Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site F142XA005NY
Acidic Sandy Outwash
Last updated: 10/03/2024
Accessed: 08/21/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 142X–St. Lawrence-Champlain Plain
This MLRA is a glaciated area of low relief dominated by broad expanses of nearly level, sandy deltas and shallow lacustrine basins or plains punctuated by low hills of glacial till. Rivers and streams have cut relatively deep but narrow valleys across the plain. Elevation ranges from 80 to 1,000 feet, increasing gradually from the St. Lawrence River southward and from Lake Champlain to the east and west. Local relief generally is less than 30 feet, but glacial till ridges, till plains, and some outwash terraces rise 15 to 80 feet above the adjacent plains.
This area has been glaciated, and a thin mantle of till covers most of the bedrock. Extensive areas of sandy glacial outwash and eolian deposits also occur. Some glacial lake sediments have been deposited above glacial moraines. These deposits are thickest in the valleys and thinnest on the ridges and highlands. During the later stages of the Wisconsin glacial period, seawater entered the Champlain Valley and deposited marine sediments that were later covered by freshwater sediments. The marine deposits are unique to the area.
This area supports hardwoods. The beech-birch-sugar maple forest type is the dominant climax forest type on uplands. Associated with this type are basswood, American elm, maple species, white ash, black cherry, and white pine. The aspen-birch type, earlier in succession, is economically important. Such species as eastern hemlock, red maple, American elm, and spruce are on wet soils.
Some of the major wildlife species in this area are white-tailed deer, red fox, raccoon, beaver, woodchuck, muskrat, cottontail, ruffed grouse, and woodcock.
Land Resource Unit (LRU): Frigid Soil Temperature Regime
The upper St. Lawrence and Champlain Valleys are characterized with soils in the frigid soil temperature regime (mean annual soil temperature greater than 32°F but less than 46°F and with a difference between mean summer and mean winter soil temperatures greater than 41°F at 20 inches below the surface or at a densic, lithic, or paralithic contact, whichever is shallower).
The Frigid Soil Temperature Regime (STR) will have shorter growing season than the lower St. Lawrence and Champlain Valleys which are characterized with soils in the mesic STR. Species more tolerant of colder year round temperatures would also be evident in the Frigid LRU.Classification relationships
NRCS:
Land Resource Region: R - Northeastern Forage and Forest Region
MLRA: 142 - St. Lawrence-Champlain Plain
LRU: A/02 - Frigid Mean Annual Soil Temperature
USFS:
Domain: 200 - Humid Temperate
Division: 210 - Warm Continental
Province: 211 - Northeastern Mixed Forest
Section: 211E - St. Lawrence and Champlain Valley
Subsections: 211Ea - St. Lawrence Glacial Marine Plain
EPA:
Level I: 8 - Eastern Temperate Forests
Level II: 8.1 - Mixed Wood Plains
Level III: 83 - Eastern Great Lakes Lowlands
Level IV: 83d - St. Lawrence Lowlands
83e - Upper St. Lawrence ValleyEcological site concept
Landform/Landscape Position:
The site occurs on outwash plains, glacial lake beaches, valley trains, kames, and eskers. Slopes range mostly from 0 to 25 percent.
Soils:
The site consists of very deep, excessively and somewhat excessively drained gravelly loam soils derived mostly from sandstone or granitic rock and small amounts of limestone.
Reaction ranges from very strongly acid through moderately acid throughout. Representative soil is Colosse.
Vegetation :
The reference plant community is a pine-northern hardwood forest (Edinger et al. 2014). Characteristic trees include white pine, red pine, eastern hemlock, red oak, sugar maple, paper birch and yellow birch (Edinger et al. 2014). Red spruce and balsam fir may also be present. Blueberries are characteristic shrubs, bracken fern is a common herb, and mosses and lichens may be common to abundant (Edinger et al 2014).Associated sites
F142XA006NY Acidic Moist Outwash Frigid
Site is lower on the landscape. Moderately well drained to somewhat poorly drained soils.
F142XA012NY Rich Lacustrine Terraces Frigid
Similar sites
F142XB012VT Rich Till Upland
F142XB018VT Moist Lake Plain
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Fagus
(2) BetulaShrub (1) Vaccinium
Herbaceous (1) Pteridium
Physiographic features
The site occurs on outwash plains, glacial lake beaches, valley trains, kames, and eskers. Slopes range mostly from 0 to 25 percent.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Lake plain > Outwash plain
(2) River valley > Kame terrace
(3) Valley > Delta
(4) Terrace
(5) Esker
(6) Lake plain
Runoff class Negligible to high Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 7 – 2201 ft Slope 0 – 70 % Water table depth 72 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The Koppen-Geiger climate classification of the area in which this MLRA occurs is
Dfb, Warm-summer humid continental. Rainfall occurs as high-intensity, convective thunderstorms in the summer, and snowfall is heavy from late in Autumn to early Spring. The frost-free period in this area is longest in a narrow belt around Lake Champlain.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 130-130 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 150-160 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 30-40 in Frost-free period (actual range) 130-130 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 150-160 days Precipitation total (actual range) 30-40 in Frost-free period (average) 130 days Freeze-free period (average) 160 days Precipitation total (average) 30 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) MALONE [USC00304996], Malone, NY
-
(2) PLATTSBURGH AFB [USC00306659], Plattsburgh, NY
-
(3) PERU 2 WSW [USC00306538], Peru, NY
">Influencing water features
NONE
Wetland description
NONE
Soil features
The site consists of very deep, excessively and somewhat excessively drained gravelly loam or sandy loam soils derived from glaciofluvial deposits. Reaction ranges from very strongly acid through moderately acid throughout. Representative soil is Colosse, Adams, Melrose, Missisquoi, and Stetson.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Glaciofluvial deposits – sandstone
(2) Glaciolacustrine deposits – gneiss
Surface texture (1) Loamy sand
(2) Fine sandy loam
(3) Loamy fine sand
(4) Sand
Family particle size (1) Coarse-loamy over clayey
(2) Loamy-skeletal
(3) Sandy
(4) Sandy-skeletal
Drainage class Well drained to excessively drained Permeability class Very slow to rapid Depth to restrictive layer 72 in Soil depth 72 – 0 in Surface fragment cover <=3" Not specified Surface fragment cover >3" 0 – 2 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)2 – 6 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)Not specified Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 2 mmhos/cm Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)3.5 – 7.8 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 31 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 25 % Ecological dynamics
The information in this provisional ecological site description, including the state-and-transition model (STM), was developed using historical information, available data, professional experience, and scientific studies. The information is representative of a complex set of plant communities. Not all scenarios or plants are included. Key indicator plants and ecological processes are described to inform land management decisions.
Cultural Ecology: Humans have occupied the St. Lawrence River and Champlain Valley for at least ten thousand years, adapting their ways of life in a variety of changing environments. Initially people lived in small, nomadic groups and later in larger settlements. Historically, the area was within the Iroquois Tribal Territory. European exploration of the area began in the 17th century. Fur trade and settlement of the area followed during the 18th century. Industrialization, riverine-related activities, agriculture, concentrated human settlement in metropolitan areas, and recreation are currently the major human activities affecting the ecosystem (USDA USFS).
The reference plant community is a pine-northern hardwood forest (Edinger et al. 2014). Characteristic trees include white pine, red pine, eastern hemlock, red oak, sugar maple, paper birch and yellow birch (Edinger et al. 2014). Red spruce and balsam fir may also be present. Blueberries are characteristic shrubs, bracken fern is a common herb, and mosses and lichens may be common to abundant (Edinger et al 2014).
Primary disturbances are wind, insects (particularly during droughts), and ice storms. These are more important than fire, although they predispose forests to fire during drought conditions. Fire interval is 27-50 years in red pine-eastern white pine communities (USDA USFS).
In many areas the site has been converted to pastureland and/or cropland with either annual or perennial crops. Conifer plantations were established in many parts of upstate New York in the early to mid-1900s as part of reforestation efforts. Remnant plantations are evident throughout the state.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
Figure 7. State and Transition Model
Figure 8. Legend
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
1a. Soils frigid, shorter growing season (St. Lawrence Valley and Upper Champlain Valley)2a. Site periodically flooded during the growing season, adjacent to a river or stream [Medomak, Sloan, Redwater]2b. Site not periodically flooded during the growing season, not adjacent to a river or stream3a. Substrate mostly organic (Histosols)4a. pH > 4.5; swamps and fens [Wonsqueak, Markey, Dorval]4b. pH < 4.5, bog [Wonsqueak, Loxley, Knob Lock, Dawson, Churubusco]3b. Substrate mostly mineral (Alfisols, Inceptisols, Spodosols, Entisols)5a. Parent material glacial outwash, soils coarse textured (sands) to moderately coarse textured (sandy loams)6a. Soils excessively drained to well drained7a. pH of upper 50 cm less than 5.5, low base saturation (acidic)8a. Soils shallow (< 50cm) to root restricting ortstein layer (iron cementation) [Constable, Wallace]8b. Soils very deep (>150cm) to bedrock [Stetson, Ondawa, Colosse, Adams, Melrose]7b. pH of upper 50 cm greater than greater than 5.5, higher base saturation (rich) [Missisquoi, Champlain, Waddington, Raquette, Trout River]6b. Soils moderately well drained to very poorly drained;9a. pH of upper 50 cm less than 5.5, low base saturation (acidic), watertable 25-100 cm deep (moderately well drained or somewhat poorly drained) [Lovewell, Occur, Coveytown, Duane, Au Gres, Wainola, Naumburg]9b. pH of upper 50 cm greater than 5.5, higher base saturation (rich)10a. Watertable 25-100 cm deep (moderately well drained or somewhat poorly drained) [Mooers, Sheddenbrook, Fahey, Flackville, Sciota, Northway, Eelweir]10b. Watertable <25 cm deep (poorly drained) [Searsport, Deinache, Stockholm, Cook, Coveytown, Deford, Munuscong, Pinconning]5b. Parent material glacial till or glaciolacustrine, soils coarse textured (sandy loams) to fine textured (clays)11a. Parent material glaciolacustrine, soils moderately coarse textured to fine textured12a. Soils well drained to somewhat poorly drained13a. pH of upper 50 cm less than 5.5, low base saturation (acidic) [Salmon, Nicholville]13b. pH of upper 50 cm greater than 5.5, higher base saturation (rich) [Buxton, Heuvelton, Depeyster, Elmwood, Muskellunge, Matoon, Hailsboro]12b. Soils poorly drained to very poorly drained [Adjidaumo, Guff, Wegatchie, Swanton, Whately]11b. Parent material glacial till, soils moderately coarse textured to medium textured14a. Soils poorly drained to very poorly drained) [Hannawa, Lyonmounten, Runeberg]14b. Soils excessively drained to somewhat poorly drained15a. pH of upper 50 cm less than 5.5, low base saturation (acidic)16a. Soils shallow and well drained to excessively drained (< 50cm) to bedrock [Ricker, Woodstock, Taconic, Success, Lyman, Hubbardton, Hogback, Irona, Insula, Quetico, Abram, Conic]16b. Soils shallow to very deep; somewhat poorly drained to well drained [Berkshire, Monadnock, Worth, Turnbridge, Rawsonville, Parishville, Mundalite, Millsite, Macomber, Gretor, Sunapee, Westbury, Skerry, Ampersand, Chazy, Topknot, Moira, Schroon]15b. pH of upper 50 cm greater than 5.5, higher base saturation (rich)17a. Soils shallow (< 50cm) to bedrock [Gouverneur, Summerville/Kings Falls]17b. Soils moderately deep to very deep (> 50cm) to bedrock or densic horizon18a. Soils well drained [Stowe, Marlow, Grenville, Pyrities, Nehasne, Neckrock, Galway cool]18b. Soils (moderately well drained or somewhat poorly drained) [Peru, Hogansburg, Kalurah, Ogdensburg, Malone, Brayton, Peasleeville]…Rich Moist Till Frigid F142XA020NY1b. Soils mesic, longer growing season (Eastern Ontario Plain and Lower Champlain Valley)19a. Substrate mostly organic (Histosols) [Aquents, Palms, Willette/Whallonsburg]19b. Substrate mostly mineral (Mollisol, Alfisols, Inceptisols, Spodosols, Entisols)20a. Landform a floodplain21a. Soils somewhat poorly to somewhat excessively drained…Reserved21b. Soils poorly or very poorly drained20b. Landform not a floodplain22a. Parent material glacial outwash, soils coarse textured (sands) to moderately coarse textured (sandy loams)23a. Soils poorly drained to very poorly drained [Scarboro, Rumney, Saco, Rippowam, Limerick, Gougeville, Enosburg]23b. Soils somewhat poorly drained to excessively drained24a. Soils well drained to excessively drained [Warwick, Tioga, Occum, Hamlin, Hadley, Kars, Factoryville, Hinesburg, Bonapart, Agawam, Arkport, Colonie, Copake, Grattan, Groton, Howard, Merrimac, Plainfield, Windsor]24b. Soils moderately well drained or somewhat poorly drained [Teel, Podunk, pootatuck, phelps, Lobdell, Herkimer, Castile, Wareham, Eldridge, Covertfalls, Northway, Cosad, Deerfield, Homer, Pipestone]22b. Parent material glacial till or glaciolacustrine, soils coarse textured (sandy loams) to fine textured (clays)25a. Parent material glaciolacustrine, soils medium textured to fine textured26a. Soils somewhat poorly drained to well drained27a. Soils fine to very fine texture (clay, clay loam, silty clay loam) [Vergennes, Wilpoint Cayuga, Hudson, Chaumont, Churchville, Kingsbury, Rhinebeck]27b. Soils coarse-silty, coarse loamy over clayey, sandy over clayey (silt loam, fine sandy loam, sandy loam, loamy fine sand) [Unadilla, Hartland, Belgrade, Claverack, Elmridge, Munson, Niagara, Stafford, Tonawanda]26b. Soils very poorly to poorly drained [Covington, Guffin, Binghamville, Livingston, Madalin, Panton]25b. Parent material glacial till, soils moderately coarse textured to medium textured28a. Soils excessively drained to well drained29a. pH of upper 50 cm less than 5.5, low base saturation (acidic)30a. Soils shallow to very shallow (< 50cm) to bedrock [Hollis, Galoo acid phase]30b. Soils moderately deep to very deep (> 50cm) to bedrock or densic horizon [Paxton, Charlton, Chatfield, Duchess, Lordstown, St. Albans]…Acidic Till Upland F142XB009VT29b. pH of upper 50 cm greater than 5.5, higher base saturation (rich)31a. Soils shallow to very shallow (< 50cm) to bedrock [Benson, Galoo, Farmington]31b. Soils moderately deep to very deep (> 50cm) to bedrock or densic horizon [Madrid, Nellis, Lowville, Galway, Gardenisle, Dover, Pittsfield, Stockbridge, Palatine, Farmington -moderately deep phase]28b. Soils moderately well drained to very poorly drained32a. Soils moderately well drained to somewhat poorly drained [Amenia, Angola, Bombay, Empeyville, Georgia, Kendaia, Massena, Newstead]32b. Soils poorly drained to very poorly drained33a. pH of upper 50 cm less than 5.5, low base saturation (acidic) [Ridgebury, Whitman]33b. pH of upper 50 cm greater than 5.5, higher base saturation (rich) [Lyons, Sun]State 1
Pine-Northern Hardwood Forest (Reference)Characteristic vegetation: Eastern white pine-red pine/lowbush blueberry/bracken fern-Pennsylvania sedge.
Community 1.1
Pine-Northern hardwood forestWhite Pine, Red Pine, Red oak
Community 1.2
Early to mid successionalHerbaceous, shrubland, or forested communities
Pathway P1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2Disturbance
Pathway P1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1Succession
State 2
Conifer PlantationNorway spruce, Scotch pine, and red pine are common species used in plantations. Abandoned plantations will consist of native trees such as white pine and red oak with scattered remnant plantation species.
Community 2.1
Conifer plantations, windbreaksNorway Spruce, Scotch Pine, White Pine, Red Pine
Community 2.2
Pine-Northern Hardwood ForestNative White Pine, Red Pine, and Red Oak, with scattered remnant non-native plantation species (Norway Spruce and Scotch Pine)
Pathway P2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2Succession
Pathway P2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1Land clearing, tree planting
State 3
PasturelandForage grasses and legumes managed for livestock grazing or hayland.
Community 3.1
Managed grazing or HaylandsForage Grasses or Legumes
Community 3.2
Abandoned Grazing or HaylandTree and shrub encroachment
Pathway P3.1A
Community 3.1 to 3.2Abandonment
State 4
CroplandAnnual or perennial crops.
Community 4.1
Annual or Perennial CropsTransition T1A
State 1 to 2Land clearing, tree planting
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3Land clearing, land smoothing
Transition T1C
State 1 to 4Land clearing, land smoothing
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1Forest stand improvement, forest harvest management
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3Land clearing, land smoothing
Transition T2B
State 2 to 4Land clearing, land smoothing
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 1Tree/shrub establishment, ecological restoration
Transition T3A
State 3 to 4Crop establishment
Restoration pathway R4A
State 4 to 1Tree/shrub establishment, ecological restoration
Transition T4A
State 4 to 3Forage and biomass planting
Additional community tables
Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 6. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 7. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 3.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 11. Community 4.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Site Development and Testing Plan Future work, as described in a project plan, to validate the information in this provisional ecological site description is needed. This will include field activities to collect low and medium intensity sampling and analysis of that data. Annual field reviews should be done by soil scientists and vegetation specialists. A final field review, peer review, quality control, and quality assurance reviews of the ESD will be needed to produce the final document. Annual reviews of the project plan are to be conducted by the Ecological Site Technical Team.
Other references
Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero (editors). 2014. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke’s Ecological Communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
USDA-NASS. 2012 Census of Agriculture. St. Lawrence County New York. Accessed on 11/17/17: https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Online_Resources/County_Profiles/New_York/cp36089.pdf
USDA-USFS. Ecological Subregions of the United States. 212E--St. Lawrence and Champlain Valley. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, and the Eastern Region. Accessed on 11/17/17: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/pubs/ecoregions/ch14.html#212EContributors
Joshua Hibit
Approval
Greg Schmidt, 10/03/2024
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 05/22/2020 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement