Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Ecological site QX197X01X503

Lavaflow Forest

Last updated: 8/21/2026
Accessed: 09/24/2026

Home / esd CATALOG / MLRA 197X / ecological site QX197X01X503

USC

Metric

General information

Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.

MLRA notes

Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 197X–Volcanic Islands of American Samoa

This MLRA consists of the islands of Tutuila, Aunuu, Ofu, Olosega, and Tau. The islands have extremely steep, highly dissected mountains, small valleys, and a narrow coastal plain. More than half of the area has slopes of more than 70 percent. The highest elevations are 3,056 feet (931 meters) on Tau and 2,142 feet (653 meters) on Tutuila. The islands consist of Pleistocene-age, basic igneous rocks, mainly basalt with some andesite and trachyte (USDA-NRCS, 2006).

The climate is moist, warm, and humid. Average annual rainfall ranges from 125 inches (3,175 millimeters) to more than 250 inches (6,350 millimeters). Rainfall varies over short distances due to topography. The driest months are June through September; the wettest months are December through March. Average annual temperature is 81 degrees F (27 degrees C). Relative humidity is 73 to 90 percent throughout the year. Prevailing winds are easterly trade winds. Cyclones occasionally strike the area (USDA-NRCS, 2006).

Soils are Mollisols, Andisols, Entisols, Oxisols, and Histosols. Soil moisture regimes are udic or perudic; the soil temperature regime is isohyperthermic. Natural vegetation is mostly tropical hardwood forest (USDA-NRCS, 2006).

Classification relationships

This ecological site occurs within Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 197 – Volcanic Islands of American Samoa.

Ecological site concept

This ecological site occurs on the island of Tutuila and on a small part of Tau in American Samoa. It occurs on gently to moderately sloping (3 to 15 percent) aa lava flows at elevations ranging from 0 to 160 feet (0 to 50 meters) elevation. It is easily accessible on the southern side of Tutuila (Green et al., 2015; USDA-SCS, 1984).

Soils are Folists (Histisols) that formed in organic matter deposited over relatively recent aa lava flows. Soil temperature regimes are isohyperthermic; soil moisture regimes are udic. Average annual rainfall ranges from 120 to 174 inches (3,050 to 4,420 millimeters). Water runoff is very slow. Effective rooting depths are variable in spaces between aa fragments and in bedrock cracks.

This forest type has high plant diversity. The upper canopy grows up to 100 feet (30 meters) tall. Ground cover is dense. Epiphytes are sparse to common; climbing plants are common (USDA-SCS, 1984).

Associated sites

QX197X01X504	Alluvial Valley Forest Alluvial Valley Forest Ecological Site adjoins Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site in the few locations where alluvial valleys descend to young aa lava flows near the coast. Alluvial Valley Forest Ecological Site has somewhat poorly drained, mineral soils. Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site has well drained, organic soils in the interstices between aa rocks.
QX197X01X507	Dry Coastal Forest Dry Coastal Forest Ecological Site adjoins Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site where uplands and mountain slopes descend to young aa lava flows near the coast. Dry Coastal Forest Ecological Site has mineral soils formed from volcanic ash deposited over hard tuff, or, in one case, in the interstices between aa rocks. Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site has organic soils that formed in the interstices between aa rocks.

QX197X01X504

Alluvial Valley Forest

Alluvial Valley Forest Ecological Site adjoins Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site in the few locations where alluvial valleys descend to young aa lava flows near the coast. Alluvial Valley Forest Ecological Site has somewhat poorly drained, mineral soils. Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site has well drained, organic soils in the interstices between aa rocks.

QX197X01X507

Dry Coastal Forest

Dry Coastal Forest Ecological Site adjoins Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site where uplands and mountain slopes descend to young aa lava flows near the coast. Dry Coastal Forest Ecological Site has mineral soils formed from volcanic ash deposited over hard tuff, or, in one case, in the interstices between aa rocks. Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site has organic soils that formed in the interstices between aa rocks.

Similar sites

QX197X01X505	Skeletal Pachic or Fulvic Forest Skeletal Pachic or Fulvic Forest Ecological Site adjoins Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site where talus slopes, uplands, and mountain slopes descend to young aa lava flows near the coast. Skeletal Pachic or Fulvic Forest Ecological Site has mineral soils with high organic carbon content and high rock content, slopes of 6 to 60 percent, elevations of 0 to 1,050 feet, and greater mean annual rainfall. Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site has organic soils with high rock content, slopes of 3 to 15 percent, elevations of 0 to 160 feet, and receives less mean annual rainfall.

QX197X01X505

Skeletal Pachic or Fulvic Forest

Skeletal Pachic or Fulvic Forest Ecological Site adjoins Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site where talus slopes, uplands, and mountain slopes descend to young aa lava flows near the coast. Skeletal Pachic or Fulvic Forest Ecological Site has mineral soils with high organic carbon content and high rock content, slopes of 6 to 60 percent, elevations of 0 to 1,050 feet, and greater mean annual rainfall. Lavaflow Forest Ecological Site has organic soils with high rock content, slopes of 3 to 15 percent, elevations of 0 to 160 feet, and receives less mean annual rainfall.

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Tree	(1) Nephelium (2) Planchonella
Shrub	Not specified
Herbaceous	(1) Asplenium nidus (2) Phymatosorus grossus

Legacy ID

F197XY503AS

Download full description

Physiographic features

This ecological site occurs on aa flows.

Table 2. Representative physiographic features

Landforms	(1) Island > Aa lava flow
Runoff class	Very low
Flooding frequency	None
Ponding frequency	None
Elevation	0 – 160 ft
Slope	3 – 15 %
Water table depth	72 in
Aspect	NW, SE

Climatic features

The area is characterized by abundant rain and warm, humid days and nights. Average annual precipitation in this ecological site ranges from 120 to 174 inches (3,050 to 4,420 millimeters). Mean annual air temperature is 80 degrees F (27 degrees C). The driest period is June through September (winter), and the wettest is December through March (summer), although heavy showers and long, rainy periods can occur in any month. June, July, and August are the coolest months, and January, February, and March are the warmest. Daytime temperatures typically reach the upper 80 degrees F in summer and the middle 80 degrees F in winter, while nighttime temperatures are in the middle 70 degrees F in summer and low 70 degrees F in winter (USDA-SCS, 1984; USDI-FWS, 1982).

The prevailing winds throughout the year are the easterly trade winds. They tend to be more directly from the east in December through March and mostly from the east-southeast and southeast during the rest of the year. The trade winds are less prevalent in summer than in winter. About 25 to 30 thunderstorms occur in an average year, mainly during the rainy season. The area lies across the path of tropical disturbances, including cyclones, that come usually from the north, but occasionally from east or west (USDA-SCS, 1984; USDI-FWS, 1982).

Table 3 Representative climatic features

Frost-free period (characteristic range)	370 days
Freeze-free period (characteristic range)	370 days
Precipitation total (characteristic range)	120-170 in
Frost-free period (actual range)	370 days
Freeze-free period (actual range)	370 days
Precipitation total (actual range)	120-170 in
Frost-free period (average)	370 days
Freeze-free period (average)	370 days
Precipitation total (average)	150 in

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 1. Monthly precipitation range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range

Bar

Line

Figure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature

Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern

Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern

Climate stations used

(1) PAGO PAGO WSO AP [AQW00061705], AS

Soil features

The soils in this ecological site are in the Histisols soil order. They formed from organic matter deposited in the interstices between aa lava rocks. They are well drained. Soil temperature regimes are isohypothermic (very warm) with a mean temperature of 80 degrees F (27 degrees C). Soil moisture regimes are udic. The soil component correlated to this ecological site is Tafuna.

Table 4. Representative soil features

Parent material	(1) Organic material
Surface texture	(1) Extremely stony
Drainage class	Well drained
Permeability class	Very rapid
Depth to restrictive layer	39 – 59 in
Soil depth	39 – 59 in
Surface fragment cover <=3"	23 %
Surface fragment cover >3"	44 %
Available water capacity (0-40in)	0.9 – 2.2 in
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-40in)	Not specified
Electrical conductivity (0-40in)	Not specified
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-40in)	Not specified
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in)	6.1 – 7.3
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-40in)	14 %
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-40in)	79 %

Ecological dynamics

Although annual rainfall is high and well distributed throughout the year, the soil depth (average 39 inches or 100 centimeters) results in dry conditions as indicated by the low water holding capacity of the soils. However, water may accumulate on top of the blue rock below the soil material zone. This has not been observed but is suggested by the abundant plant growth and presence of mosquitos in aa lava flow areas with organic soils on the Pacific Islands.

The main natural disturbance is strong storms that can damage or kill vegetation by high wind speeds. The forest is susceptible to human-caused fires in the drier season, especially in drought years. The main human disturbance is clearing of native vegetation to plant coconut plantations and abandonment of plantations that results in at least temporary dominance of introduced weedy plants (Forestry Program, Division of Community and Natural Resources, 2010; Sene, 2020; Webb and Fa`aumu, 1999; Whistler, 2002).

Very little of this ecological site exists because it has been used for homesites.

State and transition model

Custom diagram

Standard diagram

Figure 7. State and Transition Model (STM) for QX197X01X503 (Lavaflow Forest)

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

Ecosystem states

1. Reference State

2. Coconut Plantation

3. Cleared and Abandoned State

T1A	-	Removal of native vegetation and planting coconut palms (Cocos nucifera).
T1B	-	Native vegetation cleared then abandoned.
T2A	-	Coconut plantation abandoned.
R3A	-	Active restoration measures.
R3B	-	Land clearing, weed control, and replanting coconut palms.

State 1 submodel, plant communities

1.1. Tava - Mamalava/Hawai'i Birdnest Fern – Musk Fern/Fue Manogi

1.2. Tava - Toi/Hawai'i Birdnest Fern – Musk Fern

1.1A	-	Storms or fires that damage or kill trees.
1.2A	-	Adequate time to recover after disturbance.

State 2 submodel, plant communities

2.1. Coconut Palm

State 3 submodel, plant communities

3.1. Coconut Palm – White Leadtree/Giant Sensitive Plant/Romerillo/Merremia

State 1
Reference State

This diverse ecological site has a very tall (80 to 100 feet or 25 to 30 meters) tree canopy. Ground cover is dense, epiphytes are sparse to moderately abundant, and climbing vines are common (Forestry Program, Division of Community and Natural Resources, 2010; Sene, 2020; Webb and Fa`aumu, 1999; Whistler, 2002).

Dominant plant species

nephelium (Nephelium), tree
planchonella (Planchonella), tree
alphitonia (Alphitonia), tree
Hawai'I birdnest fern (Asplenium nidus), other herbaceous
musk fern (Phymatosorus grossus), other herbaceous
pepper (Piper), other herbaceous

Community 1.1
Tava - Mamalava/Hawai'i Birdnest Fern – Musk Fern/Fue Manogi

Common large trees are nephelium or tava (Pometia pinnata or Nephelium spp.), mamalava (Planchonella samoensis), asi (Syzygium inophylloides), maali (Canarium samoense), maota (Dysoxylum maota), mamala (Homalanthus nutans), auauli (Diospyros samoensis), and atone (Myristica inutilis) (Forestry Program, Division of Community and Natural Resources, 2010; Green et al., 2015; Sene, 2020; Webb and Fa`aumu, 1999; Whistler, 2002; Whistler, 1994; Whistler, 1992).

Common ferns are Hawai`i birdnest fern (Asplenium nidus), musk fern (Phymatosorus grossus), and Oriental vessel fern or mule’s foot fern (Angiopteris evecta). Orchids are common, among them Dendrobium biflorum and Dendrobium dactylodes. Common climbing vines are fue manogi (Piper graeffei), centipede tongavine or fue laufao (Epipremnum pinnatum), and fue selela (Hoya pottsii) (Forestry Program, Division of Community and Natural Resources, 2010; Green et al., 2015; Sene, 2020; Webb and Fa`aumu, 1999; Whistler, 2002; Whistler, 1994; Whistler, 1992).

Dominant plant species

nephelium (Nephelium), tree
planchonella (Planchonella), tree
Hawai'I birdnest fern (Asplenium nidus), other herbaceous
musk fern (Phymatosorus grossus), other herbaceous
pepper (Piper), other herbaceous

Community 1.2
Tava - Toi/Hawai'i Birdnest Fern – Musk Fern

The same tree species as in Community Phase 1.1 remain in this phase, but other tree species, commonly toi (Alphitonia zizyphoides) and tavai (Rhus taitensis) can join the canopy as the forest regrows. Ground vegetation, especially Hawai'i birdnest fern and musk fern, increase in abundance with increased light availability. Epiphytes are less common than in 1.1.

Dominant plant species

nephelium (Nephelium), tree
alphitonia (Alphitonia), tree
Hawai'I birdnest fern (Asplenium nidus), other herbaceous
musk fern (Phymatosorus grossus), other herbaceous

Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2

Storms or fires that damage or kill trees causes a phase change from 1.1 to 1.2 typified by a partial, temporary change in dominant tree species and a temporary increase in ground level vegetation.

Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1

This community phase will revert to phase 1.1 with gradual regrowth of native species when given adequate time to recover after disturbance.

State 2
Coconut Plantation

This state consists of one community phase that has been cleared of natural vegetation and planted with coconut palms (Cocos nucifera).

Dominant plant species

coconut palm (Cocos nucifera), tree

Community 2.1
Coconut Palm

This community phase consists of planted coconut palms (Cocos nucifera). Highly variable low ground cover is present.

Dominant plant species

coconut palm (Cocos nucifera), tree

State 3
Cleared and Abandoned State

This state consists of one community phase dominated by a variable mixture of native and introduced small trees, shrubs, vines, forbs, and grasses that thrive in sunny environments. Remnant coconut palms are likely present.

Dominant plant species

coconut palm (Cocos nucifera), tree
white leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala), tree
giant false sensitive plant (Mimosa diplotricha), shrub
merremia (Merremia peltata), other herbaceous
romerillo (Bidens alba), other herbaceous

Community 3.1
Coconut Palm – White Leadtree/Giant Sensitive Plant/Romerillo/Merremia

This community phase contains remnant coconut palms with a variable understory of native and introduced shrubs, forbs, vines, and grasses that thrive in sunny environments. White leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala), an introduced small tree, is often abundant. The introduced shrub giant sensitive plant (Mimosa diplotricha) is common, as is the introduced forb beggar’s tick (Bidens sp.). Merremia (Merremia peltata), a highly invasive introduced vine, may be very abundant. A wide variety of other species may occur depending on location of the site (Forestry Program, Division of Community and Natural Resources, 2010; Green et al., 2015; Sene, 2020; Space and Flynn, 2000; Webb and Fa`aumu, 1999; Whistler, 2002; Whistler, 1994; Whistler, 1992).

Dominant plant species

coconut palm (Cocos nucifera), tree
white leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala), tree
giant false sensitive plant (Mimosa diplotricha), shrub
merremia (Merremia peltata), other herbaceous
romerillo (Bidens alba), other herbaceous

Transition T1A
State 1 to 2

The Reference State (1) transitions to the Coconut Plantation State (2) by removal of native vegetation and planting coconut palms (<a class="species-link" href="https://plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=CONU" target="_blank" title="Open in plants.usda.gov"><i>Cocos nucifera</i></a>).

Transition T1B
State 1 to 3

The Reference State (1) transitions to the Cleared and Abandoned State (3) if cleared and abandoned. This allows heliophytes, both native and introduced, to temporarily cover the understory.

Transition T2A
State 2 to 3

The Coconut Plantation State (2) transitions to the Cleared and Abandoned State (3) if cleared and abandoned. This allows heliophytes, both native and introduced, to temporarily cover the understory.

Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 1

The Cleared and Abandoned State (3) may be restored to the Reference State (1). The intensity of active restoration measures will be determined by the presence or lack of nearby native forest or, at least, some native trees as well as the density and species mix of grasses, vines, shrubs, and trees present on the site, especially if many competitive introduced species are present.

Restoration pathway R3B
State 3 to 2

The Cleared and Abandoned State (3) may be restored to the Coconut Plantation State (2) by land clearing, weed control, and replanting coconut palms.

Additional community tables

Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition

Group	Common name	Symbol	Scientific name	Annual production ()	Foliar cover (%)

Table 6. Community 1.2 plant community composition

Group	Common name	Symbol	Scientific name	Annual production ()	Foliar cover (%)

Table 7. Community 2.1 plant community composition

Group	Common name	Symbol	Scientific name	Annual production ()	Foliar cover (%)

Table 8. Community 3.1 plant community composition

Group	Common name	Symbol	Scientific name	Annual production ()	Foliar cover (%)

Supporting information

Inventory data references

NASIS soil component data.

Other references

Forestry Program, Division of Community and Natural Resources. (2010). American Samoa Forest Assessment and Resource Strategy. American Samoa Community College, Pago Pago, American Samoa.

Green, K., Kittel, G., Lopez, C., Ainsworth, A., Selvig, M., Vaivai, V., Akamine, K., Tukman, M., and Kudray, G. (2015). Vegetation Mapping Inventory Project, National Park of American Samoa. USDI-NPS Natural Resource Stewardship and Science. Fort Collins, Colorado.

Sene, D. M. (2020). Forest Action Plan. Forestry Program, American Samoa Community College, Pago Pago, American Samoa.

Space, J. C. and Flynn, T. (2000). Observations on invasive plant species in American Samoa. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Honolulu. http://www.hear.org/pier/references/pierref000021.htm

USDA-NRCS. (2006). Major Land Resource Regions. USDA Agriculture Handbook 296. http://soils.usda.gov/MLRAExplorer

USDA-SCS. (1984). Soil Survey of Islands of American Samoa. Nakamura, S., Chavez, C. L., and Roybal, M. W., in cooperation with the Government of American Samoa.

USDI-FWS. (1982). Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat of American Samoa. II. Accounts of Flora and Fauna. R Banks, editor. Washington DC.

Webb, E. L. (2009). A Guide to the Native Ornamental Trees of American Samoa. Department of Marine and Wildlife Resources, Government of American Samoa.

Webb, E. L. and Fa`aumu, S. (1999). Diversity and structure of tropical rain forest of Tutuila, American Samoa: effects of site age and substrate. Plant Ecology 44: 257-274.

Whistler, W. A. (2002). The Samoan Rainforest. Isle Botanica, Honolulu.

Whistler, W. A. (1994). Botanical Inventory of the Proposed Tutuila and Ofu Units of the National Park of American Samoa. Technical Report 87. National Park Service. Honolulu.

Whistler, W. A. (1992). Botanical Inventory of the Proposed Ta`u Unit of the National Park of American Samoa. Technical Report 83. National Park Service. Honolulu.

Contributors

David Clausnitzer PhD
John Proctor
Ann Tan
Carolyn Auweloa
Daniel Bowman
Jennifer Fedenko
Amy Koch
Kendra Moseley
Sarah Quistberg
Jill Ficke-Beaton
Daniel Block
Brendan Brazee
Curtis Talbot

Approval

Jamin Johanson, 8/21/2026

Acknowledgments

Assistance, advice, review, and/or insights: Michael Constantinides, NRCS-PIA Jennifer Higashino, USFWS and NRCS Mike Kolman, NRCS

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)
Contact for lead author
Date	06/08/2026
Approved by
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production

Indicators

Number and extent of rills:
Presence of water flow patterns:
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):

Dominant:

Sub-dominant:

Other:

Additional:
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial plant reproductive capability:

Download reference sheet

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Ecological site QX197X01X503

Lavaflow Forest

Last updated: 8/21/2026 Accessed: 09/24/2026

Search

General information

MLRA notes

Classification relationships

Ecological site concept

Associated sites

Similar sites

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Legacy ID

Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Last updated: 8/21/2026
Accessed: 09/24/2026