Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This site occurs on mesa side slopes and along low hills, benches, and breaks dissected by narrow draws. It is characterized by a complex of soil types and miscellaneous land types including rock outcrop, badland, and riverwash. Due to exposure and soils, some areas are potentially very productive, while other areas are not. Slopes range from 10 to 65 percent; exposures are variable.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Escarpment
(2) Scarp slope
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 4500 – 5500 ft Slope 10 – 65 % Water table depth 72 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
This site has an arid climate with distinct seasonal temperature variations and large annual and diurnal temperature changes characteristic of a continental climate.
Precipitation averages 8 to 10 inches annually. Deviations of 4 inches or more from the average are quite common. Fifty percent of the precipitation is received from July to November, which is the predominant growing season of native plants. Summer precipitation is characterized by high-intensity, short-duration rainstorms. Winter precipitation averages less than one half inch per month, usually in the form of rain. There are occasional snowstorms of short duration.
Temperatures vary from a mean monthly average of 77 F in July to 34 F in January, with a maximum of 104 F and a minimum of -10 F. The average last killing frost in spring is April 15, and the average first killing frost in fall is October 28. Frost-free season averages 185 days. Temperatures are conducive to native grass and forb growth from March through November.
Spring winds of 15 to 40 miles per hour are common from February to June. These winds increase transpiration rates of native plants and rapidly dry the surface soil. Small soil particles are often displaced by the wind near the soil surface, often resulting in structural damage to native plants, especially young seedlings.
Climate data was obtained from http://www.wrcc.sage.dri.edu/summary/climsmnm.html using 50% probability for freeze-free and frost-free seasons using 28.5 degrees F and 32.5 degrees F, respectively.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 170 days Freeze-free period (average) 210 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
This site is not influenced by water from wetland or stream.<br />
<br />
Soil features
Soils are shallow to deep. Surfact textures are very cobbly loam, gravelly sandy loam, cobbly sandy loam, cobbly clay loam or gravelly fine sandy loam. Subsoil textures are very cobbly loam, very gravelly sandy loam, very cobbly sandy loam, cobbly clay loam, very gravelly loam or very gravelly fine sandy loam. Substratum textures are very cobbly loam, very gravelly sandy loam, extreamly cobbly sandy loam, cobbly clay loam, very gravelly loam or very gravelly fine sandy loam
Minimum and maximum values listed below represent the characteristic soils for this site.
Charateristic soils:
Akela
Nickel
Lithic Torriorthents
Torriorthents
Torriorthids
(note: the Nickel soil will not be used after an update to the survey).
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Gravelly loam
(2) Very gravelly fine sandy loam
(3) Extremely cobbly loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Moderately well drained to well drained Permeability class Very slow to slow Soil depth 4 – 72 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 15 – 35 % Surface fragment cover >3" 1 – 5 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)1 – 5 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)2 – 15 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 2 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)0 – 1 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)7.9 – 8.4 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)25 – 60 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)1 – 10 % Ecological dynamics
The climax vegetation on this site is diverse due to a wide range in edaphic and physiographic features. Typically the potential plant community is a shrub-grassland complex; scattered trees occur on north and east exposures.
Other grasses that could appear on this site include: plains lovegrass, sandhill muhly, threeawn spp., bottlebrush squirreltail, cane bluestem, and vine mesquite.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityCommunity 1.1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityThe climax vegetation on this site is diverse due to a wide range in edaphic and physiographic features. Typically the potential plant community is a shrub-grassland complex; scattered trees occur on north and east exposures.
Other grasses that could appear on this site include: plains lovegrass, sandhill muhly, threeawn spp., bottlebrush squirreltail, cane bluestem, and vine mesquite.
Other woody plants include: creosotebush, pale wolfberry, algerita, rabbitbrush, and broom snakeweed.
Other forbs include: globemallow, cryptantha, fleabane, and arid mustard.Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 150 281 413 Shrub/Vine 30 56 83 Forb 20 38 55 Total 200 375 551 Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM2400 , R042XA060NM-Mesa Breaks-Warm Season-HCPC. SD-1 HCPC Warm Season Plant Community.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 3 5 10 10 25 30 12 5 0 0 Figure 6. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM2401 , R042XA060NM-Mesa Breaks-Cool Season-HCPC. SD-1 HCPC Cool Season Plant Community.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 15 20 20 2 5 10 15 13 0 0 Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Warm Season 56–94 black grama BOER4 Bouteloua eriopoda 56–94 – 2 Warm Season 19–56 sideoats grama BOCU Bouteloua curtipendula 19–56 – 3 Warm Season 19–56 blue grama BOGR2 Bouteloua gracilis 19–56 – James' galleta PLJA Pleuraphis jamesii 19–56 – 4 Warm Season 11–19 New Mexico muhly MUPA2 Muhlenbergia pauciflora 11–19 – bush muhly MUPO2 Muhlenbergia porteri 11–19 – curlyleaf muhly MUSE Muhlenbergia setifolia 11–19 – 5 Cool Season 11–19 needle and thread HECO26 Hesperostipa comata 11–19 – New Mexico feathergrass HENE5 Hesperostipa neomexicana 11–19 – 6 Warm Season 38–56 Graminoid (grass or grass-like) 2GRAM Graminoid (grass or grass-like) 38–56 – Indian ricegrass ACHY Achnatherum hymenoides 38–56 – hairy grama BOHI2 Bouteloua hirsuta 38–56 – alkali sacaton SPAI Sporobolus airoides 38–56 – gyp dropseed SPNE Sporobolus nealleyi 38–56 – tridens TRIDE Tridens 38–56 – Shrub/Vine7 Shrub 11–26 fourwing saltbush ATCA2 Atriplex canescens 11–26 – shadscale saltbush ATCO Atriplex confertifolia 11–26 – Sonoran scrub oak QUTU2 Quercus turbinella 11–26 – skunkbush sumac RHTR Rhus trilobata 11–26 – 8 Shrub 11–19 Bigelow sage ARBI3 Artemisia bigelovii 11–19 – prairie clover DALEA Dalea 11–19 – mormon tea EPVI Ephedra viridis 11–19 – mariola PAIN2 Parthenium incanum 11–19 – 9 Shrub 11–19 Shrub (>.5m) 2SHRUB Shrub (>.5m) 11–19 – sacahuista NOMI Nolina microcarpa 11–19 – pricklypear OPUNT Opuntia 11–19 – yucca YUCCA Yucca 11–19 – Forb10 Forb 19–56 Forb (herbaceous, not grass nor grass-like) 2FORB Forb (herbaceous, not grass nor grass-like) 19–56 – desert marigold BAMU Baileya multiradiata 19–56 – buckwheat ERIOG Eriogonum 19–56 – bladderpod LESQU Lesquerella 19–56 – pricklyleaf dogweed THAC Thymophylla acerosa 19–56 – woody crinklemat TICAC Tiquilia canescens var. canescens 19–56 – hairy crinklemat TIHI Tiquilia hispidissima 19–56 – Interpretations
Animal community
This site provides habitats which support a resident animal community that is characterized by mule deer, coyote, desert cottontail, Texas antelope squirrel, Botta’s pocket gopher, brown towhee, scaled quail, roadrunner, cactus wren, collared lizard, and western ribbon snake.
This site provides nesting opportunities for mockingbird, western kingbird, and Swainson’s hawk.
Hydrological functions
The runoff curve numbers are determined by field investigations using hydraulic cover conditions and hydrologic soil groups.
Hydrologic Interpretations
Soil Series Hydrologic Group
Nickel D
Akela B
Orthents B
Recreational uses
This site is well suited to hunting, hiking, horseback riding, nature observation, and photography. The natural beauty of this site is a result of the diversity in vegetation, landscapes, and soil colors.
Wood products
Wood products, including fuelwood, fence posts, and landscape trees are produced on areas within the site. These are not, however, produced in significant amounts.
Other products
Approximately 85 percent of the vegetative production on this site is suitable as forage for domestic livestock and wildlife. Grazing distribution may be a problem; more level areas on the site receive more grazing pressure than the steeper areas. Construction of livestock waterings, saltings, cross fencing, and trails may improve livestock distribution.
Inadequate management of the site leads to repetitive grazing of the most desirable plant species and reduces the vigor and productivity of these plants. The result is a deterioration in the potential plant community indicated by a decrease in black grama, blue grama, sideoats grama, bush muhly, New Mexico muhly, plains lovegrass, New Mexico feathergrass, and fourwing saltbush. Plant species that increase include galleta, hairy grama, tridens, ring muhly, dropseeds, mariola, cactus, pinyon, and juniper. A planned grazing system with periodic deferment is best to maintain the desirable balance between plant species and to maintain the natural productivity and plant vigor.
In addition to domestic livestock, this site is used by deer, pronghorn, small mammals, and birds.Other information
Guide to Suggested Initial Stocking Rate Acres per Animal Unit Month
Similarity Index-----Ac/AUM
100 - 76-------------5.7 – 7.6
75 – 51--------------7.0 – 11.4
50 – 26-------------10.8 – 22.9
25 – 0--------------22.9+
Supporting information
Other references
Other References:
Data collection for this site was done in conjunction with the progressive soil surveys within the Southern Desertic Basins, Plains and Mountains, Major Land Resource Area 42, of New Mexico. This site has been mapped and correlated with soils in the following soil surveys: Valencia and Bernalillo.
Characteristic Soils Are:
Orthids – Rock outcrop
Akela
Nickel
Contributors
Brandon Bestelmeyer
Don Sylvester
Michael Carpinelli
Santiago MisquezRangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
