Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site F133CY090AL
East Gulf Coastal Plain Upland Longleaf Pine Woodland; Xeric
Last updated: 5/02/2019
Accessed: 07/14/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Draft. A draft ecological site description is either incomplete or has not undergone quality control and quality assurance review.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Climatic features
The Southwestern portion of the Southern Coastal Plains, MLRA 133A, in Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, and Louisiana has a warm, humid climate, with fairly long summers and relatively short winters. The result is a long growing season and abundant plant growth. As you move northward in this region temperature trends lower and Precipitation is not as well distributed. This change in distribution does not imply that there is a rainy season and dry season, however, there is a change in distribution. Water is a definitive part of this landscape, largely due to the combination of low elevation and fairly abundant rainfall in most years. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 60 to 69 inches (1,524 to 1,750 millimeters) over this region and is fairly well distributed throughout the year. Rainfall typically occurs as high-intensity, convective thunderstorms during the summer. The average annual temperature is 55 to 69 degrees F (13 to 21 degrees C), increasing from north to south. The freeze-free period averages 253 days and ranges from 244 to 270 days, increasing in length from north to south.
There have been very few years when less than 50 inches of precipitation has fallen. Snow is a rarity, however, chances increase as you move Northward through the region. Growing seasons are long, typically from late February to late November. Hurricanes and tropical storms impact the climate of this region predominately in the southern areas, with some impact occurring nearly every year in some areas. However, devastating storms do not occur too often, and heavy rain is usually the biggest concern compared to wind damage. The following climatic data are averages from the weather stations listed below. Temperature and precipitation may vary considerably from that listed for each month. Site-specific weather data should be used for land management decisions. For site-specific weather conditions, obtain data from a weather station close to the site. Information can be accessed from specific weather stations.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 210-220 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 250-260 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 60-60 in Frost-free period (actual range) 200-230 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 250-260 days Precipitation total (actual range) 60-70 in Frost-free period (average) 220 days Freeze-free period (average) 250 days Precipitation total (average) 60 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) BOGALUSA [USC00160945], Bogalusa, LA
-
(2) WIGGINS [USC00229639], Wiggins, MS
-
(3) JACKSON [USC00014193], Jackson, AL
-
(4) ATMORE [USC00010402], Atmore, AL
-
(5) POPLARVILLE EXP STN [USC00227128], Poplarville, MS
-
(6) TYLERTOWN 5ESE [USC00229048], Tylertown, MS
-
(7) HATTIESBURG 5SW [USC00223887], Hattiesburg, MS
-
(8) BAY MINETTE [USC00010583], Bay Minette, AL
">Influencing water features
Soil features
Ecological dynamics
NATURESERVE_Ecological System
East Gulf Coastal Plain Interior Upland Longleaf Pine Woodland
PES name in MS contract
F133AC090AL Draft Forestland 133A East Gulf Coastal Plain Upland Longleaf Pine Woodland; Xeric (from DeSoto visit - Eustis)
NATURESERVE_Association
Xeric (Sandy or Loamy) Longleaf Pine Woodland
NATURESERVE_Association__example
Pinus palustris / Quercus laevis / Serenoa repens / Aristida condensata Woodland
Translated Name: Longleaf Pine / Turkey Oak / Saw Palmetto / Piedmont Three-awn Woodland
Common Name: East Gulf Coastal Plain Longleaf Sandhill Woodland
Unique Identifier: CEGL003588
Classification Approach: International Vegetation Classification (IVC)
Summary: This sandhill community of the East Gulf Coastal Plain of Mississippi occurs on deep, excessively drained white sand soils, mapped as Troup, Lucy, and Eustis-Lakeland complex. It is restricted in extent due to the limited size of the sand deposits which are usually surrounded by more mesic pine stands. Camp Shelby examples contain stunted, widely spaced trees with a well-developed understory of oaks above a sparse ground cover of lichens and mosses and bare white sand. The open canopy consists of Pinus palustris. The subcanopy consists of Quercus laevis, Quercus hemisphaerica, Quercus incana, and Quercus margarettae. The shrub stratum consists of Serenoa repens, Osmanthus americanus var. americanus, Vaccinium arboreum, Ilex vomitoria, Ilex opaca var. opaca, and Gelsemium sempervirens. The herb layer consists of Aristida condensata, Andropogon ternarius, Sorghastrum secundum, Chrysopsis gossypina ssp. hyssopifolia, Bulbostylis ciliatifolia, and Pityopsis aspera.State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 1
NATURALCommunity 1.1
Reference LLP WoodlandCommunity 1.2
Low Fire Frequency LLP WoodlandCommunity 1.3
Pine/Hardwood Mixed ForestCommunity 1.4
Oak HammockState 2
CULTURALCommunity 2.1
Row LLP with intact understoryCommunity 2.2
Row LLP or other Pinus spp. with disturbed understoryCommunity 2.3
Improved PastureCommunity 2.4
Row CropTransition T1
State 1 to 2purchased goods and services added to system and are now the primary driver of succession
Restoration pathway R1
State 2 to 1purchased goods and services are replaced by natural forcing factors to drive sucession
Additional community tables
Table 4. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 5. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 6. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 7. Community 1.4 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 2.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 11. Community 2.4 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Supporting information
Approval
Michelle Clendenin, 5/02/2019
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement