Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 057X–Northern Minnesota Gray Drift
The Northern Minnesota Gray Drift (57) is located within the Northern Lakes Forest and Forage Region. This area is entirely in north-central Minnesota and makes up about 9,785 square miles (Figure 1). The entire area is covered by Wisconsin-age glacial drift. The glacial deposits are from four major ice lobes-Des Moines, Rainy, Superior, and Wadena. The landscape developed through a series of glaciations and the subsequent retreating and wasting of the ice sheets, which resulted in a complex pattern of moraines, outwash plains, drumlins, lake plains and drainages. Lakes, ponds and marshes are common. The thickness of the glacial till ranges from 90 to 185 meters. Some areas of these deposits are overlain by outwash or lacustrine sediments. Some depressional areas have an accumulation of organic matter. The organic deposits are more than 2.5meters thick in some areas. Elevation ranges from 300 to 500 meters across the area. (USDA-NRCS 2006)
The dominant soil orders in this MLRA are Alfisols, Entisols, and Histisols, with some Mollisols in the westernmost part of the area. The soils in the area have a frigid soil temperature regime; aquic or udic soil moisture regime, and mixed mineralogy. Their natural drainage class is related to landscape position. In general, the Alfisols formed in till on moraines, Entisols formed in outwash on moraines and outwash plains, and Histosols formed in organic material over outwash or till on moraines or outwash plains. (USDA-NRCS 2006)Classification relationships
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): Northern Minnesota Gray Drift (57) (USDA Handbook 296, 2006)
USFS Subregions: Northern Minnesota Drift & Lake Plain Section (212N); Chippewa Plains Subsection (212Na), Pine Moraines & Outwash Plains Subsections (212Nc), St. Louis Moraines Subsection (212Nb); Minnesota & NE Iowa Morainal Section (222M); Hardwood Hills Subsection (222Ma); Northern Superior Uplands Section (212L); Nashwauk Uplands Subsection (212Lc); Northern Minnesota & Ontario Peatlands Section (212M); Littlefork-Vermillion Uplands Subsection (212Ma) (Cleland et al. 2007).
US EPA Level IV Ecoregion: Itasca and St. Louis Moraines (50q); Chippewa Plains (50r); Nashwauk/Marcell Moraines and Uplands (50s); Alexandria Moraines and Detroit Lakes Outwash Plain (51j); McGrath Till Plain and Drumlins (51k); Wadena/Todd Drumlins and Osakis Till Plain (51l) (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2013)Ecological site concept
The soils associated with this site concept are very deep, very poorly drained Dysic, Typic, or Terric Histosols (Loxley, Greenwood, Beseman, Merwin series). Parent material is fibric and/or herbaceous organic material more than 40 centimeters thick. The surface water on-site is very acidic (pH <4.2), and mineral concentrations (particularly Ca++) are extremely low leading to increased acid tolerant species composition.
Associated sites
F057XY006MN Forested Peatland
Forested Peatland occurs on level to gently sloping surfaces. Soils have greater than 16” of organic material and soil pH values are greater than 4.5. This site has a water table typically below the peat surface that drops during the summer to allow for the establishment of significant tree cover.
R057XY005MN Open Peatland
Open Peatland occurs on level to gently sloping surfaces. Soils have greater than 16” of organic material and soil pH values are greater than 4.5. This site has a high water table that remain near the surface throughout the growing season, preventing the establishment of significant tree cover.
Similar sites
F057XY006MN Forested Peatland
Forested Peatland occurs on level to gently sloping surfaces. Soils have greater than 16” of organic material and soil pH values are greater than 4.5. This site has a water table typically below the peat surface that drops during the summer to allow for the establishment of significant tree cover.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Larix laricina
(2) Picea marianaShrub (1) Chamaedaphne calyculata
(2) Ledum groenlandicumHerbaceous (1) Eriophorum vaginatum
(2) Carex trispermaPhysiographic features
This area is in the Western Lake Section of the Central Lowland Province of the Interior Plains. The landscape developed through a series of glaciations and subsequent retreating and wasting of the ice sheets. A complex pattern of moraines, outwash plains, and drainages characterizes the area. The rest of the area is drained by the Mississippi River, southward into the Gulf of Mexico. The headwaters of the Mississippi River are in the northern part of the area. The Mississippi River and its tributaries drain most
of the area.Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Moraine
(2) Depression
(3) Outwash plain
(4) Bog
Runoff class Negligible to very low Flooding frequency None Ponding duration Long (7 to 30 days) to very long (more than 30 days) Ponding frequency Occasional to frequent Elevation 600 – 1640 ft Slope 0 – 2 % Ponding depth 0 – 6 in Water table depth 0 – 6 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
In general, MLRA 57 has cold winters and warm summers. About 65 percent of the annual precipitation falls as rain during the 5-month growing season (May through September), and an additional 18 percent falls as snow.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 80-110 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 120-140 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 30-30 in Frost-free period (actual range) 80-120 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 120-140 days Precipitation total (actual range) 30-30 in Frost-free period (average) 100 days Freeze-free period (average) 130 days Precipitation total (average) 30 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) BLACKDUCK [USC00210809], Blackduck, MN
-
(2) GRAND RPDS FOREST LAB [USC00213303], Grand Rapids, MN
-
(3) POKEGAMA DAM [USC00216612], Cohasset, MN
-
(4) LEECH LAKE [USC00214652], Bena, MN
-
(5) MARCELL 5NE [USC00215175], Bigfork, MN
-
(6) LITTLEFORK 10 SW [USC00214809], Big Falls, MN
-
(7) KABETOGAMA [USC00214191], Orr, MN
-
(8) ORR 3E [USC00216211], Orr, MN
">Influencing water features
Water is received through precipitation, runoff from adjacent uplands, and groundwater. Water levels are greatly influenced by precipitation rates and runoff from upland sites. Water leaves the site primarily through evapotranspiration, groundwater recharge, and less often, stream outflow. These sites are wetlands. <br />
<br />
The hydrology of acid peatland sites significantly impacts their ecological development. Groundwater movement into these sites brings in water that is exposed to surrounding acidic parent materials, such as sand deposits. This interaction keeps the soils acidic.Wetland description
Under the Cowardin System of Wetland Classification, or National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), the wetlands can be classified as: <br />
1) Palustrine, forested, needle-leaved evergreen, saturated, or <br />
2) Palustrine, scrub-shrub, broad-leaved deciduous, saturated, or <br />
3) Palustrine, scrub-shrub, broad-leaved evergreen, saturated, or <br />
4) Palustrine, emergent, persistent, saturated <br />
<br />
Under the Hydrogeomorphic Classification System (HGM), the wetlands can be classified as: <br />
1) Depressional, acidic, forested/organic, or <br />
2) Depressional, acidic, scrub-shrub/organic <br />
<br />
Permeability of the soil is very slow to moderately slow.<br />
Hydrologic Group: A/D, B/D, C/D <br />
Hydrogeomorphic Wetland Classification: Depressional acidic forested/organic; Depressional acidic scrub-shrub/organic <br />
Cowardin Wetland Classification: PFO4B, PSS4B, PSS3B, PEM1BSoil features
The soils associated with this site concept are very deep, very poorly drained Dysic, Typic, or Terric Histosols (Loxley, Beseman, Merwin series). Parent material is fibric and/or herbaceous organic material more than 40 centimeters thick. These sites usually formed in depressions on glacial moraines and lacustrine and outwash plains, where underlying impermeable layers minimize groundwater movement through the peat. The main source of water to the site is precipitation, since the site formed through a buildup of peat over thousands of years, causing the soil surface to develop a crest shape with sloping concave sides.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Organic material
(2) Till
Surface texture (1) Muck
(2) Peat
Drainage class Very poorly drained Permeability class Moderately slow to rapid Soil depth 80 – 0 in Surface fragment cover <=3" Not specified Surface fragment cover >3" Not specified Available water capacity
(0-60in)14 – 21 in Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)5.1 – 8.4 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 5 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 1 % Ecological dynamics
The soils associated with this site concept are very deep, very poorly drained Dysic, Typic, or Terric Histosols (Loxley, Greenwood, Beseman, Merwin series). Parent material is fibric and/or herbaceous organic material more than 40 centimeters thick. These sites usually formed in depressions on glacial moraines and lacustrine and outwash plains, where underlying impermeable layers minimize groundwater movement through the peat. Slopes are less than 2%. The surface water on-site is very acidic (pH
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textT1A - Logging, seeding. T1B - Impoundment or maintenance of water on-site, and/or establishment of invasive species. T1C - Beaver activity, roads, drainage, and other alterations in hydrology. T2A - Poorly logged peatlands that are excessively clearcut combined with severe rutting or road building can result in impoundment. R3A - Unblocking road culverts that cause ponding, filling in drainage ditches that are perennially blocked and impounded by beaver activity, etc. R4A - Draining or maintenance of water on-site causing alterations in hydrology. State 1 submodel, plant communities
1.1A - Lack of fire, accumulation of peat, lowering of pH<5.0 1.1B - Surface fires or windthrow or higher that average precipitation 1.2B - Neutralization of acids on-site raising of pH 1.2A - Fire, if peat depth is lowered and thereby allowing roots of plants to access groundwater or higher than average precipitation 1.3A - Time, accumulation of peat 1.4A - Time, accumulation of peat, acidification, establishment and growth of older trees. 1.4B - Severe catastrophic fire or windthrow or higher that average precipitation State 1
Reference StateMoss cover is very indicative for this site, driving the successional dynamics and species diversity. Sphagnum sp. absorb dissolved mineral cations, and release organic acids, which lowers the pH of stagnant surface water below 5.0 (MN DNR 2003). Sphagnum tends to form carpets of hummocks, which creates an acidic environment cut off from groundwater and on-site ponding. In recently developed bogs, on sites mostly in the western range of the MLRA where soils are less continuously saturated, on sites where water table fluctuations are less variable, or on inclusions of sites where there are upwellings of groundwater, isolated minerotrophic species (i.e. creeping sedge or bluejoint) may be present. Other ground cover includes fine-leaved graminoids, and minimal presence of forbs. Occasionally, seedlings of deciduous tree species associated with adjacent sites (i.e. red maple or paper birch) may become established on Sphagnum hummocks but typically do not survive to become saplings or trees (MN DNR 2003). The overstory usually consists of scattered, stunted (
Dominant plant species
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
tamarack (Larix laricina), tree
-
creeping sedge (Carex chordorrhiza), grass
-
bluejoint (Calamagrostis canadensis), grass
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum fuscum), other herbaceous
Community 1.1
Mature Tamarack-SpruceOverstory occasionally has tamarack but is mostly dominated by black spruce, most likely due to the longer lifespan of the spruce trees. In cases where tamarack is monotypic, it is usually due to a lack of seed source for black spruce, or mortality of black spruce caused by species-specific insects or disease (MN DNR Forestry). Sometimes, paper birch can be present in the canopy. In this phase, tree growth is fairly stagnant, although stocking and tree height are higher than in the Young Tamarack phase (1.4). The moss layer is dominated by Sphagnum sp., between which in the hollows can be found brown mosses. In cases where tree growth exceeds 50% canopy cover, more shade-tolerant species can be present in the understory, including creeping snowberry, soft-leaved sedge, ferns, clubmosses, groundpines, and bunchberry (MN DNR 2003).
Dominant plant species
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
tamarack (Larix laricina), tree
-
speckled alder (Alnus incana ssp. rugosa), shrub
-
bog birch (Betula pumila), shrub
-
bog Labrador tea (Ledum groenlandicum), shrub
-
leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne calyculata), shrub
-
threeleaf false lily of the valley (Maianthemum trifolium), other herbaceous
-
purple pitcherplant (Sarracenia purpurea), other herbaceous
-
tussock cottongrass (Eriophorum vaginatum), other herbaceous
-
threeseeded sedge (Carex trisperma), other herbaceous
Community 1.2
Spruce BogSome scattered tamarack may still remain in the overstory, but mostly the sites are dominated by black spruce. On well-developed crests of older sites, trees can reach up to 30 ft tall, making them more desirable for timber harvesting. While the few graminoids and forbs may remain the same as in 1.1, fewseed sedge and boreal bog sedge are more indicative of this phase. In this phase, the Sphagnum has accumulated and typically forms large carpets with greater hummocks, along with Pleurozium. In this plant community phase acidity is the lowest of all of the plant community phase. Only true bog species remain, with no minerotrophic indicator species left.
Dominant plant species
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
velvetleaf huckleberry (Vaccinium myrtilloides), shrub
-
lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium), shrub
-
Indianpipe (Monotropa), other herbaceous
-
boreal bog sedge (Carex magellanica), other herbaceous
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum), other herbaceous
-
Schreber's big red stem moss (Pleurozium schreberi), other herbaceous
-
dicranum moss (Dicranum), other herbaceous
-
threeseeded sedge (Carex trisperma), other herbaceous
-
threeleaf false lily of the valley (Maianthemum trifolium), other herbaceous
-
bog laurel (Kalmia polifolia), other herbaceous
-
leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne calyculata), other herbaceous
-
fewseed sedge (Carex oligosperma), other herbaceous
Community 1.3
Poor FenIn this phase, the overstory is often stunted (
Dominant plant species
-
tamarack (Larix laricina), tree
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
bog willow (Salix pedicellaris), shrub
-
purple marshlocks (Comarum palustre), shrub
-
leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne), shrub
-
bog birch (Betula pumila), shrub
-
Northwest Territory sedge (Carex utriculata), other herbaceous
-
woollyfruit sedge (Carex lasiocarpa), other herbaceous
-
mud sedge (Carex limosa), other herbaceous
-
white beaksedge (Rhynchospora alba), other herbaceous
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum), other herbaceous
-
(Cladopodiella fluitans), other herbaceous
-
rannoch-rush (Scheuchzeria palustris), other herbaceous
-
leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne calyculata), other herbaceous
-
polytrichum moss (Polytrichum strictum), other herbaceous
-
aulacomnium moss (Aulacomnium palustre), other herbaceous
-
Schreber's big red stem moss (Pleurozium schreberi), other herbaceous
Community 1.4
Young TamarackDominant plant species
-
tamarack (Larix laricina), tree
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
bog willow (Salix pedicellaris), shrub
-
speckled alder (Alnus incana ssp. rugosa), shrub
-
creeping snowberry (Gaultheria hispidula), shrub
-
velvetleaf huckleberry (Vaccinium myrtilloides), shrub
-
lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium), shrub
-
moccasin flower (Cypripedium acaule), other herbaceous
-
threeseeded sedge (Carex trisperma), other herbaceous
-
tussock cottongrass (Eriophorum vaginatum), other herbaceous
-
boreal bog sedge (Carex magellanica), other herbaceous
-
bluejoint (Calamagrostis canadensis), other herbaceous
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum), other herbaceous
-
buckbean (Menyanthes trifoliata), other herbaceous
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2Lack of fire, accumulation of peat, lowering of pH<5.0
Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.4Surface fires or windthrow or higher that average precipitation
Pathway 1.2B
Community 1.2 to 1.1Neutralization of acids on-site raising of pH
Context dependence.Alterations in hydrology which result in the alkalization of bogs, or fire disturbances that can result in mineral inputs from outside sources that offset depletion of cations (especially Ca++) by Sphagnum sp, (even groundwater inputs of <5% of the total water budget relative to precipitation) can revert the process of peat accumulation and acidification, and result in a community type with more minerotrophic
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.3Fire, if peat depth is lowered and thereby allowing roots of plants to access groundwater or higher than average precipitation
Context dependence.Typically, the interval of surface fires are approximately 120 years. Pockets of poor fen vegetation can develop in a spruce bog where alkalization of the bog occurs on the lower flanks of the crest, where the water source can receive nutrients from surface runoff, or where the runoff is channeled into drains or water tracks. The transition of the entire site to poor fen can occur on a broader scale when fire release nutrients and burn peat, reducing tree cover, reducing evapotranspiration and increasing water-logged conditions, resulting in even minimal groundwater and nutrient inputs to the site.
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.4Time, accumulation of peat
Context dependence.This pathway usually occurs naturally with enough time for peat to accumulate and elevate the growing surface out of water-logged conditions, so that tree growth and recruitment can be more successful.
Pathway 1.4A
Community 1.4 to 1.1Time, accumulation of peat, acidification, establishment and growth of older trees.
Pathway 1.4B
Community 1.4 to 1.3Severe catastrophic fire or windthrow or higher that average precipitation
State 2
Logged StateIn this state, the vegetation usually exhibits a structural pattern of “hard” edges which does not mimic the patch-scale distribution of canopy gaps we see from natural disturbances. Compositional changes in this state, as a diversion from reference, can be concerning, most notably the reversal of abundance of tamarack and black spruce (MN DNR Forestry). Tamarack regeneration has proven problematic for management, and can be susceptible to devastating outbreaks of larch sawfly and larch beetles. Tamarack regeneration in this state could be accomplished by leaving some tamarack seedtrees rather than always clear-cutting and seeding just black spruce (MN DNR Forestry). Harvesting should always be done in this state when the entire peat surface is frozen, although even then just a few passes with heavy equipment can damage the structural integrity of the site, or damage standing trees, thus prohibiting tree regeneration or maintenance on-site. In the field, areas identified by the presence of broad-leaved sedges and rough alder have far less structural integrity than the Sphagnum mat and should be avoided at all costs by heavy equipment. When dwarf mistletoe is present, control of the disease through broadcase burning, or by use of the “5 foot cutting rule”, can eradicate the disease, but success is dependent on total elimination of all living black spruce, and treatments (hand cutting, winter shearing, herbicides, combination treatments) need to be continued for 10 years after the initial harvest (MN DNR Forestry).
Dominant plant species
-
tamarack (Larix laricina), tree
-
black spruce (Picea mariana), tree
-
bluejoint (Calamagrostis canadensis), grass
-
creeping sedge (Carex chordorrhiza), grass
State 3
Impounded StateIn this state, the excess of water on-site for longer than normal duration typically results in the killing off of tamarack and spruce trees, and the establishment of invasive species such as Typha sp. or reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). Sometimes, other graminoids (Carex sp.) can remain on site and form floating mats. Sometimes alder and willow shrubs will remain or establish on the edges.
Dominant plant species
-
willow (Salix), shrub
-
speckled alder (Alnus incana ssp. rugosa), shrub
-
reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), grass
-
sedge (Carex), grass
-
narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), other herbaceous
-
hybrid cattail (Typha ×glauca), other herbaceous
State 4
Open Bog StatePossible open water. Develops where the peat becomes isolated from mineral rich runoff or groundwater. Mineral and nutrient inputs come from precipitation and deposition. The saturated conditions and quick accumulation of Sphagnum prevent or inhibit establishment/growth of black spruce and tamarack. Variation in species composition in the community occur.
Dominant plant species
-
leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne calyculata), shrub
-
fewseed sedge (Carex oligosperma), grass
-
sphagnum (Sphagnum fuscum), other herbaceous
-
purple pitcherplant (Sarracenia purpurea), other herbaceous
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2This transition involves logging, usually clearcutting, but with reserves for seed sources, site preparation, control for disease and invasive species, and seeding, in order to maintain the site as a viable commercial timber harvesting state. This transition is only possible, or desirable, when the management is applied to phases in which radial growth has been prolific and trees have reached maturity, exhibiting taller, more commercially viable trees.
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3Impoundment or maintenance of water on-site, and/or establishment of invasive species. Beaver activity, roads, blocked drainages, and other alterations in hydrology can transition the Acid Peatlands out of Reference to an Impounded State, where water is ponded on site for longer durations and receives excessive nutrients from overland surface flow.
Transition T1C
State 1 to 4Impoundment or maintenance of water on-site. Beaver activity, roads, drainage, and other alterations in hydrology can transition the Acid Peatlands out of Reference to an Open State, where water is on site for longer durations and receives excessive nutrients from overland surface flow causing stunted tree growth.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3Poorly logged peatlands that are excessively clearcut combined with severe rutting or road building can result in impoundment.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 1Unblocking road culverts that cause ponding, filling in drainage ditches that are perennially blocked and impounded by beaver activity, etc.
Restoration pathway R4A
State 4 to 1Draining or maintenance of water on-site causing alterations in hydrology that can transition the Open state back to the Reference State, where water is on site for shorter durations and receives less nutrients from overland surface flow causing increased tree growth.
Additional community tables
Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 6. Community 1.1 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height ft Canopy cover (%) Diameter in Basal area (square ft/acre) Table 7. Community 1.1 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (ft) Canopy cover (%) Table 8. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 1.2 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height ft Canopy cover (%) Diameter in Basal area (square ft/acre) Table 10. Community 1.2 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (ft) Canopy cover (%) Table 11. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 12. Community 1.3 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height ft Canopy cover (%) Diameter in Basal area (square ft/acre) Table 13. Community 1.3 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (ft) Canopy cover (%) Table 14. Community 1.4 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 15. Community 1.4 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height ft Canopy cover (%) Diameter in Basal area (square ft/acre) Table 16. Community 1.4 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (ft) Canopy cover (%) Interpretations
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Information presented was derived from Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota, USDA-NRCS soil survey information, and USDA Plants Database. Relationship to Other Established Classifications: MN DNR Native Plant Community (MN DNR, 2003); the reference community of this Provisional Ecological Site is most similar to: MN DNR APn80 Northern Spruce Bog MN DNR APn81 Northern Poor Conifer Bog MN DNR APn91 Northern Poor Fen MN DNR APn90, Northern Open Bog
Other references
Almendinger, J. C. 1997. Minnesota’s Bearing Tree Database. Biological Report No. 56.
Brinson, M. M. 1993. A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands.
Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31.
Cleland, D.T.; Freeouf, J.A.; Keys, J.E., Jr.; Nowacki, G.J.; Carpenter, C; McNab, W.H. 2007. Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections of the Conterminous United States.[1:3,500,000], Sloan, A.M., cartog. Gen. Tech. Report WO-76. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979.
Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. MNDNR St. Paul, MN.
Interpretations - Silviculture Program APn81. Retrieved at https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/forestry/ecs_silv/interpretations.html
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
MN DNR Forestry. Accessed 2018, June 13.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (2003). Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota: The Laurentian Mixed Forest Province.
Official Soil Series Descriptions. Available online. Accessed March 2018.
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
USDA, NRCS. 2018. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 26 June 2018). National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC 27401-4901 USA.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. Level III and IV ecoregions of the continental
United States: Corvallis, Oregon, U.S. EPA, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, map scale 1:3,000,000, https://www.epa.gov/eco-research/level-iii-and-iv-ecoregions-continental-united-states.
Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.Contributors
Kade Anderson, Ecological Site Specialist for North Central Region
Patty Burns, Soil Scientist at Bemidji Soil Survey Office
Stacey Clark, Former Regional Ecologist for Regions 10 & 11
Ezra Hoffman, Ecological Site Specialist for North Central RegionApproval
Suzanne Mayne-Kinney, 10/03/2023
Acknowledgments
MLRA 57 technical team completed in 2022.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 08/29/2026 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement