Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site F135AY360AL
Deep Poorly Drained Clay Acid Flatwoods Slopes
Last updated: 5/29/2025
Accessed: 04/22/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 135A–Alabama and Mississippi Blackland Prairie
This MLRA has two narrow (less than 40 miles wide), long, arching bands known as the Blackland Prairie and the Jackson Prairie, which are characterized by clayey, soils with a high shrink-swell potential. Several major drainageways bisect this region on their way to larger tributaries. Very little native prairie vegetation remains due to agriculture and forestry activities.
This area is in eastern Mississippi (57 percent) and central and western Alabama (43 percent). It makes up about 10,165 square miles(26,328 square kilometers). Most of this region is surrounded by the distinctly different MLRA 133C, which has sandy soils and stratified, coastal sediment mineralogy. A very small section of MLRA 135A has a diffuse boundary with MLRA 134 that occurs as a loess cap that gradually thins from west to east. (USDA, NRCS, 2022)LRU notes
The Interior Flatwoods: This physiographic region consists of a narrow band, of soils which were formed out of an acidic, gray clay. This band of similar soils is situated directly west of the Blackland Prairie. These acid and clayey soils are flat, low lying, mostly saturated, hardwood forests with some areas in heavy cultivation.
Classification relationships
This area is in the East Gulf Coastal Plain section of the Coastal Plain province of the Atlantic Plain. The northern part of the area is a slightly elevated, hilly plain. The separate southwestern part is locally known as the Jackson Prairie portion of the East Gulf Coastal Plain section in Mississippi. (USDA, NRCS, 2022)
National Vegetation Classification System Vegetation Association (NatureServe, 2010):
The reference state for this system is comparable to Quercus stellata - Quercus marilandica - Carya (tomentosa, pallida) Upper East Gulf Coastal Plain WoodlandEcological site concept
These sites occur on the uplands slopes of the flatwoods of MLRA 135A with deep poorly drained, acid, clay soils. Historically, these sites are forested. Today, many sites are still mixed forest with loblolly pine and hardwoods. In areas used for agriculture common land use is cotton, corn, and soybeans.
Associated sites
F135AY320MS Deep Poorly Drained To Somewhat Poorly Drained Fine Silty Acid Flatwoods Uplands
These sites are positioned higher on the landscape on more gently sloping sites than F135AY360AL.
F135AY340MS Deep Poorly Drained To Somewhat Poorly Drained Clay Acid Flatwoods Uplands
These sites are located on more gentle slopes than F135AY360AL.
Similar sites
F135AY320MS Deep Poorly Drained To Somewhat Poorly Drained Fine Silty Acid Flatwoods Uplands
These sites have siltier soil texture and occur on gentler slopes than F135AY360AL.
F135AY330MS Deep Moderately Well Drained Fine Loamy Acid Flatwoods Uplands
These sites have loamier soil texture, a better drainage class, and occur on gentler slopes than F135AY360AL.
F135AY340MS Deep Poorly Drained To Somewhat Poorly Drained Clay Acid Flatwoods Uplands
These sites occur on gentler slopes than F135AY360AL.
F135AY350AL Deep Moderately Well Drained Clay Acid Flatwoods Slopes
These sites have a better drainage class than F135AY360AL.
R135AY140MS Deep Somewhat Poorly Drained Clay Alkaline Broad Flats
These sites have a more basic pH, a larger geographic distribution, and occur on gentler slopes than F135AY360AL.
F135AY150AL Deep Well to Moderately Well Drained Clay Acid Broad Flats
These sites have a better drainage class, a larger geographic distribution, and occur on gentler slopes than F135AY360AL.
F135AY310AL Deep Moderately Well Drained Clay Acid Flatwoods Uplands
These sites have a better drainage class and occur on gentler slopes than F135AY360AL.
F135AY160MS Deep Somewhat Poorly Drained Clay Acid Broad Flats
These sites have a larger geographic distribution and occur on gentler slopes than F135AY360AL.
F135AY180MS Deep Somewhat Poorly Drained To Moderately Well Drained Fine Silty Acid Broad Flats
These sites have siltier soil texture, a larger geographic distribution, and occur on gentler slopes than F135AY360AL.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Quercus stellata
(2) Pinus taedaShrub (1) Quercus alba
(2) Quercus falcataHerbaceous (1) Smilax glauca
(2) Vitis rotundifoliaPhysiographic features
Most of this area is underlain by Cretaceous-age clay, marl, soft limestone, or chalk of the Selma Group. The Jackson Prairie part, in southern Mississippi, and parts of the MLRA in southwest Alabama are underlain by Tertiary-age clay, marl, soft limestone, or chalk of the Vicksburg and Jackson Groups. (USDA, NRCS, 2022)
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Upland > Ridge
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 310 – 480 ft Slope 5 – 12 % Water table depth 0 – 12 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 310 – 480 ft Slope 5 – 12 % Water table depth 0 – 12 in Climatic features
This ecological site occurs in the thermic temperature regime for MLRA 135A.The thermic soil temperature regime has mean annual soil temperatures of 15 ⁰C or more, but less than 22 ⁰C; and a difference between mean summer and mean winter soil temperatures of greater than 6 ⁰C at 50 cm below the surface.
The average annual precipitation is sampled from areas running the length of MLRA 135A. Rainfall is common throughout the year; with the maximum precipitation occurring in early winter, spring, and midsummer. The lowest rainfall occurs in autumn. The rainfall typically occurs during high intensity, convective thunderstorms in summer, but some heavy rains occur during tropical storms in winter.Table 4 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 180-200 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 220-240 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 50-60 in Frost-free period (actual range) 170-210 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 200-240 days Precipitation total (actual range) 50-60 in Frost-free period (average) 190 days Freeze-free period (average) 230 days Precipitation total (average) 60 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) CORINTH 7 SW [USC00221962], Corinth, MS
-
(2) BOONEVILLE [USC00220955], Booneville, MS
-
(3) RIPLEY [USC00227467], Ripley, MS
-
(4) TUPELO RGNL AP [USW00093862], Tupelo, MS
-
(5) VERONA EXP STN [USC00229173], Tupelo, MS
-
(6) FULTON 3 W [USC00223208], Fulton, MS
-
(7) HOUSTON [USC00224265], Houston, MS
-
(8) ABERDEEN [USC00220021], Amory, MS
-
(9) STATE UNIV [USC00228374], Starkville, MS
-
(10) COLUMBUS [USC00221880], Columbus, MS
-
(11) BROOKSVILLE EXP STN [USC00221111], Brooksville, MS
-
(12) MACON 3N [USC00225361], Macon, MS
-
(13) LIVINGSTON [USC00014798], Livingston, AL
-
(14) MARION JUNCTION 2 NE [USC00015121], Marion Junction, AL
-
(15) MONTGOMERY AP [USW00013895], Hope Hull, AL
-
(16) MONTGOMERY 6SW [USC00015553], Montgomery, AL
-
(17) PELAHATCHIE [USC00226811], Pelahatchie, MS
-
(18) FOREST [USC00223107], Forest, MS
">Influencing water features
There is a chance some areas within this ecological site will be classified as a wetland.
Soil features
Soils associated with this site fall within the thermic temperature regime of MLRA 135A. The thermic soil temperature regime is defined as having a difference in soil temperature of 6 degrees C or more between mean summer (June, July, and August) and mean winter (December, January, and February) and a mean annual soil temperature of: 15 degrees C (59 degrees F) to 22 degrees C (72 degrees F). Soils in this ecological site are deep, poorly drained, clayey, and acidic. This Ecological site is comprised of the Mayhew soil series.
Please note that the soils listed in this section of the description may not be all inclusive. There may be additional soils that fit the site’s concepts. Additionally, the soils that provisionally form the concepts of this site may occur elsewhere, either within or outside of the MLRA and may or may not have the same geomorphic characteristics or support similar vegetation. Some soil map units and soil series included in this “provisional” ecological site were used as a “best fit” for a particular soil – landform catena during a specific era of soil mapping, regardless of the origin of parent material or the location of MLRA boundaries. Therefore, the listed soils may not be typical for MLRA 135A or a specific location, and the associated soil map units may warrant further investigation in a joint ecological site inventory – soil survey project. When utilizing this provisional description, the user is encouraged to verify that the area of interest meets the appropriate ecological site concepts by reviewing the soils, landform, vegetation, and physical location. If the site concepts do not match the attributes of the area of interest, please review the Similar or Associated Sites listed in the General Information section of this description to determine if another site may be a better fit for your area of interest.Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Marine deposits – sedimentary rock
Surface texture (1) Silty clay loam
(2) Silt loam
Drainage class Poorly drained Permeability class Very slow Soil depth 80 in Surface fragment cover <=3" Not specified Surface fragment cover >3" Not specified Available water capacity
(0-40in)7.2 – 8 in Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-10in)4.5 – 6 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-60in)0 – 1 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-60in)Not specified Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class Poorly drained Permeability class Very slow Soil depth 80 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)7.2 – 8 in Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-10in)4.5 – 6 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-60in)0 – 1 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-60in)0 % Ecological dynamics
This Ecological site has seven states: Fire Dependent Forest, Fire Suppressed Forest, Temporary Post Disturbance Grassland, Silviculture, Pasture, Cropland and Conservation Area.
The reference state for this ecological site is Fire Dependent Forest. This state is characterized as having fire resistant (blackjack oak...) and fast growing (loblolly and shortleaf pine) trees in the overstory with a grassy and herbaceous understory. Due to the regular fire regimes these resistant and fast growing species were given an advantage allowing them to dominate the landscape. In the time since fire suppression has become more common the representation of this community has greatly decreased.
Fire Suppressed Forest is a community comprised of mixed hardwoods and pines interspaced by a herbaceous understory. This community occurs in two phases, "wetter" and "drier". For the provisional phase of ecological site development, it is difficult to determine which of these phases is typical for this site. In future stages of ESD development, when there is more data, it will be possible to determine how common these phases occur on this ecological site.
Temporary Post Disturbance Grassland is a community that occurs after a large-scale disturbance on these sites. This disturbance can be either management driven (clearcutting, abandonment,…) or naturally occurring (fire…). This phase is temporary, if management continues the landscape will shift into whatever state is being managed for. If a site is not being managed post disturbance it will likely transform into a forest community. Plants that occur on this site depend largely on what was growing prior to the disturbance.
The Silviculture community is predominantly used to grow loblolly pine for wood production and wildlife habitat.
Pasture is a grassland that occurs as a result of heavy land management changes (clearcutting, herbicide, grazing, planting etc.) in order to produce livestock forage or hay. Pasture differs from native grassland as the plant species in the pasture are typically selected and planted specifically for forage quality.
Cropland occurs as a result of heavy land management changes (clearcutting, herbicide, tilling, etc.) in order to produce crops. Common crops for this ecological site are cotton, corn, and soybeans. Due to the slope of this ecological site, erosion is a major concern for cropland. Therefore, cropland may not be the most suitable use for this ecological site. If these sites are going to be put into cropland there are management practices that can minimize soil erosion. Some of these practices include no till cropping, terraces, grass strips, and cover crop.
Conservation areas are sites set aside to try and recapture the historical plant and animal communities of the reference state. These states will never be a perfect replication because of anthropogenic and natural changes to the ecological system including fire suppression, extinction of species, changes in hydrology (channeling waterways...), introduced species, invasive species, altering landscapes (farming practices and urbanization) and probable changes to the soil microbial communities. These sites are meant to be the best representation possible for these historical communities given the changes that have occurred.State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
States 2, 7 and 3 (additional transitions)
States 4 and 7 (additional transitions)
T1-2 - No fire disturbance T1-3 - Intense disturbance T2-3 - Intense disturbance T2-7 - Manage for fire dependent forest T3-2 - Prevent fire and other disturbances T3-4 - Plant and manage for desired silviculture community T3-5 - Manage for pasture T3-6 - Manage for crops T3-7 - Manage for fire dependent forest T4-2 - Leave unmanaged T4-3 - Clear the trees, ensure the desired area has a wetland determination T4-5 - Mange for pasture T4-6 - Mange for crops T4-7 - Mange for crops T5-3 - Any significant disturbance T5-4 - Manage for silviculture community T5-6 - Manage for crops T5-7 - Manage for fire dependent forest T6-3 - Any significant disturbance can cause this shift T6-4 - Manage for silviculture T6-5 - Mange for pasture T6-7 - Manage for historic forest community T7-2 - Prevent disturbance T7-3 - Intense disturbance T7-4 - Manage for desired silviculture community T7-5 - Manage for desired tree species T7-6 - Manage for desired crops State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
2.1A - Decreased soil moisture 2.2A - Increased soil moisture State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 5 submodel, plant communities
State 6 submodel, plant communities
State 7 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Fire Dependent ForestFire Dependent Forest are characterized by having predominantly blackjack oaks and shortleaf pines, with other oak and hickory species occurring to a lesser extent, interspaced by a herbaceous understory. This community was common on the acidic uplands of the Blackland Prairie before regular fire suppression and heavy land management. Blackjack oaks are highly resistant to fire and pines grow more rapidly than most hardwood species giving them an advantage over other tree species in areas experiencing common disturbance from fire. In the time since fire suppression has become more common the representation of this community has greatly decreased with post and white oak replacing blackjack oak. Pine trees are still common.
Resilience management. A regular fire regime is required to maintain this community.
Community 1.1
Fire Dependent Forest
Resilience management. A regular fire regime is required to maintain this community.
Dominant plant species
-
blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica), tree
-
shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), tree
-
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tree
-
white oak (Quercus alba), tree
-
post oak (Quercus stellata), tree
-
southern red oak (Quercus falcata), tree
-
pignut hickory (Carya glabra), tree
-
mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), tree
-
hybrid hickory (Carya), shrub
-
winged elm (Ulmus alata), shrub
-
eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), shrub
-
big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass
-
Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), grass
-
muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), other herbaceous
-
cat greenbrier (Smilax glauca), other herbaceous
-
longleaf woodoats (Chasmanthium sessiliflorum), other herbaceous
State 2
Fire Suppressed ForestFire Suppressed Forest communities are comprised of post oak, white oak, southern red oak, hickories, sweetgum, shortleaf pine, and loblolly pine interspaced by a herbaceous understory. These forests can occur in two phases, “wetter” and “drier”. In the “wetter” hardwoods are predominant with a few pine trees. In the “drier” phase the inverse is true, with pines occurring more regularly and hardwoods to a lesser extent. For the provisional phase of ecological site development, it is difficult to determine which of these phases is typical for this site. In future stages of ESD development, when there is more data, it will be possible to determine how common these phases occur on this ecological site.
Resilience management. This state thrives when there is little disturbance on the landscape.
Community 2.1
Wet Phase Fire Suppressed ForestThis phase occurs on this site when there is little disturbance from land management or fire and there is greater moisture availability. In the wet phase, hardwoods are predominant mixed with a few pine trees and surrounded by a herbaceous understory.
Resilience management. This state thrives when there is little disturbance on the landscape.
Dominant plant species
-
post oak (Quercus stellata), tree
-
southern red oak (Quercus falcata), tree
-
pignut hickory (Carya glabra), tree
-
mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), tree
-
white oak (Quercus alba), tree
-
sweetgum (Liquidambar), tree
-
shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), tree
-
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tree
-
hybrid hickory (Carya), shrub
-
winged elm (Ulmus alata), shrub
-
eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), shrub
-
big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass
-
Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), grass
-
muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), other herbaceous
-
cat greenbrier (Smilax glauca), other herbaceous
-
longleaf woodoats (Chasmanthium sessiliflorum), other herbaceous
Community 2.2
Dry Phase Fire Suppressed ForestThis phase occurs on this site when there is little disturbance from land management or fire and there is less moisture availability. In the dry phase, the plant community tends to be a mixed pine and hardwood forest surrounded by a herbaceous understory.
Resilience management. This state thrives when there is little disturbance on the landscape.
Dominant plant species
-
shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), tree
-
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tree
-
post oak (Quercus stellata), tree
-
white oak (Quercus alba), tree
-
southern red oak (Quercus falcata), tree
-
pignut hickory (Carya glabra), tree
-
mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), tree
-
hybrid hickory (Carya), shrub
-
winged elm (Ulmus alata), shrub
-
eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), shrub
-
big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass
-
Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), grass
-
muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), other herbaceous
-
cat greenbrier (Smilax glauca), other herbaceous
-
longleaf woodoats (Chasmanthium sessiliflorum), other herbaceous
Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1State 3
Temporary Post Disturbance GrasslandTemporary Post Disturbance Grassland occurs after a large-scale disturbance on these sites. This disturbance can be either management driven (clearcutting, abandonment,…) or naturally occurring (fire…). This phase is temporary. If management continues the landscape will shift into whatever state is being managed for. If a site is not being managed post disturbance it will likely transform into a forest community. Plants that occur on this site depend largely on what was growing prior to the disturbance.
Resilience management. This community is dependent on a large scale disturbance or change in management.
Community 3.1
Temporary Post Disturbance GrasslandGrasses, forbs, and other herbaceous species are the first to recover after a major disturbance. If this disturbance is not maintained the grassland will transition into another state.
Resilience management. This community is dependent on a large scale disturbance or change in management.
Dominant plant species
-
little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), grass
-
big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass
-
prostrate dallis grass (Paspalum dilatatum var. pauciciliatum), grass
-
bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), grass
-
Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), grass
-
poverty oatgrass (Danthonia spicata), grass
-
red clover (Trifolium pratense), other herbaceous
-
white clover (Trifolium repens), other herbaceous
-
greater tickseed (Coreopsis major), other herbaceous
-
ticktrefoil (Desmodium), other herbaceous
-
combleaf yellow false foxglove (Aureolaria pectinata), other herbaceous
State 4
SilvicultureThe Silviculture community is a managed forest used for wood production and wildlife habitat. Most silviculture communities in this area are planted loblolly pine, but in some instances hardwoods are planted. Silviculture is best suited to the Interior Flatwoods LRU of MLRA 135A, but it can be implemented in the other LRUs. Before committing to silviculture, it would be best to consult an NRCS area forester to ensure that it is a viable option for a given site.
Resilience management. Common practices for maintaining this state are tree thinning, herbicide, and fire.
Community 4.1
Silviculture
Resilience management. Common practices for maintaining this state are tree thinning, herbicide, and fire.
Dominant plant species
-
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tree
State 5
PasturePasture is a grassland that occurs as a result of heavy land management changes (clearcutting, herbicide, grazing, planting etc.) in order to produce livestock forage or hay. Pasture differs from native grassland as the plant species in the pasture are typically selected and planted specifically for forage quality. Livestock grazing can greatly alter the plant community.
Resilience management. Plant and manage for desired species.
Community 5.1
Pasture
Resilience management. Plant and manage for desired species.
Dominant plant species
-
Bermudagrass (Cynodon), grass
-
dallisgrass (Paspalum dilatatum), grass
-
fescue (Festuca), grass
-
ryegrass (Lolium), grass
State 6
CroplandCropland occur as a result of heavy land management changes (clearcutting, herbicide, tilling, etc.) in order to produce crops. Common crops for this ecological site are cotton, corn, and soybeans. There are different management styles used for cropland communities including conventional till, no till, cover crop, double crop, and others. Some of these practices are mutually exclusive, but others can be combined.
Due to the slope of this ecological site, erosion is a major concern for cropland. Therefore, cropland may not be the most suitable use for this ecological site. If these sites are going to be put into cropland there are management practices that can minimize soil erosion. Some of these practices include no till cropping, terraces, grass strips, and cover crop.
Resilience management. Plant and manage for desired crops.
Community 6.1
CroplandState 7
Conservation AreaConservation areas are sites set aside to try and recapture the historical plant and animal communities of the reference state. These states will never be a perfect replication because of anthropogenic and natural changes to the ecological system. Some of these changes include fire suppression, changes in hydrology (channeling waterways...), extinction of species, introduced species, invasive species, altering landscapes (farming practices and urbanization) and probable changes to the soil microbial communities. These sites are meant to be the best representation possible for these historical communities given the changes that have occurred. For this ecological site a restoration area would be a forested area that maintained a regular burning regiment.
Community 7.1
Conservation Area
Resilience management. This will require managing for specific species such as blackjack oak an incorporating a regular burning regiment.
Dominant plant species
-
blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica), tree
-
shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), tree
-
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tree
-
white oak (Quercus alba), tree
-
post oak (Quercus stellata), tree
-
southern red oak (Quercus falcata), tree
-
pignut hickory (Carya glabra), tree
-
mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), tree
-
hybrid hickory (Carya), shrub
-
winged elm (Ulmus alata), shrub
-
eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana), shrub
-
big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass
-
Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), grass
-
muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), other herbaceous
-
cat greenbrier (Smilax glauca), other herbaceous
-
longleaf woodoats (Chasmanthium sessiliflorum), other herbaceous
Transition T1-2
State 1 to 2Prevent fire and other large scale disturbance. This is a slow transition.
Transition T1-3
State 1 to 3If a fire is intense enough to kill even the fire resistant trees or if the forest is clear-cut, it will transition into a temporary grassland.
Transition T2-3
State 2 to 3Any major disturbance that kills the trees in the forest will cause it to transition to a temporary grassland.
Transition T2-7
State 2 to 7Clear trees and plant and manage for the historical fire dependent forest. These sites will never be a perfect representation of the historical community.
Transition T3-2
State 3 to 2Prevent fire and other disturbances and a forest will grow.
Transition T3-4
State 3 to 4Plant and manage for desired forest community.
Transition T3-5
State 3 to 5Plant and manage for desired forage species.
Transition T3-6
State 3 to 6Plant and manage for desired crops.
Transition T3-7
State 3 to 7Plant and manage for the historical fire dependent forest. These sites will never be a perfect representation of the historical community.
Transition T4-2
State 4 to 2If the site is not managed it could transition into a Fire Suppressed Forest.
Transition T4-3
State 4 to 3Clear the trees.
Transition T4-5
State 4 to 5Clear the trees and then plant and mange for desired forage species.
Transition T4-6
State 4 to 6Clear the trees and then plant and mange for desired crops.
Transition T4-7
State 4 to 7Clear trees and plant and manage for the historical fire dependent forest. These sites will never be a perfect representation of the historical community.
Transition T5-3
State 5 to 3Any significant natural or management disturbance can cause this shift.
Transition T5-4
State 5 to 4Clear forage species and plant and manage for desired forest community.
Transition T5-6
State 5 to 6Clear forage species and plant and manage for desired crops.
Transition T5-7
State 5 to 7Plant and manage for the historical fire dependent forest. These sites will never be a perfect representation of the historical community.
Transition T6-3
State 6 to 3Any significant natural or management disturbance can cause this shift.
Transition T6-4
State 6 to 4Clear crops and plant desired forest species.
Transition T6-5
State 6 to 5Clear crop species and plant and mange for desired forage species.
Transition T6-7
State 6 to 7Plant and manage for the historical fire dependent forest. These sites will never be a perfect representation of the historical community.
Transition T7-2
State 7 to 2Prevent fire and other large scale disturbance.
Transition T7-3
State 7 to 3If a fire is intense enough to kill even the fire resistant trees or if the forest is clear-cut, it will transition into a temporary grassland.
Transition T7-4
State 7 to 4Clear forest and plant desired tree species.
Transition T7-5
State 7 to 5Clear forest and plant and mange for desired forage species.
Transition T7-6
State 7 to 6Clear forest, plant and manage for desired crops.
Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 11. Community 4.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 12. Community 5.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 13. Community 6.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 14. Community 7.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Data collection and analysis of field data will be performed during the Verification Stage of ESD development.
Other references
Barone John A. 2005. The Historical Presence and Distribution of Prairies in the Black Belt of Mississippi and Alabama. Castanea Vol.70 No.3 (2005): 170-183. http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2179/04-25.1
Barone John A. and Jovonn G. Hill. 2007. Herbaceous Flora of Blackland Prairie Remnants in Mississippi and Western Alabama. Castanea Vol.72 No.4 (2007): 226-234. http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2179/06-34.1
Campbell, J.J.N and W.R. Seymour Jr. 2011. A Review of Native Vegetation Types in the Black Belt of Mississippi and Alabama, with Suggested Relationships to the Catenas of Soil Series. Journal of the Mississippi Academy of Sciences Vol. 56 No.2 (2011). http://www.thefreelibrary.com/A+review+of+native+vegetation+types+in+the+Black+Belt+of+Mississippi...-a0266845301
Campbell, J.J.N and W.R. Seymour Jr. 2012. The Flora of Pulliam Prairie, Chickasaw County, Mississippi: a Significant Remnant of Native Vegetation in the Black Belt Region. Journal of the Mississippi Academy of Sciences Vol. 57. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Flora-of-Pulliam-Prairie%2CChickasawCounty%2CaCampbelSeymour/3e143794339468a405d660d1b2575e6bff0e4755
Evans, R.E. 2024. Pinus echinata - Quercus stellata - (Quercus marilandica) Forest. NatureServe. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.720797/Pinus_echinata_-_Quercus_stellata_-_(Quercus_marilandica)_Forest
Gruchy, John. Restoring Native Grasslands and Bobwhite Quail In The Black Belt Prairie. Mississippi Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks. https://www.mdwfp.com/media/4199/bbp_restoration_for_onm.pdf
Leidolf, Andreas and Sidney McDaniel. 1998. A Floristic Study of Black Prairie Plant Communities at Sixteen Section Prairie, Oktibbeha County, Mississippi. Castanea 63, no.1 (1998): 51-62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4034055
McDearman, Will and Malcolm Hodges. Southeast Gulf Coastal Plain Blackland Prairie and Woodland Rapid Assessment Reference Condition Model. US Forest Service. https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/pdfs/PNVGs/Southeast/R9BKBE.pdf
Pyne, M. and R.E. Evans. 2024. Quercus stellata - Quercus marilandica - Carya (tomentosa, pallida) Upper East Gulf Coastal Plain Woodland. NatureServe. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.683601/Quercus_stellata_-_Quercus_marilandica_-_Carya_(tomentosa_pallida)_Upper_East_Gulf_Coastal_Plain_Woodland
Schotz, Al and Michael Barbour. 2009. Ecological Assessment and Terrestrial Vertebrate Surveys for Black Belt Prairies in Alabama. Auburn University. https://www.outdooralabama.com/sites/default/files/Research/SWG%20Reports/Prairie_SWG_Final_Report.compressed.pdf
Schotz A. and R. Wieland. 2024. Quercus stellata - Quercus muehlenbergii / Schizachyrium scoparium - Sorghastrum nutans Black Belt Woodland. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.684566/Quercus_stellata_-_Quercus_muehlenbergii_-_Schizachyrium_scoparium_-_Sorghastrum_nutans_Black_Belt_Woodland
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2022. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. Agriculture Handbook 296.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. The PLANTS database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC. http://plants.usda.gov (accessed 7 August 2023).Contributors
Peyton Fralick
Approval
Charles Stemmans, 5/29/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Peyton Fralick Contact for lead author Peyton Fralick Peyton.Fralick@usda.gov 662-205-3404 Date 04/22/2026 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement