Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
-
Transition T1A
Large scale disturbance
More details -
Transition T1C
Clearing of site; agricultural production - forage
More details -
Transition T1B
Clearing of site; agricultural production -row crops.
More details -
Restoration pathway R2A
Restoration inputs such as planting, brush control, prescribed fire, and timber stand improvement.
More details -
Transition T2B
Clearing; agricultural production - forage
More details -
Transition T2C
Clearing; agricultural production - row crops
More details -
Transition T3B
Abandonment of agricultural practices
More details -
Transition T3A
Site preparation and tillage, seeding, weed control, cropland management
More details -
Transition T4A
Transition site to forage production; seeding; weed/brush control; pasture management
More details -
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The historic reference state for this ecological site was an old-growth riverine deciduous forest with maximum trees ages from 100-300 years old. Sites were disturbed periodically via flooding but the overall, these communities were stable and long-lived. Numerous species were co-dominant on these sites including American sycamore, black walnut, American elm, ash, basswood, maple, and boxelder. Swamp white oak, bur oak, Shumard oak, pin oak, northern red oak, white oak, shellbark hickory and bitternut hickory were also present on sites with less frequent or no flooding.
Historically these sites were influenced by flooding, wind damage, ice storms, and grazing by native undulates. Few undisturbed sites remain today as anthropogenic activities have altered site hydrology and ecology.
Dominant plant species
American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), tree
black walnut (Juglans nigra), tree
American elm (Ulmus americana), tree
northern spicebush (Lindera benzoin), shrub
pawpaw (Asimina triloba), shrub
Virginia wildrye (Elymus virginicus), grass
jumpseed (Polygonum virginianum), grass
Canadian clearweed (Pilea pumila), grass
Jack in the pulpit (Arisaema triphyllum), grass
Submodel
Description
Most remaining Loamy Floodplain Forest sites have been altered due to disturbances including hydrological modification, clearing, logging, grazing, and development. Remaining wooded sites may be in various stages of succession with a variety of trees depending on seed sources and severity of disturbance. Common trees on site include American sycamore, hickory, white ash, green ash, boxelder, sugar maple, American elm, and maples. On many sites, the oak, walnut, and hickory have been cut and may be rare or absent.
Introduction of non-native plant species to these sites is not uncommon, and without management control, these invasive plants will fundamentally alter the plant community.
Many disturbed Loamy Floodplain sites get transitioned to Pastureland (State 3) or cropland (State 4).
Dominant plant species
maple (Acer), tree
boxelder (Acer negundo), tree
ash (Fraxinus), tree
Submodel
Description
A portion of these sites have been converted to pastureland or forage production. Species selection will depend upon the objectives and goals of the landowner; however, commonly planted grasses include tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), brome (Bromus spp.), white clover (Trifolium repens) and red clover (Trifolium pratense). Species health and productivity are determined by the management and long-term overgrazing on some sites has caused soil erosion and compaction.
Dominant plant species
tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), grass
brome (Bromus), grass
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), grass
white clover (Trifolium repens), grass
red clover (Trifolium pratense), grass
Submodel
Description
Hydrological modifications such as ditching and tiling are often used on these sites to increase crop production. Common crops include corn (Zea mays), soybeans (Glycine max), and occasionally winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Some landowners choose to convert sites to cool season grasses for a period before resuming cropland production.
A return to the historical Reference State from State 4 is unlikely, if not impossible.
Submodel
Mechanism
Severe disturbances will transition this site to State 2.
Mechanism
Site is transitioned to an agricultural site focused on forage production. Management inputs would include clearing, site preparation, seeding and weed/brush control.
Mechanism
Site is transitioned to an agricultural site focused on row crop production. Management inputs would include clearing, site preparation, seeding and weed control. Hydrological modifications are often installed to aid in drainage.
Restoration pathway R2A
Restoration inputs such as planting, brush control, prescribed fire, and timber stand improvement.
Mechanism
Restoration would require long-term management inputs including planting of desired species, brush control, timber stand improvement, and control of non-native vegetation.
Mechanism
Site is cleared and forage/pasture production is initiated. Management inputs would include tree/shrub removal, site preparation, seeding, and weed/brush control.
Mechanism
Site is cleared and row crop production is initiated. Management inputs would include tree/shrub removal, site preparation, seeding, and weed control.
Mechanism
Site is abandoned and slowly would transition to a wooded state dominated by deciduous trees. Species on site would depend on the severity and length of disturbance and available seed sources.
Transition T3A
Site preparation and tillage, seeding, weed control, cropland management
Mechanism
Management inputs that transition a site from pasture or forage production to a site that is utilized for row crop production.
Model keys
Briefcase
Add { ecological sites } and { Major Land Resource Areas } to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase
(
) icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement