Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site NX118A01Y010
Calcareous Bottomland
Last updated: 1/03/2019
Accessed: 10/03/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 118A–Arkansas Valley and Ridges, Eastern Part
118A—Arkansas Valley and Ridges, Eastern Part Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) is in Arkansas (75 percent) and Oklahoma (25 percent) encompassing an area of approximately 6,755 square miles (17,510 square kilometers). The towns of Poteau and Sallisaw, OK, and Booneville, Clarksville, Fort Smith, Greenwood, and Ozark, AR, are in the western part. The Arkansas towns of Conway, Morrilton, Russellville, and Searcy are in the eastern section along with a part of Little Rock in the southeast corner. Interstate 40 passes through from east to west and parallels the northern side of the Arkansas River. The Ozark National Forest and the northern fringe of the Ouachita National Forest occur in this area as does Ft. Chaffee, Camp Joseph T. Robinson, and Little Rock Air Force Base (USDA 2006).
Most of 118A is in the Arkansas Valley Section of the Ouachita Province of the Interior Highlands. Long, narrow ridges and high flat-topped mountains capped with sandstone trend northeastward. Crests are narrow and rolling on ridges and broad and flat on mountaintops. The intervening valleys are broad and smooth. Elevation ranges from 300 ft. (90 m) on the lowest valley floors to 2,750 ft. (840 m) on the mountaintops. The Arkansas River is a major inland navigational river. It flows from the northwestern part of the MLRA, at Robert S. Kerr Lake, in Oklahoma to Little Rock in the southeast.
The ridges and valleys of 118A are underlain by slightly folded to level beds of sandstone and shale, respectively. The area principally consists of the following geologic groups: Savanna, McAlester, Hartshorne sandstone, and the upper and lower Atoka. These are of Pennsylvanian age (formed approximately 300 million years ago). The terrace deposits along the Arkansas River include a complex sequence of unconsolidated gravel, sandy gravel, sands, silty sands, silts, clayey silts, and clays. At least three terrace levels are recognized. The lowest is the youngest.Classification relationships
This ecological site is found in Major Land Resource Area 118A - the Arkansas Valley and Ridges, Eastern Part. MLRA 118A is located within Land Resource Region N - the East and Central Farming and Forest Region (USDA 2006). In addition, MLRA118A falls within area #37 of EPA Ecoregion Level III - the Arkansas Valley (USEPA 2013). The Calcareous Bottomland ecological site occurs in United States Forest Service Ecoregions -255A – the Prairie Parkland (Subtropical) Province, M222A – the Ozark Broadleaf Forest-Meadow Province, and -251E – the Prairie Parkland (Temperate) Province (Bailey 1995). This ecological site is found primarily in 37b - Arkansas River Floodplain of EPA Ecoregion IV (Woods et. al. 1996).
South-Central Interior Large Floodplain - CES202.705 and
(NatureServe 2017).Ecological site concept
The Calcareous Bottomlands ecological site occurs on floodplains, natural levees, and stream terraces formed from alluvium of mixed sedimentary geologies within EPA Ecoregion 37b - the Arkansas River Floodplains section of the Arkansas Valley and Ridges major land resource area. Potential natural vegetation is southern floodplain forest. Bottomland hardwood species including Quercus macrocarpa (bur oak), Platanus occidentalis (American sycamore), Liquidamber styraciflua (sweetgum), Salix spp. (willows), Populus deltoides (eastern cottonwood), Fraxinus pennsylvanica (green ash), Carya illinoinensis (pecan), Celtis occidentalis (hackberry), and Ulmus spp. (elm) were once extensive (Woods, Foti et. Al. 2004). The driest areas may have been dominated by oak-hickory forests. The Calcareous Bottomlands are fertile and have been widely cleared for agriculture – nearly 60 percent of the ecological site has been converted to row crops and 20 percent to pasture and hayland. Forest remains in the most frequently flooded areas. Their fertility and extensive use for agriculture distinguishes these sites from the Loamy Bottomlands. They are drier than the Poorly to Somewhat Poorly Drained Bottomland and Terraces and the Somewhat Poorly Drained Calcareous Bottomlands.
Associated sites
NX118A01Y007 Seasonally Wet Terraces and Footslopes
Similar sites
NX118AY011 Somewhat Poorly Drained Calcareous Bottomland
F119XY013AR Loamy Floodplain
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Ulmus americana
(2) Celtis laevigataShrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Legacy ID
F118AY010AR
Physiographic features
The Calcareous Bottomlands ecological site occurs on floodplains, natural levees, and stream terraces formed from alluvium of mixed sedimentary geologies within the Arkansas River Floodplains section of the Arkansas Valley and Ridges major land resource area. Elevation ranges from 120 to 180 m (approximately 390 to 590 ft.) and slopes are 0 to 3 percent. Flooding is occasional with a 5 to 50 percent chance of flooding in any year or 5 to 50 times in 100 years (USDA NSSH, 2018). Depth to the seasonal high-water table is 152 cm (60 in).
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Flood plain
(2) Stream terrace
Flooding duration Brief (2 to 7 days) Flooding frequency None to occasional Ponding frequency None Elevation 390 – 585 ft Slope 0 – 3 % Water table depth 24 – 60 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The average annual precipitation for the Arkansas Ridges and Valley, Eastern Part varies from west to east. In the western one-third of this area, average annual precipitation is 41 to 45 inches (1,040 to 1,145 millimeters). It is 45 to 61 inches (1,145 to 1,550 millimeters) in the eastern two thirds of the area. Most of the rainfall occurs as frontal storms in spring and early summer. Some high-intensity, convective thunderstorms occur in summer. Precipitation occurs as rain and snow in January and February. The average seasonal snowfall is 5 inches (125 millimeters). The average annual temperature is 58 to 62 degrees F (14 to 17 degrees C). The freeze-free period averages 240 days and ranges from 220 to 260 days. It is shortest at the higher elevations on ridges. The moderate precipitation generally is adequate for crops and pasture. In the uplands, water for livestock is obtained from small ponds on individual farms. In the valleys, springs, small ponds, and perennial streams provide water for most uses (USDA 2006).
Data for mean annual precipitation, frost-free and freeze-free periods and monthly precipitation for this ecological site are shown below. The original data used in developing the tables was obtained from the USDA-NRCS National Water & Climate Center (2015) climate information database for 3 weather stations throughout MLRA 118A in proximity to this ecological site. All climate station monthly averages for maximum and minimum temperature and precipitation were then added together and averaged to make this table.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 190-200 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 200-220 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 50-50 in Frost-free period (actual range) 190-200 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 200-230 days Precipitation total (actual range) 50-50 in Frost-free period (average) 200 days Freeze-free period (average) 210 days Precipitation total (average) 50 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 7 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) LAKE EUFAULA [USC00344975], Checotah, OK
-
(2) WEBBERS FALLS 5 WSW [USC00349445], Webbers Falls, OK
-
(3) FT SMITH RGNL AP [USW00013964], Fort Smith, AR
">Influencing water features
This site is influenced by flooding during the year.
Soil features
The soil series associated with this site are: Wabbaseka, Severn, Roxana, Redport, Oklared, Norwood, Gallion, Coushatta, and Caspiana. They formed in calcareous alluvium from sedimentary rock. They are deep to very deep and typically do not have a root limiting layer within 203 cm (80 in) of the soil surface. The drainage class is moderately well to well drained with the depth to the seasonal high-water table occurring within 61 to 152 cm (24 to 60 in). The surface texture ranges from fine sandy loam to silty clay loam, while subsoils tend to be loamy. Permeability ranges from very slow to moderately rapid and soils are slightly acid to moderately alkaline with pH ranging from 6.5 to 8.2. Soils data was obtained from the Natural Resources and Conservation Service (NRCS) National Soils Information System database (USDA 2015).
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Alluvium – sedimentary rock
Surface texture (1) Silt loam
(2) Silty clay loam
(3) Fine sandy loam
(4) Loamy fine sand
Drainage class Moderately well drained to well drained Permeability class Very slow to moderately rapid Soil depth 80 in Available water capacity
(0-40in)5.5 – 8.4 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)0 – 15 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 1 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)Not specified Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.5 – 8.2 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)1 – 2 % Ecological dynamics
The information in this section including the State and Transition Model (STM) was developed from several sources, including NatureServe’s Ecological Systems of the United States (NatureServe 2009), Landfire’s Biophysical Settings and Existing Vegetation Type layers (Landfire 2010; Landfire 2013), the Official Soil Series Descriptions (Soil Survey Staff 2018), scientific literature, and ecological site descriptions from adjoining areas. The information presented is representative of very complex vegetation communities. Key indicator plants, animals and ecological processes are described to help inform land management decisions. Plant communities will differ across the MLRA because of the naturally occurring variability in weather, soils, and aspect. The reference plant community is not necessarily the management goal. The species lists are representative and are not botanical descriptions of all species occurring, or potentially occurring, on this site. They are not intended to cover every situation or the full range of conditions, species, and responses for the site.
The Calcareous Bottomlands of the Arkansas Valley and Ridges Eastern Part are on floodplains and stream terraces that may experience frequent flooding. The reference forest is part of the South-Central Interior Large Floodplain system as defined by NatureServe (NatureServe 2009) and the southern floodplain forest (Woods et. al. 2004). Species typical of these bottomland hardwood forests are: Ulmus Americana (American elm), Celtis laevigata (sugarberry), Fraxinus pennsylvanica (green ash), Carya illinoinensis (pecan), and Quercus spp. (oaks). Most areas have been cleared for pastureland, hay land, and cropland. Remaining forest stands most likely have been logged, with desirable species removed.
Both historically and today, these woodlands are structurally and compositionally diverse, with occasional tree fall gaps and natural mortality providing opportunities for regeneration of over story species. Periodic disturbances from flooding, fire, wind or ice as well as grazing by native large herbivores maintained the woodland structure and diverse ground flora species. Long disturbance-free periods allowed an increase in both the density of trees and the abundance of shade tolerant species.
Today, nearly 60 percent of the Calcareous Bottomlands have been converted to cropland. Historic rangeland classification is the Loamy Bottomland (Brinlee, 1975). Remaining forests play an important role as a source of food and shelter for migrating birds. In addition, they are very important in stream bank stabilization.
Re-establishment of these woodlands is important for stream quality and stream health, and as critical habitat for migratory birds. Planting of later successional species on the appropriate landscape position and soils and introducing prescribed fire has proven to be an effective means for restoration.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagramMore interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textT1A - Fire suppression > 20 years; repeated timber harvests T1B - Land clearing; brush management; prescribed grazing; prescribed burning T1C - Land clearing; conservation tillage; conservation cropping system; drainage installation R2A - Forest stand improvement; brush management; prescribed fire 3-10 years; herbaceous weed control T2A - Land clearing; brush management; prescribed grazing; prescribed burning T2B - Land clearing; conservation tillage; conservation cropping system; drainage installation T3A - No fire, no brush management T3B - Conservation tillage; conservation cropping system or pasture and hay land planting. R4A - Range Planting, Herbaceous Weed Control, Prescribed Grazing; Prescribed Burning. Possibility of return to other plant communities depends on soil integrity and intensive restoration. State 1 submodel, plant communities
1.1A - Fire and grazing 1.2A - Fire suppression State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 1
ReferenceThe reference state refers to what is presumed to be the historic plant community that existed prior to European settlement. Currently, detailed vegetation field data is lacking for the Calcareous Bottomland ecological site. The structure of the State and Transition model is adapted from surrounding MLRA’s and is assumed to be similar to other bottomland ecological sites.
Community 1.1
Bottomland Oak – Hickory Woodland 10 to 50% canopyForest and woodlands are dominated by Quercus phellos (willow oak) and Quercus nigra (water oak). Carya ovata (shagbark hickory) is a common associate. A wide variety of other species may be present or dominate including Liquidambar styraciflua (sweetgum), Quercus macrocarpa (bur oak), Quercus nuttalii (Nuttal oak) and Carya cordiformis (bitternut hickory). Ulmus Americana (American elm), Fraxinus pennsylvanica (green ash), Celtis laevigata (sugarberry), Platanus occidentalis (American sycamore), Diospyros virginiana (persimmon), Carya illinoinensis (pecan), Nyssa sylvatica (blackgum), and Carpinus caroliniana (ironwood) are also commonly present. Elymus canadensis (Canada wildrye) and Elymus virginicus (Virginia wildrye) are present as understory grasses that can tolerate the shade. Periodic disturbances from flooding, fire, wind or ice as well as grazing by native large herbivores maintained the woodland structure and diverse ground flora species. Long disturbance-free periods allowed an increase in both the density of trees and the abundance of shade tolerant species.
Community 1.2
Tallgrass Prairie <10% tree canopyParts of this ecological site were also once prairie, but very few remnants remain. Where prairies still exist, they are dominated by grasses, particularly Andropogon gerardii (big bluestem), Schizachyrium scoparium (little bluestem), Sorghastrum nutans (Indiangrass), and Panicum virgatum (switchgrass). All prairie communities have been drastically reduced by fire suppression and conversion to agriculture, and few remnants in good condition remain, mostly in the western part of the region.
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2It is assumed that fire and grazing is the control mechanism between the woodland state and the more open prairies.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1Fire suppression will convert the prairie state to the woodland state.
State 2
Fire-suppressed-Logged WoodlandComposition is altered from the reference state depending on tree selection during harvest. This state will slowly shift to more shade tolerant species. Without periodic canopy disturbance, stem density and fire intolerant species, like hackberry, will increase in abundance.
Community 2.1
Sweetgum-Cottonwood Floodplain Forest >50% CanopyThis state has been subjected to very selective timber harvests. While these forested areas may resemble the reference state, the diversity of tree species has been selectively (removal of oak and walnut) altered. Platanus occidentalis (American sycamore), Liquidambar styraciflua (sweetgum), Salix spp. (willows), Populus deltoides (eastern cottonwood), Fraxinus pennsylvanica (green ash) may be the dominant tree species.
State 3
Managed GrasslandIn this state, the forest and woodland has been converted to an open grassland dominated by tallgrasses and forbs. However, without proper management, this state may return to a woodland or shrubland.
Community 3.1
Tallgrass-MidgrassAndropogon gerardii (big bluestem), Panicum virgatum (switchgrass), Sorghastrum nutans (Indiangrass), Tripsacum dactyloides (Eastern gamagrass), and Spartina pectinata (prairie cordgrass) are the principal species. Elymus canadensis (Canada wildrye) and Elymus virginicus (Virginia wildrye) may be present along with Sporobolus spp. (dropseed), Arundinaria gigantean (switchcane), and Chasmanthium latifolium (Indian woodoats). Some woody species may be present including Juglans nigra (black walnut), Carya illinoinensis (pecan), Ulmus americana (American elm), and Fraxinus pennsylvanica (green ash). Fire is an important aspect in maintaining the health of upland prairies and could be an important factor in managing tallgrass species.
State 4
ConvertedConversion of other states to cropland or pasture has been common.
Community 4.1
Cropland/Tame PastureTypical crops grown on this site include soybeans, wheat, alfalfa, cotton, corn, and grain sorghum. Pastures are planted to non-native cool season species such as Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass) and Schedonorus arundinaceus (tall fescue). A return to the reference state may be impossible, requiring a very long-term series of management options and transitions.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2It is presumed that in the absence of fire, the woodland and tallgrass dominated vegetation community would transition to a closed canopy forest dominated by trees and shrubs.
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3This conversion takes place with land clearing, brush management, prescribed grazing, and possibly prescribed fire. Maintenance is required with brush management to prevent trees and shrubs from establishing.
Conservation practices
Brush Management Prescribed Burning Land Clearing Prescribed Grazing Transition T1C
State 1 to 4This conversion takes place with land clearing, conservation tillage and then planting of agricultural commodity crops or cool season pasture grasses. Maintenance is required with brush management to prevent trees and shrubs from establishing. Drainage installation might be required depending on the agricultural commodity to be grown.
Conservation practices
Land Clearing Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1Through intensive chemical brush management, and/or prescribed burning and grazing, the forested state might transition back to a prairie or woodland state dominated by tallgrasses or midgrasses with some trees and shrubs.
Conservation practices
Brush Management Prescribed Burning Forest Stand Improvement Herbaceous Weed Control Transition T2A
State 2 to 3This conversion takes place with land clearing, brush management, prescribed grazing, and possibly prescribed fire. Maintenance is required with brush management to prevent trees and shrubs from establishing.
Conservation practices
Brush Management Prescribed Burning Land Clearing Prescribed Grazing Transition T2B
State 2 to 4This conversion takes place with land clearing, conservation tillage and then planting of agricultural commodity crops or cool season pasture grasses. Maintenance is required with brush management to prevent trees and shrubs from establishing.
Conservation practices
Brush Management Land Clearing Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed Transition T3A
State 3 to 2Fire suppression, cessation of brush management.
Transition T3B
State 3 to 4This conversion takes place with land clearing, conservation tillage and then planting of agricultural commodity crops or cool season pasture grasses. Maintenance is required with brush management to prevent trees and shrubs from establishing.
Conservation practices
Forage and Biomass Planting Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed Restoration pathway R4A
State 4 to 3The potential for this converted state to revert to another state varies greatly from site to site. It is dependent upon multiple factors including length of time in production, soil integrity, planned restoration methods, and precipitation patterns. Consult with local conservationists to develop a site-specific restoration plan. Practices that would be implemented include: range planting, herbaceous weed control, prescribed grazing, and prescribed burning. Possibility of return to other plant communities depends on soil integrity and intensive restoration. Conversion back to any semblance of the reference state is unlikely.
Conservation practices
Prescribed Burning Range Planting Prescribed Grazing Herbaceous Weed Control Additional community tables
Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 6. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 7. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 4.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
Numerous animal and bird species utilize this site as habitat. Small mammals, song birds, predators, along with traditional game species such as turkey, bobwhite quail, whitetail deer, mule deer, and others frequent this site. The combination of grasses, forbs, trees and woody shrubs that occur in the presumed historic plant community provide suitable habitat for all the above species, at least at some time during the year. Surface water, in the form of ponds, springs, and flowing streams provide water for species that require daily watering. Many different species move in and out of the site. Predators such as coyotes and bobcats may utilize the site for hunting prey and hiding during the day.
The Plant Preferences by Animal Kind table contained herein provides general guidance as to animal preferences for plant species. It also reveals possible competition between kinds of herbivores for various plants. Grazing preference changes from time to time, especially between seasons, and between animal kinds and classes. Grazing preference does not reflect the ecological status of the plant within the plant community.Hydrological functions
Calcareous Bottomlands are subject to frequent or occasional overflow from the streams and runoff from hillsides.
Recreational uses
Hunting, Fishing, Camping, Hiking, Bird Watching, Photography, Horseback Riding, etc..
Wood products
Several species of trees are found on this site, but there is seldom any harvesting of wood products other than firewood for cooking, heat and fence posts.
Other products
Fruit from blackberries, grapes, plums, and pecans are harvested.
Supporting information
Other references
Bailey, Robert G. 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States 2d ed. Rev. and expanded (1st ed. 1980). Misc. Publ. No. 1391 (rev.), Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service. 108p. with separate map at 1:7,500,000.
Brabander, J. J., R. E. Masters, and R. M. Short. 1985. Bottomland hardwoods of eastern Oklahoma: a special study of their status, trends, and values. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Tulsa.
Brinlee, R. C. 1975. Soil Survey of Haskell County, Oklahoma. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station.
LANDFIRE: LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings. (2010, January 01 - last update). U.S. Department of Interior, Geological Survey. [Online]. Available: http://landfire.cr.usgs.gov/viewer/ [2015, June 5].
LANDFIRE: LANDFIRE Existing Vegetation Type Layer. (2013, June – last update). U.S. Department of Interior, Geological Survey. [Online]. Available: https://landfire.cr.usgs.gov/viewer/[2015, June 5].
NatureServe. 2009. International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological
Classifications. NatureServe Central Databases. Arlington, VA, U.S.A. Data current as of
06 February 2009.
NatureServe 2017. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://explorer.natureserve.org. (Accessed: June 2017).
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Official Soil Series Descriptions. Available online. Accessed [07/11/2018]. https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/osdname.asp
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2015. National Soils Information System.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Water and Climate Center, http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov, Accessed February 2015.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 accessed (4/23/2018)
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296, 669p.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2013, Level III ecoregions of the continental United States: Corvallis, Oregon, U.S. EPA National health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, map scale 1:7,500,000, http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/level_iii_iv.htm.
Woods A.J., Foti, T.L., Chapman, S.S., Omernik, J.M., Wise, J.A., Murray, E.O., Prior, W.L., Pagan, J.B., Jr., Comstock, J.A., and Radford, M., 2004, Ecoregions of Arkansas (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,000,000).
Woods, A.J., J.O. Omernik, D.D. Brown, C.W. Kiilsgaard. 1996. Level IV Ecoregions of EPA Region 3. US Environmental Protection Agency National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon. Map scale 1:250,000.Contributors
Yuri Plowden, Ecological Site Specialist, Mill Hall, PA
Kevin Godsey, Soil Scientist, Springfield, MOApproval
Nels Barrett, 1/03/2019
Acknowledgments
Doug Wallace and Fred Young at Missouri NRCS State office, personal communication and sharing of state and transition models. Future Ecological Site Development and Testing Plan Future work to validate the information in this Provisional Ecological Site Description is needed. This will include field activities to collect low, medium and high intensity sampling, soil correlations, and analysis of that data. Annual field reviews should be done by soil scientists and vegetation specialists. A final field review, peer review, quality control, and quality assurance reviews of the ESD will be needed to produce the final correlated document.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
