Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This site occurs on on channeled valley bottom terraces, alluvial fans and piedmont slopes and other low-lying landscapes that receive additional run-on from adjacent sites. Slopes range from 0 to 5 percent. Elevations range from 4,500 to 5,500 feet above sea level.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Stream terrace
(2) Swale
(3) Alluvial fan
Flooding duration Very brief (4 to 48 hours) Flooding frequency Rare to occasional Ponding frequency None Elevation 4500 – 5500 ft Slope 0 – 5 % Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
This site has an arid climate with distinct seasonal temperature variations and large annual and diurnal temperature changes characteristic of a continental climate.
Precipitation averages 8 to 10 inches annually. Deviations of 4 inches or more from the average are quite common. Fifty percent of the precipitation is received from July to November, which is the predominant growing season of native plants. Summer precipitation is characterized by high-intensity, short-duration rainstorms. Winter precipitation averages less than one-half inch per month, usually in the form of rain. There are occasional snowstorms of short duration.
Temperatures vary from a mean monthly average of 77 F in July to 34 F in January, with a maximum of 104 F and a minimum of -10 F. The average last killing frost in spring is April 15, and the average first killing frost in fall is October 28. Frost-free season averages 185 days. Temperatures are conducive to native grass and forb growth from March through November.
Spring winds of 15 to 40 miles per hour are common from February to June. These winds increase transpiration rates of native plants and rapidly dry the surface soil. Small soil particles are often displaced by the wind near the soil surface. This results in structural damage to native plants, especially young seedlings.
Due to the low-lying position of the landscape and the resulting run-on, the soil moisture is more effective than on adjacent sites. This results in early green-up and higher productivity.
Climate data was obtained from http://www.wrcc.sage.dri.edu/summary/climsmnm.html using 50% probability for freeze-free and frost-free seasons using 28.5 degrees F and 32.5 degrees F, respectively.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 170 days Freeze-free period (average) 210 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
This site is not influenced by water from a wetland or stream.<br />
<br />
Soil features
The soils are moderately deep to deep. Surface textures range from loam, clay loam, silty clay loam and some clay. Substratum textures are very fine sandy loam, silt loam, clay loam, or silty clay loam. Calcium carbonate equivalent ranges from 0 to 15 percent
Depth to free carbonates - 0 to 20 inches.Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Loam
(2) Silty clay loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Moderately well drained to well drained Permeability class Slow to moderate Soil depth 72 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 – 5 % Surface fragment cover >3" Not specified Available water capacity
(0-40in)7 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)0 – 15 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 4 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)0 – 2 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)7.4 – 8.4 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 5 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)Not specified Ecological dynamics
This is a grassland site with shrubs scattered throughout. Trees are not commonly found on this site. Forbs comprise an important component on this site.
Other grasses that could appear on this site include: western wheatgrass, mat muhly, cane bluestem, sideoats grama, black grama, and Indian ricegrass.
Other woody plants include broom snakeweed and yucca spp.
Other forbs include: whorled milkweed, thistle spp., verbena spp., and spurge spp.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityCommunity 1.1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityThis is a grassland site with shrubs scattered throughout. Trees are not commonly found on this site. Forbs comprise an important component on this site.
Other grasses that could appear on this site include: western wheatgrass, mat muhly, cane bluestem, sideoats grama, black grama, and Indian ricegrass.
Other woody plants include broom snakeweed and yucca spp.
Other forbs include: whorled milkweed, thistle spp., verbena spp., and spurge spp.Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 585 1103 1620 Shrub/Vine 33 61 90 Forb 33 61 90 Total 651 1225 1800 Table 6. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 10% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 0% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 40% Forb foliar cover 0% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 20% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 40% Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM2311 , R042XA062NM-Swale Warm Season Plant- HCPC. SD-1 Swale HCPC Warm Season Plant Community.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 3 5 10 10 25 30 12 5 0 0 Figure 6. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM2312 , R042XA062NM-Swale Cool Season Plant-HCPC. SD-1 Swale HCPC Cool Season Plant Community.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 5 20 15 5 5 5 5 10 15 15 0 Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Warm Season 184–306 vine mesquite PAOB Panicum obtusum 184–306 – 2 Warm Season 184–306 James' galleta PLJA Pleuraphis jamesii 184–306 – tobosagrass PLMU3 Pleuraphis mutica 184–306 – 3 Warm Season 184–306 alkali sacaton SPAI Sporobolus airoides 184–306 – big sacaton SPWR2 Sporobolus wrightii 184–306 – 4 Warm Season 86–147 blue grama BOGR2 Bouteloua gracilis 86–147 – 5 Cool Season 61–98 squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 61–98 – 6 Warm Season 12–37 burrograss SCBR2 Scleropogon brevifolius 12–37 – 7 Warm Season 37–86 Graminoid (grass or grass-like) 2GRAM Graminoid (grass or grass-like) 37–86 – Shrub/Vine8 Shrub 12–37 fourwing saltbush ATCA2 Atriplex canescens 12–37 – winterfat KRLA2 Krascheninnikovia lanata 12–37 – 9 Shrub 0–37 Shrub (>.5m) 2SHRUB Shrub (>.5m) 0–37 – rubber rabbitbrush ERNAN5 Ericameria nauseosa ssp. nauseosa var. nauseosa 0–37 – Apache plume FAPA Fallugia paradoxa 0–37 – littleleaf sumac RHMI3 Rhus microphylla 0–37 – skunkbush sumac RHTR Rhus trilobata 0–37 – Forb10 Forb 61–123 Forb (herbaceous, not grass nor grass-like) 2FORB Forb (herbaceous, not grass nor grass-like) 61–123 – broadleaf milkweed ASLA4 Asclepias latifolia 61–123 – leatherweed CRPOP Croton pottsii var. pottsii 61–123 – Russian thistle SAKA Salsola kali 61–123 – ragwort SENEC Senecio 61–123 – American black nightshade SOAM Solanum americanum 61–123 – scarlet globemallow SPCO Sphaeralcea coccinea 61–123 – Interpretations
Animal community
This site provides habitats which support a resident animal community that is characterized by coyote, desert cottontail, silky pocket mouse, horned lark, ornate box turtle, New Mexico whiptail, and prairie rattlesnake.
Hydrological functions
The runoff curve numbers are determined by field investigations using hydraulic cover conditions and hydrologic soil groups.
Hydrologic Interpretations
Soil Series Hydrologic Group
Mimbres C
Largo b
Recreational uses
This site is not normally considered for its recreational value other than for nature obervation, hunting, and horseback riding. The beauty of this site may be enhanced by its proximity to a colorful setting.
Wood products
This site has no potential for wood products in its potential plant community.
Other products
Approximately 90 percent of the production on this site is suitable for grazing or browsing by domestic livestock and wildlife. Grazing pressure on adjacent sites may be a problem since grazing animals are attracted to this site because of early green-up. Heavy grazing pressure during early green-up, as well as trampling damage on wet soils may lead to deterioration of the potential plant community. Such deterioration is indicated by a decrease in vine mesquite, blue grama, bottlebrush squirreltail, and desireable forbs. Plants that increase include burrograss, mat muhly, broom snakeweed, and threadleaf groundsel.
A planned grazing system with periodic deferment is best to maintain the desirable balance between plant species and to maintain the natural productivity and plant vigor.
Removal of the previous year's growth, either by grazing or by prescribed burning, will remove old plant growth and lead to increased production and palatability of the coarser grasses found on this site.
Other information
Guide to Suggested Initial Stocking Rate Acres per Animal Unit Month
Similarity Index-----Ac/AUM
100 - 76--------------1.9 – 2.3
75 – 51--------------2.2 – 3.5
50 – 26--------------3.3 – 7.0
25 – 0---------------7.0 +
Supporting information
Other references
Other References:
Data collection for this site was done in conjunction with the progressive soil surveys within the Southern Desertic Basins, Plains and Mountains, Major Land Resource Area 42, of New Mexico. This site has been mapped and correlated with soils in the following soil surveys: Valencia and Bernalillo.
Characteristic Soils Are:
Mimbres silt loam
Largo
Contributors
Brandon Bestelmeyer
Don Sylvester
Michael Carpinelli
Santiago MisquezRangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
