Ecological site F044BP909MT

Tree	(1) Abies lasiocarpa (2) Pseudotsuga menziesii
Shrub	(1) Symphoricarpos albus (2) Vaccinium membranaceum
Herbaceous	(1) Calamagrostis rubescens (2) Carex geyeri

Landforms	(1) Valley > Hillslope (2) Valley > Fan remnant (3) Valley > Escarpment
Elevation	6800 – 8600 ft
Slope	0 – 60 %

Frost-free period (characteristic range)	10 days
Freeze-free period (characteristic range)	40 days
Precipitation total (characteristic range)	20-20 in
Frost-free period (actual range)	10 days
Freeze-free period (actual range)	40 days
Precipitation total (actual range)	20-20 in
Frost-free period (average)	10 days
Freeze-free period (average)	40 days
Precipitation total (average)	20 in

Parent material	(1) Alluvium (2) Colluvium
Surface fragment cover >3"	0 – 5 %

Ecological dynamics

The Upland Cold Woodland and Shallow Cold Woodland Sites share State and Transition Models however the Upland Cold Woodland expresses an increase in both herbaceous and timber production. The Upland Cold Woodland tends to also be more resilient and resistant to disturbance.

The Reference State consists of a Douglas fir dominated forest with Lodgepole and minor amounts of Subalpine fir and Englemann's Spruce. The Reference state produces limited grasses and sedges. The understory is often dominated by heavy amounts of shrubs with the exact composition being quite variable. Shrub species include snowberry, spirea, huckleberry, menziesia, alder, ninebark, Russett buffaloberry, and Oregon grape. The limited grass and sedge are those typically associated with dark forest cover such as Pinegrass and Elk sedge. The Reference state offers little in the way of livestock forage. This is one of the coldest and wettest forest in MLRA 44B which allows for limited Subalpine fir compared to other potential forest in this MLRA. These sites are often north face.

The Post Disturbance State (2) consists of 2 communities: 2.1 Recent Post Fire and 2.2 Lodgepole Seral Community

Community 2.1 Recent Post Fire community is a result of a moderate fire in the Reference state. This community is dominated by shrubs and forbs. Snowberry, Ceanothus, alder, and spirea. Fireweed is the most abundant forb with limited beargrass. Scattered lodgepole saplings will begin to sprout as a result of the increased light interception.

Community 2.2 Lodgepole Seral Community is a Lodgepole pine dominated forest with scattered Douglas fir and possibly very limited subalpine fir saplings growing on the coldest, wettest of these sites. Understory of shrubs returns to a snowberry, Spirea, Bearberry community. Limited grasses and sedges begin to reduce as a result of less light interception.

Fire is the integral driver of this community as this site tends to not produce commercial timber and has very limited grazeable forage. Communities 2.1 and 2.2 can be caught in a feedback loop if fire frequency increases. Extended fire return interval will allow State 2 to return to the Reference State however this could take 100-150 years.

State and transition model

Custom diagram

Standard diagram

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models

Additional community tables

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)
Contact for lead author
Date
Approved by
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production

Indicators

Number and extent of rills:
Presence of water flow patterns:
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):

Dominant:

Sub-dominant:

Other:

Additional:
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial plant reproductive capability:

Download reference sheet

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Ecological site F044BP909MT

Upland Cold Woodland

Last updated: 8/26/2019 Accessed: 07/12/2026

Search

General information

MLRA notes

Ecological site concept

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Last updated: 8/26/2019
Accessed: 07/12/2026