Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R102BY019SD
Closed Depression
Last updated: 2/01/2024
Accessed: 07/02/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 102B–Till Plains
The Till Plains (102B) is located within the Western Lake Section of the Central Lowland Province of the Interior Plains. It is entirely in South Dakota, encompassing 2,215 square miles (Figure 1). The elevation ranges from 1,140 to 1,880 feet. The MLRA is characterized by glaciated, nearly level to hilly plains populated by stagnation and end moraines, glacial outwash terraces, and floodplains as the major landforms. The dominant parent materials are silty drift, glacial till, glacial outwash, and alluvium. (USDA-NRCS, 2006)
The dominant soil order in this MLRA is Mollisols. The soils in the area dominantly have a mesic temperature regime, a udic ustic moisture regime and mixed or smectitic mineralogy. They generally are very deep, well drained to poorly drained, and clayey or loamy. This area is in the western area of the tall grass prairie and supports big bluestem (Andropogon gerardi), little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), porcupine grass (Hesperostipa spartea), and green needlegrass (Nassella viridula) as the dominant native species. Cattails (Typha), prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinate), bulrush (Cyperaceae) and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) are commonly found on the poorly drained soils. (USDA-NRCS, 2006).Classification relationships
Hierarchical Framework Relationships:
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): Till Plains (102B) (USDA-NRCS, 2006)
USFS Subregions: North Central Glaciated Plains Section (251B); Outer Coteau des Prairies (251Bb); Yankton Hills and Valleys (251Bf); Northwest Iowa Plains (251Bd); (Cleland et al., 2007).
US EPA Level IV Ecoregion: Prairie Coteau (46k); James River Lowland (46n); Loess Prairies (47a); Big Sioux Basin (46m) - (USEPA, 2013)Ecological site concept
The Closed Depression ecological site typically occurs in slight depressions on nearly level slopes in the upland areas. Soils are poorly drained and may have a claypan (columnar structure) within six inches of the soil surface or an abrupt texture change within 12 inches of the soil surface. Permeability is very slow due to the claypan (columnar structure) or the clayey subsoil and the site may pond water four to eight weeks in the spring of the year. Ponded water conditions, very slow permeability and/or a natric horizon strongly influences the soil-water-plant relationship. The natric horizon in the subsoil typically has a Sodium Absorption Ratio (SAR) greater than 13 or an Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) greater than 15.
Vegetation in the Reference State includes western wheatgrass and common spikerush. The site my become degraded due to change in disturbance regime, and vegetation may shift to community dominated by foxtail barley, inland saltgrass, and bareground.Associated sites
R102BY010SD Loamy
These sites occur on upland areas. The soils are well drained and have less than 40 percent clay in the surface and subsoil. The central concept soil series are Egan and Wentworth, but other series are included.
R102BY020SD Loamy Overflow
These sites occur in upland swales. The Soils are moderately well drained, which have water flow into and over or through the site. The central concept soil series are Trent and Viborg, but other series are included.
Similar sites
R102BY004SD Wet Meadow
The Wet Meadow site occurs in a similar landscape position and does not have a claypan (columnar structure) within 6 inches of the soil surface. The Wet Meadow site will have more wetland species and more cordgrass than the Closed Depression site.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous (1) Pascopyrum smithii
(2) Eleocharis palustrisPhysiographic features
This site typically occurs on nearly level depressions on upland areas.
Figure 1. Site Distribution Map for the Closed Depression site in MLRA 102B.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Climatic features
Major Land Resource Area 102B is considered to have a continental climate with cold winters and relatively hot summers, low to moderate humidity, light rainfall, and much sunshine. Extremes in temperature may also abound. The climate is the result of the location of this MLRA near the geographic center of North America. There are few natural barriers on the Northern Great Plains and air masses move freely across the plains and account for rapid changes in temperature.
Annual precipitation typically ranges from 24 to 26 inches per year. The average annual temperature is about 46°F. January is the coldest month with average temperatures ranging from about 14°F (Wentworth 2 WNW, South Dakota, to about 18°F (Canton 4 WNW, SD). July is the warmest month with temperatures averaging from about 72°F (Wentworth 2 WNW, SD), to about 73°F (Canton 4 WNW, SD). The range of normal average monthly temperatures between the coldest and warmest months is about 57°F. This large annual range attests to the continental nature of the climate of this area. Hourly winds are estimated to average about 11 miles per hour (mph) annually, ranging from about 13 mph during the spring to about 10 mph during the summer. Daytime winds are generally stronger than nighttime and occasional strong storms may bring brief periods of high winds with gusts to more than 50 mph.
Growth of cool-season plants begins in early to mid-March, slowing or ceasing in late June. Warm-season plants begin growth about mid-May and continue to early or mid-September. Green-up of cool-season plants may occur in September and October when adequate soil moisture is present.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 120-130 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 140-140 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 30 in Frost-free period (actual range) 120-130 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 140-140 days Precipitation total (actual range) 30-30 in Frost-free period (average) 130 days Freeze-free period (average) 140 days Precipitation total (average) 30 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 7 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) WENTWORTH 2.5 WNW [USC00399042], Wentworth, SD
-
(2) MADISON 2SE [USC00395090], Madison, SD
-
(3) MONTROSE 8N [USC00395738], Montrose, SD
-
(4) CANTON [USC00391392], Canton, SD
-
(5) CENTERVILLE 6 SE [USC00391579], Beresford, SD
">Influencing water features
No riparian features are directly associated with this site.
Soil features
The Closed Depression site typically occurs in slight depressions on nearly level slopes in the upland areas. Soils are poorly drained and may have a claypan (columnar structure) within six inches of the soil surface. The central concept soil series is Hoven. Note: This ecological site description will only be used for minor soil components in MLRA 102B.
Ecological dynamics
The information in this Ecological Site Description, including the state-and-transition model (STM), was developed based on historical data, current field data, professional experience, and a review of the scientific literature. As a result, all possible scenarios or plant species may not be included. Key indicator plant species, disturbances, and ecological processes are described to inform land management decisions.
The site which is located in the Till Plains Region developed under Northern Great Plains climatic conditions and included natural influence of large herding herbivores and occasional fire. Changes will occur in the plant communities due to weather fluctuations and management actions. Under adverse impacts, a relatively rapid decline in vegetative vigor and composition can occur. Under favorable conditions the site has the potential to resemble the Reference State. Interpretations for this site are based primarily on the 1.1 Reference Plant Community Phase. This community phase and the Reference State have been determined by study of rangeland relic areas, areas protected from excessive disturbance, and areas under long-term rotational grazing regimes. Trends in plant community dynamics ranging from heavily grazed to lightly grazed areas, seasonal use pastures, and historical accounts also have been considered. Plant community phases, states, transitional pathways, and thresholds have been determined through similar studies and experience.
This site is very sensitive to precipitation fluctuations from year to year. With above average precipitation the site becomes very wet, leading to a much different plant community than what would be present with average to below average precipitation. In dry years, plant density becomes very low. The two plant communities influenced strongly by precipitation alone, Western Wheatgrass-Common Spikerush Plant Community Subphase and Common Spikerush-Pale Dock Plant Community Subphase make up the natural fluctuation of what could be considered the 1.1 Reference Plant Community Phase.
Following the state-and-transition diagram are narratives for each of the described states and community phases. These may not represent every possibility, but they are the most prevalent and repeatable states and community phases. The associated plant composition tables have been developed from the best available knowledge at the time of this revision. As more data are collected, some of these community phases and states may be revised or removed, and new ones may be added. The main purpose for including the descriptions here is to capture the current knowledge and experience at the time of this revision.
The following is a diagram that illustrates the common plant community phases that can occur on the site and the transition and community pathways between them. The ecological processes will be discussed in more detail in the plant community descriptions following the diagram.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
Figure 8. State-And-Transition Model and Legend for the Closed Depression site in MLRA 102B.
Figure 9. Matrix for the Closed Depression site in MLRA 102B.
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
T1A & T1B - Heavy continuous grazing, invasion, T2A - Long term prescribed grazing State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference StateThe Reference State represents the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of this ecological site (ES). This state was dominated by cool-season grasses, with warm-season grasses being subdominant. Before European settlement in North America, the primary disturbance mechanisms for this site in the Reference condition included periods of below and above average precipitation, periodic fire, and herbivory by insects and large ungulates. Timing of fires and herbivory coupled with weather events dictated the dynamics that occurred within the natural range of variability. Wheatgrass species can decline and a corresponding increase in foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum), short, warm-season grasses and forbs would will occur. Under extended periods of disturbance, the main change is a reduction in vigor and production and an increase in bare ground and forb composition.
Interpretations are based primarily on the 1.1 Reference Plant Community Phase, which are also considered to be climax. This plant community evolved with grazing by large herbivores and occasional fire, as well as, periodic flooding and drying, and can be maintained with prescribed grazing, prescribed burning, or areas receiving occasional short periods of rest or deferment. This plant community phase has two sub-phases, just referred to as plant communities here. These sub-phases are mainly driven by precipitation and flooding and drying sequences.Community 1.1
Reference CommunityCommunity Sub-phase 1.1 Western Wheatgrass-Common Spikerush – Interpretations are based primarily on the 1.1 Western Wheatgrass-Common Spikerush Plant Community Sub-phase (this is also considered to be Reference). Following several years of above average precipitation, the plant community stabilizes and becomes dominated with perennial grasses such as western wheatgrass and common spikerush. Other grasses and grass-likes present include Nuttall’s alkaligrass (Puccinellia nuttalliana), sedge (Carex), rush (Juncus), slender wheatgrass (Elymus trachcaulus). The occurrence of forbs will be considerably lower, including some species such as American licorice (Glycyrrhiza lepidota), curlytop knotweed (Polygonum lapathifolium), Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum), Pursh seepweed (Suaeda calceoliformis), and western dock (Rumex aquaticus). The plant community is made up of about 80 to 90 percent grasses and grass-likes, and about 10 to 20 percent forbs.
Community Subphase 1.1 Common Spikerush-Pale Dock – Interpretations are based primarily on the 1.1 Common Spikerush-Pale Dock Plant Community Subphase (this is also considered to be climax). This plant community often occurs after a period of higher precipitation that follows an extended dry cycle. Grasses and grass-likes commonly occurring include common spikerush, sedge, rush, foxtail barley, western wheatgrass, and bluegrasses. The forbs commonly found include pale dock, western dock, mint (Mentha), Pursh seepweed, lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), knotweed (Polygonum), evening-primrose (Oenothera), buttercup (Ranunculus), and New England aster (Symphyotrichum novae-angliae). The plant community is made up of about five to 10 percent grasses, 30 to 40 percent grass-likes, and about 50 to 60 percent forbs.
Precipitation cycles will shift this community between the 1.1 Western Wheatgrass-Common Spikerush Plant Communtity Subphase and the 1.1 Common Spikerush-Pale Dock Plant Communtity Subphase. After several years of above average precipitation, the plant community stabilizes and perennial grasses and western wheatgrass will dominate the site with few grass-likes and forbs; and in the instance of higher precipitation received after extended years of drought, there will be an increase in the grass-likes and forbs components.Community 1.2
Western Wheatgrass-Inland SaltgrassThis plant community is the result of heavy, continuous grazing. Repeated defoliation depletes stored carbohydrates resulting in weakening and eventual death of the most palatable grasses. Lack of litter and reduced plant vigor result in higher soil temperatures, poor water infiltration rates, high evapotranspiration, and increased percolation of the high water table, which increases salt concentrations on the surface. This gives inland saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) and other salt tolerant species a competitive advantage over less tolerant species.
Inland saltgrass drastically increases and competes with western wheatgrass as the dominant species. Other grass and grass-like species present include Nuttall’s alkaligrass, plains bluegrass (Poa arida), common spikerush, needle Spikerush (Eleocharis acicularis), and other sedges (Cyperaceae) and rushes (Juncaceae). Early cool-season grasses including foxtail barley, fowl bluegrass (Poa palustris), and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa Pratensis) begin to invade. Forbs that will invade are curly dock (Rumex crispus) and cocklebur (Xanthium). Common forbs to the site include lambsquarters, Pennsylvania smartweed, curlytop knotweed, plantain (Plantago), and povertyweed (Iva axillaris).
This plant community is relatively stable and well adapted to increased salinity. Plant vigor, litter, frequency, and production have decreased. The biological integrity, water, and nutrient cycles of this plant community are becoming impaired. This plant community is less productive than the 1.1 Reference Plant Community Phase.Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2Heavy, continuous grazing (grazing at full to heavy levels for extended portions of the growing season without adequate recovery periods) will shift this community to the 1.2 Western Wheatgrass-Inland Saltgrass Plant Community.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1Prescribed grazing, and/or prescribed burning returned to normal disturbance regime levels and frequencies, or periodic light to moderate grazing will convert this plant community to the 1.1 Reference Plant Community Phase.
State 2
Native Invaded StateThis state represents the range of variability that exists with reduced vigor and production of the dominant species as a result of grazing-induced disturbance and the introduction of non-native species. This state is dominated by cool-season grasses. It can be found on areas that are impacted by extended periods of heavy, continuous grazing. Grazing tolerant species become dominant, and non-native species are present.
Community 2.1
Foxtail Barley-Inland SaltgrassThis plant community developed with heavy, continuous grazing where adequate recovery periods between grazing events were not allowed. Patches of inland saltgrass sod are typical and foxtail barley and fowl bluegrass are well distributed throughout the community. Nuttall’s alkaligrass and western wheatgrass have been greatly reduced in production and vigor, but may persist in remnant amounts. This plant community is resistant to change due to the grazing tolerance of inland saltgrass and increased surface salts. A significant amount of production and diversity has been lost when compared to the 1.1 Reference Plant Community Phase. Loss of key cool-season grasses and increased bare ground have negatively impacted energy flow and nutrient cycling. Water infiltration is reduced significantly due to the massive shallow root system “root pan,” characteristic of inland saltgrass and increased bare ground.
It will take a long time to bring this plant community back to the Reference State (State 1) with management alone. Renovation (mechanical and chemical inputs) is typically not effective due to high salt content of the soil and saltgrass persistence.Community 2.2
Curly Dock-Foxtail BarleyThis plant community can be reached with heavy, continuous grazing coupled with compaction due to grazing when the soil is saturated. This plant community can also result from long-term ponding and occasional subsequent drying, as when this site is developed for a water source. The dominant vegetation includes pioneer annual grasses, forbs, invaders, and early successional biennial and perennial species. Grasses may include foxtail barley, which may become dominant, along with fowl bluegrass, Nuttall’s alkaligrass, and western wheatgrass.
The dominant forbs include curly dock, curlycup gumweed (Grindelia squarrosa), kochia (Bassia scoparia), cocklebur, and other early successional salt tolerant species. The community is susceptible to non-native species due to severe soil disturbances and the relatively high percent of bare ground. This plant community is resistant to change as long as soil disturbance or severe vegetation defoliation persist, thus holding back secondary plant succession. Secondary succession is highly variable, depending upon availability and diversity of a viable seed bank of higher successional species within the existing plant community and neighboring plant communities.Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2Heavy, continuous grazing which includes herbivory at moderate to heavy levels at the same time of year each year without adequate recovery periods, or during periods of below normal precipitation shifts this community to the 2.2 Curly Dock-Foxtail Barley Plant Community Phase.
Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1Prescribed grazing (alternating season of use and providing adequate recovery periods) or periodic light to moderate grazing will convert this plant community to the 2.1 Foxtail Barley-Inland Saltgrass Plant Community Phase.
Transition T1A & T1B
State 1 to 2Heavy, continuous grazing (stocking levels well above carrying capacity for extended portions of the growing season, and often at the same time of year each year, typically beginning early in the season) and invasion of non-native plant species will convert the 1.1 Common Spikerush-Pale Dock Plant Communtity Subphase within the Reference State (State 1) to the 2.2 Curly Dock-Foxtail Barley Plant Community Phase within the Native/Invaded State (State 2). Heavy, continuous grazing (stocking levels well above carrying capacity for extended portions of the growing season, and often at the same time of year each year, typically beginning early in the season) and invasion of non-native plant species will convert the 1.2 Western Wheatgrass-Inland Saltgrass Plant Community Phase within the Reference State (State 1) to the 2.1 Foxtail Barley-Inland Saltgrass Plant Community Phase within the Native/Invaded State (State 2).
Restoration pathway T2A
State 2 to 1Long-term prescribed grazing (moderate stocking levels coupled with adequate recovery periods, or other grazing systems such as high-density, low-frequency intended to treat specific species dominance, or periodic light to moderate stocking levels possibly including periodic rest) may lead the Native/Invaded State (State 2) over a threshold to the Reference State (State 1).
Additional community tables
Table 4. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 5. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 6. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 7. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Other information
Ecological Site Correlation Issues and Questions:
• Note: the R102BY019SD Closed Depression ecological site description was established to be used for minor components only in MLRA 102B.
• Note: Worthing silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes (national symbol 2tlch) is currently a MLRA 55C map unit and has a minor component of Hoven (Closed Depression ESD). This MLRA map unit is currently used in MLRA 53C, 55C, 102B and 102C. The Hoven soil does not exist and should not be used in MLRA 102B and 102C. A future project will be needed to split correlate and designate the correct MLRA map unit for each MLRA.
• Note: Worthing silty clay loam, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes (national symbol 2tlcj) is currently a MLRA 55C map unit and has a minor component of Hoven (Closed Depression ESD). This MLRA map unit is currently used in MLRA 53C, 55C and 102B. The Hoven soil does not exist and should not be used in MLRA 102B A future project will be needed to split correlate and designate the correct MLRA map unit for each MLRA.
• Reference and alternative states within the state and transition model are may not be fully documented and may require additional field sampling for refinement.Supporting information
Inventory data references
There is no NRCS clipping data and other inventory currently available for this site. Information presented here has been derived using field observations from range-trained personnel. Those involved in developing this site include: Stan Boltz, Range Management Specialist, NRCS; and Bruce Kunze, Soil Scientist, NRCS. Data Source Sample Period State County None
Other references
Cleland, D.T., J.A. Freeouf, J.E. Keys, G.J. Nowacki, C. Carpenter, and W.H. McNab. 2007. Ecological Subregions: sections and subsections of the coterminous United States. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report WO-76. Washington, DC.
Gilbert, M.C., Whited, P.M., Clairain Jr, E.J., & Smith, R.D. 2006. A Regional Guidebook for Applying the Hydrogeomorphic Approach to Assessing Wetland Functions of Prairie Potholes. Washington, DC.
Samson, F.B., & Knopf, F.L. 1996. Prairie Conservation Preserving North America's Most Endangered Ecosystem. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Official Soil Series Descriptions. Available online. Accessed March 2018.
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). 2003. National Range and Pasture Handbook, Revision 1. Grazing Lands Technology Institute. 214.
United States Department of Agriculture – Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
USDA, NRCS. 2018. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, accessed 27 March 2018). National Plant Data Team.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. 2013. Level III and Level IV Ecoregions of the Continental United States. Corvallis, OR, U.S. EPA, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, map scale 1:3,000,000. Available at http://www.epa.gov/eco-research/level-iii-and-iv-ecoregions- continental-united-states. (Accessed 1 March 2018).
High Plains Regional Climate Center, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. http://www.hprcc.unl.edu/
USDA, NRCS. National Water and Climate Center, Portland, OR. http://wcc.nrcs.usda.gov
USDA, NRCS. National Soil Information System, Information Technology Center, Fort Collins, CO. http://nasis.nrcs.usda.govContributors
Lance Howe
Steve WinterApproval
Suzanne Mayne-Kinney, 2/01/2024
Acknowledgments
Contact for Lead Authors: Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS), Redfield Soil Survey Office, Redfield, SD & Stanton Soil Survey Office, Stanton, NE; Lance Howe (Lance.Howe@usda.gov), Soil Survey Office Leader, USDA-NRCS, Redfield, SD; Steve Winter (Steven.Winter@usda.gov), Soil Scientist, USDA-NRCS, Redfield, SD; and Greg Clark (Greg.Clark@usda.gov), Soil Survey Office Leader, USDA-NRCS, Stanton, NE. Additional Information Acknowledgment: Jason Hermann (Jason.Hermann@usda.gov), Area Rangeland Management Specialist, USDA-NRCS, Redfield, SD. This Provisional Ecological Site concept has passed both Quality Control and Quality Assurance processes. It was officially approved for publication by David Kraft as of 11/12/2020. Non-discrimination Statement In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, available online and at any USDA office, or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632- 9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 07/02/2026 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement