Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 088X–Northern Minnesota Glacial Lake Basins
MLRA 88 consists of the lake beds of glacial Lakes Agassiz, Upham, and Aitkin. These vast glacial lake beds were formed by meltwaters associated with the last glaciation of the Wisconsin age. The large, flat, wet landscapes are filled with lacustrine lake sediments, wave-washed glacial till, and vast expanses of organic soils. This area is entirely in Minnesota and makes up about 11,590 square miles (30,019 square kilometers).
The western boundary of MLRA 88 with MLRA 56B is gradual. MLRA 56B is a portion of the Red River Valley that was formed by glacial Lake Agassiz and is dominantly prairie. The southern boundary of MLRA 88 with MLRA 57 consists of distinct moraines that formed from the glacial drift sediments of Late Wisconsin age. The eastern and southeastern boundaries are with portions of MLRAs 90A and 93A. These MLRAs are in a distinct glaciated region of sediments of the Rainy and Superior Lobes, and much of MLRA 93A is bedrock controlled (USDA-Ag Handbook 296, 2022).Classification relationships
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): Northern Minnesota Glacial Lake
Basins (88)
USFS Subregions: Northern Superior Uplands Section (212L); North Shore Highlands Subsection (212Lb)
Relationship to Other Established Classifications:
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR) APn80-Northern Spruce Bog, Acid Peatland System, Northern Floristic Region
MN DNR APn81-Northern Poor Conifer Bog, Acid Peatland System, Northern Floristic Region
MN DNR APn90–Northern Open Bog, Acid Peatland System, Northern Floristic Region
MN DNR APn91-Northern Poor Fen, Acid Peatland System, Northern Floristic Region
NatureServe
Association: Picea mariana - (Larix laricina) / Ledum groenlandicum / Sphagnum
spp. Swamp Forest, NatureServe Element Code, CEGL005271Ecological site concept
The ecological site concept is a conifer-dominated acidic peatland with a sparse canopy, depauperate understory, and sphagnum hummocks. Surface water is acidic and low in minerals. Water table fluctuations are more variable than poor fens, but less variable than in forested bogs. (MN DNR, 2005).
Associated sites
F088XY005MN Forestland Peatland
Forestland Peatland occurs on level to gently sloping surfaces. Soils have greater than 16” of organic material and soil pH values are greater than 4.5. This site has a water table typically below the peat surface that drops during the summer to allow for the establishment of significant tree cover.
F088XY003MN Open Peatland
Open Peatland occurs on level to gently sloping surfaces. Soils have greater than 16” of organic material and soil pH values are greater than 4.5. This site has a high water table that remain near the surface throughout the growing season, preventing the establishment of significant tree cover.
Similar sites
F088XY005MN Forestland Peatland
Forestland Peatland occurs on level to gently sloping surfaces. Soils have greater than 16” of organic material and soil pH values are greater than 4.5. This site has a water table typically below the peat surface that drops during the summer to allow for the establishment of significant tree cover.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Picea mariana
(2) Larix laricinaShrub (1) Betula pumila
(2) Ledum groenlandicumHerbaceous (1) Eriophorum vaginatum
(2) SphagnumPhysiographic features
This site occurs on depressions, bog landforms on till plains, moraines, outwash plains, till plains and lake plains. Sites are nearly level and the organic soils are typically saturated to the surface from the water table. The buildup of organic materials over time has led to the development of a crested microtopography on these sites.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Slope shape across (1) Linear
Slope shape up-down (1) Linear
Landforms (1) Till plain > Depression
(2) Till plain > Raised bog
(3) Till plain > Bog
(4) Moraine
(5) Outwash plain
(6) Till plain
(7) Lake plain
Runoff class Negligible Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 590 – 2030 ft Slope 0 – 1 % Ponding depth 0 in Water table depth 0 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The average annual precipitation is 25 to 28 inches (635 to 711 millimeters). Most of the rainfall comes from convective thunderstorms during the growing season. Snowfall generally occurs from October through April. The average annual temperature is 43 to 46 degrees F (6 to 8 degrees C). The mean frost free period ranges from 86 to 110 days, with the mean freeze-free period ranging from 120 to 135 days.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 90-110 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 120-140 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 30-30 in Frost-free period (actual range) 80-110 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 110-140 days Precipitation total (actual range) 20-30 in Frost-free period (average) 100 days Freeze-free period (average) 130 days Precipitation total (average) 30 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) WARROAD [USC00218679], Warroad, MN
-
(2) CAMP NORRIS DNR [USC00211250], Beltrami Isl State for, MN
-
(3) BAUDETTE INTL AP [USW00094961], Baudette, MN
-
(4) WASKISH 4NE [USC00218700], Big Falls, MN
-
(5) RED LAKE INDIAN AGCY [USC00216795], Ponemah, MN
-
(6) BIG FALLS [USC00210746], Big Falls, MN
-
(7) LITTLEFORK 10 SW [USC00214809], Big Falls, MN
-
(8) INTL FALLS INTL AP [USW00014918], International Falls, MN
-
(9) LEECH LAKE [USC00214652], Bena, MN
-
(10) POKEGAMA DAM [USC00216612], Cohasset, MN
-
(11) GRAND RPDS FOREST LAB [USC00213303], Grand Rapids, MN
-
(12) SANDY LAKE DAM LIBBY [USC00217460], McGregor, MN
-
(13) FLOODWOOD 3 NE [USC00212842], Floodwood, MN
-
(14) EVELETH WWTP [USC00212645], Eveleth, MN
">Influencing water features
Water is received through precipitation, runoff from adjacent uplands, and groundwater. Water levels are greatly influenced by precipitation rates and runoff from upland sites. Water leaves the site primarily through evapotranspiration, groundwater recharge, and less often, stream outflow. These sites are wetlands.<br />
<br />
The hydrology of acid peatland sites significantly impacts their ecological development. Groundwater movement into these sites brings in water that is exposed to surrounding acidic parent materials, such as sand deposits. This interaction keeps the soils acidic.Wetland description
Under the Cowardin System of Wetland Classification, or National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), the wetlands can be classified as:<br />
1) Palustrine, forested, needle-leaved evergreen, saturated, or<br />
2) Palustrine, scrub-shrub, broad-leaved deciduous, saturated, or<br />
3) Palustrine, scrub-shrub, broad-leaved evergreen, saturated, or<br />
4) Palustrine, emergent, persistent, saturated<br />
<br />
Under the Hydrogeomorphic Classification System (HGM), the wetlands can be classified as:<br />
1) Depressional, acidic, forested/organic, or<br />
2) Depressional, acidic, scrub-shrub/organic<br />
<br />
Permeability of the soil is very slow to moderately slow.<br />
Hydrologic Group: A/D, B/D, C/D<br />
Hydrogeomorphic Wetland Classification: Depressional acidic forested/organic; Depressional acidic scrub-shrub/organic<br />
Cowardin Wetland Classification: PFO4B, PSS4B, PSS3B, PEM1BSoil features
Acid Peatland soils developed as organic materials. They are very poorly drained, deep, and have relatively high available water capacity (13.4 to 17.7). Parent material is fibric and/or herbaceous organic material more than 40 centimeters thick. Underlying impermeable layers minimize groundwater movement through the peat. The main source of water to the site is precipitation, since the site formed through a buildup of peat over thousands of years, causing the soil surface to develop a crest shape with sloping concave sides.
All soils in the Acid Peatland ecological site are Histosols. Soils for this site can be further described as Hemic Sphagnofibrists, Typic Borohemists, Typic Haplohemists, and Typic Shpagnofibrists.
The soil series included in the Acid Peatland ecological site include Greenwood, Lobo, Waskish, and Borohemists.Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Organic material
Surface texture (1) Peat
Drainage class Very poorly drained Permeability class Moderately rapid to rapid Depth to restrictive layer Not specified Soil depth 80 – 0 in Surface fragment cover <=3" Not specified Surface fragment cover >3" Not specified Available water capacity
(0-40in)18.7 – 22.6 in Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0in)Not specified Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0in)Not specified Ecological dynamics
Parent material is fibric and/or herbaceous organic material more than 40 centimeters thick. These sites usually formed in depressions on glacial moraines and lacustrine and outwash plains, where underlying impermeable layers minimize groundwater movement through the peat. Slopes are less than 2%. The surface water on-site is very acidic (pH
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textT1A - Logging, seeding. T1B - Impoundment or maintenance of water on-site, and/or establishment of invasive species. T1C - Beaver activity, roads, drainage, and other alterations in hydrology. T2A - Poorly logged peatlands that are excessively clearcut combined with severe rutting or road building can result in impoundment. R3A - Unblocking road culverts that cause ponding, filling in drainage ditches that are perennially blocked and impounded by beaver activity, etc. R4A - Draining or maintenance of water on-site causing alterations in hydrology. State 1 submodel, plant communities
1.1A - Lack of fire, accumulation of peat, lowering of pH<5.0 1.1B - Surface fires or windthrow or higher that average precipitation 1.2B - Neutralization of acids on-site raising of pH 1.2A - Fire, if peat depth is lowered and thereby allowing roots of plants to access groundwater or higher than average precipitation 1.3A - Time, accumulation of peat 1.4A - Time, accumulation of peat, acidification, establishment and growth of older trees. 1.4B - Severe catastrophic fire or windthrow or higher than average precipitation State 1
Reference StateMoss cover is very indicative for this site, driving the successional dynamics and species diversity. Sphagnum sp. absorb dissolved mineral cations, and release organic acids, which lowers the pH of stagnant surface water below 5.0 (MN DNR 2003). Sphagnum tends to form carpets of hummocks, which creates an acidic environment cut off from groundwater and on-site ponding. In recently developed bogs, on sites mostly in the western range of the MLRA where soils are less continuously saturated, on sites where water table fluctuations are less variable, or on inclusions of sites where there are upwellings of groundwater, isolated minerotrophic species (i.e. creeping sedge or bluejoint) may be present. Other ground cover includes fine-leaved graminoids, and minimal presence of forbs. Occasionally, seedlings of deciduous tree species associated with adjacent sites (i.e. red maple or paper birch) may become established on Sphagnum hummocks but typically do not survive to become saplings or trees (MN DNR 2003). The overstory usually consists of scattered, stunted (
Dominant plant species
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
tamarack (Larix laricina), tree
-
bog willow (Salix pedicellaris), shrub
-
creeping snowberry (Gaultheria hispidula), shrub
-
creeping sedge (Carex chordorrhiza), grass
-
bluejoint (Calamagrostis canadensis), grass
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum fuscum), other herbaceous
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum angustifolium), other herbaceous
-
papillose sphagnum (Sphagnum papillosum), other herbaceous
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum subsecundum), other herbaceous
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum majus), other herbaceous
-
polytrichum moss (Polytrichum strictum), other herbaceous
-
aulacomnium moss (Aulacomnium palustre), other herbaceous
-
Schreber's big red stem moss (Pleurozium schreberi), other herbaceous
-
(Cladopodiella fluitans), other herbaceous
-
Fern or Fern Ally (Fern or Fern Ally), other herbaceous
-
clubmoss (Lycopodiella), other herbaceous
-
Liverwort (Liverwort), other herbaceous
-
bunchberry dogwood (Cornus canadensis), other herbaceous
Community 1.1
Mature Tamarack-SpruceOverstory occasionally has tamarack but is mostly dominated by black spruce, most likely due to the longer lifespan of the spruce trees. In cases where tamarack is monotypic, it is usually due to a lack of seed source for black spruce, or mortality of black spruce caused by species-specific insects or disease (MN DNR Forestry). Sometimes, paper birch can be present in the canopy. In this phase, tree growth is fairly stagnant, although stocking and tree height are higher than in the Young Tamarack phase (1.4). The moss layer is dominated by Sphagnum sp., between which in the hollows can be found brown mosses. In cases where tree growth exceeds 50% canopy cover, more shade-tolerant species can be present in the understory, including creeping snowberry, soft-leaved sedge, ferns, clubmosses, groundpines, and bunchberry (MN DNR 2003).
Community 1.2
Spruce BogSome scattered tamarack may still remain in the overstory, but mostly the sites are dominated by black spruce. On well-developed crests of older sites, trees can reach up to 30 ft tall, making them more desirable for timber harvesting. While the few graminoids and forbs may remain the same as in 1.1, fewseed sedge and boreal bog sedge are more indicative of this phase. In this phase, the Sphagnum has accumulated and typically forms large carpets with greater hummocks, along with Pleurozium. In this plant community phase acidity is the lowest of all of the plant community phase. Only true bog species remain, with no minerotrophic indicator species left.
Community 1.3
Poor FenIn this phase, the overstory is often stunted (
Community 1.4
Young TamarackPathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2Lack of fire, accumulation of peat, lowering of pH<5.0
Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.4Surface fires or windthrow or higher that average precipitation
Pathway 1.2B
Community 1.2 to 1.1Neutralization of acids on-site raising of pH
Context dependence.Alterations in hydrology which result in the alkalization of bogs, or fire disturbances that can result in mineral inputs from outside sources that offset depletion of cations (especially Ca++) by Sphagnum sp, (even groundwater inputs of <5% of the total water budget relative to precipitation) can revert the process of peat accumulation and acidification, and result in a community type with more minerotrophic
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.3Fire, if peat depth is lowered and thereby allowing roots of plants to access groundwater or higher than average precipitation.
Context dependence.Typically, the interval of surface fires are approximately 120 years. Pockets of poor fen vegetation can develop in a spruce bog where alkalization of the bog occurs on the lower flanks of the crest, where the water source can receive nutrients from surface runoff, or where the runoff is channeled into drains or water tracks. The transition of the entire site to poor fen can occur on a broader scale when fire release nutrients and burn peat, reducing tree cover, reducing evapotranspiration and increasing water-logged conditions, resulting in even minimal groundwater and nutrient inputs to the site.
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.4Time, accumulation of peat.
Context dependence.This pathway usually occurs naturally with enough time for peat to accumulate and elevate the growing surface out of water-logged conditions, so that tree growth and recruitment can be more successful.
Pathway 1.4A
Community 1.4 to 1.1Time, accumulation of peat, acidification, establishment and growth of older trees.
Pathway 1.4B
Community 1.4 to 1.3Severe catastrophic fire or windthrow or higher that average precipitation
State 2
Logged StateIn this state, the vegetation usually exhibits a structural pattern of “hard” edges which does not mimic the patch-scale distribution of canopy gaps we see from natural disturbances. Compositional changes in this state, as a diversion from reference, can be concerning, most notably the reversal of abundance of tamarack and black spruce (MN DNR Forestry). Tamarack regeneration has proven problematic for management, and can be susceptible to devastating outbreaks of larch sawfly and larch beetles. Tamarack regeneration in this state could be accomplished by leaving some tamarack seedtrees rather than always clear-cutting and seeding just black spruce (MN DNR Forestry). Harvesting should always be done in this state when the entire peat surface is frozen, although even then just a few passes with heavy equipment can damage the structural integrity of the site, or damage standing trees, thus prohibiting tree regeneration or maintenance on-site. In the field, areas identified by the presence of broad-leaved sedges and rough alder have far less structural integrity than the Sphagnum mat and should be avoided at all costs by heavy equipment. When dwarf mistletoe is present, control of the disease through broadcase burning, or by use of the “5 foot cutting rule”, can eradicate the disease, but success is dependent on total elimination of all living black spruce, and treatments (hand cutting, winter shearing, herbicides, combination treatments) need to be continued for 10 years after the initial harvest (MN DNR Forestry).
Dominant plant species
-
tamarack (Larix laricina), tree
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
bluejoint (Calamagrostis canadensis), grass
-
creeping sedge (Carex chordorrhiza), grass
State 3
Impounded StateIn this state, the excess of water on-site for longer than normal duration typically results in the killing off of tamarack and spruce trees, and the establishment of invasive species such as Typha sp. or reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). Sometimes, other graminoids (Carex sp.) can remain on site and form floating mats. Sometimes alder and willow shrubs will remain or establish on the edges.
Dominant plant species
-
willow (Salix), shrub
-
speckled alder (Alnus incana ssp. rugosa), shrub
-
reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), grass
-
sedge (Carex), grass
-
narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), other herbaceous
-
hybrid cattail (Typha ×glauca), other herbaceous
State 4
Open Bog StatePossible open water. Develops where the peat becomes isolated from mineral rich runoff or groundwater. Mineral and nutrient inputs come from precipitation and deposition. The saturated conditions and quick accumulation of Sphagnum prevent or inhibit establishment/growth of black spruce and tamarack. Variation in species composition in the community occur.
Dominant plant species
-
leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne calyculata), shrub
-
fewseed sedge (Carex oligosperma), grass
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum fuscum), other herbaceous
-
purple pitcherplant (Sarracenia purpurea), other herbaceous
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2This transition involves logging, usually clearcutting, but with reserves for seed sources, site preparation, control for disease and invasive species, and seeding, in order to maintain the site as a viable commercial timber harvesting state. This transition is only possible, or desirable, when the management is applied to phases in which radial growth has been prolific and trees have reached maturity, exhibiting taller, more commercially viable trees.
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3Impoundment or maintenance of water on-site, and/or establishment of invasive species. Beaver activity, roads, blocked drainages, and other alterations in hydrology can transition the Acid Peatlands out of Reference to an Impounded State, where water is ponded on site for longer durations and receives excessive nutrients from overland surface flow.
Transition T1C
State 1 to 4Impoundment or maintenance of water on-site. Beaver activity, roads, drainage, and other alterations in hydrology can transition the Acid Peatlands out of Reference to an Open State, where water is on site for longer durations and receives excessive nutrients from overland surface flow causing stunted tree growth.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3Poorly logged peatlands that are excessively clearcut combined with severe rutting or road building can result in impoundment.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 1Unblocking road culverts that cause ponding, filling in drainage ditches that are perennially blocked and impounded by beaver activity, etc.
Restoration pathway R4A
State 4 to 1Draining or maintenance of water on-site causing alterations in hydrology that can transition the Open state back to the Reference State, where water is on site for shorter durations and receives less nutrients from overland surface flow causing increased tree growth
Additional community tables
Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 6. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 7. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 1.4 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Information presented was derived from Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota, USDA-NRCS soil survey information, and USDA Plants Database.
Other references
Almendinger, J. C. 1997. Minnesota’s Bearing Tree Database. Biological Report No. 56.
Brinson, M. M. 1993. A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands.
Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31.
Cleland, D.T.; Freeouf, J.A.; Keys, J.E., Jr.; Nowacki, G.J.; Carpenter, C; McNab, W.H. 2007. Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections of the Conterminous United States.[1:3,500,000], Sloan, A.M., cartog. Gen. Tech. Report WO-76. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979.
Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. MNDNR St. Paul, MN.
Interpretations - Silviculture Program APn81. Retrieved at https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/forestry/ecs_silv/interpretations.html
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
MN DNR Forestry. Accessed 2018, June 13.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (2003). Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province.
Official Soil Series Descriptions. Available online. Accessed March 2018.
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2022. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
USDA, NRCS. 2018. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 26 June 2018). National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC 27401-4901 USA.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. Level III and IV ecoregions of the continental
United States: Corvallis, Oregon, U.S. EPA, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, map scale 1:3,000,000, https://www.epa.gov/eco-research/level-iii-and-iv-ecoregions-continental-united-states.
Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.Contributors
Kade Anderson, Ecological Site Specialist for North Central Region
Patty Burns, Soil Scientist at Bemidji Soil Survey Office
Stacey Clark, Former Regional Ecologist for Regions 10 & 11
Ezra Hoffman, Ecological Site Specialist for North Central Region
Landon Wolter, Rangeland Management Specialist for North Central RegionApproval
Suzanne Mayne-Kinney, 8/12/2024
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 08/31/2026 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement