Ecological site R044AP805MT

R044AP808MT	Upland Grassland Group This associated ecological site resides in areas with deeper soils than this ecological site.

R044AP808MT	Upland Grassland Group This ecological site is similar in that it resides in upland areas and has a grassland vegetation community, but this site has deeper soils than the shallow grassland ecological site.

Tree	Not specified
Shrub	Not specified
Herbaceous	(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata (2) Festuca idahoensis

Landforms	(1) Valley > Hillslope (2) Valley > Fan remnant (3) Valley > Escarpment
Elevation	3500 – 5500 ft
Slope	15 – 35 %
Water table depth	60 – 0 in
Aspect	W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW

Frost-free period (characteristic range)	40-100 days
Freeze-free period (characteristic range)	90-140 days
Precipitation total (characteristic range)	10-20 in
Frost-free period (actual range)	20-120 days
Freeze-free period (actual range)	80-140 days
Precipitation total (actual range)	10-30 in
Frost-free period (average)	80 days
Freeze-free period (average)	120 days
Precipitation total (average)	20 in

Parent material	(1) Slope alluvium – igneous and metamorphic rock (2) Colluvium – igneous and metamorphic rock (3) Residuum – igneous and metamorphic rock
Surface texture	(1) Very stony loam (2) Cobbly loam
Drainage class	Well drained
Soil depth	0 – 19 in
Surface fragment cover >3"	0 – 15 %

Ecological dynamics

1.1 Mid-statured bunchgrasses dominant (bluebunch, rough fescue, Idaho fescue, trace cover of prairie Junegrass, Sandberg’s bluegrass), Shrubs are a relatively small component.
1.1a Extended drought, improper grazing, climate change, catastrophic fire (limited on this site)
1.2 Mid-statured bunchgrasses subdominant to increaser bunchgrasses such as needle-and-thread or Idaho fescue. Shrubs increasing, clubmoss possible (limited extent), mat forming forbs increasing
1.2a Proper grazing management, favorable growing conditions, time

T1A Poor post settlement grazing (late 1800’s), drought with improper grazing, multiple spring grazing, fire suppression
T1B Sodbusting, introduction of tame pasture species and other invasive plants, overgrazing, drought, heavy human disturbance, extreme fire (multiple years or very intense)
T1C Poor post settlement grazing (late 1800’s), drought with improper grazing, multiple spring grazing and/or long term overgrazing, fire suppression
T3A Sodbusting, invasive plants, overgrazing, extended drought, adjacent to construction or disturbance event

2.1 Mixed grass dominated site (needle-and-thread and Idaho fescue), mid-statured bunchgrasses existent under shrub canopy, possible conifer encroachment, forbs (scarlet globemallow, hoods phlox, mat forming forbs) and shrubs increase (broom snakeweed, big sagebrush)
2.1a Improper grazing management, drought, fire, climate change
2.2 Needle and thread and Idaho fescue losing dominance to Sandberg bluegrass and prairie Junegrass. Decreaser bunchgrasses very rare and limited under shrub canopy. Broom snakeweed and Fringed sagewort beginning to replace shrub component
2.2a Proper grazing management, time, Integrated Pest Management, brush management

3.1 Shortgrass State lacks mid-statured bunchgrasses, Sandberg bluegrass and Junegrass dominant grasses, increaser shrubs nearly replace larger shrub species. Remaining larger shrub species heavily hedged.

T2A Overgrazing, introduction of weeds, drought, heavy human disturbance
R2A Fire, range seeding, timely moisture, proper grazing management, IPM
R3B Possibly not feasible, range seeding, time, proper grazing management, IPM
T2B Sodbusting, introduction of tame pasture species and other invasive plants, overgrazing, extended drought, adjacent to construction or disturbance event, extreme fire (multiple years or very intense)

4.1 Invaded State may resemble reference however contains noxious or invasive weeds such as cheatgrass or knapweed. Conifer encroachment common.

R3A Range seeding, time, proper grazing management, IPM
R4A IPM, timely moisture, grazing management, brush management, range seeding
R4B IPM, range seeding, timely moisture, grazing management, brush management, range seeding

State and transition model

Custom diagram

Standard diagram

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models

Additional community tables

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)
Contact for lead author
Date	05/29/2026
Approved by
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production

Indicators

Number and extent of rills:
Presence of water flow patterns:
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):

Dominant:

Sub-dominant:

Other:

Additional:
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial plant reproductive capability:

Download reference sheet

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Ecological site R044AP805MT

Shallow Grassland Group

Last updated: 9/07/2023 Accessed: 05/29/2026

Search

General information

MLRA notes

Ecological site concept

Associated sites

Similar sites

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Last updated: 9/07/2023
Accessed: 05/29/2026