Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 035X–Colorado Plateau
“PROVISIONAL ecological site concepts developed and described. See Project Plan [insert Project Plan Name] for more details and related milestones.”
Ecological site concept
“ATTENTION: This ecological site meets the requirements for PROVISIONAL (if not more). A provisional ecological site is established after ecological site concepts are developed and an initial state-and-transition model is drafted. A provisional ecological site typically will include literature reviews, land use history information, legacy data (prior approved range site descriptions, forage suitability groups, woodland suitability groups, etc.,) , and includes some soils data, and estimates for canopy and/or species composition by weight,. A provisional ecological site provides the conceptual framework of soil-site correlation for the development of the ESD. For more information about this ecological site, please contact your local NRCS office.”
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub (1) Rumex crispus
(2) ErigeronHerbaceous (1) Pascopyrum smithii
(2) Elymus trachycaulusPhysiographic features
This site occurs on lacustrine materials that settled in slightly concave playas and closed depressions in lava plateaus and near cinder cones. slopes range from 0 to 3 percent.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Cinder cone
(2) Basin floor
(3) Depression
Elevation 7000 – 9000 ft Slope 0 – 3 % Water table depth 40 – 60 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The average annual precipitation ranges from 18 to 25 inches. Forty percent occurs during the months of June to September. Most of the summer precipitation comes in the form of high intensity-short duration thunderstorms. Many of these storms are accompanied by hail. Snow accumulation typically occurs from November to March. Typically, depths range from 1 to 4 feet.
The average annual air temperature is about 43 degrees F. However, there are wide ranges in both yearly and daily temperatures. Temperatures may fluctuate as much as 75 degrees F in any 24-hour period. The frost-free period ranges from 80 to 100 days. The last killing frost is in June and the first killing frost is in September.
Climate data was obtained from http://www.wrcc.sage.dri.edu/summary/climsmnm.html web site using 50% probability for freeze-free and frost-free seasons using 28.5 degrees F and 32.5 degrees F respectively.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 170 days Freeze-free period (average) 200 days Precipitation total (average) 20 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
No regular water geatures associated with this site.
Soil features
These soils are deep and very deep and moderatly well drained and very slowly permeable. They formed in lacustrine materials derived from basalt. They occure in slightly concave playas and closed depressions in lava plateaus. slopes range from 0 to 2 percent overall. Runoff is neglidgable. Typical surface texture is clay. The surface is covered by 0 to 5 percent basalt cobbles, stones and lava bombs. Subsoil texture are clay. Reaction is slightly acidic to slightly alkaline. available waterholding capacity is moderate to high. These soils have high to very high shrink swell potential with common surface and subsurface cracks. Effective rooting depth is greater than 60 inches.
Typical taxonomic units include:
McKinley County (NM692) Soil Map Units - 420 Chivato;Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Stony clay
Family particle size (1) Clayey
Drainage class Somewhat poorly drained to poorly drained Permeability class Moderately slow to slow Soil depth 60 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 – 5 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 – 5 % Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 5 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 5 % Ecological dynamics
This site is easily recognized by the volcanic setting. High soil clay content. sparse vegetation and soil surfce cracks when the soil is dry.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityCommunity 1.1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityThis is a sparse grassland vegetation community on a deep clay soil with large deep soil surface and subsurface cracks.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 250 300 324 Shrub/Vine 8 40 80 Forb 4 25 40 Total 262 365 444 Table 6. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 0-0% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 10-20% Forb foliar cover 10-10% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 20-30% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0-10% Surface fragments >3" 0-10% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 70-80% Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM1005 , R035XH005NM-Playa-HCPC. R035XH005NM-Playa-HCPC.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 3 5 10 10 25 30 12 5 0 0 Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 western wheatgrass 300–325 2 slender wheatgrass 8–25 slender wheatgrass ELTR7 Elymus trachycaulus 8–25 – Forb3 curley dock 8–24 curly dock RUCR Rumex crispus 8–24 – 4 pingue 8–24 pingue rubberweed HYRI Hymenoxys richardsonii 8–24 – 5 fleabane 8–24 fleabane ERIGE2 Erigeron 8–24 – Shrub/Vine6 horsetail 8–24 scouringrush horsetail EQHY Equisetum hyemale 8–24 – Interpretations
Animal community
Mule deer, elk, coyote, fox, raven, red tailed hawk, golden eagle, bobcat, nuthatches, finches, gray jay, black bear, tassel eared squirrel, merriams turkey, mourning dove, prarie rattlesnake.
Supporting information
Contributors
Joe May
John Tunberg
Peter LefebvreRangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement