolia Native – 0–5 green false hellebore VEVI Veratrum viride Native – 0–2 common yarrow ACMI2 Achillea millefolium Native – 0–2 dwarf fireweed CHLA13 Chamerion latifolium Native – 0–2 Tilesius' wormwood ARTI Artemisia tilesii Native – 0–1 beach strawberry FRCH Fragaria chiloensis Native – 0–1 claspleaf twistedstalk STAM2 Streptopus amplexifolius Native – 0–1 northern starwort STCA Stellaria calycantha Native – 0–1 threeleaf foamflower TITR Tiarella trifoliata Native – 0–1 burnet SANGU2 Sanguisorba Native – 0–1 locoweed OXYTR Oxytropis Native – 0–1 Fern/fern allyfield horsetail EQAR Equisetum arvense Native – 0–3 spreading woodfern DREX2 Dryopteris expansa Native – 0–1 western oakfern GYDR Gymnocarpium dryopteris Native – 0–1 common ladyfern ATFI Athyrium filix-femina Native – 0–1 Shrub/Subshrubsalmonberry RUSP Rubus spectabilis Native – 0–70 Sitka willow SASI2 Salix sitchensis Native – 2–70 Sitka alder ALVIS Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata Native – 10–65 feltleaf willow SAAL Salix alaxensis Native – 0–10 Scouler's willow SASC Salix scouleriana Native – 0–7 Barclay's willow SABA3 Salix barclayi Native – 0–5 squashberry VIED Viburnum edule Native – 0–5 devilsclub OPHO Oplopanax horridus Native – 0–2 Drummond's mountain-avens DRDR Dryas drummondii Native – 0–2 Nonvasculargoose neck moss RHYTI2 Rhytidiadelphus Native – 0–10 ceratodon moss CERAT9 Ceratodon Native – 0–5 Schreber's big red stem moss PLSC70 Pleurozium schreberi Native – 0–4 hookeria moss HOOKE Hookeria Native – 0–3 tree climacium moss CLDE70 Climacium dendroides Native – 0–1 dicranum moss DICRA8 Dicranum Native – 0–1 polytrichum moss POLYT5 Polytrichum Native – 0–1 knights plume moss PTCR70 Ptilium crista-castrensis Native – 0–1 rhizomnium moss RHGL70 Rhizomnium glabrescens Native – 0–1 Table 12. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 13. Community 1.2 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (ft) Canopy cover (%) Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)tufted hairgrass DECE Deschampsia cespitosa Native – 0–5 American dunegrass LEMO8 Leymus mollis Native – 0–3 common woodrush LUMU2 Luzula multiflora Native – 0–2 arctic rush JUAR2 Juncus arcticus Native – 0–2 water sedge CAAQ Carex aquatilis Native – 0–2 twocolor sedge CABI4 Carex bicolor Native – 0–2 Mertens' sedge CAME6 Carex mertensii Native – 0–2 bluejoint CACA4 Calamagrostis canadensis Native – 0–1 Forb/Herbdwarf fireweed CHLA13 Chamerion latifolium Native – 0–20 marsh grass of Parnassus PAPA8 Parnassia palustris Native – 0–15 Nootka lupine LUNO Lupinus nootkatensis Native – 0–3 beach strawberry FRCH Fragaria chiloensis Native – 0–2 fireweed CHAN9 Chamerion angustifolium Native – 0–1 Fern/fern allyscouringrush horsetail EQHY Equisetum hyemale Native – 0–2 Shrub/SubshrubSitka alder ALVIS Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata Native – 0–20 undergreen willow SACO2 Salix commutata Native – 0–10 grayleaf willow SAGL Salix glauca Native – 0–10 Sitka willow SASI2 Salix sitchensis Native – 0–5 Barclay's willow SABA3 Salix barclayi Native – 0–5 balsam poplar POBA2 Populus balsamifera Native – 0–1 Interpretations
Supporting information
Inventory data references
All data currently reside in NASIS under the User Site IDs in the following table: NASIS ID Plant community 13TD06801 community 1.1 13NP02403 community 1.1 13NP01801 community 1.1 13TD00401 community 1.2 13NP01802 community 1.2 13NP00803 community 1.2 2015AK282010 community 1.1 2015AK282013 community 1.1 2015AK282108 community 1.1
Other references
Chapin, F.S., L.R. Walker, C.L. Fastie, and L.C. Sharman. 1994. Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecological Monographs 64: 149-175.
Clague, John J., and V.N. Rampton. 1982. Neoglacial Lake Alsek. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 19.1: 94-117.
Clarke, J.A. 1977. An inverse problem in glacial geology: The reconstruction of glacier thinning in Glacier Bay, Alaska, between AD 1910 and 1960 from relative sea level data. Journal of Glaciology 80: 481-503.
Hall, D.K., C.S. Benton, and W.O. Field, 1994. Changes of glaciers in Glacier Bay, Alaska, using ground and satellite measurements. Physical Geography 16(1): 27-41.
Hall, M.H.P., and D. Fagre. 2003. Modeled climate-induced glacier change in Glacier National Park 1850–2100. BioScience 53:131–140.
Hicks, S.D., and W. Shofnos. 1965. The documentation of land emergence from sea-level observations in southeast Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research 70: 3315–3320.
Larsen, C.F., K.A. Echelmeyer, J.T. Freymueller, and R.J. Motyka. 2003. Tide gauge records of uplift along the northern Pacific-North American plate boundary, 1937 to 2001, Journal of Geophysical Research. Volume 108, number B4. DOI: 10.1029/2001JB001685.
Lawson, D.E. 2015. An overview of selected glaciers in Glacier Bay. National Park Service. Retrieved August 15, 2010.
Milne, G.A., and I. Shennan. 2013. Isostasy: Glaciation-induced sea-level change. In Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science. Volume 3, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 452-459.
Schoeneberger, P.J., and D.A. Wysocki. 2012. Geomorphic Description System, Version 4.2. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Schoeneberger, P.J., D.A. Wysocki, E.C. Benham, and W.D. Broderson, editors. 2012. Field book for describing and sampling soils. Version 3.0. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
Viereck, L.A., C.T. Dyrness, A.R. Batten, and K.J. Wezlick. 1992. The Alaska vegetation classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-286.Contributors
Elizabeth Powers
Jamin Johanson
Chad Okrup
Blaine Spellman
Nathan ParryApproval
Blaine Spellman, 6/05/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 06/05/2025 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement