Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R084AY088OK
Shallow Savannah
Last updated: 9/21/2023
Accessed: 08/17/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 084A–North Cross Timbers
MLRA 84A “North Cross Timbers” is characterized by rolling to hilly uplands with oak trees, bedrock outcrops, and narrow stream valleys. It is believed that the Cross Timbers ecosystem is one the least disturbed forest types remaining in the Eastern US. Major rivers in this MLRA include the Verdigris River in Kansas and the Arkansas, Cimarron, and South Canadian Rivers in Oklahoma. The western parts of this MLRA are underlain by sandstone and shale of Permian age, while the eastern parts are underlain by sandstone and shale of Pennsylvanian age. There are also occurrences of Pleistocene age stream terraces along the rivers.
Classification relationships
This ecological site is correlated to soil components at the Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) level which is further described in USDA Ag Handbook 296.
Level IV EPA Ecoregions 27o “Crosstimbers Transition”, 29a “Northern Crosstimbers”, and 29h “Northwestern Crosstimbers”.Ecological site concept
These sites occur on shallow soils formed from sandstone parent material. They are on summits and shoulders of low hills The reference vegetation consists of native midgrass and tallgrass species such as little bluestem and big bluestem with an overstory of Post Oak and Blackjack Oak, creating a savannah mosiac ecotype. Woody canopy is variable but averages 30 percent across the site. This plant community is disturbance driven and requires periodic fire to maintain the savannah community. When fire is removed from the system, the site is at risk of encroachment of woody species and buildup of leaf litter, altering the plant community and driving it towards a woodland system with little understory production. Slopes are generally less steep than the Savannah Breaks site and have fewer surface boulders.
Associated sites
R084AY079OK Savannah Breaks
Similar soils. >20% slopes with large rock outcrops.
R084AY075OK Sandy Loam Savannah
Similar vegetation with deeper soil resources. Generally more productive.
Similar sites
R084AY075OK Sandy Loam Savannah
Similar vegetation with deeper soil resources. Generally more productive.
R084AY079OK Savannah Breaks
Similar soils. >20% slopes with large rock outcrops.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Quercus stellata
(2) Quercus marilandicaShrub Not specified
Herbaceous (1) Schizachyrium scoparium
(2) Andropogon gerardiiPhysiographic features
This ecological site occurs on gently sloping to sloping summits and upper sideslopes of cuestas and hills within the Northern Crosstimbers MLRA. Slopes range from 0 to 20 but are typically 5 to 15 percent and rock outcrops are common.
Figure 2. Shallow Savannah
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Hills > Hill
(2) Hills > Cuesta
Runoff class Medium to very high Elevation 700 – 1300 ft Slope 1 – 20 % Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
Climate is moist sub-humid with annual precipitation ranging from 30 to 45. There will be noticeable differences in precipitation and temperatures from north to south and east to west. The most intense rainfall occurs in late spring and early summer while warm season vegetation is growing rapidly. Frost free and freeze free days increase from north to south. Precipitation increases from west to east.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 170-190 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 200-210 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 40-40 in Frost-free period (actual range) 170-200 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 190-230 days Precipitation total (actual range) 30-50 in Frost-free period (average) 180 days Freeze-free period (average) 210 days Precipitation total (average) 40 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 4. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 5. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 6. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 7. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 8 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) SEDAN [USC00147305], Sedan, KS
-
(2) BARTLESVILLE F P FLD [USW00003959], Bartlesville, OK
-
(3) PAWHUSKA [USC00346935], Pawhuska, OK
-
(4) BARNSDALL [USC00340535], Barnsdall, OK
-
(5) MANNFORD 6 NW [USC00345522], Cleveland, OK
-
(6) BRISTOW [USC00341144], Bristow, OK
-
(7) CHANDLER [USC00341684], Chandler, OK
-
(8) NORMAN 3SSE [USC00346386], Norman, OK
-
(9) ADA [USC00340017], Ada, OK
-
(10) SEMINOLE [USC00348042], Seminole, OK
-
(11) CHICKASHA EXP STATION [USC00341750], Chickasha, OK
-
(12) ANADARKO 3 E [USC00340224], Anadarko, OK
-
(13) LINDSAY 2 W [USC00345216], Lindsay, OK
-
(14) DUNCAN [USC00342660], Duncan, OK
-
(15) STILLWATER 5 WNW [USW00053927], Stillwater, OK
">Influencing water features
These upland sites are not associated with any riparian or wetland system.
Wetland description
NA
Figure 9.
Soil features
Representative soils: Bigheart, Darnell, Darsil
The soils of this site are shallow sandy loam soils formed over sandstone. The principal productivity limitation is shallow soil depths that limit moisture storage capacity. In areas, stoniness also limits productivity.
Soils are mapped for each county within the MLRA. Mapunits are representations of the major soil series component(s) and named accordingly. Each Mapunit is spatially represented on a digital soils map as polygons of different shapes and sizes. Within these Mapunits, there are often minor soil series components included. These minor components are soils that occur within a Mapunit polygon but are of small extent (15% or less of the Mapunit area). However, it is difficult to separate these minor soils spatially due to the scale of soil mapping.
Ecological sites are correlated at the component level of the soil survey. Therefore, a single Mapunit may contain multiple Ecological Sites just as it may contain multiple soil components. This is important to understand when investigating soils and Ecological Sites. A soil survey Mapunit may be correlated to a single Ecological Site based on the major component; however, there may be inclusional areas of additional Ecological Sites which are correlated to the minor components of that particular soil Mapunit.Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Residuum – sandstone
Surface texture (1) Very stony fine sandy loam
(2) Gravelly loamy fine sand
Drainage class Moderately well drained to excessively drained Permeability class Moderately slow to moderately rapid Soil depth 10 – 20 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 – 12 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 – 35 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)0.8 – 2.3 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)0 – 1 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 1 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)0 – 1 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)5.5 – 7.3 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 18 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 16 % Ecological dynamics
The reference ecological state is an oak savannah interspersed with tallgrasses, forbs and shrubs. The general aspect of the vegetation is savannah; a grassland with an overstory of scattered trees. The site is predominately tallgrasses and midgrasses, consisting of big bluestem, little bluestem, Indiangrass and switchgrass. Secondary grasses included purpletop, sand lovegrass, purple lovegrass, sand dropseed Canada wildrye and Virginia wildrye. Overstory trees of post oak, blackjack oak and various species of hickory formed a canopy of approximately 15 to 20 percent. However, it is important to note that woody canopy has always varied from 70+ to
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
T1A - No brush management, No fire T1B - Chemical brush management, Prescribed burning T1C - Soil erosion R2A - Selective thinning, Prescribed burning T2A - Chemical brush management, Prescribed burning T2B - Soil erosion R3A - Prescribed burning 4+ year interval, Prescribed grazing T3A - No fire, No brush management T3B - Soil erosion State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
SavannahThis ecological state consists of native grasses and forbs with an overstory of oak trees. The average canopy coverage of tree species ranges from 20-40%.
Characteristics and indicators. The average canopy coverage of tree species ranges from 20-40%.
Resilience management. Without periodic fire or alternative brush management, woody species may continue to encroach and eventually dominate the site.
Dominant plant species
-
post oak (Quercus stellata), tree
-
blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica), tree
-
black hickory (Carya texana), tree
-
coralberry (Symphoricarpos orbiculatus), shrub
-
saw greenbrier (Smilax bona-nox), shrub
-
little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), grass
-
big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass
-
goldenrod (Solidago), other herbaceous
Community 1.1
Tallgrass Savannah (Reference Community)
The Reference Plant Community for this site was formed by the collective influence of fire, herbivory, drought, and extremes of temperature. This site is dominated by a mixture of tall and midgrasses with scattered woody species. The dominant grasses include big bluestem, little bluestem, switchgrass, and indiangrass. The major woody species are oaks, elms, hickory, sumacs, wild plum, redbud and other understory species. This plant community evolved with a fire frequency of every 3-5 years.
Dominant plant species
-
post oak (Quercus stellata), tree
-
blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica), tree
-
black hickory (Carya texana), tree
-
coralberry (Symphoricarpos orbiculatus), shrub
-
smooth sumac (Rhus glabra), shrub
-
little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), grass
-
big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass
-
goldenrod (Solidago), other herbaceous
Figure 10. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 980 2100 2600 Tree 350 480 600 Forb 70 320 400 Shrub/Vine 60 300 375 Total 1460 3200 3975 Figure 11. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). OK0003 , Warm season tallgrasses, forbs, and a few woody species.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 2 6 9 21 24 14 6 11 4 2 1 Community 1.2
Midgrass SavannahWithin this community phase, the more palatable tallgrasses and forbs have decreased. They have been replaced by species such as tall dropseed, silver bluestem, and sideoats grama. The less palatable annual forbs, such as broomweed and western ragweed have increased also. Total herbacious production may remain the same as the reference community, however, the composition has been altered significantly.
Figure 12. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 6. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 980 2100 2600 Tree 350 480 600 Forb 70 320 400 Shrub/Vine 60 300 375 Total 1460 3200 3975 Figure 13. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). OK0003 , Warm season tallgrasses, forbs, and a few woody species.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 2 6 9 21 24 14 6 11 4 2 1 Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2Abusive grazing practices will result in a quick reduction of tall grass species and palatable forbs.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1Through a properly implemented prescribed grazing system that includes some degree of growing season rest, this community phase may be reverted to the reference plant community. The length of deferment and time required for this restoration is dependent upon precipitation and management system used.
State 2
WoodlandThis vegetative state is composed of an overstory of trees and shrubs that will slowly eliminate most herbaceous vegetation from the plant community if left unchecked.
Characteristics and indicators. The major species are post oak and black jack oak with elm, hackberry and eastern redcedar.
Resilience management. There is a high potential for encroachment by eastern redcedar in this ecological state if proper management is not applied.
Dominant plant species
-
blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica), tree
-
post oak (Quercus stellata), tree
-
sugarberry (Celtis laevigata), tree
-
American elm (Ulmus americana), tree
-
saw greenbrier (Smilax bona-nox), shrub
-
sedge (Carex), grass
-
Canada wildrye (Elymus canadensis), grass
-
poverty oatgrass (Danthonia spicata), grass
Community 2.1
Tree/Shrub Dominant
This plant community is composed of an overstory of post oak and blackjack oak. There are occasional elm, hackberry, and hickory also. The understory is composed of buckbrush, sumac, and other shrubby woody plants. The grasses include shade tolerant species such as Canada wildrye, nimblewill, and others. Some warm season grasses occur where sunlight penetrates the overstory. Forbs include ironweed, goldenrod, and others. Woody canopy has increased greater than 35 percent.
Figure 14. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). OK0006 , MLRA 84A, Oak/Cedar. Mature oak overstory .
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 2 3 5 10 18 25 10 5 8 5 4 5 Community 2.2
Closed Canopy Woodland
This plant community is composed of an overstory of mature post oak and blackjack oak with a midstory of eastern redcedar. Birds sit in the oak trees and through defecation, deposit eastern redcedar seeds into the leaf litter. The leaf litter makes an ideal site for winter germination of the cedar. There is very little herbaceous plant cover. Herbaceous cover is represented by shade tolerant species such as Canada wildrye and Scribner’s panicum. Some warm season grasses include little bluestem, purpletop, and big bluestem where sunlight is sufficient. Goldenrod, sagewort, and ragweeds are the main forb components.
Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2
Tree/Shrub Dominant
Closed Canopy WoodlandIn the absence of fire or brush managment, the trees and shrubs in this plant community will continue to out-compete the herbaceous vegetation for sunlight and resources. With time, it will become a closed canopy woodland community.
Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1
Closed Canopy Woodland
Tree/Shrub DominantThrough a program of brush management and prescribed fire, the closed canopy plant community can be reverted to the tree/shrub dominant community. This pathway can be accomplished by opening the canopy and allowing more sunlight to reach the soil surface.
State 3
GrasslandIn this state, the shallow savannah has been transitioned to an open grassland dominated by tallgrasses and forbs.
Resilience management. Without management, this state may return to a savannah state within a short time. It is important to note that maintaining this state will require significant inputs.
Dominant plant species
-
little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), grass
-
big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass
-
broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus), grass
Community 3.1
Tallgrass Dominant
This community is dominated by tallgrass species such as little bluestem, big bluestem, switchgrass, and indiangrass. Some perenial forbs may persist, deopending on the herbicide used on the oak trees. Grazing management plays a key role in the maintenance of this plant community. If tebuthiuron pellets are used to control woody species, it is important to rememeber that there is a period of years following treatment that it is inadvisable to burn. Therefore special caution should be taken when stocking pastures to ensure that the tallgrass community remains dominant. Other invaders such as sericia lespedeza and eastern redcedar also thrive once released from the oak canopy.
Figure 15. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 7. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 1000 2100 2800 Forb 70 250 400 Tree 50 100 200 Shrub/Vine 20 50 100 Total 1140 2500 3500 Figure 16. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). OK0006 , MLRA 84A, Oak/Cedar. Mature oak overstory .
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 2 3 5 10 18 25 10 5 8 5 4 5 Community 3.2
Midgrass Dominant
This community is dominated by less palatable midgrass species. Abusive grazing has resulted in the decline of palatable tallgrasses and forbs. Little bluestem will persist, along with dropseed species, silver bluestem, native lovegrasses, sideoats grama, and broomsedge bluestem(in eastern portions of MLRA). Annual forbs increase in abundance. Total site production may be similar to community 3.1 but composition has change significantly.
Community 3.3
Shortgrass/AnnualsThis community is the result of long term abusive grazing. The plant community consists some perennial shortgrass species, a large amount of annual grasses and forbs, and increased bare ground. Over time this site will become susceptible to water erosion. There is very little grazing or wildlife value remaining on this site.
Pathway 3.1A
Community 3.1 to 3.2
Tallgrass Dominant
Midgrass DominantAbusive grazing can push this tallgrass dominated plant community towards a community that is dominated by less palatable midgrass species.
Pathway 3.2A
Community 3.2 to 3.1
Midgrass Dominant
Tallgrass DominantThrough a properly implemented prescribed grazing system that includes some degree of growing season rest, this community phase may be reverted to the reference plant community. The length of deferment and time required for this restoration is dependent upon precipitation and management system used.
Pathway 3.2B
Community 3.2 to 3.3If grazing management is not altered, this site will continue to decline. Long term abusive grazing will push this site to a plant community of shortgrasses and annuals.
Pathway 3.3A
Community 3.3 to 3.2It can be difficult to shift this site to another grassland community. Long term rest will be required to allow tall and midgrasses to re-establish. The length of deferment and time required for this restoration is dependent upon precipitation and management system used.
State 4
ErodedThis state is the result of water erosion over bare soil. Most of the "A" horizon of the soil profile has been displaced. The remaining subsoil is very low in fertility. Some native grasses and forbs will persist in this state, however, production is greatly reduced. The return of soil properties to reference condition may not be
achievable, post cultivation. Range planting can be used to establish reference vegetation, however, this restoration effort may take many years.Dominant plant species
-
silver beardgrass (Bothriochloa laguroides), grass
-
threeawn (Aristida), grass
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2In the absence of fire or brush management, this savannah state will transition to a woodland state of tree/shrub dominance.
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3Through intensive chemical brush management, the savannah state may be transitioned to a grassland state dominated by tallgrasses or midgrasses with very few trees and shrubs. It is important to note that maintaining this state will require significant inputs.
Transition T1C
State 1 to 4If this ecological site is subjected to soil disturbances such as land clearing, ripping, or plowing that leave large amounts of exposed soil, the site may become very susceptible to water erosion. Once the "A" horizon has been displace through erosion, this site has transitioned to an Eroded Sate.
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1Implementing a brush management plan that includes mechanical thinning and the use of prescribed fire can restore the woodland state to an open canopy savannah state.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3Through intensive chemical brush management, the woodland state may be transitioned to a grassland state dominated by tallgrasses or midgrasses with very few trees and shrubs. It is important to note that maintaining this state will require significant inputs.
Transition T2B
State 2 to 4If this ecological site is subjected to soil disturbances such as land clearing, ripping, or plowing that leave large amounts of exposed soil, the site may become very susceptible to water erosion. Once the "A" horizon has been displace through erosion, this site has transitioned to an Eroded Sate.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 1This state may be restored to the savannah state with the exclusion of chemical brush management. However, a prescribed fire program must be imoplemented to control resprouting woody species and maintain an open savannah canopy. Otherwise, the site could transition to the woody dominated state.
Transition T3A
State 3 to 2In the absence of fire or brush management, this grassland state will transition to a woodland state of tree/shrub dominance.
Transition T3B
State 3 to 4If this ecological site is subjected to soil disturbances such as land clearing, ripping, or plowing that leave large amounts of exposed soil, the site may become very susceptible to water erosion. Once the "A" horizon has been displace through erosion, this site has transitioned to an Eroded Sate.
Additional community tables
Table 8. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Tallgrasses 336–890 Indiangrass SONU2 Sorghastrum nutans 187–495 – big bluestem ANGE Andropogon gerardii 187–495 – switchgrass PAVI2 Panicum virgatum 140–370 – 2 Little Bluestem 420–1115 little bluestem SCSC Schizachyrium scoparium 420–1115 – 3 Wildryes 75–200 Canada wildrye ELCA4 Elymus canadensis 75–200 – 4 Mid/Shortgrasses 150–400 dropseed SPORO Sporobolus 93–250 – purpletop tridens TRFL2 Tridens flavus 70–185 – sideoats grama BOCU Bouteloua curtipendula 70–185 – blue grama BOGR2 Bouteloua gracilis 70–185 – hairy grama BOHI2 Bouteloua hirsuta 70–185 – Scribner's rosette grass DIOLS Dichanthelium oligosanthes var. scribnerianum 47–125 – sand lovegrass ERTR3 Eragrostis trichodes 47–125 – cylinder jointtail grass COCY Coelorachis cylindrica 35–93 – tufted lovegrass ERPEP2 Eragrostis pectinacea var. pectinacea 25–62 – Forb5 Forbs 35–200 Cuman ragweed AMPS Ambrosia psilostachya 10–65 – prairie sagewort ARFR4 Artemisia frigida 10–65 – blacksamson echinacea ECAN2 Echinacea angustifolia 10–65 – ashy sunflower HEMO2 Helianthus mollis 10–65 – dotted blazing star LIPU Liatris punctata 10–65 – fringeleaf wild petunia RUHU Ruellia humilis 10–65 – goldenrod SOLID Solidago 10–65 – 6 Legumes 35–200 leadplant AMCA6 Amorpha canescens 60–100 – prairie clover DALEA Dalea 10–65 – lespedeza LESPE Lespedeza 10–65 – Nuttall's sensitive-briar MINU6 Mimosa nuttallii 10–65 – ticktrefoil DESMO Desmodium 10–65 – prairie clover DALEA Dalea 30–50 – zarzabacoa comun DEIN3 Desmodium incanum 30–50 – lespedeza LESPE Lespedeza 30–50 – Nuttall's sensitive-briar MINU6 Mimosa nuttallii 30–50 – Shrub/Vine7 Minor Shrubs 20–125 leadplant AMCA6 Amorpha canescens 6–38 – Virginia creeper PAQU2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 6–38 – greenbrier SMILA2 Smilax 6–38 – western poison ivy TORY Toxicodendron rydbergii 6–38 – grape VITIS Vitis 6–38 – 8 Major Shrubs 40–250 New Jersey tea CEAM Ceanothus americanus 20–125 – plum PRUNU Prunus 20–125 – sumac RHUS Rhus 20–125 – coralberry SYOR Symphoricarpos orbiculatus 20–125 – blackberry RUBUS Rubus 15–95 – dwarf chinquapin oak QUPR Quercus prinoides 14–88 – Tree9 Trees 350–600 blackjack oak QUMA3 Quercus marilandica 220–375 – post oak QUST Quercus stellata 220–375 – American elm ULAM Ulmus americana 36–63 – black hickory CATE9 Carya texana 36–63 – eastern redbud CECA4 Cercis canadensis 36–63 – Table 9. Community 1.1 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height ft Canopy cover (%) Diameter in Basal area (square ft/acre) Treeblackjack oak QUMA3 Quercus marilandica Native – 10-25 – 0 post oak QUST Quercus stellata Native – 10-25 – 0 black hickory CATE9 Carya texana Native – 1-5 – 0 Table 10. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 11. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 12. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 13. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 700–850 Indiangrass SONU2 Sorghastrum nutans 300–400 – big bluestem ANGE Andropogon gerardii 300–400 – switchgrass PAVI2 Panicum virgatum 200–300 – 2 700–800 little bluestem SCSC Schizachyrium scoparium 700–800 – 3 140–160 Canada wildrye ELCA4 Elymus canadensis 140–160 – 4 150–384 sideoats grama BOCU Bouteloua curtipendula 100–150 – blue grama BOGR2 Bouteloua gracilis 100–150 – purpletop tridens TRFL2 Tridens flavus 100–150 – sand lovegrass ERTR3 Eragrostis trichodes 50–100 – hairy grama BOHI2 Bouteloua hirsuta 50–100 – Scribner's rosette grass DIOLS Dichanthelium oligosanthes var. scribnerianum 80–100 – tufted lovegrass ERPEP2 Eragrostis pectinacea var. pectinacea 30–50 – Forb5 50–288 prairie sagewort ARFR4 Artemisia frigida 30–50 – blacksamson echinacea ECAN2 Echinacea angustifolia 30–50 – ashy sunflower HEMO2 Helianthus mollis 30–50 – dotted blazing star LIPU Liatris punctata 30–50 – fringeleaf wild petunia RUHU Ruellia humilis 30–50 – goldenrod SOLID Solidago 30–50 – 6 20–112 leadplant AMCA6 Amorpha canescens 30–50 – prairie clover DALEA Dalea 30–50 – zarzabacoa comun DEIN3 Desmodium incanum 30–50 – lespedeza LESPE Lespedeza 30–50 – Shrub/Vine7 20–100 New Jersey tea CEAM Ceanothus americanus 10–30 – Virginia creeper PAQU2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 10–30 – plum PRUNU Prunus 10–30 – dwarf chinquapin oak QUPR Quercus prinoides 10–30 – sumac RHUS Rhus 10–30 – blackberry RUBUS Rubus 10–30 – greenbrier SMILA2 Smilax 10–30 – roundleaf snowberry SYRO Symphoricarpos rotundifolius 10–30 – western poison ivy TORY Toxicodendron rydbergii 10–30 – grape VITIS Vitis 10–30 – Tree8 50–200 blackjack oak QUMA3 Quercus marilandica 50–75 – post oak QUST Quercus stellata 50–75 – American elm ULAM Ulmus americana 30–50 – black hickory CATE9 Carya texana 30–50 – eastern redbud CECA4 Cercis canadensis 30–50 – Table 14. Community 3.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 15. Community 3.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
This plant community has value for grazing cattle. It also provides cover and food for many species of wildlife including whitetail deer and bobwhite quail. Coyote, red fox, squirrel, cottontail rabbit, opossum and raccoon are common. Numerous song birds and woodpeckers may be found on the site.
Hydrological functions
The water cycle on this site functions to the existing plant community and the management of that plant community. The water cycle is most functional when the site is dominated by tall bunchgrasses. As ground cover decreases, sediment loss may increase.
Recreational uses
Savanna sites offer scenic opportunities for outdoor recreation including photography, trail rides, camping, and hunting.
Wood products
Firewood is the major wood product from this site. This site index is not sufficient to support commercial harvest.
Other products
NA
Other information
NA
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Clipping data and other observations on file in the Oklahoma NRCS State Office: Suite 206 100 USDA Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074 The original information presented here was derived from field observations of Dr. Jack Eckroat, in the summer of 2007, correlated to office files and old Range Site Technical Descriptions (1961 USDA/SCS). Species compositions are as complete as possible. Production will vary by species from within years, from year to year, and from site to site.
Type locality
Location 1: Osage County, OK Township/Range/Section T26N R10E S12 General legal description State Park References
-
Bestelmeyer, B., J.R. Brown, K.M. Havstad, B. Alexander, G. Chavez, and J.E. Herrick. 2003. Development and Use of State and Transition Models for Rangelands. Jornal of Range Management 56:114–126.
-
Frost, C.C. 1998. Presettlement Fire Frequency Regimes of the United States: A First Approximation. Plant Conservation Program. North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Raleigh, NC.
Other references
Fuhlendorf, S. D., Engle, D. M., Kerby, J. A. Y., & Hamilton, R. (2009). Pyric herbivory: rewilding landscapes through the recoupling of fire and grazing. Conservation Biology, 23(3), 588-598.
Harlan, J. R. (1957). Grasslands of Oklahoma.
National Soil Information System (NASIS). Accessed 2013
Shantz, H. L. (1923). The natural vegetation of the Great Plains region. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 13(2), 81-107.
Shiflet, T. N. (1994). Rangeland cover types of the United States (Vol. 152). Denver, CO, USA: Society for Range Management.
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed [5/5/2014].
USDA NRCS Plants Database. Online.
USDA-SCS Oklahoma Range Site Descriptions(1960s)
Eastern Redcedar in Oklahoma, conference Proceeding Feb. 1985
Management of Beef Cattle for Efficient Reproduction. Circular E-869 OSU
Activities and Grazing Preferences of cows with Calves in Northern Osage County, Oklahoma, October 1961, Don Dyer.Contributors
Edits by Colin Walden, Soil Survey Region 9, Stillwater, OK
Dr. Jack Eckroat, Grazing Lands Specialist, NRCS, Oklahoma
Harland Dietz, Range Conservationist, NRCS, Oklahoma, (Retired)Approval
Bryan Christensen, 9/21/2023
Acknowledgments
Site Development and Testing Plan: Future work, as described in a Project Plan, to validate the information in this Provisional Ecological Site Description is needed. This will include field activities to collect low, medium and high intensity sampling, soil correlations, and analysis of that data. Annual field reviews should be done by soil scientists and vegetation specialists. A final field review, peer review, quality control, and quality assurance reviews of the ESD will be needed to produce the final document. Annual reviews of the Project Plan are to be conducted by the Ecological Site Technical Team.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Colin Walden, Brandon Reavis Contact for lead author 100 USDA, Suite 206, Stillwater, OK. 74074 Date 05/28/2020 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
There are few, if any, rills (then no more than 2” wide and 4” deep) and there is no active headcutting and sides are covered with vegetation. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
There is slight evidence of water flow patterns around vegetation, particularly after significant rain events, but water generally flows evenly over the entire landscape. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
No pedestals or terracettes under reference conditions. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
There is some variability, but it should average <25% bare ground on this site. Bare areas are small and not connected. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
No gullies under reference condition. Some evidence of geological erosion. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
No wind erosion on site. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Uniform distribution of litter. Litter rarely moves >12 inches on flatter slopes and may be as much as doubled on steeper slopes, then only during high intensity storms. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Average of scores 5 or higher. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
A horizon: 0 to 6 inches; reddish brown very gravelly silty clay loam, dark reddish strong medium granular structure. B horizon: 6 to 28 inches; reddish brown silty clay loam, reddish brown moderate medium granular structure. Refer to soil specific description for component sampled. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Infiltration and runoff are not affected by any changes in plant community composition and distribution. (Tallgrass/Midgrass/Tree canopy dominant). -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
There is no compaction layer. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Tree = Little BluestemSub-dominant:
Tallgrasses , Other MidgrassesOther:
Forb+Legume , cool season grasses, ShrubAdditional:
Tree species should be predominately oak and hickory -
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Plant mortality and decadence is highly variable on this site due to the droughty nature of the soils, (especially after a severe drought), but will primarily average <10%. This is more likely in the absence of fire and herbivory. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Litter should cover 50-75% of the area between plants with accumulations of <1/2 inch deep. Variable with time since fire. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Normal production is 2500-3200 pounds/ac per year. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Invasives include: eastern redcedar, elm, hackberry, greenbriar, privet, sericea lespedeza and non-natives (introduced species). -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All plants capable of reproducing at least every year.
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement