Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site FX053A99X160
Thin Breaks (TB)
Last updated: 4/25/2025
Accessed: 04/22/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 053A–Northern Dark Brown Glaciated Plains
The Northern Dark Brown Glaciated Plains, MLRA 53A, is a large, agriculturally and ecologically significant area. It consists of approximately 6.1 million acres and stretches 140 miles from east to west and 120 miles from north to south, encompassing portions of 8 counties in northeastern Montana and northwestern North Dakota. This region represents part of the southern edge of the Laurentide Ice Sheet during maximum glaciation. It is one of the driest and westernmost areas within the vast network of glacially derived prairie pothole landforms of the northern Great Plains and falls roughly between the Missouri Coteau to the east and the Brown Glaciated Plains to the west. Elevation ranges from 1,800 feet (550 meters) to 3,300 feet (1,005 meters).
Soils are primarily Mollisols, but Inceptisols and Entisols are also common. Till from continental glaciation is the predominant parent material, but alluvium and bedrock are also common. Till deposits are typically less than 50 feet thick (Soller, 2001). Underlying the till is sedimentary bedrock largely consisting of Cretaceous shale, sandstone, and mudstone (Vuke et al., 2007). The bedrock is commonly exposed on hillslopes, particularly along drainageways. Significant alluvial deposits occur in glacial outwash channels and along major drainages, including portions of the Missouri, Poplar, and Big Muddy rivers. Large eolian deposits of sand occur in the vicinity of the ancestral Missouri river channel east of Medicine Lake (Fullerton et al., 2004). The northwestern portion of the MLRA contains a large unglaciated area containing paleoterraces and large deposits of sand and gravel known as the Flaxville gravels.
Much of this MLRA was glaciated towards the end of the Wisconsin age, and the maximum glacial extent occurred approximately 20,000 years ago (Fullerton and Colton, 1986; Fullerton et al., 2004). Subsequent erosion from major stream and river systems have created numerous drainageways throughout much of the MLRA. The result is a geologically young landscape that is predominantly a dissected till plain interspersed with alluvial deposits and dominated by soils in the Mollisol and Inceptisol orders. Much of this area is typic ustic, making these soils very productive and generally well suited to production agriculture.
Dryland farming is the predominant land use with approximately 50 percent of the land area in cultivated crops. Winter, spring, and durum varieties of wheat are the major crops with over 48 million bushels produced annually (USDA-NASS, 2017) Areas of rangeland typically are on steep hillslopes along drainages. The rangeland is mostly native mixed-grass prairie similar the Stipa-Agropyron, Stipa-Bouteloua-Agropyron, and Stipa-Bouteloua faciations (Coupland, 1950; 1961). Cool season grasses predominate and include rhizomatous wheatgrasses, needle and thread, western porcupine grass, and green needlegrass. Woody species are generally rare, however many of the steeper drainages support stands of trees and shrubs such as green ash and chokecherry. Seasonally ponded, prairie pothole wetlands may occur throughout the MLRA, but the greatest concentrations are in the east and northeast where receding glaciers stagnated, forming disintegration moraines with hummocky topography and numerous areas of poorly-drained soils.Classification relationships
NRCS Soil Geography Hierarchy
• Land Resource Region: Northern Great Plains
• Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 053A Northern Dark Brown Glaciated Plains
National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units (Cleland et al., 1997; McNab et al., 2007)
• Domain: Dry
• Division: Temperate Steppe
• Province: Great Plains-Palouse Dry Steppe Province 331
• Section: Glaciated Northern Grasslands Section 331L
• Subsection: Glaciated Northern Grasslands Subsection 331La
• Landtype association/Landtype phase: N/A
National Vegetation Classification Standard (Federal Geographic Data Committee, 2008)
• Class: Mesomorphic Shrub and Herb Vegetation Class (2)
• Subclass: Temperate and Boreal Grassland and Shrubland Subclass (2.B)
• Formation: Temperate Grassland and Shrubland Formation (2.B.2)
• Division: Central North American Grassland and Shrubland Division (2.B.2.Nb)
• Macrogroup: Hesperostipa comata - Pascopyrum smithii - Festuca hallii Grassland Macrogroup (2.B.2.Nb.2)
• Group: Pascopyrum smithii - Hesperostipa comata - Schizachyrium scoparium Mixedgrass Prairie Group (2.B.2.Nb.2.c)
• Alliance: Schizachyrium scoparium Northwestern Great Plains Grassland Alliance
• Association: Schizachyrium scoparium - Bouteloua (curtipendula, gracilis) - Carex filifolia Grassland
EPA Ecoregions
• Level 1: Great Plains (9)
• Level 2: West-Central Semi-Arid Prairies (9.3)
• Level 3: Northwestern Glaciated Plains (42)
• Level 4: Glaciated Dark Brown Prairie (42i)
Glaciated Northern Grasslands (42j)Ecological site concept
This provisional ecological site is common throughout MLRA 53A. Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of this ecological site based on current data. This map is approximate, is not intended to be definitive, and may be subject to change. Thin Breaks is an extensive ecological site occurring on moderately steep to very steeply sloping landscapes, usually occuring in areas that have been dissected by streams or rivers and where bedrock occurs near the surface. This site is characterized by lithic or paralithic bedrock within 40 inches of the soil surface and a relatively young, undeveloped soil profile, which is lacking features such as an argillic horizon. Soils typically have an ochric epipedon, but may have a mollic epipedon in some cases. Characteristic vegetation is little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula), and needle and thread (Hesperostipa comata).
Associated sites
FX053A99X029 Limy Steep (LyStp)
This site occurs upslope from the Thin Breaks ecological site It most commonly occupies a shoulder position were the soil depth is greater than 40 inches.
FX053A99X131 Shallow Clay (SwC)
This site occurs on moderate to steeply sloping hillslopes adjacent to the Thin Breaks ecological site where soils contain greater than 35 percent clay. It typically occupies a similar slope position to the Thin Breaks ecological site.
Similar sites
FX053A99X131 Shallow Clay (SwC)
This site differs from Thin Breaks in that the clay content is greater than 35 percent and depth to bedrock is less than 20 inches.
FX053A99X029 Limy Steep (LyStp)
This site differs from the Thin Breaks ecological site in that the soil depth is greater than 40 inches and soils are typically derived from glacial till rather than residuum. Composition of cool-season bunchgrasses is significantly higher.
FX053A99X040 Loamy Steep (LoStp)
This site differs from Thin Breaks ecological site in that the soil is typically greater than 40 inches deep and derived from glacial till. When moderately deep (20 to 40 inches) soils are well developed (evidenced by a mollic epipedon and argillic horizon).
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous (1) Schizachyrium scoparium
(2) Bouteloua curtipendulaLegacy ID
R053AY721MT
Physiographic features
The Thin Breaks ecological site largely occurs where the till plain has been dissected by streams or rivers and bedrock occurs near the surface. It occurs on a variety of slope positions including side slopes, nose slopes, and headslopes. Typical landforms are hillslopes, bluffs, and escarpments. Slopes vary from 0 to 60 percent, but are typically greater than 15 percent .
Figure 1. General distribution of the Thin Breaks ecological site by map unit extent.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Geomorphic position, hills (1) Side Slope
(2) Nose Slope
(3) Head Slope
Landforms (1) Till plain > Hillslope
(2) Till plain > Bluff
(3) Till plain > Escarpment
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 1800 – 3300 ft Slope 16 – 60 % Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Flooding frequency Not specified Ponding frequency Not specified Elevation 0 ft Slope 0 – 60 % Climatic features
The Northern Dark Brown Glaciated Plains is a semi-arid region with a temperate continental climate that is characterized by frigid winters and warm to hot summers (Coupland, 1958; Richardson and Hanson, 1977; Heidel et al., 2000). The majority of precipitation occurs as steady, soaking, frontal system rains in late spring to early summer. Summer rainfall comes mainly from convection thunderstorms that typically deliver scattered amounts of rain in intense bursts. These storms may be accompanied by damaging winds and large-diameter hail and result in flash flooding along low-order streams. Approximately 80 percent of the annual precipitation occurs during the growing season. June is the wettest month, followed by July and May (Richardson and Hanson, 1977; Heidel et al., 2000). Average annual precipitation ranges from 11 inches (280 mm) near Richey, Montana, to 15 inches (380 mm) in the Little Muddy drainage near Williston, North Dakota, but precipitation varies greatly from year to year. On average, severe drought and very wet years occur with the same frequency, which is 1 out of 10 years (Coupland, 1958; Heidel et al., 2000). Extreme climatic variations, especially droughts, have the greatest influence on species cover and production (Coupland, 1958, 1961; Biondini et al., 1998). The frost-free period for this ecological site ranges from 90 to 130 days, and the freeze-free period ranges from 115 to 155 days.
Table 4 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 90-130 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 120-160 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 10-20 in Frost-free period (average) 110 days Freeze-free period (average) 140 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 4. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 5 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) BREDETTE [USC00241088], Poplar, MT
-
(2) CULBERTSON [USC00242122], Culbertson, MT
-
(3) OPHEIM 10 N [USC00246236], Opheim, MT
-
(4) OPHEIM 12 SSE [USC00246238], Opheim, MT
-
(5) PLENTYWOOD [USC00246586], Plentywood, MT
-
(6) SCOBEY 4 NW [USC00247425], Scobey, MT
-
(7) SIDNEY [USC00247560], Sidney, MT
-
(8) VIDA 6 NE [USC00248569], Vida, MT
-
(9) WILLISTON SLOULIN INTL AP [USW00094014], Williston, ND
">Influencing water features
This is an upland ecological site and is not influenced by a water table or run in from adjacent sites. Due to the semi-arid climate in which it occurs, the water budget is normally contained within the soil pedon. Steep slopes combined with bedrock at relatively shallow depths result in very high runoff potential. Intense precipitation events deliver large amounts of surface runoff downslope. Moisture loss through evapotranspiration exceeds precipitation for the majority of the growing season and soil moisture is the primary limiting factor for plant production on this ecological site.
Soil features
The soils that best represent the central concept of this ecological site are Cabba and Cambert. The Cabba soil is in the Ustorthents great group and is characterized by a surface horizon that lacks enough organic matter to have a mollic epipedon and by paralithic bedrock within 20 inches of the soil surface. The Cambert soil is in the Haplustepts great group and and is characterized by a surface horizon that lacks enough organic matter to have a mollic epipedon and by paralithic bedrock between 20 and 40 inches below the soil surface. Both soils have mixed mineralogy and the typical parent material is loamy or silty residuum. The soil moisture regime for all soils in this ecological site concept is typic ustic, which means that the soils are moist in some or all parts for either 180 cumulative days or 90 consecutive days during the growing season but are dry in some or all parts for over 90 cumulative days. These soils have a frigid soil temperature regime (Soil Survey Staff, 2014).
Surface horizon textures found in this site are typically loam or silt loam, but maybe also include sandy loam and silty clay loam. Clay content is typically 18 to 25 percent and sand content is typically less than 70 percent. The underlying horizons are typically weakly developed and an argillic horizon is lacking. Subsurface textures are typically similar to the surface horizon. Organic matter content in the surface horizon typically ranges from 1 to 3 percent, and moist colors vary from light olive brown (2.5Y 5/4) to very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2). Typically the surface horizon that lacks enough organic matter to have a mollic epipedon, but not always. The upper 5 inches of these soils frequently reacts with hydrochloric acid and the calcium carbonate equivalent varies from 0 to 10 percent. In the upper 20 inches, electrical conductivity is less than 4, and the sodium absorption ratio is less than 13. Soil pH classes are slightly to moderately alkaline in the surface horizon and moderately to strongly alkaline in the subsurface horizons. The soil depth class for this site can be very shallow (less than 10 inches), but is typically shallow to moderately deep (10 to 40 inches). Content of coarse fragments in the upper 20 inches of soil is less than 35 percent.Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Residuum
Surface texture (1) Loam
(2) Silt loam
Drainage class Well drained Depth to restrictive layer 0 – 40 in Soil depth 0 – 40 in Available water capacity
(0-40in)5.8 – 7.3 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-5in)0 – 10 % Electrical conductivity
(0-20in)0 – 3 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-20in)0 – 12 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)7.4 – 9 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-20in)0 – 34 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-20in)0 – 34 % Ecological dynamics
The information in this ecological site description, including the state-and-transition model (STM) (Figure 3), was developed based on historical data, current field data, professional experience, and a review of the scientific literature. As a result, all possible scenarios or plant species may not be included. Key indicator plant species, disturbances, and ecological processes are described to inform land management decisions.
The Thin Breaks provisional ecological site in MLRA 53A consists of four states: the Historic Reference state (1), the Current Potential state (2), the Altered state (3), and the Invaded state (4). Plant communities associated with this ecological site evolved under the combined influences of climate, grazing, and fire. Extreme climatic variability results in frequent droughts, which have the greatest influence on the relative contribution of species cover and production (Coupland, 1958, 1961; Biondini et al., 1998).
The historic ecosystem experienced periodic lightning-caused fires with estimated fire return intervals of 6 to 25 years (Bragg, 1995). Historically, Native Americans also set periodic fires. The majority of lightning-caused fires occurred in July and August, whereas Native Americans typically set fires during spring and fall to correspond with the movement of bison (Higgins, 1986). The precise effects of the historic fire return interval are not definitive, but in general the mixed-grass ecosystem was resilient to fire. Potential effects are generally temporary and may include reduction of litter, fluctuations in production, and changes in species composition (Vermeire et al., 2011, 2014).
Native grazers also shaped these plant communities. Bison (Bison bison) were the dominant historic grazer, but pronghorn (Antilocapra americana), elk (Cervus canadensis), and deer (Odocoileus spp.) were also common. Additionally, small mammals such as prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) and ground squirrels (Urocitellus spp.) influenced this plant community (Salo et al., 2004). Grasshoppers and periodic outbreaks of Rocky Mountain locusts (Melanoplus spretus) also played an important role in the ecology of these communities (Lockwood, 2004). The mixed-grass ecosystem was resilient to grazing, although localized areas could experience shifts in species composition due to heavy grazing.
Following European settlement, fire was largely eliminated, domestic livestock replaced native ungulates as the primary grazers, and non-native species were introduced to the ecosystem. Aside from drought, livestock grazing is now the principle disturbance on the landscape.
Improper grazing of this site can result in a reduction in the cover of the mid-statured grasses and an increase in shortgrasses such as blue grama (Smoliak et al., 1972; Smoliak, 1974). Improper grazing practices include any practices that do not allow sufficient opportunity for plants to physiologically recover from a grazing event or multiple grazing events within a given year and/or that do not provide adequate cover to prevent soil erosion over time. These practices may include, but are not limited to, overstocking, continuous grazing, and/or inadequate seasonal rotation moves over multiple years. Periods of extended drought (approximately 3 years or more) can reduce mid-statured, cool-season grasses and shift the species composition of this community to one dominated by warm season grasses such as blue grama (Coupland, 1958, 1961). Further degradation of the site due to improper grazing can result in a community dominated by shortgrasses such as blue grama and prairie Junegrass (Koeleria cristata).
Most, if not all, extant examples of this site have some degree of invasion by non-native species. Non-native grasses such as crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum), and bluegrasses (Poa spp.) are the most common invasive species. These species are widespread throughout the Northern Great Plains can invade relatively undisturbed grasslands (Heidinga and Wilson 2002, Henderson and Naeth 2005, Toledo et al., 2014). In most cases native ecological function is relatively intact, but in some cases non-native grasses will displace native species and dominate the ecological functions of the site.
The effects of an altered fire regime are not completely understood at the time of this writing, but evidence suggests that long-term fire suppression can result in accumulations of litter and may contribute to increased abundance of creeping juniper (Juniperus horizontalis) and non-native grasses (Murphy and Grant, 2005; Gucker, 2006; Vermeire et al., 2011). Conversely, fire return intervals less than 6 years, such as annual burning, can reduce productivity and shift species composition toward warm-season, short-statured grasses (Shay et al., 2001; Smith and McDermid, 2014).
Due to the steep slopes and the relatively shallow soils, this ecological site is generally not suitable for cropland. In general, this site has not been converted to cropland and has remained in native vegetation.
The state-and-transition model (STM) diagram (Figure 2) suggests possible pathways that plant communities on this site may follow as a result of a given set of ecological processes and management. The site may also support states not displayed in the STM diagram. Landowners and land managers should seek guidance from local professionals before prescribing a particular management or treatment scenario. Plant community responses vary across this MLRA due to variability in weather, soils, and aspect. The reference community phase may not necessarily be the management goal. The lists of plant species and species composition values are provisional and are not intended to cover the full range of conditions, species, and responses for the site. Species composition by dry weight is provided when available and is considered provisional based on the sources identified in the narratives associated with each community phase.State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
T1A - Introduction of non-native grass species, such as Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and crested wheatgrass. T2A - Prolonged drought, improper grazing management, or a combination of these factors T2B - Displacement of native species by non-native invasive species (Crested Wheatgrass, Kentucky bluegrass, noxious weeds, etc.) R3A - Range seeding, grazing land mechanical treatment, timely moisture, proper grazing management (management intensive and costly) State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
2.1A - Drought, improper grazing management 2.2A - Return to normal or above average precipitation, proper grazing management State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic ReferenceThe Historic Reference state (1) contains one community phase characterized by a predominance of mid-statured warm-season grasses and cool-season bunchgrasses. This state is considered extinct and is included here for historical reference purposes. It evolved under the combined influences of climate, grazing, and fire with climatic variation having the greatest influence on cover and production. In general, this state was resilient to grazing, although localized areas likely received heavy grazing, resulting in the species composition shifting to short statured species. Fire most likely resulted in a short term shifts in species composition with more warm-season grasses and fewer cool-season bunchgrasses (Steinberg, 2002; Chadwick, 2003; Vermeire et al., 2011).
Community 1.1
Little Bluestem - Sideoats Grama CommunityThe Little Bluestem - Sideoats Grama Community Phase (1.1) was characterized by a dominance of mid-statured warm-season grasses. The predominant grasses were little bluestem and sideoats grama, but plains muhly (Muhlenbergia cuspidata) and needle and thread were also common. Sedges such as threadleaf sedge (Carex filifolia) were common, although not abundant. The mat-forming, warm-season, perennial grass blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis) and prairie Junegrass (Koeleria macrantha) were the predominant shortgrasses (Coupland 1950, 1961). Forbs comprised about 10 percent cover and shrubs 5 percent cover or less.
State 2
Current PotentialThe Current Potential state (2) contains two community phases characterized by a predominance of mid-statured warm-season grasses and cool-season bunchgrasses. It evolved under the combined influences of climate, grazing, and fire with climatic variation having the greatest influence on cover and production. This state differs from the historical reference state in that it is influenced by introduced plant species and has altered fire and grazing regimes In general, this state is resilient to grazing and fire, although these factors can influence species composition in localized areas.
Community 2.1
Little Bluestem - Sideoats Grama - Introduced Grass CommunityThe Little Bluestem - Sideoats Grama - Introduced Grass Community Phase (2.1) is predominantly native warm-season grasses but has some degree of non-native grass establishment. Mid-statured warm-season grasses are predominated by little bluestem and sideoats grams. Plains muhly also occurs frequently, but is less abundant. The predominant cool-season bunchgrass is needle and thread. Sedges, particularly threadleaf sedge, are common with low to moderate cover. Shortgrasses include blue grama and prairie Junegrass. Common forbs are spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), blacksamson echinacea (Echinacea angustifolia), and sunflower (Helianthus spp). Shrubs and subshrubs occur at 5 percent cover or less and may include prairie sagewort (Artemisia frigida) and creeping juniper. Non-native species typically comprise 1 to 3 percent of the plant community and may include crested wheatgrass and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis). The approximate species composition of this plant community is as follows:
Percent composition by weight*
Mid-Statured Warm-season grasses - 40-50%
Little Bluestem (25-30%)
Sideoats Grama (10-20%)
Plains Muhly (0-15%)
Needle and Thread - 5-15%
Sedges - 5-10%
Shortgrasses - 5%
Blue Grama (0-5%)
Prairie Junegrass (0-5%)
Other Native Grasses - 15%
Perennial Forbs - 10%
Shrubs/Subshrubs - 5%
Non-native grasses - 1-3%
Estimated Total Annual Production (lbs./ac)*
Low - 700
Representative Value - 900
High - 1100
*Estimated based on current data – subject to revisionCommunity 2.2
At-Risk CommunityThe At-Risk Community Phase (2.2) occurs when site conditions decline due to drought or improper grazing management. It is characterized by a decline in mid-statured grasses and an increase in shortgrasses. The cover of shortgrasses equals or exceeds the cover of mid-statured grasses and palatable, grazing sensitive grasses such as plains muhly are rare or absent. More resilient mid-statured grasses such as sideoats grama may persist, but eventually decline as well (Chadwick, 2003; Kilian, 2016). Shortgrasses such as blue grama and prairie Junegrass are increasing. The response of little bluestem depends on the season of grazing use. It tends to decrease when grazed in early summer, but may increase in abundance in fall grazed pastures due to its low palatability in the fall. Sedges, particularly threadleaf sedge, may also increase in this phase.
Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2Drought, improper grazing management, or a combination of these factors can shift the Little Bluestem - Sideoats Grama - Introduced Grass Community Phase (2.1) to the At-Risk Community Phase (2.2). These factors favor an increase in shortgrasses such as blue grama and a decrease in midgrasses (Coupland, 1961).
Key drivers
-
Livestock grazing or browsing
-
Precipitation (annual scale)
Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1Normal or above-normal spring precipitation and proper grazing management transitions the At-Risk Community Phase (2.2) back to the Little Bluestem - Sideoats Grama - Introduced Grass Community Phase (2.1).
Key drivers
-
Livestock grazing or browsing
-
Precipitation (annual scale)
State 3
AlteredThe Altered state (3) consists of two community phases. The dynamics of this state are driven by long-term drought, improper grazing management, or a combination of these factors. Shortgrasses increase with long-term improper grazing at the expense of cool-season midgrasses (Coupland, 1961; Biondini and Manske, 1996). Blue grama-dominated communities in particular, can alter soil properties, creating conditions that resist establishment of other grass species (Dormaar and Willms, 1990; Dormaar et al., 1994). Reductions in stocking rates can reduce shortgrass cover and increase the cover of cool-season midgrasses, although this recovery may take decades (Dormaar and Willms, 1990; Dormaar et al., 1994).
Community 3.1
Shortgrass CommunityThe Shortgrass Community Phase (3.1), occurs when site conditions decline due to long-term drought or improper grazing, particularly when grazing occurs in spring or early summer. Mid-statured grasses such as plains muhly and sideoats grama have been largely eliminated. Short-statured species such as blue grama and prairie Junegrass dominate the plant community. Threadleaf sedge may persist due to its low stature and extensive root system, however, vigor is declining due to grazing pressure. Subshrubs such as creeping juniper and prairie sagewort may also be common.
Community 3.2
Little Bluestem - Shortgrass CommunityThe Little Bluestem-Shortgrass Community Phase (3.2) may develop under certain conditions. When actively growing, little bluestem is regarded as desirable forage for livestock, however, they tend to avoid it when it is mature and unpalatable. As a result, pastures that are repeatedly grazed in late summer or fall may exhibit an increase in little bluestem. This combined with improper grazing management may result in this phase. Dynamics of this phase are not completely understood and require further investigation.
State 4
InvadedThe Invaded state (4) occurs when invasive plant species invade adjacent native grassland communities and displace the native species. Data suggest that native species diversity declines significantly when invasive species exceed 30 percent of the plant community. Non-native perennial grasses, such as crested wheatgrass and Kentucky bluegrass are the most likely concerns. Crested wheatgrass has been planted on an estimated 20 million acres in the western U.S. since the 1930’s (Holechek 1981). It is extremely drought tolerant, establishes readily on a variety of soil types, has high seedling vigor, and can dominate the seedbank of invaded grasslands (Rogler and Lorenz 1983; Henderson and Naeth 2005). Kentucky bluegrass is widespread throughout the Northern Great Plains (Toledo et al., 2014) and mainly affects the moister portions of this site. It is very competitive and displaces native species by forming dense root mats, altering nitrogen cycling, and creating allelopathic effects on germination (DeKeyser et al., 2013). It may also alter soil surface hydrology and modify soil surface structure (Toledo et al., 2014). Plant communities dominated by Kentucky bluegrass have significantly less cover of native grass and forb species (Toledo et al., 2014; DeKeyser et al., 2009). Invasive grass species can invade relatively undisturbed grasslands and it is not clear what triggers them to displace native species. In some cases, they have been found to substantially increase under long-term grazing exclusion (DeKeyser et al., 2009, 2013; Grant et al., 2009), but a consistent correlation to grazing management practices cannot be made at this time. Reduced plant species diversity, simplified structural complexity, and altered biologic processes result in a state that is substantially departed from both the Reference state (1) and the Current Potential state (2).
Noxious weeds such as leafy spurge and Canada thistle are not widespread in MLRA 53A, but they can be a concern in localized areas. These species are very aggressive perennials. They typically displace native species and dominate ecological function when they invade a site. In some cases, these species can be suppressed through intensive management (herbicide application, biological control, or intensive grazing management). Control efforts are unlikely to eliminate noxious weeds, but their density can be sufficiently suppressed so that species composition and structural complexity are similar to that of the Current Potential state (2). However, cessation of control methods will most likely result in recolonization of the site by the noxious species.Community 4.1
Invaded CommunityEncroachment by introduced grasses, noxious weeds, and other invasive species is common. Rangeland health attributes have departed substantially from both the Reference state (1) and the Current Potential state (2).
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2Introduction of non-native grass species occurred in the early 20th century. The naturalization of these species in relatively undisturbed grasslands coupled with changes in fire and grazing regimes transitions the Reference state (1) to the Current Potential state (2).
Key drivers
-
Nonnative plant species presence and/or establishment
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3Prolonged drought, improper grazing management, or a combination of these factors weaken the resilience of the Current Potential state (2) and drive its transition to the Altered state (3). The Current Potential state (2) transitions to the Altered state (3) when mid-statured grasses become rare and contribute little to production. Shortgrasses such as blue grama and prairie Junegrass dominate the plant community.
Key drivers
-
Precipitation (decadal scale)
-
Livestock grazing or browsing
Transition T2B
State 2 to 4The Current Potential state (2) transitions to the Invaded state (4) when aggressive perennial grasses or noxious weeds displace native species. The most common concerns are crested wheatgrass and introduced bluegrasses, which are widespread invasive species in the northern Great Plains (Henderson and Naeth 2005, Toledo et al., 2014). The precise triggers of this transition are not clear, but data suggest that exclusion of grazing and fire may be a contributing factor in some cases (DeKeyser et al., 2013). In addition, other rangeland health attributes, such as reproductive capacity of native grasses and soil quality, have been substantially altered.
Key drivers
-
Nonnative plant species presence and/or establishment
-
Fire frequency
-
Exclusion of grazing
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 2A reduction in livestock grazing pressure alone may not be sufficient to reduce the cover of shortgrasses in the Altered State (3) (Dormaar and Willms, 1990). Blue grama, in particular, can resist displacement by other species (Dormaar and Willms, 1990; Laycock, 1991; Dormaar et al., 1994; Lacey et al., 1995). Intensive management such as reseeding and mechanical treatment may be necessary (Hart et al., 1985), but these practices are labor intensive, costly and may not be possible on this site due to topography. Therefore, returning the Altered state (3) to the Current Potential state (2) may require considerable energy and cost, and may not be feasible within a reasonable amount of time.
Conservation practices
Prescribed Grazing Grazing Land Mechanical Treatment Range Planting Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 7. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 3.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 11. Community 4.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Data for this provisional ecological site was obtained from one low-intensity plot and one medium-intensity plot representing the Contemporary Reference State (2). Two medium intensity plots from similar sites in the adjacent MLRA 54 were used as supplementary references. These plots were used in conjunction with a review of the scientific literature and professional experience to approximate the plant communities for the Contemporary Reference State (2). Information for remaining states was obtained from professional experience and a review of the scientific literature. All community phases are considered provisional based on these plots and the sources identified in this ecological site description.
Other references
Anderson, R.C. 2006. Evolution and origin of the central grassland of North America: Climate, fire, and mammalian grazers. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 133:626-647.
Biondini, M.E., and L. Manske. 1996. Grazing frequency and ecosystem processes in a northern mixed prairie, USA. Ecological Applications 6:239-256.
Biondini, M.E., B.D. Patton, and P.E. Nyren. 1998. Grazing intensity and ecosystem processes in a northern mixed-grass prairie, USA. Ecological Applications 8:469-479.
Bragg, T.B. 1995. The physical environment of the Great Plains grasslands. In: A. Joern and K.H. Keeler (eds.) The Changing Prairie, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 49-81.
Chadwick, A.C. 2003. Bouteloua curtipendula. In: Fire Effects Information System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/graminoid/boucur/all.html (accessed 10 May, 2018)
Christian, J.M., and S.D. Wilson. 1999. Long-term ecosystem impacts of an introduced grass in the Northern Great Plains. Ecology 80:2397-2407.
Clarke, S.E, E.W. Tisdale, and N.A. Skoglund. 1947. The effects of climate and grazing practices on short-grass prairie vegetation in southern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan. Canadian Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 46.
Cleland, D.T., et al. 1997. National hierarchical framework of ecological units. In: M.S. Boyce and A. Haney (eds.) Ecosystem Management Applications for Sustainable Forest and Wildlife Resources, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Coupland, R.T. 1950. Ecology of the mixed prairie of Canada. Ecological Monographs 20:271-315.
Coupland, R.T. 1958. The effects of fluctuations in weather upon the grasslands of the Great Plains. Botanical Review 24:273-317.
Coupland, R.T. 1961. A reconsideration of grassland classification in the Northern Great Plains of North America. Journal of Ecology 49:135-167.
Coupland, R.T., and R.E. Johnson. 1965. Rooting characteristics of native grassland species in Saskatchewan. Journal of Ecology 53:475-507.
DeKeyser, E.S., M. Meehan, G. Clambey, and K. Krabbenhoft. 2013. Cool season invasive grasses in northern Great Plains natural areas. Natural Areas Journal 33:81-90.
DeKeyser, S., G. Clambey, K. Krabbenhoft, and J. Ostendorf. 2009. Are changes in species composition on central North Dakota rangelands due to non-use management? Rangelands 31:16-19.
Derner, J.D., and R.H. Hart. 2007. Grazing-induced modifications to peak standing crop in northern mixed-grass prairie. Rangeland Ecology and Management 60:270-276.
Dix, R.L. 1960. The effects of burning on the mulch structure and species composition of grasslands in western North Dakota. Ecology 41:49-56.
Dormaar, J.F., and S. Smoliak. 1985. Recovery of vegetative cover and soil organic matter during revegetation of abandoned farmland in a semiarid climate. Journal of Range Management 38:487-491.
Dormaar, J.F. and W.D. Willms. 1990. Effect of grazing and cultivation on some chemical properties of soils in the mixed prairie. Journal of Range Management 43:456-460.
Dormaar, J.F., S. Smoliak, and W.D. Willms. 1990. Soil chemical properties during succession from abandoned cropland to native range. Journal of Range Management 43:260-265.
Dormaar, J.F., B.W. Adams, and W.D. Willms. 1994. Effect of grazing and abandoned cultivation on a Stipa-Bouteloua community. Journal of Range Management 47:28-32.
Dormaar, J.F., M.A. Naeth, W.D. Willms, and D.S. Chanasyk. 1995. Effect of native prairie, crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) and Russian wildrye (Elymus junceus) on soil chemical properties. Journal of Range Management 48:258-263.
Federal Geographic Data Committee. 2008. The National Vegetation Classification Standard, Version 2. FGDC Vegetation Subcommittee. FGDC-STD-005-2008 (Version 2). pp. 126.
Fullerton, D.S., and R.B. Colton. 1986. Stratigraphy and correlation of the glacial deposits on the Montana Plains. U.S. Geological Survey.
Fullerton, D.S., R.B. Colton, C.A. Bush, and A.W. Straub. 2004. Map showing spatial and temporal relations of mountain and continental glaciations on the northern plains, primarily in northern Montana and northwestern North Dakota. U.S. Geologic Survey pamphlet accompanying Scientific Investigations Map 2843.
Grant, T.A., B. Flanders-Wanner, T.L. Shaffer, R.K. Murphy, and G.A. Knutsen. 2009. An emerging crisis across northern prairie refuges: Prevalence of invasive plants and a plan for adaptive management. Ecological Restoration 27:58-65.
Gucker, C.L. 2006. Juniperus horizontalis. In: Fire Effects Information System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/shrub/junhor/all.html (accessed 10 May, 2018)
Hart, M., S.S. Waller, S.R. Lowry, and R.N. Gates. 1985. Disking and seeding effects on sod bound mixed prairie. Journal of Range Management 38:121-125.
Heidel, B., S.V. Cooper, and C. Jean. 2000. Plant species of special concern and plant associations of Sheridan County, Montana. Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, Montana, MT.
Heidinga, L., and S.D. Wilson. 2002. The impact of an invading alien grass (Agropyron cristatum) on species turnover in native prairie. Diversity and Distributions 8:249-258.
Heitschmidt, R.K., and L.T. Vermeire. 2005. An ecological and economic risk avoidance drought management decision support system. In: J.A. Milne (ed.) Pastoral Systems in Marginal Environments, XXth International Grasslands Congress, July 2005, p. 178.
Henderson, A.E., and S.K. Davis. 2014. Rangeland health assessment: A useful tool for linking range management and grassland bird conservation? Rangeland Ecology and Management 67:88-98.
Henderson, D.C., and M.A. Naeth. 2005. Multi-scale impacts of crested wheatgrass invasion in mixed-grass prairie. Biological Invasions 7:639-650.
Herrick, J.E., J.W. Van Zee, K.M. Havstad, L.M. Burkett, and W.G. Whitford. 2009. Monitoring manual for grassland, shrubland and savanna ecosystems. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM.
Higgins, K.F. 1986. Interpretation and compendium of historical fire accounts in the Northern Great Plains. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 161.
Holechek, J.L. 1981. Crested wheatgrass. Rangelands 3:151-153.
Kilian, R. 2016. Sideoats Grama Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr. A Native Perennial Warm Season Grass for Conservation Use in Montana and Wyoming. Plant Materials Technical Note No. MT-116. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service
Knopf, F.L. 1996. Prairie legacies—birds. In: F.B. Samson and F.L. Knopf (eds.) Prairie Conservation: Preserving North America’s Most Endangered Ecosystem, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 135-148.
Knopf, F.L., and F.B. Samson. 1997. Conservation of grassland vertebrates. In: F.B. Samson and F.L. Knopf (eds.) Ecology and Conservation of Great Plains Vertebrates: Ecological Studies 125, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp. 273-289.
Krzic, M., K. Broersma, D.J. Thompson, and A.A. Bomke. 2000. Soil properties and species diversity of grazed crested wheatgrass and native rangelands. Journal of Range Management 53:353-358.
Lacey, J., R. Carlstrom, and K. Williams. 1995. Chiseling rangeland in Montana. Rangelands 17:164-166.
Laycock, W.A. 1991. Stable states and thresholds of range condition on North American rangelands. Journal of Range Management 44:427-433.
Lockwood, J.A. 2004. Locust: The devastating rise and mysterious disappearance of the insect that shaped the American frontier. Basic Books, New York, NY.
McNab, W.H., et al. 2007. Description of ecological subregions: Sections of the conterminous United States [CD-ROM]. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report WO-76B.
Montana State College. 1949. Similar vegetative rangeland types in Montana. Montana State College, Agricultural Experiment Station.
Murphy, R.K. and T.A. Grant. 2005. Land management history and floristics in mixed-grass prairie, North Dakota, USA. Natural Areas Journal 25:351-358
Nesser, J.A., G.L. Ford, C.L. Maynard, and D.S. Page-Dumroese. 1997. Ecological units of the Northern Region: Subsections. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-GTR-369.
Ogle, S.M., W.A. Reiners, and K.G. Gerow. 2003. Impacts of exotic annual brome grasses (Bromus spp.) on ecosystem properties of the northern mixed grass prairie. American Midland Naturalist 149:46-58.
Richardson, R. E. and L. T. Hanson. 1977. Soil survey of Sheridan County, Montana. USDA Soil Conservation Service (NRCS). Bozeman, MT.
Rogler, G.A., and R.J. Lorenz. 1983. Crested wheatgrass: Early history in the United States. Journal of Range Management 36:91-93.
Romo, J.T. and Y. Bai. 2004. Seedbank and plant community composition, mixed prairie of Saskatchewan. Journal of Range Management 57:300-304.
Romo, J.T. 2011. Clubmoss, precipitation, and microsite effects on emergence of graminoid and forb seedlings in the semiarid northern mixed prairie of North America. Journal of Arid Environments 75:98-105.
Rowe, J.S. 1969. Lightning fires in Saskatchewan grassland. Canadian Field Naturalist 83:317-327.
Salo, E.D., et al. 2004. Grazing intensity effects on vegetation, livestock and non-game birds in North Dakota mixed-grass prairie. Proceedings of the 19th North American Prairie Conference, Madison, WI.
Samuel, M.J., and R.H. Hart. 1994. Sixty-one years of secondary succession on rangelands of the Wyoming High Plains. Journal of Range Management 47:184-191.
Schoeneberger, P. J., D.A. Wysocki, E.C. Benham, and Soil Survey Staff. 2012. Field book for describing and sampling soils. Version 3.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service. National Soil Survey Center. Lincoln, NE.
Shay, J., D. Kunec, and B. Dyck. 2001. Short-term effects of fire frequency on vegetation composition and biomass in mixed prairie in south-western Manitoba. Plant Ecology 155:157-167.
Smith, B., and G.J. McDermid. 2014. Examination of fire-related succession within the dry mixed-grass subregion of Alberta with the use of MODIS and Landsat. Rangeland Ecology and Management 67:307-317.
Smoliak, S. 1974. Range vegetation and sheep production at three stocking rates on Stipa-Bouteloua prairie. Journal of Range Management 27:23-26.
Smoliak, S., J.F. Dormaar, and A. Johnston. 1972. Long-term grazing effects on Stipa-Bouteloua prairie soils. Journal of Range Management 25:246-250.
Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to soil taxonomy, 12th edition. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Soller, D.R. 2001. Map showing the thickness and character of Quaternary sediments in the glaciated United States east of the Rocky Mountains. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series I-1970-E, scale 1:3,500,000.
Steinberg, P.D. 2002. Schizachyrium scoparium. In: Fire Effects Information System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/graminoid/schsco/all.html (Accessed 10 May, 2018)
Toledo, D., M. Sanderson, K. Spaeth, J. Hendrickson, and J. Printz. 2014. Extent of Kentucky bluegrass and its effect on native plant species diversity and ecosystem services in the Northern Great Plains of the United States. Invasive Plant Science and Management 7:543-552.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service 2017. Montana Annual Bulletin. Volume LIV. Issue 1095-7278 https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Montana/Publications/Annual_Statistical_Bulletin/2017/Montana_Annual_Bulletin_2017.pdf (Accessed 14 Feb 2017).
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Glossary of landform and geologic terms. National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, Part 629.02c. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 (Accessed 13 April 2016).
Van Dyne, G.M., and W.G. Vogel. 1967. Relation of Selaginella densa to site, grazing, and climate. Ecology 48:438-444.
Vaness, B.M., and S.D. Wilson. 2007. Impact and management of crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) in the northern Great Plains. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 87:1023-1028.
Vermeire, L.T., J.L. Crowder, and D.B. Wester. 2011. Plant community and soil environment response to summer fire in the northern Great Plains. Rangeland Ecology & Management 64:37-46.
Vermeire, L.T., J.L. Crowder, and D.B. Wester. 2014. Semiarid rangeland is resilient to summer fire and postfire grazing utilization. Rangeland Ecology & Management 67:52-60.
Vuke, S.M., K.W. Porter, J.D. Lonn, and D.A. Lopez. 2007. Geologic map of Montana - information booklet: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Geologic Map 62-D.
Whisenant, S.G. 1990. Postfire population dynamics of Bromus japonicus. American Midland Naturalist 123:301-308.
Wilson, S.D., and J.M. Shay. 1990. Competition, fire, and nutrients in a mixed-grass prairie. Ecology 71:1959-1967.Contributors
Scott Brady
Stuart VeithApproval
Kirt Walstad, 4/25/2025
Acknowledgments
A number of USDA-NRCS staff supported this project. Staff contributions are as follows: Soil Concepts, Soils Information, and Field Descriptions Charlie French, USDA-NRCS (retired) Steve Sieler, USDA-NRCS NASIS Reports, Data Dumps, and Soil Sorts Bill Drummond, USDA-NRCS (retired) Pete Weikle, USDA-NRCS Peer Review Kirt Walstad, USDA-NRCS Mark Hayek, USDA-NRCS Kami Kilwine, USDA-NRCS Robert Mitchell, USDA-NRCS Quality Control Kirt Walstad, USDA-NRCS Quality Assurance Stacey Clark, USDA-NRCS Preceding Version: Compilation of multiple concepts from Field Office Technical Guide Section II-E-8: Thin Breaks 10-14” p.z. Eastern Glaciated Plains (USDA-SCS-MT, 1981) Shallow 10-14” p.z. Eastern Glaciated Plains (USDA-SCS-MT, 1981) Very Shallow 10-14” p.z. Eastern Glaciated Plains (USDA-SCS-MT, 1981)
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 04/25/2025 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
