Lowland 22-30 PZ

Description

The Reference State represents what is believed to show the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of the ecological site prior to European settlement. Historically, this state ranged from a tall, warm-season grass dominated site to one dominated by deciduous shrubs, saplings, and trees depending upon disturbance regime. The primary disturbance mechanisms for this site in the reference condition included periodic fire and grazing by large herding ungulates. Timing of fires and grazing coupled with weather events dictated the dynamics that occurred within the natural range of variability. Dominance during the herbaceous phases of this state shifted between warm-season and cool-season grasses. Although slight shifts may have occurred in timing of energy capture, hydrologic function, and nutrient cycling between plant community phases within the Reference State (1.0), overall the ecological processes were functioning at near optimum levels. High basal density and deep root systems resulted in low runoff rates and high infiltration rates.

Areas of trees and shrubs existed within this state due to irregularity of burn patterns. Areas which escaped fire may have permitted trees and shrubs to become established. These areas may have served as a seed source for further expansion of the woody dominated plant communities as the fire frequency was altered after settlement.

Dominant plant species

1. green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), tree

2. American elm (Ulmus americana), tree

3. western snowberry (Symphoricarpos occidentalis), shrub

4. big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass

5. switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), grass

6. American licorice (Glycyrrhiza lepidota), grass

7. sunflower (Helianthus), grass

Submodel

Description

The Native/Invaded State (2.0) represents the more common range of variability that exists with higher levels of grazing management but in the absence of periodic fire due to fire suppression. The invasion of non-native cool-season grasses has also altered the natural range of variability for this ecological site. Currently this state is dominated by tall native warm-season grasses, but invasive introduced cool-season grasses are now present in all community phases of this state. It can be found on areas that are properly managed with grazing and/or prescribed burning, and sometimes on areas receiving occasional short periods of rest. Many times, this state appears as a mosaic of community phases caused primarily by continuous season-long grazing. Native cool- and warm-season species can decline and a corresponding increase in non-native cool-season grasses will occur. Non-native cool-season grasses will typically make up less than 15 percent of total annual production. Preliminary studies tend to indicate that when Kentucky bluegrass exceeds 30 percent of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40 percent of the plant community composition a threshold has been crossed to an Invaded State (5.0). These invaded plant communities that are dominated by Kentucky bluegrass will have significantly less cover and diversity of native grasses and forb species (Toledo, D. et al., 2014).

Dominant plant species

1. green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), tree

2. American elm (Ulmus americana), tree

3. western snowberry (Symphoricarpos occidentalis), shrub

4. chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), shrub

5. big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), grass

6. switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), grass

7. goldenrod (Solidago), grass

8. American licorice (Glycyrrhiza lepidota), grass

Submodel

Description

This Invaded State (3.0) is the result of invasion and dominance of introduced species. The Invaded State is characterized by the dominance of Kentucky bluegrass and smooth brome, and an increasing thatch layer that effectively blocks introduction of other plants into the system. Plant litter accumulation tends to favor the more shade-tolerant, introduced grass species. The nutrient cycle is also impaired, and the result is typically a higher level of nitrogen, which also favors the introduced species. Increasing plant litter decreases the amount of sunlight reaching plant crowns, thereby shifting competitive advantage to shade-tolerant introduced grass species. Studies indicate that soil biological activity is altered, and this shift apparently exploits the soil microclimate and encourages growth of the introduced grass species. Once the threshold is crossed, a change in grazing management alone cannot cause a reduction in the invasive grass dominance. Preliminary studies would tend to indicate this threshold may exist when Kentucky bluegrass exceeds 30 percent and native grasses represent less than 40 percent of the plant community composition. Plant communities dominated by Kentucky bluegrass have significantly less cover and diversity of native grasses and forb species (Toledo, D., et al., 2014).

Once this state is well established, even drastic events such as high intensity fires driven by high fuel loads of litter and thatch may not result in more than a very short-term reduction of Kentucky bluegrass. These events can reduce the dominance of Kentucky bluegrass, but due to the large amount of rhizomes in the soil, there is little opportunity for the native species to establish and dominate before Kentucky bluegrass rebounds and again dominates the system.

Dominant plant species

1. western snowberry (Symphoricarpos occidentalis), shrub

2. chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), shrub

3. Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), grass

4. smooth brome (Bromus inermis), grass

5. white sagebrush (Artemisia ludoviciana), grass

6. goldenrod (Solidago), grass

Submodel

Description

Historically, this state existed as small patches of trees and shrubs scattered across the site. Repeated intense disturbances (e.g., fire coupled with grazing) would have reverted these smaller patches of trees to the herbaceous dominated Reference State (1.0). In pre-European times, periodic low intensity fires typically would have maintained these small, wooded patches in a tree dominated state. Alterations to the historic fire and grazing disturbance regimes have resulted in these scattered tree/shrub patches forming almost continuous woody dominated plant communities across the site. This state is characterized by an overstory of tall trees, an understory of shrubs, and depending upon the amount of canopy cover, an herbaceous understory of grasses, sedges, and forbs.

The dynamics of the Wooded Overstory State (4.0) are largely due to flooding and the natural successional changes, starting with cottonwood and shrub establishment, and eventually the development of a green ash and boxelder plant community. The successional process can restart following another flooding event. Water control structures which limit flooding, livestock grazing, heavy wildlife browse, fire, the introduction of non-native, cool-season grasses, and encroachment of juniper can alter the dynamics of this site, resulting in old remnant stands of trees with little, if any regeneration.

Dominant plant species

1. eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides), tree

2. American plum (Prunus americana), shrub

3. chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), shrub

Submodel

Description

The Woody Invaded State develops as a result of continuous season-long grazing, or continuous seasonal grazing and no fire combined with the invasion and establishment of Russian olive, saltcedar, or conifer trees. With time, the cottonwood, boxelder, and ash trees that survive become mature, with little or no regeneration. This is due mainly to grazing of seedlings and saplings. Wildlife browse can also contribute to the loss of native tree and shrub regeneration. Grazing that limits regeneration also results in a reduction of the desirable native herbaceous species, often resulting in a dominance of species such as bluegrass and smooth brome, and forbs such as western ragweed, Canada thistle, burdock, and hound’s tongue.

Dominant plant species

1. Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia), tree

2. ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), tree

3. cottonwood (Populus), tree

4. boxelder (Acer negundo), tree

5. green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), tree

6. tamarisk (Tamarix), shrub

Submodel