Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 137X–Carolina and Georgia Sand Hills
MLRA 137 covers approximately 8,665 square miles (22,450 square kilometers) in the states of South Carolina (44 percent), Georgia (34 percent), and North Carolina (21 percent).
The Sand Hills region occurs below the "fall line", which delineates the older crystalline rocks of the Southern Piedmont (MLRA 136) from the younger sediments of the Southern Coastal Plain (MLRA 133A). The term "fall line" came about because the rivers of the Piedmont cut downward through hard bedrock to meet the lower Coastal Plain sediments. The elevational change is evident in the waterfalls and rapids that occur along this transitional line.
This region is underlain by unconsolidated sediments deposited during the Cretaceous period. Overlying these sediments is the late Miocene to early Pliocene Pinehurst Formation. The Pinehurst Formation is of windblown or eolian origin. Soils in this formation are the subject of this ecological site. Deposits of kaolin and high-silica sands are found across the area and are often mined.
This MLRA has an average annual precipitation of 40 to 50 inches (1,025 to 1,278 millimeters). The maximum precipitation occurs in midsummer during high-intensity, convective thunderstorms. The minimum precipitation occurs in autumn. Snowfall is light if it occurs at all. The average annual temperature is 60 to 65 degrees F (16 to 18 degrees C). The freeze-free period averages 250 days and ranges from 220 to 280 days, increasing in length from north to the south (USDA-NRCS 2022).Classification relationships
APPLICABLE USNVC ASSOCIATIONS
CEGL004468 Gaylussacia frondosa - Clethra alnifolia - Arundinaria tecta / Aristida stricta - Pteridium aquilinum var. pseudocaudatum; CEGL004467 Clethra alnifolia - Toxicodendron vernix / Aristida stricta - Osmunda cinnamomea - Sarracenia spp. (USNVC 2023)
APPLICABLE EPA ECOREGIONS
Level III: 65. Southeastern Plains
Level IV: 65c. Sand Hills (EPA 2013).
APPLICABLE USFS ECOLOGICAL UNITS
Domain: Humid Temperate
Division: Subtropical
Ecological province: 232. Outer Coastal Plain Mixed Forest
Ecological section: 232J. Southern Atlantic Coastal Plains and Flatwoods
Ecological subsection: 232Ja. Sand Hills (Cleland et al. 2007).
Based on the USGS physiographic classification system (Fenneman and Johnson 1946), most of MLRA 137 is in the Sea Island section of the Coastal Plain province, in the Atlantic Plain division.Ecological site concept
This ecological site includes small, localized seepage-fed herbaceous or shrub-herb wetlands found on hillslopes and other inclined surfaces, which form in areas where an aquitard forces shallow groundwater to the surface. Hillside seeps of the Sandhills region are generally small-patch communities found on middle to lower slopes. They may occur as isolated seepage areas or as ecotonal communities between drier longleaf pine-dominated uplands and wetter seepage-fed streamheads. The water chemistry of these wetlands is usually nutrient-poor and acidic. Wildlife habitat is the dominant land use.
Soils on this ecological site are typically very deep, poorly drained Ultisols. Surface layers are typically sandy but become finer with depth. A seasonal high water table is found at depths between 0 to 12 inches.
ES CHARACTERISTICS SUMMARY
• Occurs in small patches on slopes
• Flooding from streams does not occur, though free water may be found at or near the surface in late winter and early spring
• Soils are poorly drained, with a seasonal high water table within 12 inches of the soil surfaceAssociated sites
F137XY030SC Seasonally Wet Lowland and Valley Slope
Often in close proximity to this ecological site, in the surrounding longleaf pine-dominated uplands that historically covered most of the landscape. Although landscape position can be similar, the seasonal high water table is deeper and groundwater discharge is absent.
F137XY010SC Flood Plains And Seepage Swamps
Generally in lower landscape positions in seepage-fed drainageways, streamheads, and small stream bottoms. These sites are generally more prone to flooding and less prone to fire. Though the vegetation can be similar, species diversity is typically lower and a significant herb component is usually absent.
F137XY050GA Loamy Backslope Woodland
Generally in higher landscape positions, in drier longleaf pine-dominated uplands. The seasonally high water table is much deeper.
F137XY080SC Dry Sandy Backslope Woodland
Generally in higher landscape positions, in drier longleaf pine-dominated uplands. Soils are sandier throughout and the seasonal high water table is much deeper.
Similar sites
F137XY010SC Flood Plains And Seepage Swamps
Not on slopes. Flooding frequency is frequent to occasional.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub (1) Clethra alnifolia
(2) Gaylussacia frondosaHerbaceous (1) Osmunda cinnamomea
(2) AristidaPhysiographic features
Hillside seeps of the Sandhills are found on gentle to steep slopes, over substrates where a more permeable layer overlies a less permeable layer at some depth, causing water to move laterally under the surface. These conditions are common in the Sandhills region, where younger and coarser eolian sediments often overly older and finer marine sediments. These seeps are usually found in lower landscape positions, on footslopes and toeslopes, or on slope breaks. Some seeps occur in distinctive amphitheater-shaped indentations in the slope. This configuration is likely a product of groundwater sapping, an erosional process unique to groundwater discharge (Schafale 2012a).
Figure 1. Landscape-vegetation relationships of a typical hill in the Sandhills region, where localized seepage areas can often be found at the foot of slopes (Wells and Shunk 1931).
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Hillslope profile (1) Footslope
(2) Toeslope
Landforms (1) Sandhills > Hill
(2) Sandhills > Marine terrace
Runoff class High to very high Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 170 – 250 ft Slope 2 – 8 % Water table depth 0 – 10 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Runoff class Negligible to very high Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 160 – 415 ft Slope 0 – 15 % Water table depth 0 – 12 in Climatic features
On this ecological site, the average mean annual precipitation is 46 inches. On average, June, July, and August are the rainiest months. On average, December and January are the coldest months, while July and August are the warmest.
Table 4 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 180-210 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 210-250 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 50-50 in Frost-free period (actual range) 170-230 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 200-270 days Precipitation total (actual range) 40-50 in Frost-free period (average) 190 days Freeze-free period (average) 230 days Precipitation total (average) 50 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 7 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) POPE AFB [USW00013714], Fort Bragg, NC
-
(2) JACKSON SPRINGS 5 WNW [USC00314464], Jackson Springs, NC
-
(3) HAMLET [USC00313784], Hamlet, NC
-
(4) CHESTERFIELD 3 E [USC00381645], Chesterfield, SC
-
(5) CHERAW [USC00381588], Cheraw, SC
-
(6) PAGELAND [USC00386616], Pageland, SC
-
(7) CAMDEN 3 W [USC00381310], Camden, SC
-
(8) COLUMBIA [USW00013883], West Columbia, SC
-
(9) PELION 4 NW [USC00386775], Pelion, SC
-
(10) JOHNSTON 4 SW [USC00384607], Johnston, SC
-
(11) AIKEN 5SE [USC00380074], Aiken, SC
-
(12) AUGUSTA DANIEL FLD AP [USW00013837], Augusta, GA
-
(13) AUGUSTA BUSH FLD AP [USW00003820], Augusta, GA
-
(14) IRWINTON 4 WNW [USC00094594], Gordon, GA
-
(15) MACON MIDDLE GA RGNL AP [USW00003813], Macon, GA
-
(16) WARNER ROBINS [USC00099124], Warner Robins, GA
-
(17) BYRON EXP STN [USC00091448], Byron, GA
-
(18) COLUMBUS METRO AP [USW00093842], Columbus, GA
">Influencing water features
Though seasonal groundwater discharge often occurs during late winter and early spring, this ecological site sits well above any flooding that may occur from nearby streams. A seasonal high water table is found at depths between 0 to 12 inches, typically during the months of November through April. During these months, free water is often found at or near the surface.
Wetland description
In the reference state, wetlands on this ecological site typically classify as one of the following according to the Cowardin system (Cowardin 1979).<br />
<br />
System: Palustrine<br />
Class: Scrub-Shrub<br />
Subclass: Broad-leaved deciduous <br />
Water Regime: Saturated<br />
Water Chemistry: Fresh, acid<br />
Soil: Mineral<br />
<br />
System: Palustrine<br />
Class: Emergent<br />
Subclass: Nonpersistent <br />
Water Regime: Saturated<br />
Water Chemistry: Fresh, acid<br />
Soil: MineralSoil features
Soils on this ecological site are typically very deep, poorly drained Ultisols. Redoximorphic features (iron and/or manganese depletions) are found at depths between 0 to 12 inches and below. Soils are typically sandy to loamy at the surface, becoming finer with depth. Parent materials are marine sediments.
Soils associated with this ecological site are typically minor components, representing small dissimilar inclusions within a drier map unit concept. Representative soils include the Rains and Ogeechee series, but several other soil series may apply to unnamed inclusions in soil map units.Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Marine deposits
Surface texture (1) Sandy loam
(2) Loamy sand
Drainage class Poorly drained Permeability class Slow Soil depth 80 in Surface fragment cover <=3" Not specified Surface fragment cover >3" Not specified Available water capacity
(0-80in)6 – 8 in Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)4 – 5.5 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-80in)1 – 2 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-80in)Not specified Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class Poorly drained Permeability class Slow to moderate Soil depth 80 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 % Available water capacity
(0-80in)6 – 10 in Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)4 – 6 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-80in)0 – 2 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-80in)0 % Ecological dynamics
U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) associations that are consistent with reference conditions on this ecological site include CEGL004468 Gaylussacia frondosa - Clethra alnifolia - Arundinaria tecta / Aristida stricta - Pteridium aquilinum var. pseudocaudatum, and CEGL004467 Clethra alnifolia - Toxicodendron vernix / Aristida stricta - Osmunda cinnamomea - Sarracenia spp., with the latter representing the innermost zone and the former representing the slightly drier, outer zone (USNVC 2023).
Hillside seeps of the Sandhills region are small, localized seepage-fed slope wetlands. In the reference state, with frequent fire, herb and shrubs dominate, though widely spaced trees can also be present. These wetlands are usually heterogeneous in cover and often visibly zoned in response to gradients of soil wetness and fire penetration. While seeps with little recent fire may be covered with shrubs throughout, even frequently burned seeps often have a wetter inner zone dominated by woody plants.
Wetlands of this type are known colloquially as seepage bogs. However, the term "bog," as applied here, is a technical misnomer, since these environments are not true peatlands, but rather nutrient-poor mineral wetlands with only limited organic matter accumulation at the surface. Further, these wetlands are not solely fed by precipitation, as they receive shallow groundwater from upslope. This term however, is widely used in the southeastern United States as a label for open, acidic seepage wetlands. This term will be retained here (for simplicity) to maintain congruence with other literary sources.
Seepage bogs of the Sandhills are extremely dependent on fire to maintain their open structure and characteristic herb diversity. Without fire, shrubs quickly expand to cover the entire site, and herb cover can be reduced or eliminated. Though fire ordinarily spreads from the surrounding longleaf pine-dominated uplands, the interaction of fire between drier uplands and seepage-fed wetlands is complex.
Many seeps show evidence of variable fire penetration, with a tall, unburned shrub zone in the center, a zone of intermediate fire penetration away from this zone, and a more frequently burned outer zone along the margins. These communities likely exhibited significant temporal variation, with shrub cover expanding and contracting over time. While the outer zone will likely burn every time fire moves across the landscape, the wetter inner zones usually dampen the spread of fire toward the center. Even if ignited, the innermost zone does not usually carry fire efficiently except during dry spells. However, as the source of ground water is local, shallow, and has limited residence time, the hydroperiod can vary greatly from year to year, periodically allowing fire to infiltrate the seep's innermost zone, while also allowing upland species to establish along its margins.
This ecological site is one of the principle habitat for the pine barrens tree frog (Hyla andersonii), a protected species found in wetlands of the Sandhills region. These frogs generally prefer acidic wetlands and are often found in the shrubbery around seepages. This species requires small-diameter woody vegetation for calling posts, which are found readily on this ecological site. Other wildlife that utilize hillside seeps include the Swainson’s warbler (Limnothlypis swainsonii), the prairie warbler (Dendroica discolor), the American woodcock (Scolopax minor), and the great crested flycatcher (Myiarchus crinitus) (Means and Moler 1979; Barry 1980; Wharton et al. 1978; Nelson 1986; Schafale and Weakley 1990; Peet 2007; USFWS 2010, 2014; Schafale 2012a, 2012b; Edwards et al. 2013; SCDNR 2015).
Canopy layer (where present): Pinus serotina, Liriodendron tulipifera, Acer rubrum, Persea palustris, Magnolia virginiana, Pinus palustris,
Shrub layer: Clethra alnifolia, Gaylussacia frondosa, Toxicodendron vernix, Arundinaria tecta, Kalmia latifolia, Leiophyllum buxifolium, Smilax laurifolia, Cyrilla racemiflora, Ilex glabra, Lyonia ligustrina, Lyonia mariana, Lyonia lucida, Vaccinium fuscatum, Kalmia carolina, Alnus serrulata, Viburnum nudum, Ilex opaca, Morella caroliniensis, Aronia arbutifolia, Kalmia cuneata, Amelanchier obovalis, Lindera subcoriacea, Rhododendron atlanticum, Fothergilla gardenii
Herb layer – forbs: Osmunda cinnamomea, Sarracenia spp. (rubra, purpurea var. venosa, flava), Xyris spp. (caroliniana, platylepis, scabrifolia, ambigua, chapmanii), Eupatorium spp. (pilosum, rotundifolium, leucolepis), Polygala lutea, Sphagnum spp., Lobelia nuttallii, Lobelia batsonii, Rhexia spp. (petiolata, lutea, alifanus, mariana), Utricularia spp., Woodwardia areolata, Pycnanthemum flexuosum, Woodwardia virginica, Bidens aristosa, Solidago salicina, Symphyotrichum dumosum, Osmunda spectabilis, Hexastylis sorriei, Calopogon tuberosus, Pogonia ophioglossoides, Cleistes divaricata, Cleistes bifaria, Spiranthes cernua, Lycopodium spp., Platanthera ciliaris, Anchistea virginica, Erigeron vernus, Desmodium tenuifolium, Pinguicula caerulea, Lilium catesbaei, Asclepias rubra, Burmannia biflora, Lysimachia asperulifolia, Platanthera clavellate, Lachnocaulon anceps, Marshallia graminifolia, Eryngium integrifolium, Gentiana autumnalis, Syngonanthus flavidulus, Pyxidanthera barbulata, Oxypolis ternata, Drosera spp. (capillaris, brevifolia, rotundifolia), Coreopsis linifolia, Doellingeria sericocarpoides, Chaptalia tomentosa, Ludwigia hirtella, Ludwigia virgata, Eriocaulon decangulare, Eriocaulon texense, Calopogon barbatus, Eriophorum virginicum, Triantha racemosa, Lilium pyrophilum
Herb layer – graminoids: Aristida stricta, Aristida beyrichiana, Ctenium aromaticum, Muhlenbergia expansa, Andropogon spp., Dichanthelium strigosum, Dichanthelium dichotomum var. ensifolium, Chasmanthium laxum, Glyceria obtusa, Scleria triglomerata, Scleria ciliata, Calamovilfa brevipilis, Fimbristylis spp., Juncus scirpoides, Carex collinsii, Carex styloflexa, Sporobolus pinetorum,State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
T1A - Fire exclusion or reduced fire frequency (~10 to 20-year return interval). T2A - Prescribed burns and selective removals, with increased fire frequency thereafter (< 10-year return interval). T2B - Continued exclusion of fire or reduced fire frequency (≥ 20-year return interval). T3A - Stand replacing disturbance, increased fire frequency (< 10-year return interval), and natural succession. T3B - Prescribed burns and selective removals, with increased fire frequency thereafter (< 20-year return interval). State 1 submodel, plant communities
1.1A - Low-intensity fire. 1.1B - Natural succession. 1.2A - Natural succession. 1.3A - Low-intensity fire. 1.3B - High-intensity fire. State 1
Reference State - Hillside Seepage Bog
Figure 8. A typical hillside seep under reference conditions.
Hillside seeps are dynamic systems, undergoing considerable change over time in response to natural disturbances. Shrubs expand and contract as cycles of drought give rise to differential penetration of fire, allowing shrub and herb cover to expand and contract over time.
Characteristics and indicators. Although rarely abundant, emergent trees may be present in small numbers. The most common species overall is pond pine (<a class="species-link" href="https://plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=PISE" target="_blank" title="Open in plants.usda.gov"><i>Pinus serotina</i></a>). If present, trees are usually widely spaced or confined to the wetter, innermost zone.
Community 1.1
Hillside Shrub-Herb BogThis community phase is dominated by a mixture of shrubs and herbaceous plant species. It typically develops in the interval between fires, or as a result of a slightly lower fire frequency than is required for long-term maintenance of community phase 1.2.
Resilience management. While this community phase briefly transitions to herb dominance with a single low-intensity fire event, long-term maintenance of shrub-herb codominance can be achieved with a fire return interval of approximately 2 to 4 years. This is the optimal condition for the pine barrens tree frog (USFWS 2010, 2014).
Dominant plant species
-
coastal sweetpepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), shrub
-
blue huckleberry (Gaylussacia frondosa), shrub
-
poison sumac (Toxicodendron vernix), shrub
-
switchcane (Arundinaria tecta), shrub
-
mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), shrub
-
sandmyrtle (Leiophyllum buxifolium), shrub
-
swamp titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), shrub
-
inkberry (Ilex glabra), shrub
-
staggerbush (Lyonia), shrub
-
black highbush blueberry (Vaccinium fuscatum), shrub
-
threeawn (Aristida), grass
-
toothache grass (Ctenium aromaticum), grass
-
cutover muhly (Muhlenbergia expansa), grass
-
bluestem (Andropogon), grass
-
roughhair rosette grass (Dichanthelium strigosum), grass
-
cypress panicgrass (Dichanthelium dichotomum var. ensifolium), grass
-
slender woodoats (Chasmanthium laxum), grass
-
Atlantic mannagrass (Glyceria obtusa), grass
-
whip nutrush (Scleria triglomerata), grass
-
fringed nutrush (Scleria ciliata), grass
-
cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), other herbaceous
-
pitcherplant (Sarracenia), other herbaceous
-
yelloweyed grass (Xyris), other herbaceous
-
thoroughwort (Eupatorium), other herbaceous
-
orange milkwort (Polygala lutea), other herbaceous
-
Nuttall's lobelia (Lobelia nuttallii), other herbaceous
-
meadowbeauty (Rhexia), other herbaceous
-
netted chainfern (Woodwardia areolata), other herbaceous
-
Appalachian mountainmint (Pycnanthemum flexuosum), other herbaceous
Community 1.2
Hillside Herb BogThis community phase is dominated by herbaceous plant species. It can develop in the immediate aftermath of fire, serving as a transient plant community in the maintenance of community phase 1.1, or it can be maintained long term with increased fire frequency (1 to 2-year return interval).
Dominant plant species include a variety of grasses, sedges, and pitcher plants. Various orchids, lilies, and other showy species are frequently present, as well as numerous other carnivorous plants. The herb-dominated outer zones often give way to a shrub-dominated inner zone.
Resilience management. Herb dominance can be maintained long term with increased fire frequency. Woody vegetation is most effectively suppressed through warm-season burns (USFWS 2010, 2014).
Dominant plant species
-
pond pine (Pinus serotina), tree
-
switchcane (Arundinaria tecta), shrub
-
threeawn (Aristida), grass
-
toothache grass (Ctenium aromaticum), grass
-
cutover muhly (Muhlenbergia expansa), grass
-
bluestem (Andropogon), grass
-
slender woodoats (Chasmanthium laxum), grass
-
Atlantic mannagrass (Glyceria obtusa), grass
-
whip nutrush (Scleria triglomerata), grass
-
cypress panicgrass (Dichanthelium dichotomum var. ensifolium), grass
-
roughhair rosette grass (Dichanthelium strigosum), grass
-
fimbry (Fimbristylis), grass
-
cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), other herbaceous
-
pitcherplant (Sarracenia), other herbaceous
-
yelloweyed grass (Xyris), other herbaceous
-
thoroughwort (Eupatorium), other herbaceous
-
orange milkwort (Polygala lutea), other herbaceous
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum), other herbaceous
-
Nuttall's lobelia (Lobelia nuttallii), other herbaceous
-
meadowbeauty (Rhexia), other herbaceous
-
bladderwort (Utricularia), other herbaceous
-
netted chainfern (Woodwardia areolata), other herbaceous
Community 1.3
Hillside Shrub BogThis community phase is dominated by shrubs and vines. It typically develops in the interval between fires, as a result of a long inter-fire period (~4 to 10 years), or as a result of other fire-related variables such as fire intensity and timing. Because of the vicissitudes of unpredictable drought, the intensity of fires and the extent to which they burn into the seep can vary significantly. In the past, shrub cover would have presumably expanded naturally during periods of higher overall precipitation. With a prescribed burn of appropriate intensity and timing, it readily transitions to community phase 1.1 with fire (Means and Moler 1979; USFWS 2010, 2014).
Dominant plant species
-
coastal sweetpepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), shrub
-
blue huckleberry (Gaylussacia frondosa), shrub
-
poison sumac (Toxicodendron vernix), shrub
-
laurel greenbrier (Smilax laurifolia), shrub
-
mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), shrub
-
sandmyrtle (Leiophyllum buxifolium), shrub
-
swamp titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), shrub
-
inkberry (Ilex glabra), shrub
-
staggerbush (Lyonia), shrub
-
black highbush blueberry (Vaccinium fuscatum), shrub
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2The hillside shrub-herb bog readily transitions to the hillside herb bog through fire. In the past, under the natural fire regime, this community pathway presumably happened regularly with low-intensity fires that spread from the surrounding landscape. Herb dominance can be maintained long term through an increase in fire frequency (1 to 2-year return interval).
Key drivers
-
Fire
-
Fire frequency
Key ecosystem services affected
-
Wildlife habitat
-
Animal biodiversity
-
Plant biodiversity
Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.3In the absence of disturbance, the hillside shrub-herb bog naturally moves toward the hillside shrub bog through natural succession.
Key ecosystem services affected
-
Wildlife habitat
-
Animal biodiversity
-
Plant biodiversity
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1In the absence of disturbance, the hillside herb bog naturally moves toward the hillside shrub-herb bog through natural succession.
Key ecosystem services affected
-
Wildlife habitat
-
Animal biodiversity
-
Plant biodiversity
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.1The hillside shrub bog readily transitions to the hillside shrub-herb bog through fire. In the past, under the natural fire regime, this community pathway presumably happened regularly with low-intensity fires that spread from the surrounding landscape.
Key drivers
-
Fire
Pathway 1.3B
Community 1.3 to 1.2The hillside shrub bog can transition to the hillside herb bog through high-intensity fire. In the past, this may have occurred in response to months or consecutive years of dry soil conditions, allowing fire to penetrate more effectively and burn at higher intensity.
Context dependence.This community pathway is most likely during periods of severe drought, following several years without fire. Under periods of normal precipitation, fires that spread from the surrounding landscape are usually of lower intensity, as represented by community pathway 1.3A
Key drivers
-
Fire
Key ecosystem services affected
-
Wildlife habitat
-
Animal biodiversity
-
Plant biodiversity
State 2
Pond Pine Seepage WoodlandThis state begins to develop with reduced fire frequency (~10 to 20 years). In response, cover from trees begins to increase, with pond pine (Pinus serotina) typically being the most common species. Other important species that begin to establish include sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), swamp bay (Persea palustris), red maple (Acer rubrum), and tuliptree (Liriodendron tulipifera), among others. Scattered longleaf pines may also be present. Shrub cover is dense in the understory and herb cover is sparse (Sutter and Kral 1994; USFWS 2010, 2014).
Dominant plant species
-
pond pine (Pinus serotina), tree
-
sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), tree
-
swamp bay (Persea palustris), tree
-
red maple (Acer rubrum), tree
-
American holly (Ilex opaca), tree
-
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), tree
-
longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), tree
-
swamp titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), shrub
-
sandmyrtle (Leiophyllum buxifolium), shrub
-
inkberry (Ilex glabra), shrub
-
mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), shrub
-
laurel greenbrier (Smilax laurifolia), shrub
-
coastal sweetpepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), shrub
-
staggerbush (Lyonia), shrub
-
Carolina laurel (Kalmia carolina), shrub
-
blue huckleberry (Gaylussacia frondosa), shrub
-
black highbush blueberry (Vaccinium fuscatum), shrub
State 3
Hillside Seepage ForestIn this closed canopy state, the canopy is dominated by hardwoods that have come in after prolonged periods without fire (≥ 20 years of fire exclusion). In the absence of fire, ecological dynamics are driven largely by canopy gaps caused by windthrow.
Dominant plant species
-
tuliptree (Liriodendron tulipifera), tree
-
red maple (Acer rubrum), tree
-
sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), tree
-
pond pine (Pinus serotina), tree
-
swamp bay (Persea palustris), tree
-
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), tree
-
American holly (Ilex opaca), tree
-
blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), tree
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2The reference state can transition to the pond pine seepage woodland with ongoing exclusion of fire or reduced fire frequency (~10 to 20-year return interval). Under these conditions, cover from tree species begins to increase.
Key drivers
-
Fire frequency
Key ecosystem services affected
-
Wildlife habitat
-
Animal biodiversity
-
Plant biodiversity
Transition T2A
State 2 to 1Pond pine seepage woodlands can transition back to the reference state through a combination of prescribed burns and selective removals. For long-term maintenance of the reference state, increased fire frequency (< 10-year return interval) will be needed thereafter. Warm season burns are most effective as a restoration tool. Though increased fire frequency is a critical part of restoration, fire alone is not usually sufficient to overcome the threshold needed to reestablish the unique ecological dynamics that characterize the reference state, wherein vegetation structure moves fluidly between shrub and herb dominance with fire.
Key drivers
-
Fire
-
Timber management
-
Fire frequency
Key ecosystem services affected
-
Wildlife habitat
-
Animal biodiversity
-
Plant biodiversity
Transition T2B
State 2 to 3In the absence of fire, or with reduced fire frequency (≥ 20-year return interval), pond pine seepage woodlands can succeed to forest.
Key drivers
-
Fire frequency
Key ecosystem services affected
-
Wildlife forage
-
Wildlife habitat
-
Animal biodiversity
-
Plant biodiversity
Transition T3A
State 3 to 1Over time, the hillside seepage forest state can transition back to the reference state through a stand replacing disturbance (clear-cutting, catastrophic fire, etc.) followed by an increase in the frequency of fire (< 10-year return interval). This is a gradual process, as it can take a number of years to ameliorate the effects of long-term fire suppression, and many more to approximate the composition and diversity of species observed under reference conditions.
Constraints to recovery.Because forest patches associated with this ecological site are typically small and insular, seed sources for characteristic seep species tend to be scarce in the surrounding landscape. Recovery can be hastened to some extent by planting keystone species.
Key drivers
-
Timber management
-
Fire frequency
-
Seeding
Key ecosystem services affected
-
Wildlife forage
-
Wildlife habitat
-
Animal biodiversity
-
Plant biodiversity
Transition T3B
State 3 to 2The hillside seepage forest state can transition to the pond pine seepage woodland through prescribed burns, and if necessary, selective removals. Conditions needed to carry fire may take a number of years to restore. Increased fire frequency (< 20-year return interval) will be needed for long-term maintenance thereafter. Warm season burns are most effective as a restoration tool.
Key drivers
-
Fire
-
Timber management
-
Fire frequency
Key ecosystem services affected
-
Wildlife forage
-
Wildlife habitat
-
Animal biodiversity
-
Plant biodiversity
Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Data collection and analysis of field data will be performed during the Verification Stage of ESD development.
Other references
Barry, J.M. 1980. Part Three: Piedmont Province. p. 55 – 94. In J.M. Barry (ed.) Natural Vegetation of South Carolina. University of South Carolina Press. Columbia, SC.
Cleland, D.T., J.A. Freeouf, J.E. Keys, G.J. Nowacki, C.A. Carpenter, W.H. McNab. 2007. Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections for the conterminous United States. General Technical Report WO-76D. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Washington, D.C.
Cowardin, L.M. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Washington, D.C., Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Dept. of the Interior.
Edwards, L., J. Ambrose, and L.K. Kirkman. 2013. Piedmont Ecoregion. In L. Edwards et al. (ed.) The natural communities of Georgia. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA. 257-345.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2013. Level III and IV ecoregions of the continental
United States. National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory. Corvallis, Oregon. Map scale 1:3,000,000.
Fenneman, N.M., Johnson D.W. 1946. Physiographic Divisions of the Conterminous U.S. U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, DC.
Nelson, J.B. 1986. The natural communities of South Carolina: Initial classification and description. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries. Columbia, SC.
Means, D.B., P.E. Moler. 1979. The pine barrens treefrog: fire, seepage bogs, and management implications. Pp 77-83 in R. R. Odum and L. Landers (eds.) Georgia Game and Fish Division Technical Bulletin WL4. Atlanta, GA.
Peet, R.K. 2007. Ecological classification of longleaf pine woodlands. In: S. Jose, E.J. Jokela, D.L. Miller (eds.) The longleaf pine ecosystem: ecology, silviculture, and restoration. Springer, New York.
Schafale, M.P. 2012a. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation. Natural Heritage Program. Raleigh, NC.
Schafale, M.P. 2012b. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina. 4th Approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation. Natural Heritage Program. Raleigh, NC.
Schafale, M.P., A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. Third approximation. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program. Raleigh, NC.
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR). 2015. South Carolina State Wildlife Action Plan. Columbia, SC.
Sutter, R.D., R. Kral. 1994. The ecology, status, and conservation of two non-alluvial wetland communities in the south Atlantic and eastern Gulf Coastal Plain, USA. Biological Conservation. 68:235-243.
United State Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2010. Carolina Sandhills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan. Carolina Sandhills National Wildlife Refuge. McBee, SC.
United State Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2014. Habitat Management Plan for the Carolina Sandhills National Wildlife Refuge. Chesterfield County, South Carolina. Carolina Sandhills National Wildlife Refuge. McBee, SC.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2022. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 296.
United States National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) Database Version 2.04. 2023. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee. Washington, DC. Available at https://usnvc.org.
Wells, B.W., I.V. Shunk. 1931. The Vegetation and Habitat Factors of the Coarser Sands of the North Carolina Coastal Plain: An Ecological Study. Ecological Monographs. 1(4):465-520.
Wharton, C.H. 1978. Natural environments of Georgia. Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Atlanta, Georgia.Contributors
Yogev Erez
Dee PedersonApproval
Matthew Duvall, 5/19/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 08/20/2026 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement