Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R047XA308UT
Upland Loam
(basin big sagebrush)
Last updated: 2/05/2025
Accessed: 07/20/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 047X–Wasatch and Uinta Mountains
MLRA 47 occurs in Utah (86 percent), Wyoming (8 percent), Colorado (4 percent), and Idaho (2 percent). It encompasses approximately 23,825 square miles (61,740 square kilometers). The northern half of this area is in the Middle Rocky Mountains Province of the Rocky Mountain System. Parts of the western edge of this MLRA are in the Great Basin Section of the Basin and Range Province of the Intermontane Plateaus. The MLRA includes the Wasatch Mountains, which trend north and south. The steeply sloping, precipitous Wasatch Mountains have narrow crests and deep valleys. Active faulting and erosion are a dominant force in controlling the geomorphology of the area.
The mountains in this area are primarily fault blocks that have been tilted up. Alluvial fans at the base of the mountains are recharge zones for the basin fill aquifers. An ancient shoreline of historic Bonneville Lake is evident on the footslopes along the western edge of the area. Rocks exposed in the mountains are mostly Mesozoic and Paleozoic sediments. The average precipitation is from 12 to 16 inches in the valleys and can range up to 73 inches in the mountains. Peak precipitation occurs in the winter months. The average annual temperature is 30 to 50 degrees Fahrenheit (-1 to 15 C). The freeze-free period averages 140 days and ranges from 60 to 220 days, generally decreasing in length with elevation.
The dominant soil orders in this MLRA are Entisols, Inceptisols, and Mollisols. The lower elevations are dominated by a frigid temperature regime, while the higher elevations experience cryic temperature regimes. The soil moisture regime is typically xeric. The minerology is generally mixed and the soils are very shallow to very deep, generally well drained, and loamy or loamy-skeletal.LRU notes
This LRU includes the Wasatch Mountains which tend to run north and south. These steeply sloping, precipitous mountains have narrow crests and deep valleys. They are primarily fault blocks that have been tilted up. The alluvial fans located at the base of these mountains are important recharge zones for valley aquifers.
Ecological site concept
The soils in this site are moderately deep to deep and are well-drained. They formed mostly in alluvium derived from various sedimentary and igneous rocks. Bedrock may be present at depths greater than 24 inches. The surface layer is a loam or silt loam texture, dark in color, and usually about 8 to 20 inches thick. The entire soil is often devoid of rock fragments, however there may be rock fragments present on the soil surface and throughout the profile. Permeability is moderately slow to moderate and the available water holding capacity ranges from 2.3 to 7.1 inches in the upper 40 inches of soil. These soils are usually calcareous but not always. The soil moisture regime is xeric and the soil temperature regime is frigid bordering on mesic.
Associated sites
R047XA320UT Upland Shallow Loam (Wyoming big sagebrush)
This site is often adjacent to the upland loam site and is differentiated by shallow soils (less than 20 inches deep) and the presence of Wyoming big sagebrush instead of Basin big sagebrush.
R047XA004UT Interzonal Cold Semi-wet Fresh Meadow (meadow sedge/tufted hairgrass)
R047XA008UT Interzonal Wet Fresh Meadow (sedge)
R047XA305UT Upland Stony Loam (Utah juniper)
Similar sites
R047XA310UT Upland Loam (basin wildrye)
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub (1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata
Herbaceous (1) Pseudoroegneria spicata
Physiographic features
This site occurs mostly on mountains, alluvial fans, fan remnants and hillslopes. It is found at elevations between 4,800 and 7,400 feet on slopes ranging from 5 to 70 percent. Often it occurs on south and southwest aspects, but it may occur on all other aspects as well. Runoff class is low to very high due to the wide range of variability in slope. Flooding and ponding do not occur on this site.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Mountain slope
(2) Alluvial fan
(3) Fan remnant
Runoff class Medium to high Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 4800 – 7400 ft Slope 5 – 70 % Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Runoff class Not specified Flooding frequency Not specified Ponding frequency Not specified Elevation 4800 – 8160 ft Slope 0 % Climatic features
The climate for this site is characterized by cold, snowy winters and warm, dry summers. Winter snowmelt and spring rain provide the most dependable supply of moisture for plant growth. May is the wettest month of the year, while June, July and August are the driest. Many herbaceous species become dormant during the hot, dry summer period.
Table 4 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 80 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 110 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 20-20 in Frost-free period (actual range) 80 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 110 days Precipitation total (actual range) 20-20 in Frost-free period (average) 80 days Freeze-free period (average) 110 days Precipitation total (average) 20 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 7 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) ECHO DAM [USC00422385], Coalville, UT
-
(2) FAIRVIEW 8N [USC00422702], Fairview, UT
">Influencing water features
Due to its landscape position, this site is not influenced by streams or wetlands.
Wetland description
N/A
Soil features
The soils in this site are moderately deep to deep and are well-drained. They formed mostly in alluvium derived from various sedimentary and igneous rocks. Bedrock may be present at depths greater than 24 inches. The surface layer is a loam or silt loam texture, dark in color, and usually about 8 to 20 inches thick. The entire soil is often devoid of rock fragments, however there may be rock fragments present on the soil surface and throughout the profile. Permeability is moderately slow to moderate and the available water holding capacity ranges from 2.3 to 7.1 inches in the upper 40 inches of soil. These soils are usually calcareous but not always. The soil moisture regime is xeric and the soil temperature regime is frigid bordering on mesic.
Soil Survey Area; Soil Components (Map units in parentheses)
Box Elder County East (UT602) Middle (BUG, GEE, MIE, MIG, MJG, MKE, MKG, RMG2);
Cache Valley Area (UT603) Middle (RDG2);
Rich County (UT604) Ant Flat (AFD);
Summit Area (UT613) Dastrup (115, 116, 117); Richsum (148, 162, 163);
Carbon Area (UT616) Atrac (1, 54); Chupadera (19); Hernandez (54);
Sanpete Valley Area (UT627) Ant Flat (AkC, ALD); Deer Creek (DCD); Obrast (ObC, SEE); Toehead (ToB, ToC, TSD); Watkins Ridge (WhB);
Sevier County (UT628) Koosharem (KhA, UaA); Krueger (KdA, KdB, KdC, KeA, KeC); Vicking (VMD, VNE2, VOD, VOF); Watkins Ridge (CGC);Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Alluvium – metamorphic and sedimentary rock
(2) Colluvium – metamorphic and sedimentary rock
(3) Residuum – metamorphic and sedimentary rock
Surface texture (1) Cobbly silt loam
(2) Silt loam
(3) Loam
Family particle size (1) Fine-loamy
(2) Loamy-skeletal
Drainage class Well drained Permeability class Moderately slow to moderate Depth to restrictive layer 24 – 60 in Soil depth 24 – 60 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 – 15 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 – 16 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)2.3 – 7.1 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)0 – 15 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 2 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)0 – 1 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.6 – 8.4 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-40in)0 – 20 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-40in)5 – 30 % Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class Not specified Permeability class Slow to moderately rapid Depth to restrictive layer 0 in Soil depth 0 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 – 25 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)0 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)0 – 40 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)0 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.1 – 9 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-40in)0 – 23 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-40in)0 – 34 % Ecological dynamics
It is impossible to determine in any quantitative detail the Historic Climax Plant Community (HCPC) for this ecological site because of the lack of direct historical documentation preceding all human influence.
Below is a State and Transition Model diagram to illustrate the “phases” (common plant communities), and “states” (aggregations of those plant communities) that can occur on the site. Differences between phases and states depend primarily upon observations of a range of disturbance histories in areas where this ESD is represented. These situations include grazing gradients to water sources, fence-line contrasts, patches with differing dates of fire, herbicide treatment, tillage, etc. Reference State 1 illustrates the common plant communities that probably existed just prior to European settlement.
The major successional pathways within states, (“community pathways”) are indicated by arrows between phases. “Transitions” are indicated by arrows between states. The drivers of these changes are indicated in codes decipherable by referring to the legend at the bottom of the page and by reading the detailed narratives that follow the diagram. The transition between Reference State 1 and State 2 is considered irreversible because of the naturalization of exotic species of both flora and fauna, possible extinction of native species, and climate change. There may have also been accelerated soil erosion.
When available, monitoring data (of various types) were employed to validate more subjective inferences made in this diagram. See the complete files in the office of the State Range Conservationist for more details.
The plant communities shown in this State and Transition Model may not represent every possibility, but are probably the most prevalent and recurring plant communities. As more monitoring data are collected, some phases or states may be revised, removed, and/or new ones may be added. None of these plant communities should necessarily be thought of as “Desired Plant Communities.” According to the USDA NRCS National Range & Pasture Handbook (USDA-NRCS 2003), Desired Plant Communities (DPC’s) will be determined by the decision-makers and will meet minimum quality criteria established by the NRCS. The main purpose for including descriptions of a plant community is to capture the current knowledge at the time of this revision.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
Figure 8. State and Transition Model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
T1a - introduction of exotic species T2a - excessive livestock grazing, particularly during the growing season of herbs State 1 submodel, plant communities
1.1a,b,c - 1.1a: Wildfire 1.1b: An extremely wet period or insect/disease outbreak 1.1c: Unusually cold, dry winters 1.2a - absence of fire State 2 submodel, plant communities
2.1a,b,c - 2.1a: Wildfire 2.1b: An extremely wet period; insect/disease outbreak 2.1c: Unusually cold, dry winters 2.1a - absence of fire State 3 submodel, plant communities
3.1a - Wildfire or mechanical removal of sagebrush 3.2a - extended period without wildfire State 4 submodel, plant communities
4.1a - Re-seeding with a mix of forbs and shrubs combined with limited use/prescribed grazing by livestock 4.2a - mechanical or chemical brush management 4.2b - absence of fire 4.3a - mechanical or chemical brush management 4.3b - Mechanically removing some shrubs and re-seeding State 1
Reference StateThe Reference State is a description of this ecological site just prior to Euro-American settlement but long after the arrival of Native Americans. The description of the Reference State was determined by NRCS Soil Survey Type Site Location information and familiarity with rangeland relict areas where they exist. The Reference State for this site would have been characterized as a shrub steppe co-dominated by basin big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata), the dominant shrub, and having a rich herbaceous understory. The proportions of shrubs and herbs would have been dependent upon the length of time elapsed since the last wildfire or other sagebrush-killing event. If fire had not occurred within the past 30 years (1.2a), basin big sagebrush would have been the dominant shrub, having a native perennial herbaceous understory (1.1). If less than 10 years had elapsed since the last fire (1.1a), perennial native herbs would have increased and the shrub component would have been dominated by root-sprouting species such as rubber rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa), yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus) and spineless horsebrush (Tetradymia canescens) (1.2). Soil anoxia from extremely wet years or an outbreak of Aroga (Aroga spp.) moth (1.1b) could have also reduced sagebrush and enhanced root-sprouting shrubs and perennial herbs (1.2) in some years. The same effect would have also been achieved by parch blight due to lack of snow cover during dry, cold winters (1.1c). A more complete list of species by lifeform for the Reference State is available in the accompanying tables in the “Plant Community Composition by Weight and Percentage” section of this document.
Community 1.1
Basin big sagebrush/ abundant native perennial herbsThis plant community would have developed in the absence of recent fire and was characterized by basin big sagebrush and abundant native perennial herbs. Primary bunchgrasses would have included bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), needle and thread (Hesperostipa comata), Indian ricegrass (Achnatherum hymenoides), and basin wildrye (Leymus cinereus). Primary forbs would have included buckwheat (Eriogonum spp.), tapertip hawksbeard (Crepis acuminata), arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata), western stoneseed (Lithospermum ruderale), and longleaf phlox (Phlox longifolia).
Figure 9. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 7. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 618 878 1170 Shrub/Vine 190 270 360 Forb 143 203 270 Total 951 1351 1800 Table 8. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 20-30% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 50-50% Forb foliar cover 10-10% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 9. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (ft) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.5 – – – – >0.5 <= 1 – – – 9-11% >1 <= 2 – – 49-51% – >2 <= 4.5 – 24-26% – – >4.5 <= 13 – – – – >13 <= 40 – – – – >40 <= 80 – – – – >80 <= 120 – – – – >120 – – – – Community 1.2
Root-sprouting shrubs/ increased perennial herbsThis phase of the Reference State would have been dominated by root-sprouting shrubs such as rubber rabbitbrush, yellow rabbitbrush, snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae), and spineless horsebrush, with a rich understory of native perennial herbs.
Pathway 1.1a,b,c
Community 1.1 to 1.21.1a: Wildfire would have removed basin big sagebrush, allowing root-sprouting shrubs and the native perennial forbs and grasses to increase. 1.1b: An extremely wet period such as an El Nino-Southern Oscillation event and subsequent anoxious soil conditions would have killed off basin big sagebrush and converted the plant community to one dominated by root-sprouting shrubs and native perennial herbs. The same result would have been seen following a sudden insect (e.g. Aroga moth), or other pathogen outbreak on sagebrush. 1.1c: Unusually cold, dry winters may have caused severe parch blight, killing off substantial portions of sagebrush and allowing roots-sprouting shrubs and native perennial herbs to dominate the plant community.
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.1In the absence of fire, this plant community would have responded with an increase in basin big sagebrush and a corresponding decrease in native perennial herbs.
State 2
Basin Big Sagebrush/ Introduced Non-native Herbs StateState 2 is very similar to State 1 in form and function, with the exception of the presence of non-native plants and animals, possible extinctions of native species, and a different climate. State 2 is a description of the ecological site shortly following Euro-American settlement. This State can be regarded as the current potential. As with State 1, a shift will be seen in the abundance of basin big sagebrush relative to the perennial herbs based upon the amount of time that has elapsed since the last wildfire or other sagebrush-killing event. Wildfire (2.1a) will temporarily remove basin big sagebrush, allowing root-sprouting shrubs and all types of herbs (both native and non-native) to increase (2.2). Lack of fire (2.2a) will favor the return of basin big sagebrush provided that there is adequate seed source from adjacent unburned areas. Perennial native herbs and non-native annuals will maintain their presence post-fire. Other drivers that could reduce sagebrush and favor root-sprouting shrubs (2.2) include anoxic soils from extremely wet years, outbreaks of Aroga moth (2.1b), or parch blight due to lack of snow cover during dry cold winters (2.1c). The resiliency of this State is maintained by a healthy, productive, and diverse plant community that can provide native seed sources and promotes soil stability, water infiltration, and soil moisture retention. The resiliency of this State can be maintained by reducing livestock grazing impacts, especially during the growing season of perennial herbs. Conversely, continued heavy grazing will negatively impact the resiliency of this State.
Community 2.1
Basin Big Sagebrush/ Introduced Non-native Herbs State
Figure 10. R047XA308UT Upland Loam (Basin big sagebrush) community 2.1 Basin Big Sagebrush/ Introduced Non-native Herbs State. Basin big sagebrush dominates the overstory and an unknown grass dominates the understory.
This plant community will develop in the absence of fire and is characterized by basin big sagebrush with an understory made up of both native perennial and introduced herbs. Bunchgrasses include bluebunch wheatgrass, needle-and-thread, Indian ricegrass, and basin wildrye. Forbs include buckwheat, tapertip hawksbeard, arrowleaf balsamroot, western stoneseed, and longleaf phlox. Common invaders are cheatgrass and Russian thistle.
Community 2.2
Root-sprouting shrubs/ increased native perennial herbsThis plant community is dominated by root-sprouting shrubs such as rubber rabbitbrush, yellow rabbitbrush, and spineless horsebrush, with a rich understory of native perennial herbs.
Pathway 2.1a,b,c
Community 2.1 to 2.22.1a: Wildfire will remove basin big sagebrush, allowing root-sprouting shrubs and the native perennial forbs and grasses to increase. 2.1b: An extremely wet period such as an El Nino-Southern Oscillation event and subsequent anoxious soil conditions can kill basin big sagebrush and convert the plant community to one dominated by root-sprouting shrubs and native perennial herbs. The same result would be seen following a sudden insect (e.g. Aroga moth) or other pathogen outbreak on sagebrush. 2.1c: Unusually cold, dry winters may cause severe parch blight, killing substantial portions of sagebrush and allowing roots-sprouting shrubs and native perennial herbs to dominate the plant community.
Pathway 2.1a
Community 2.2 to 2.1In the absence of fire, this plant community will respond with an increase in basin big sagebrush and a corresponding decrease in native perennial herbs.
State 3
Brush Super-dominance StateWith multiple-year heavy livestock grazing, especially during the growing season, native perennial herbs are diminished. Once the soil seed reserve is exhausted, there is little opportunity for recovery. In the absence of fire (3.2a) basin big sagebrush will begin to dominate (3.1). Where mechanical or fire damage occur to the non-sprouting basin big sagebrush (3.1a), root-sprouting shrubs can increase (3.2). The state is maintained by the lack of a healthy, productive and diverse herb component capable of providing native seed source, soil stabilization, and soil moisture retention.
Community 3.1
Brush Super-dominance State
Figure 11. R047XA308UT Upland Loam (Basin big sagebrush) community 3.1 Basin big sagebrush super-dominance. Basin big sagebrush dominates the overstory and Cheatgrass dominates the understory.
This plant community is characterized as a basin big sagebrush-dominated site where the understory is greatly diminished in species richness and abundance from heavy continuous livestock grazing and lack of fire.
Community 3.2
Root-sprouting shrubs super-dominanceAs the site deteriorates from heavy continuous livestock grazing compounded by fire or mechanical removal of sagebrush, the plant community will become dominated by root-sprouting shrubs such as rubber rabbitbrush, yellow rabbitbrush, and spineless horsebrush.
Pathway 3.1a
Community 3.1 to 3.2Wildfire or mechanical removal of sagebrush will develop a plant community dominated by root-sprouting shrubs.
Pathway 3.2a
Community 3.2 to 3.1After an extended period without wildfire, provided a viable seed source is available, basin big sagebrush will begin to re-establish and dominate the site.
State 4
Seeded StateThe most common seedings of the past have been to Eurasian wheatgrasses (Agropyron spp.) or ryegrasses (Elymus spp.) (4.1). Where tillage has been employed, the native forbs and browse have most likely been destroyed. Thus, if a more diverse plant community is required (4.2), other species will have to be added to the seed mix and utilization by livestock deferred for several years (4.1a). In some circumstances, the native forbs and shrubs will slowly re-establish (4.2 and 4.3) when adjacent area have not been tilled. Subsequent re-treatment with herbicide or mechanical (e.g. Lawson pasture-aerator) action (4.2a and 4.3a) will be necessary to maintain grass dominance (4.1). Fortunately, annual invaders such as cheatgrass are short-lived where Wasatch Formation-derived soils (MLRA 47A) or the Gilbert Land Surface (MLRA 47C) are involved, both being of nutrient-poor parent materials. Once a site is re-established with forbs and shrubs (4.2) and a sufficient length of time has elapsed since the last fire (4.2b), pioneering shrubs such as snakeweed, rubber rabbitbrush, and yellow rabbitbrush may dominate the site (4.3). Returning to a more diverse plant community (4.2) may require mechanically removing some shrubs and re-seeding (4.3b). This State can be maintained by moderate levels of livestock use or alteration of dates of use, particularly during the boot stage of the grass. Heavy spring use by livestock will reduce the resiliency of this State.
Community 4.1
Crested wheatgrass monoculture
Figure 12. R047XA308UT Upland Loam (Basin big sagebrush) community 4.1 Introduced perennial bunchgrass. Cover is 30% grasses, 25% forbs, 0% shrubs, 20% bare ground and 25% litter.
This plant community is predominantly a monoculture of a seeded species, commonly crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum).
Community 4.2
Re-invaded herbs and shrubsThis plant community is characterized by a mix of native and non-native herbs and shrubs that have re-invaded or have been seeded into the site. Disturbance follower species that may be present include snakeweed, rubber rabbitbrush, yellow rabbitbrush, and Russian thistle (Salsola sp.). Other invaders could also include bulbous bluegrass (Poa bulbosa), Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), or Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis).
Community 4.3
Re-invaded shrub dominanceDisturbance following shrubs such as snakeweed, rubber rabbitbrush, and yellow rabbitbrush may dominate the site in the absence of fire.
Pathway 4.1a
Community 4.1 to 4.2Re-seeding with a mix of forbs and shrubs combined with limited use/prescribed grazing by livestock will be necessary to facilitate the re-establishment of a more diverse plant community.
Pathway 4.2a
Community 4.2 to 4.1Either mechanical or chemical brush management will be required to maintain a grass-dominated site.
Pathway 4.2b
Community 4.2 to 4.3The absence of fire will shift this community into a re-invaded shrub-dominated site.
Pathway 4.3a
Community 4.3 to 4.1Either mechanical or chemical brush management will be required to maintain a grass-dominated site.
Pathway 4.3b
Community 4.3 to 4.2Mechanically removing some shrubs and re-seeding with a diverse mixture of forbs and grasses will improve the balance between the herbaceous and shrub components.
Transition T1a
State 1 to 2The simultaneous introduction of exotic species, both plants and animals, and possible extinctions, along with climate change, has caused State 1 to transition to State 2. Reversal of such historic changes (i.e. a return pathway) back to State 1 is not practical.
Transition T2a
State 2 to 3The Basin Big Sagebrush/ Introduced Non-natives State will transition to the Brush Super-dominance State following excessive livestock grazing, particularly during the growing season of herbs. Native perennial herbs are eventually depleted such that mere reduction or removal of livestock will not allow for their recovery. The approach to this transition is indicated by the dominance of large, old sagebrush. This transition can be avoided by removal or reduction of sagebrush by prescribed fire, herbicides, or mechanical means well before the diminishment of native perennial herbs has occurred.
Transition T3a
State 3 to 4Because reduction or exclusion of livestock use will not allow ready recovery of the herbaceous understory in State 3, the manager is left with few options to increase the perennial herbaceous cover. Tillage followed by re-seeding is the usual action required. Thus, the transition from a Brush Super-dominance State (regardless of phase) to the Seeded State is commonly seen.
Context dependence.Tillage followed by re-seeding
Additional community tables
Table 10. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Shrub/Vine0 Dominant Shrubs 225–450 basin big sagebrush ARTRT Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata 150–300 – antelope bitterbrush PUTR2 Purshia tridentata 75–150 – 3 Sub-Dominant Shrubs 105–195 Shrub (>.5m) 2SHRUB Shrub (>.5m) 45–75 – yellow rabbitbrush CHVI8 Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus 17–30 – winterfat KRLA2 Krascheninnikovia lanata 15–30 – creeping barberry MARE11 Mahonia repens 15–30 – spineless horsebrush TECA2 Tetradymia canescens 15–30 – rubber rabbitbrush ERNA10 Ericameria nauseosa 5–10 – broom snakeweed GUSA2 Gutierrezia sarothrae 5–10 – Grass/Grasslike0 Dominant Grasses 600–1050 bluebunch wheatgrass PSSP6 Pseudoroegneria spicata 375–450 – Indian ricegrass ACHY Achnatherum hymenoides 75–150 – needle and thread HECO26 Hesperostipa comata 75–150 – basin wildrye LECI4 Leymus cinereus 75–150 – 1 Sub-Dominant Grasses 225–525 Grass, annual 2GA Grass, annual 75–150 – Grass, perennial 2GP Grass, perennial 75–150 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 15–45 – prairie Junegrass KOMA Koeleria macrantha 15–45 – western wheatgrass PASM Pascopyrum smithii 15–45 – muttongrass POFE Poa fendleriana 15–45 – Forb2 Forbs 405–1065 Forb, annual 2FA Forb, annual 75–150 – Forb, perennial 2FP Forb, perennial 75–150 – common yarrow ACMI2 Achillea millefolium 15–45 – Arizona pricklypoppy ARAR4 Argemone arizonica 15–45 – white sagebrush ARLUL2 Artemisia ludoviciana ssp. ludoviciana 15–45 – arrowleaf balsamroot BASA3 Balsamorhiza sagittata 15–45 – Douglas' dustymaiden CHDO Chaenactis douglasii 15–45 – meadow thistle CISC2 Cirsium scariosum 15–45 – tapertip hawksbeard CRAC2 Crepis acuminata 15–45 – shortstem buckwheat ERBR5 Eriogonum brevicaule 15–45 – Eaton's fleabane EREA Erigeron eatonii 15–45 – low beardtongue PEHU Penstemon humilis 15–45 – longleaf phlox PHLO2 Phlox longifolia 15–45 – oneflower helianthella HEUN Helianthella uniflora 15–45 – Nevada pea LALA3 Lathyrus lanszwertii 15–45 – western stoneseed LIRU4 Lithospermum ruderale 15–45 – stemless dwarf lupine LUCA3 Lupinus caespitosus 15–45 – lobeleaf groundsel PAMU11 Packera multilobata 15–45 – Table 11. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 12. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 13. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 14. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 15. Community 3.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 16. Community 4.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 17. Community 4.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 18. Community 4.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
This site is valuable for use by sheep, cattle, and horses in the spring and fall. In some locations, it is used as summer range.
This site is extremely valuable for wildlife habitat because of a variety and abundance of grasses and relatively high abundance of forbs and shrubs within the site. It is also adjacent to other sites that provide food and cover for wildlife.
This site is used by deer as a winter feeding area especially where big sagebrush is abundant. This site provides food and cover at least part of the year for quail, Hungarian partridge, chukars, sage grouse, song birds, golden eagle, bald eagle, hawks, cottontail rabbit, pigmy rabbit, jack rabbit, coyote, mule deer, and elk.Recreational uses
This site has good aesthetic appeal and is valued for open space. It has a relatively large number of forbs and several shrubs, which have flowers in bloom from early spring to mid-summer. It has little value for screening because of the low growing nature of the plants, thereby discouraging camping and picnicking. Hunting is good for upland birds, jack rabbits, pigmy rabbits, cottontail, but poor for mule deer. Snowmobiling is a good winter recreation activity on this site when not conflicting with wintering herds of big game.
Wood products
Mature Basin big sagebrush can be used for firewood for campfires.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Information presented here has been derived from NRCS clipping data and other inventory data. Field observations from range trained personnel were also used.
Other references
Galatowitsch, S. M. 1990. Using the original land survey notes to reconstruct pre-settlement landscapes in the American West. Great Basin Naturalist 50:181-191. Keywords: [Western U.S., conservation, history, human impact]
Parson, R. E. 1996. A History of Rich County. Utah State Historical Society, County Commission, Rich County, Utah. Keywords: [Rich County, Utah, Historic land use, European settlements]
USDA-NRCS. 2003. National Range and Pasture Handbook. in USDA, editor, USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service-Grazing Lands Technology Institute. Keywords: [Western US, Federal guidelines, Range pasture management]
Western Regional Climate Center, Western U.S. Climate Historical Summaries. Available at: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/summary/Climsmut.html. Accessed 5 February 2009.
Web Soil Survey, Official Soil Series Descriptions. Available at: http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html. Accessed 20 February 2009.Contributors
Darryl L. Trickler, NRCS
David J. Somorville, NRCS
Dr. R. Douglas Ramsey, USU
John Lowry, USU
Neil E. West, USU
Lisa Langs Stoner, USU
Kate Peterson, USU
Samuel Rivera, USU
Leila Shultz, USUApproval
Kendra Moseley, 2/05/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) V. Keith Wadman (NRCS Retired), Shane A. Green (NRCS) Contact for lead author shane.green@ut.usda.gov Date 10/23/2012 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None to Very Few. Some very minor rill development may occur on steeper slopes (> 15%) or on areas located below exposed bedrock or other water shedding areas where increased runoff may occur. Where these rills are present, they should be fairly short (3-6 feet), < 1 inch deep and somewhat widely spaced (4-8 feet). Minor rill development may be observed on all slopes following major thunderstorm or spring runoff events but should heal during the next growing season. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Rare. Some very minor evidence of water flow patterns may be found winding around perennial plant bases. They show little evidence of current erosion. They are expected to be short (3-6 feet), stable, sinuous and normally not connected. There may be very minor evidence of deposition. Evidence of water flow may increase somewhat in slopes > 15%. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Perennial vegetation shows little evidence of erosional pedestalling (1 to 2% of individual plants). Plant roots are covered and most litter remains in place around plant crowns. Terracettes should be absent or, if present, stable. A slight increase in both pedestal and terracette development may occur with increasing slope or following severe runoff events. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground ranges from 20% - 30%. Soil surface may be covered by 0 to 10% coarse fragments. Bare ground openings should not be greater than 1 to 2 feet in diameter and should normally not be connected. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None to Rare at site level. Scattered landscape level gully channels, however, are a normal component of these environments. Where landscape gullies are present, they should be stable, partially vegetated on their sides and bottoms, with no evidence of head-cutting. Some slight increase in disturbance may be evident following significant weather events or when gullies convey considerable runoff from higher elevation rocky or naturally eroding areas. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None. No evidence of wind generated soil movement is present. Wind caused blowouts and deposition are not present. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Most litter resides in place with some redistribution caused by water movement. Minor litter removal may occur in flow channels with deposition occurring within 1 to 2 feet at points of obstruction. The majority of litter accumulates at the base of plants. Some grass leaves and small twigs (grass stems) may accumulate in soil depressions adjacent to plants. Woody stems are not likely to move. However, some litter movement is expected (up to 6 feet) with increases in slopes >15% and/or increased runoff resulting from heavy thunderstorms. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
This site should have a soil stability rating of 5 or 6 under the plant canopies, and a rating of 4 to 5 in the interspaces. The average rating should be a 5. Soil surface textures are typically loams, very fine sandy loams and silt loams. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
(Dastrup) Soil surface 0-12 inches. Texture is a loam; color is dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2); and structure is moderate, fine granular. Mollic epipedon ranges to 20 inches. Use the specific information for the soil you are assessing found in the published soil survey to supplement this description. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Perennial vegetation produces sufficient cover and spatial arrangement to intercept most raindrops and reduce raindrop splash erosion. Litter on soil surface and cryptogamic crusting, where present, also protects soil from splash erosion and encourages a higher rate of infiltration. Plant spatial distribution should slow runoff, allowing additional time for infiltration. Bare spaces are expected to be small and irregular in shape and are usually not connected. Vegetative structure is usually adequate to capture snow and ensure that snowmelt occurs in a controlled manner, allowing maximum time for infiltration, and reducing runoff and erosion in all but the most extreme storm events. When perennial grasses and shrubs decrease due to natural events including drought, insect damage, etc., which reduce ground cover and increase bare ground, runoff is expected to increase and associated infiltration reduced. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None. Some soils have an argillic horizon that could be mistaken for a compaction pan. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Perennial bunchgrasses (bluebunch wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass), = > Non-sprouting shrub (basin big sagebrush, >> Sprouting shrub (antelope bitterbrush).Sub-dominant:
Rhizomatous grasses (western wheatgrass) > Sprouting shrubs (green rabbitbrush, rubber rabbitbrush) > Perennial forbs (arrowleaf balsamroot).Other:
A wide variety of other perennial grasses and both perennial and annual forbs can be expected to occur in the plant community.Additional:
Natural disturbance regimes include fire, drought, and insects. Assumed fire cycle of 30 to 40+ years. Functional/structural groups may appropriately contain non-native species if their ecological function is the same as the native species in the reference. Following a disturbance such as fire, drought, rodents or insects that remove woody vegetation, forbs and perennial grasses (herbaceous species) may dominate the community for a period of time. If a disturbance has not occurred for an extended period of time, woody species may continue to increase. These conditions would reflect a functional community phase within the reference state. -
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
All age classes of perennial grasses should be present under average to above average growing conditions with age class expression likely subdued during periods of extended drought. Slight decadence in the principle shrubs could occur near the end of the fire cycle or during periods of extended drought, or insect infestations. In general, a mix of age classes should be expected with some dead and decadent plants present. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Litter cover will be heavier under plants. Most litter will be herbaceous and depths of 1 to 2 inches would be considered normal. Perennial vegetation should be well distributed on the site. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual production in air-dry herbage should be approximately 1200 - 1500 #/acre on an average year but could range from 900 - 2000 #/acre during periods of prolonged drought or above average precipitation. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Cheatgrass, Halogeton, Allysum, Russian thistle, mustard species, Utah juniper. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All perennial plants should have the ability to reproduce in all years, except in extreme drought years. Green rabbitbrush sprouts vigorously following fire. There are no restrictions on either seed or vegetative reproduction. Some seedling recruitment of major species is present during average and above average growing years.
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
