Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 143X–Northeastern Mountains
MLRA 143, known as the Northeastern Mountains, covers approximately 23 million acres of mountains, hills, and valleys in northern Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, New York, and Massachusetts. The area is sparsely populated, with less than five percent of the land area developed for agriculture, residential, and urban development. About 90 percent of the area is forested, most of which is actively managed for timber. Elevations are mostly between 1,000 to 4,000 feet, with a few isolated peaks more than 5,000 feet above sea level. The present day mountains are but remnants of a much larger ancient range that has been eroding for approximately 500 million years. Bedrock consists of mostly very old metamorphic rock (gneiss, schist, slate, marble, quartzite, etc.) with younger intrusions of igneous rock (e.g. granite and granodiorite) from the Triassic and Cretaceous periods. MLRA 143 differs somewhat geologically from its neighboring MLRAs (142, 144A, 144B, 145, and 146), which have greater amounts of nutrient-rich sedimentary rock. Compared to MLRA 143, they are all lower in elevation, with longer growing seasons large areas that were once submerged by the ocean following glaciation.
The characteristic landforms and soils of northern New England were derived from the massive continental ice sheet that engulfed the region during North America’s most recent glaciation. Mighty glaciers, embedded with sediment and rock fragments, scoured bedrock and compacted mineral beds in a steady march south and east toward the Atlantic Ocean. The softer sedimentary rocks were pulverized into fine silts and clays under the immense weight of ice a mile thick, while the more resistant igneous and metamorphic rocks were sculpted into steep mountains and hills or plucked and dragged along the base of the glacier. With a warming climate, the ice retreated northward, depositing a thin layer of unsorted glacial till sediment atop the newly-exposed bedrock and compacted mineral beds. Deeper mounds of unsorted till formed small hills, kames, moraines and drumlins. Enormous chunks of ice detached as the glacier retreated, melting slowly in place and forming many kettle lakes and basins where water and fine sediments collect. Raging torrents of glacial meltwater dissected much of the barren landscape, entraining coarse and fine sediments, carving river valleys, and leaving well-sorted deposits of mostly sand and gravel along the watercourse. By 10,000 years ago the ice sheet had fully receded from MLRA 143. Silty floodplains developed along perennial rivers, many of which occupy the same channels that once gushed with sediment-rich glacial meltwater. Over time, wet basins accumulated fine sediment, some dried out, and still others became acidified by organic matter inputs from colonizing vegetation.
In terms of climate, MLRA 143 is distinguished from neighboring MLRAs by a shorter growing season and the occurrence of cryic soil temperature regimes at high elevations. The majority of MLRA 143 averages 32 to 44 inches of precipitation annually with a five to six month growing season and frigid winter temperatures. However, the higher elevations may receive up to double the annual precipitation of the lower elevations, and have a three to four month growing season with extremely cold winters. As the northernmost MLRA in the region with the coldest temperatures and shortest growing season, the Northeastern Mountains have less overall tree diversity, fewer pine and oak trees, and more abundant spruce and fir trees than neighboring MLRAs.Classification relationships
This site occurs in Ecological Site Group 3 (Wooded Wetlands) of MLRA 143 (The Northeastern Mountains), in the Northeastern Forage and Forest Region (Land Resource Region R).
The Northeastern Forage and Forest LRR includes all of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode Island, and Connecticut, as well as large portions of Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. Its southern boundary marks the extent of the Wisconsin ice sheet, which engulfed the entire LRR as recently as 10,000 to 15,000 years ago. Erosional and depositional processes associated with glaciation created many of the topographic patterns that distinguish MLRAs within the Northeastern region. Harder granitic and metamorphic bedrock to the north were more resistant to glacial erosion, resulting in the relatively nutrient poor mountains of MLRA 143; whereas nutrient-rich sedimentary bedrock of MLRAs 139, 140, and 146 resulted in relatively flat, fertile landscapes ideal for cultivation. Other areas were depressed below sea-level by the sheer mass of the glacier, resulting in pockets of marine sediments which distinguish MLRAs 142, 144A, 144B, and 145.
Precipitation is sufficient to support productive forestland throughout the Northeastern region. Still, a latitudinal temperature gradient from mesic to frigid soil temperatures results in a general transition from central hardwoods and pine in the southern MLRAs to northern hardwoods and spruce-fir forests farther north (no true boreal forests exist in the region). Elevations are generally low throughout the Northeastern region, with the exception of MLRA 143 which has many high mountain ecosystems with cryic temperature regimes and alpine vegetation above the tree line.Ecological site concept
This site occurs in gently sloping areas (0-8% slopes) near the bottom of watersheds where water saturates glacial till deposits for much of the growing season. Soils are poorly-drained with very little or no very poorly-drained inclusions. Soil textures may vary from fine to coarse and may or may not have a restrictive layer which serves to perch water. These areas will often lack the thick organic horizons as seen in wetter spruce forests (RX143X00Y303) and will lack inclusion of drier soils as seen in upland spruce forests (RX143X00Y503). The water table is seasonally high (within 18 inches [45 centimeters] of the surface) and typically dries out in late summer and fall.
The reference state is characterized by an overstory that is dominantly red spruce, sometimes mixed with black spruce. Tamarack and balsam fir are often present in smaller amounts, and typically occurring in younger patches. A groundcover of mosses, typically Sphagnum species, as well as diverse herbs are often present.Associated sites
RX143X00Y301 Loamy Till Swamp
The Loamy Till Swamp site can occur downslope of the Wet Flat site as soil moisture increases farther down the watershed. The Loamy Till Swamp will generally receive more subsurface water flow (seepage) that promotes the dominance of northern white cedar rather than spruce.
RX143X00Y303 Acidic Swamp
The Acidic Swamp often occurs downslope of the Wet Flat site as soils become very poorly drained and soil surface organic layers become thicker and the area supports more black spruce.
RX143X00Y503 Loamy Flat
The Loamy Flat site can occur upslope from the Wet Flat site as soils become somewhat poorly to poorly drained, rather than very poorly to poorly. These sites will both support red spruce but will differ in the dominant soil textures and functions.
Similar sites
RX143X00Y303 Acidic Swamp
The Acidic Swamp site is wetter than this site, a result of occurring further downslope in watersheds. As a result, an organic cap often 2 to 10 inches (5 to 25 centimeters) will be present and will support an understory dominantly of sphagnum mosses and ericaceous shrubs and forbs. The overstory will be primarily black spruce rather than red spruce or a red spruce/ black spruce mixture.
RX143X00Y503 Loamy Flat
The Loamy Flat site is slightly drier than this site, and will often occur upslope in watersheds. Soils of Loamy Flat will have loamy surface soils underlain by soils finer than sandy or sandy-skeletal textures, and will be mapped as poorly drained with somewhat poorly drained components on slopes less than 5 percent.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Picea rubens
(2) Picea marianaShrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Legacy ID
F143XY304ME
Physiographic features
This ecological site occurs on gently sloping landforms of diverse origins. This ecological site and its associated plant communities occur as depressions and basins on backslopes, footslopes, and toeslopes of glaciated mountains, where large amounts of water pass through creating hydric conditions. This site often exhibits pit and mound topography, a result of years of individual tree tip ups.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Hillslope profile (1) Toeslope
(2) Footslope
(3) Backslope
Landforms (1) Till plain
(2) Ground moraine
(3) Depression
Runoff class Medium to high Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 10 – 2500 ft Slope 0 – 5 % Water table depth 6 – 18 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Runoff class Very low to high Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 10 – 2500 ft Slope 0 – 8 % Water table depth 0 – 31 in Climatic features
As the northernmost MLRA in the region, this site experiences frigid and snowy winters, warm rainy summers, and a relatively short five to six month growing season. Precipitation is considerably constant from month to month; however, areas of higher elevations may receive up to double the annual precipitation of the lower elevations and have a three to four month growing season with extremely cold winters.
Table 4 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 80-100 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 120-130 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 40-50 in Frost-free period (actual range) 70-110 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 120-130 days Precipitation total (actual range) 40-50 in Frost-free period (average) 90 days Freeze-free period (average) 130 days Precipitation total (average) 40 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) NORTH STRATFORD [USC00276234], Guildhall, NH
-
(2) PLYMOUTH [USC00276945], Campton, NH
-
(3) SOUTH LINCOLN [USC00437612], Bristol, VT
-
(4) EUSTIS [USC00172700], Eustis, ME
-
(5) CAVENDISH [USC00431243], Cavendish, VT
-
(6) FIRST CONNECTICUT LAKE [USC00272999], Pittsburg, NH
-
(7) MORRISVILLE 4 SSW [USC00435376], Morrisville, VT
-
(8) ROCHESTER [USC00436893], Rochester, VT
-
(9) JACKMAN [USC00174086], Jackman, ME
-
(10) COLEBROOK 3SW [USC00271647], Canaan, NH
">Influencing water features
Though soils are poorly drained with a seasonally high-water table ranging close to the soil surface, this site does not regularly experience ponding water on the soil surface. During dry periods from June to September the water table may drop below 18 inches (45 centimeters) below the soil surface.
Wetland description
Classification System: Cowardin<br />
System: Palustrine<br />
Subsystem: NA<br />
Class: Forested Wetlands<br />
Subclass: Needle-leaved EvergreenSoil features
Soils are dominantly poorly- drained and will be absent from any very poorly- drained inclusions. They form in a variety of parent materials, including till, glaciofluvial deposits, and outwash. In natural conditions there is often a thin organic horizon, but in disturbed sites may be replaced by a disturbed A horizon. Underlying mineral soil can range from fine clays to coarse sands, typically without a restrictive layer or with a restrictive layer below 40 inches (100 centimeters). Further study is needed to better understand the influence of soil texture on species composition and / or productivity of this site.
Representative soils include the Grange (Aeric Endoaquepts), Roundabout [poorly drained] (Aeric Endoaquept), and Dixmont (Aquic Haplorthod) series. Other series may be locally representative in some cases, a result of local physiography compared to solely soil characteristics.Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Lodgment till – mica schist
(2) Till – granite and gneiss
(3) Glaciofluvial deposits
(4) Outwash
Surface texture (1) Silt loam
(2) Channery silt loam
(3) Fine sandy loam
Drainage class Poorly drained Depth to restrictive layer 40 – 80 in Soil depth 80 in Surface fragment cover <=3" Not specified Surface fragment cover >3" 1 – 2 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)2.1 – 7.3 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)Not specified Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)Not specified Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)Not specified Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)4 – 6.6 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-50in)0 – 4 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-40in)0 – 2 % Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class Poorly drained Depth to restrictive layer 40 – 80 in Soil depth 60 – 80 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 – 25 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 – 25 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)2 – 12 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)0 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)0 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)3.5 – 7.3 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-50in)0 – 12 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-40in)0 – 14 % Ecological dynamics
[Caveat: The vegetation information contained in this section and is only provisional, based on concepts, and future projects support validation through field work. *] The vegetation groupings described in this section are based on the terrestrial ecological system classification and vegetation associations developed by NatureServe (Comer et al., 2003) and localized associations provided by the New York Natural Heritage Program (Edinger et al., 2014), Maine Natural Areas Program (Gawler and Cutko, 2010), New Hampshire Natural Heritage Program (Sperduto and Nichols, 2011), and Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife (Swain, 2020).
The reference state is a boreal softwood dominated forest where red spruce (Picea rubens) often makes up a dominant component in the canopy. Other trees may include black spruce, tamarack, balsam fir, red maple, and / or white pine, but will often only be present in small amounts. The understory is diverse with sphagnum moss, cinnamon fern, creeping snowberry, and three-seed sedge common.
Large scale logging is common on this site and will set the stand through a series of phases but will revert to a spruce dominant forest within 100 years. Due to the wetness of this site, limiting harvesting to very dry years or during the winter months should be prioritized so soil and ground disturbances may be minimized. Logging operations can significantly alter the structure and function of these swamps, causing shifts in vegetative composition, hydrologic function, and ecosystem services. Selective harvesting, thinning, and shelterwood cuts will not generally shift the site to a different state but may help promote forest regeneration and result in a temporary increase in understory shrubs and herbs. Clear cutting may have the largest impact on these communities, with potential disruption of water retention, soil surface cover and altered groundwater flow. In some cases, clearcutting can be used as a surrogate to fire, promoting rapid growth of seedlings after the disturbance. Draining and ditching along with tree cover removal can convert the site to hayfield and pasture with varying degrees of ponding, depending on the extent of hydrological alteration.
Red spruce is relatively free from insects and diseases until it is mature, where it can become susceptible to spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana), eastern spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis), European spruce sawfly (Diprion hercyniae), yellowheaded spruce sawfly (Pikonema alaskensis), and eastern spruce gall adelgid (Adelges abietis).
Fire is typically not a dominant risk in these communities due to their inherent wetness and general lack of ladder fuels. It has been suggested that the increase of dead fuels following insect or disease outbreaks (such as spruce budworm) increased the likelihood of fire (Sullivan 1993). Red spruce is easily killed by fire and can cause serious damage to the roots if it consumes the litter and organic layers but may assist seed germination. Postharvest/postfire restocking by red spruce is extremely slow where the organic layers are destroyed by severe fire (particularly where harvest has been heavy).State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
T1A - Natural Vegetation Clearing, Introduction of Native and Non-Native Pasture Grasses and Legumes T2A - Long-Term Field Abandonment State 1 submodel, plant communities
Communities 1, 5 and 2 (additional pathways)
1.1A - Patch cut, clearcut, or blowdown that increases soil wetness and light availability 1.2A - Spruce regeneration (<20 years) 1.3A - Patch cut, clearcut, or blowdown that increases soil wetness and light availability 1.3B - Time (20-100 years), selective cuts for softwood dominance 1.3C - Time (20-100 years) 1.4A - Time (>100 years), spruce management 1.4B - Patch cut, clearcut, or blowdown that increases soil wetness and light availability 1.4C - Shelterwood removal cut 1.4D - Time (20-100 years), minimal management 1.5A - Time (>100 years), minimal management 1.5B - Patch cut, clearcut, or blowdown that increases soil wetness and light availability State 2 submodel, plant communities
2.1A - Reduced or eliminated grassland management operations that allows for succession of predominantly invasive or incursive shrubs and trees 2.2A - Removal of undesirable species via management practices (mechanical, chemical, biological), regular maintenance and management of grassland operations State 1
Red Spruce SwampThese are softwood dominated boreal forests most often comprised of mature red spruce (Picea rubens) found on shallow organic over mineral soils. The canopy is often a pure stand of red spruce that is often closed to broken but may be mixed with black spruce (Picea mariana) or red-black spruce hybrids. Other trees that are found in the canopy include balsam fir (Abies balsamea) or red maple (Acer rubrum). Tall shrubs are often well developed, and forbs and graminoids are well expressed in the understory. Bryophytes are the dominant groundcover, covering both hummocks and hollows. Natural disturbances by wind create tip-ups of individual trees or small groups of trees that are attributed to the hummock and hollow microtopography. Changes in light availability and soil wetness are the dominant drivers for these communities, with logging being the main factor attributable to large scale changes.
Dominant plant species
-
red spruce (Picea rubens), tree
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
balsam fir (Abies balsamea), tree
-
red maple (Acer rubrum), tree
-
blueberry (Vaccinium), shrub
-
holly (Ilex), shrub
-
white meadowsweet (Spiraea alba), shrub
-
gray alder (Alnus incana), shrub
-
sedge (Carex), grass
-
bunchberry dogwood (Cornus canadensis), other herbaceous
-
osmunda (Osmunda), other herbaceous
-
sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), other herbaceous
-
eastern marsh fern (Thelypteris palustris), other herbaceous
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum), other herbaceous
Community 1.1
Late Successional Spruce ForestThe reference phase consists of a closed to partly open (ranging from greater than 20 to over 65% closure) of red and black spruce with a minor to moderate amount of red maple. Other trees such as yellow birch, northern white cedar, balsam fir, and occasionally eastern hemlock may be present. Tall shrubs are often well developed and will be inversely related to canopy closure. The herbaceous layer will often be dominated by species adapted to wet conditions and will have a groundcover of mosses and other bryophytes. This site is often resilient to small disturbances, most commonly single tree tip ups, which creates a microtopography of hummocks and hollows. These will often reflect even-age structures likely result from the past influences of insects, fire, blowdowns, harvesting, or a combination of those factors.
Within the Northeast US, this community type correlates to Maine’s “Spruce – Fir – Wet Flat” concept (Gawler and Cutko 2010), Massachusetts’ “Red Spruce Swamp” (Swain and Kearsley 2001), New Hampshire’s “Red Spruce Swamp” concept (Sperduto and Nichols 2012), New York’s “Spruce-fir Swamp” concept (Edinger et al. 2014), and Vermont’s “Red Spruce – Cinnamon Fern Swamp” concept (Thompson, Sorenson, and Zaino 2019). This correlates with NatureServes ‘Picea rubens - Acer rubrum / Ilex mucronata Swamp Forest’ Association (CEGL006198).Dominant plant species
-
red spruce (Picea rubens), tree
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
balsam fir (Abies balsamea), tree
-
red maple (Acer rubrum), tree
-
catberry (Ilex mucronata), shrub
-
common winterberry (Ilex verticillata), shrub
-
gray alder (Alnus incana), shrub
-
highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), shrub
-
white meadowsweet (Spiraea alba), shrub
-
threeseeded sedge (Carex trisperma), grass
-
greater bladder sedge (Carex intumescens), grass
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum), other herbaceous
-
bunchberry dogwood (Cornus canadensis), other herbaceous
-
parasol whitetop (Doellingeria umbellata), other herbaceous
-
starflower (Trientalis borealis), other herbaceous
-
cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), other herbaceous
-
royal fern (Osmunda regalis), other herbaceous
-
sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), other herbaceous
-
eastern marsh fern (Thelypteris palustris), other herbaceous
Community 1.2
Early Successional Herbaceous PhaseThis phase occurs after large scale disturbances such as heavy logging or a stand replacing natural event such as windstorm damage, fire, insect damage, disease, etc. resulting in an open stand. Annual species may have important temporary dominance as woody perennial shrubs and trees become reestablished. Trees will tend to be less than 1.5 feet in height, whereas shrubs can range up to 15 feet in some areas but will often be less than 6 feet. The once dominant groundcover of bryophytes is likely to be all but replaced with herbaceous litter of these species. Remnant living overstory species, standing dead snags, understory downed woody debris, and remaining groundcover may vary depending on the nature and severity of the disturbance. Large accumulations of slash and the development of heavy herbaceous cover (Viburnums, Rubus, Vaccinium, etc.) may inhibit natural regeneration, perpetuating this phase.
Community 1.3
Early Successional Even Aged Spruce-Fir Forest (Doghair Forest)This phase consists of spruce and balsam fir saplings that are the dominant species growing extremely close together. This forested phase will often be extremely dense and greater than 1.5 feet but less than 15 feet in height, with average diameters less than 1.6 inches at breast height (DBH). As these trees grow, competition will weed out individual trees until a balanced density is achieved. Mixed in with the highly dense spruce-fir forest will often be other early successional forest species such as paper birch, aspen, and pine. As the ground surface becomes more shaded and more deposits of downed woody debris occur, bryophyte cover may begin to reestablish. Overstocked areas of spruce and / or fir may result in slow growth rates, resulting in overtopping by faster growing hardwood species that can suppress conifer growth, resulting in a temporary hardwood or mixed forest.
Dominant plant species
-
red spruce (Picea rubens), tree
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
balsam fir (Abies balsamea), tree
Community 1.4
Mid Successional Even Aged Spruce-Fir ForestThis successional phase consists of a variable canopy in which spruce and fir are mixed with early successional hardwood species in a similar age class (less than 100 years).
In natural settings, as the larger early successional species become removed, canopy gaps will allow for the development of a multi-aged stand of dominantly spruce, with some fir and hardwood species being present in under lower canopy layers (transition to 1.5).
In managed settings, preparatory and establishment cuts can be used to increase the vitality and health of the intended residual trees while simultaneously open growing space in the canopy to encourage the establishment of regrowth in the understory before removal of the remaining overstory species.
The understory will often be sparse to absent and will not reflect the microtopography of the reference state caused by tip ups. These even age stands will often have one to two distance age classes present, often seen as regeneration and pole (immature trees) or sawtimber (mature trees) wood.Dominant plant species
-
red spruce (Picea rubens), tree
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
balsam fir (Abies balsamea), tree
Community 1.5
Mid Successional Uneven Aged Mixed Conifer ForestThis successional phase consists of a closed canopy in which spruce and fir are mixed with early successional hardwood species of different age classes. As the larger early successional species become removed, canopy gaps will allow for the development of a multi-aged stand of dominant spruce. Lower canopy layers are often variable and will begin to reflect the reference condition, but rarely extensive, composed of tree regeneration and sparse shrubs and herbaceous species where gap dynamics occur. Extensive repetitive harvesting of spruce may cause the seedbank to become exhausted and will reflect a forest with a greater hardwood dominance than spruce dominance.
Dominant plant species
-
red spruce (Picea rubens), tree
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
balsam fir (Abies balsamea), tree
-
red maple (Acer rubrum), tree
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2This may occur through intensive harvesting practices such as clearcutting for pulp and lumber. Immediate loss of mature canopy trees increases light availability for understory vegetation and disturbs the seedbank, shifting dominant species composition and structure. Natural mortality from windstorms, insects, diseases, ice or snow damage may also reflect a similar transition, opening the canopy and allowing for the temporary dominance of grasses and forbs, but will leave behind large pieces of woody material for nurse logs. Loss of characteristic groundcover mosses is common as more light availability and altered soil conditions favor faster-growing species. Harvesting during winter months is recommended to prevent extensive rutting and hydrologic instability that may lead to issues such as erosion, loss of moisture retention, and changes in groundwater flow.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.3This transition can occur if the basic requirements for tree regeneration are met, primarily an adequate seed supply, proper seedbed, and light, temperature, and moisture conditions are conductive for seed germination and survival. This transition will often occur in less than but no greater than 20 years post-canopy disturbance. Planting black spruce can help accelerate the restoration of the natural vegetation of the swamp.
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.2This may occur through intensive harvesting practices such as clearcutting for pulp. Immediate loss of regenerating trees increases light availability for understory vegetation and disturbs the seedbank, shifting dominant species composition and structure. Natural mortality from windstorms, insects, diseases, ice or snow damage may also reflect a similar transition, opening the canopy and allowing for the temporary dominance of grasses and forbs, but will leave behind large pieces of woody material for nurse logs. Loss of characteristic groundcover mosses is common as more light availability and altered soil conditions favor faster-growing species. Harvesting during winter months is recommended to prevent extensive rutting and hydrologic instability that may lead to issues such as erosion, loss of moisture retention, and changes in groundwater flow.
Pathway 1.3B
Community 1.3 to 1.4This transition will occur over time, typically greater than 20 years but less than 100 years into a stand’s lifecycle. The early successional stand will thin in density either naturally (treefall, disease, etc.) and with human interference (forest stand improvement [FSI]). This will lead to an even aged stand in which spruce is typically the dominant species. Selective cuts and thinning through FSI methods can allow for the regeneration of understory vegetation, including saplings, while encouraging the growth of the desired species. FSI during winter months is recommended and will differ from clearcutting or selecting harvesting methods through the limited disturbance to the local hydrology.
Pathway 1.3C
Community 1.3 to 1.5This transition will occur over time, typically greater than 20 years but less than 100 years into a stand’s lifecycle. The early successional stand will thin in density naturally (treefall, disease, etc.) and often without human interference. This will lead to an uneven aged stand in which spruce and fir may be mixed in with hardwood species such as red maple.
Pathway 1.4A
Community 1.4 to 1.1This transition will over time, often greater than 100 years, in which the main stand remains relatively undisturbed. This will allow the spruce stand to mature in its size and height classes, creating a more uneven aged stand with a well-developed overstory and a dark, cool understory that limits regeneration. Balsam fir will reach the end of its natural life expectancy and will revert the canopy to spruce dominance. This transition may be assisted with forest stand improvement practices. Red spruce will become the dominant canopy, and the understory will reflect more variation in microtopography (hummocks and hollows) due to natural disturbance tip ups.
Pathway 1.4B
Community 1.4 to 1.2This may occur through intensive harvesting practices such as clearcutting for pulp and lumber. Immediate loss of regenerating trees increases light availability for understory vegetation and disturbs the seedbank, shifting dominant species composition and structure. Natural mortality from windstorms, insects, diseases, ice or snow damage may also reflect a similar transition, opening the canopy and allowing for the temporary dominance of grasses and forbs, but will leave behind large pieces of woody material for nurse logs. Loss of characteristic groundcover mosses is common as more light availability and altered soil conditions favor faster-growing species. Harvesting during winter months is recommended to prevent extensive rutting and hydrologic instability that may lead to issues such as erosion, loss of moisture retention, and changes in groundwater flow.
Pathway 1.4C
Community 1.4 to 1.3This is often seen in shelterwood systems and used to release the established seedlings by removing the overstory to allow the understory more growing space.
Pathway 1.4D
Community 1.4 to 1.5This may occur over time, typically greater than 20 years but less than 100 years into a stand's lifecycle, where the even-aged forest will undergo changes in canopy structure, resulting in multiple age classes, often seen as regeneration, pole (immature trees), and sawtimber (mature trees) wood. The even aged stand will thin in density either naturally (treefall, disease, etc.) or via human interference (irregular shelterwood cuts, forest stand improvement [FSI]). Thinning through FSI methods can allow for the regeneration of understory vegetation, including saplings, while encouraging the growth of the desired species. FSI during winter months is recommended and will differ from clearcutting or selecting harvesting methods through the limited disturbance to the local hydrology.
Pathway 1.5A
Community 1.5 to 1.1This transition will over time, often greater than 100 years, in which the main stand remains relatively undisturbed. This will allow the spruce stand to mature in its size, age, and height classes, creating a more uneven aged stand with a well-developed overstory and a dark, cool understory that limits regeneration. Balsam fir and other mixed in hardwoods will reach the end of their natural life expectancy and will revert the canopy to spruce dominance. This transition may be assisted with forest stand improvement (FSI) practices, often seen as single tree removal. Red spruce will become the dominant canopy, and the understory will reflect more variation in microtopography (hummocks and hollows) due to natural disturbance tip ups.
Pathway 1.5B
Community 1.5 to 1.2This may occur through intensive harvesting practices such as clearcutting for pulp and lumber. Immediate loss of regenerating trees increases light availability for understory vegetation and disturbs the seedbank, shifting dominant species composition and structure. Natural mortality from windstorms, insects, diseases, ice or snow damage may also reflect a similar transition, opening the canopy and allowing for the temporary dominance of grasses and forbs, but will leave behind large pieces of woody material for nurse logs. Loss of characteristic groundcover mosses is common as more light availability and altered soil conditions favor faster-growing species. Harvesting during winter months is recommended to prevent extensive rutting and hydrologic instability that may lead to issues such as erosion, loss of moisture retention, and changes in groundwater flow.
State 2
Converted Cultural StateThis state represents a once forested area now cleared for pasture. This will typically only occur on gentler slopes (
Dominant plant species
-
orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata), grass
-
reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), grass
-
timothy (Phleum pratense), grass
-
smooth brome (Bromus inermis), grass
-
tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), grass
Community 2.1
Improved Pasture Grasses and LegumesThis community phase represents commonly planted forage species on pastureland and hayland. The suite of plants established on any given site may vary considerably depending upon purpose, management goals, and usage (e.g., horse vs. cattle). Most systems include a mixture of grasses and legumes that provide forage throughout the growing season. Several additional plants and/or species combinations maybe present depending on the objectives and management approaches of the land manager/owner.
Dominant plant species
-
timothy (Phleum pratense), grass
-
sweet vernalgrass (Anthoxanthum odoratum), grass
-
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), grass
-
orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata), grass
-
smooth brome (Bromus inermis), grass
-
red fescue (Festuca rubra), grass
-
sheep fescue (Festuca ovina), grass
-
perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), grass
-
redtop (Agrostis gigantea), grass
-
festulolium (×Festulolium), grass
-
alfalfa (Medicago sativa), other herbaceous
-
red clover (Trifolium pratense), other herbaceous
-
milkvetch (Astragalus), other herbaceous
-
bedstraw (Galium), other herbaceous
Community 2.2
Herbaceous and Shrubby “Old Field”This phase represents a more degraded phase for livestock. While some utilization of desirable pasture plants will occur, undesirable species are prolific. As undesirable pasture species grow, desirable pasture grasses and forbs will decrease in cover. Small trees representative of the reference condition (often early successional species) is often present but do not form great amounts of canopy cover.
Dominant plant species
-
alder (Alnus), shrub
-
goldenrod (Solidago), other herbaceous
-
cowparsnip (Heracleum), other herbaceous
-
yellow rattle (Rhinanthus), other herbaceous
-
buttercup (Ranunculus), other herbaceous
-
hawkweed (Hieracium), other herbaceous
-
iris (Iris), other herbaceous
-
absinthium (Artemisia absinthium), other herbaceous
Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2This transition may occur through the absence or mismanagement of pasture or haylands may result with the increase in undesirable species and decrease in desirable species.
Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1This transition may occur through management practices via mechanical, chemical, or biological means may be used to remove undesirable pasture or hayland species.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2The reference state transitions to the managed grassland state with the clearing of woody vegetation and the establishment of pasture grasses and legumes.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 1This state transitions to a post-agricultural successional forest following the long-term abandonment of converted fields. While short-term abandonment of fields may allow for dominance of undesirable species they can revert to a commodity field with proper management. Long-term abandonment is accepted as the establishment of a single age stand of closed canopy forest.
Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 1.4 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 11. Community 1.5 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 12. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 13. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
**DRAFT**
The following information is provided from University of New Hampshire’s “Dirt to Trees to Wildlife”. Asterisks denotes Species of Greatest Conservation Need and hyperlinks will take you to recommendations specific to those species.
Common animals found in Spruce-Fir Forest Types at ANY elevation may include:
Snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus), Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris), Southern red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi), Long-tailed shrew (Sorex dispar)*, American marten (Martes americana)*, Boreal chickadee (Poecile hudsonicus), Dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis), Pine siskin (Spinus pinus), Spruce grouse (Canachites canadensis )*, and Red-breasted nuthatch (Sitta canadensis).
Common animals found in Spruce-Fir Forest Types at low-elevation (generally below 2,500 feet) only may include
Northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus), Deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), Hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus)*, Tri-colored bat (Perimyotis subflavus)*, Little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus)*, Silver-haired bat (Lasionycteris noctivagans)*, Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis)*, Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis)*, Red bat (Lasiurus borealis)*, Red fox (Vulpes vulpes), Bobcat (Lynx rufus)*, Moose (Alces alces)*, Bay-breasted warbler (Setophaga castanea)*, Blackburnian warbler (Setophaga fusca), Cape May warbler (Setophaga tigrina)*, Common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula), Magnolia warbler (Setophaga magnolia), Olive-sided flycatcher (Contopus cooperi)*, Purple finch (Haemorhous purpureus)*, Rusty blackbird (Euphagus carolinus)*, Sharp-shinned hawk (Accipiter striatus)*, Swainsons thrush (Catharus ustulatus), Three-toed woodpecker (Picoides dorsalis)*, Yellow-bellied flycatcher (Empidonax flaviventris), Blackpoll warbler (Setophaga striata), Blue-headed vireo (Vireo solitarius), Northern parula (Setophaga americana), evening grosbeak (Coccothraustes vespertinus), Northern saw-whet owl (Aegolius acadicus), Hermit thrush (Catharus guttatus), Merlin (Falco columbarius), and the Nashville warbler (Leiothlypis ruficapilla).
Silvicultural recommendations for managing wildlife habitat:
-Use uneven-aged management - group selection with group sizes of less than 1 acre.
-Rotation age - 120 years
-Entry cycle every 15 to 20 years
-Avoid entry during nesting season (April to June)
-Whole-tree harvest or cut-to-length is preferred.Supporting information
Inventory data references
Future work is needed, as described in a future project plan, to validate the information presented in this provisional ecological site description. Future work includes field sampling, data collection and analysis by qualified ecologists and soil scientists. As warranted, annual reviews of the project plan can be conducted by the Ecological Site Technical Team. A final field review, peer review, quality control, and quality assurance reviews of the ESD are necessary to approve a final document.
Other references
Comer, P., D. Faber-Langendoen, R. Evans, S. Grawler, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, M. Pyne, M. Reid, K. Schultz, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2003. Ecological Systems of the United States: A Working Classification of U.S. Terrestrial Systems. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia
Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero (editors). 2014. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke’s Ecological Communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
Gawler, S. and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural Landscapes of Maine: A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation, Augusta, Maine.
NatureServe. 2021. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. https://explorer.natureserve.org/. (accessed 10 July. 2021).
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. Agricultural Handbook 296
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Official Soil Series Descriptions. Available online. (accessed 11 Aug. 2021).
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Climate Research Station Data. Available online. (accessed 23 June. 2021).
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for [MLRA 141, Maine]. Available online. (accessed 14 Oct. 2021).
Sperduto, D.D. and William F. Nichols. 2011. Natural Communities of New Hampshire. 2nd Ed. NH Natural Heritage Bureau, Concord, NH. Pub. UNH Cooperative Extension, Durham, NH.
Sullivan, Janet. 1993. Picea rubens. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Swain, P. C. 2020. Classification of the Natural Communities of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Westborough, MA
USNVC [United States National Vegetation Classification]. 2017. United States National Vegetation Classification Database V2.01. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee, Washington DC. Available The U.S. National Vegetation Classification (usnvc.org) (accessed 2 July. 2021).Contributors
Jack Ferrara, Revisions 2025
Christopher Mann, Revisions 2022
Jamin Johanson, Original Author 2016Approval
Greg Schmidt, 5/15/2025
Acknowledgments
Nels Barrett, Nick Butler, and Carl Bickford provided considerable review of this ecological site concept.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 04/23/2025 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement