Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
-
Transition T1A
Soil Degradation / Erosion
More details -
Restoration pathway R2A
Habitat protection, Seedbank Establishment
More details -
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
These are forests dominated by balsam fir, with common associates of red spruce, black spruce, and heartleaf paper birch in lower amounts. These communities are often seen as the first community types when transitioning into the alpine zone between 2500 and 4000 feet (762 and 1219 meters) in elevation, with a noticeable shift from the Northern Hardwood Forest complexes lower in elevation. These community types all correlate to the International Vegetation Classification (IVC) Hierarchy Alliance A443 “High Montane Red Spruce – Fir – Yellow Birch Forest” and LandFire’s CES201.566 “Acadian-Appalachian Montane Spruce-Fir Forest” classifications.
Dominant plant species
balsam fir (Abies balsamea), tree
red spruce (Picea rubens), tree
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
mountain paper birch (Betula papyrifera var. cordifolia), tree
mountain maple (Acer spicatum), shrub
mountain ash (Sorbus), shrub
viburnum (Viburnum), shrub
bunchberry dogwood (Cornus canadensis), grass
bluebead (Clintonia borealis), grass
woodfern (Dryopteris), grass
mountain woodsorrel (Oxalis montana), grass
Schreber's big red stem moss (Pleurozium schreberi), grass
knights plume moss (Ptilium crista-castrensis), grass
splendid feather moss (Hylocomium splendens), grass
dicranum moss (Dicranum), grass
sphagnum (Sphagnum), grass
(Bazzania trilobata), grass
Submodel
Communities 1, 5 and 2 (additional pathways)
1.1. High Montane Balsam Fir – Birch Forest
1.5. High Montane (Mixed) Hardwood Forest
1.2. High Montane Red Spruce – Fir Forest
Description
This state consists of exposed areas within alpine communities in which the native vegetation is absent, displaced, or destroyed by soil degradation and erosion and will lack dominant vegetation cover.
Submodel
Mechanism
Soil degradation and erosion may lead to loss of habitat, resulting exposed soil or bedrock. This often occurs in localized zones of trampled vegetation, soil erosion, and unofficial trail development. Extreme loss of soils materials may create localized channels which can funnel snowmelt and increase habitat loss. Extreme loss may be more common on steeper, more slide-prone areas. Other factors such as historical high elevation logging, development (ski areas, wind generators, etc.), or historical fires may have similar or compounding effects.
Mechanism
Habitat protection is needed to restore subalpine communities, allowing the soil and seedbank to recover without disturbance from human traffic. This is often a slow and sensitive process and requires more detailed study.
Model keys
Briefcase
Add { ecological sites } and { Major Land Resource Areas } to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase
(
) icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement