Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Draft. A draft ecological site description is either incomplete or has not undergone quality control and quality assurance review.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 035X–Colorado Plateau
AZ CRA 35.4 – Colorado Plateau Cold Sagebrush – Grasslands
Elevations range from 4200 to 5100 feet and precipitation averages 7 to 11 inches. Vegetation includes winterfat, fourwing saltbush, buckwheat species, needlegrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, Indian ricegrass, black grama, blue grama, sideoats grama, gyp dropseed, and galleta. The soil temperature regime is mesic and the soil moisture regime is typic aridic. This unit occurs within the Colorado Plateau Physiographic Province and is characterized by a sequence of flat to gently dipping sedimentary rocks eroded into plateaus, valleys and deep canyons. Sedimentary rock classes dominate the plateau with volcanic fields occurring for the most part near its margin.Associated sites
R035XD414AZ Sandy Loam Upland 7-11" p.z.
Sandy Loam Upland, 7-11" p.z.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous (1) Sporobolus cryptandrus
Physiographic features
This site occurs on low stream terraces and flood plains adjacent to ephemeral drainages. It receives run-on moisture from a drainageway and adjacent ecological sites, especially during high entensity thunderstorms characteristic of the summer monsoon season. The soils of this site are deep to very deep. Slopes are relatively flat.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Flood plain
(2) Stream terrace
Flooding duration Brief (2 to 7 days) Flooding frequency Frequent Ponding frequency None Elevation 3800 – 6500 ft Slope 1 – 3 % Ponding depth 0 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
Winter-Summer moisture ratios are typically 70:30 on the west side of this LRU and shift to 60:40 on the east side. Late spring is usually the driest period, and early fall moisture can be sporadic. Summer rains fall June-September; moisture originates in the Gulf of Mexico and creates convective, usually brief, intense thunderstorms. Cool season moisture October-May tends to be frontal; it originates in the Pacific and the Gulf of California and falls in widespread storms with longer duration and lower intensity. Precipitation generally comes as snow December-February. Accumulations above 10 inches are not common, but can occur. Snow usually lasts 3-4 days, but can persist much longer. Summer daytime temperatures are commonly 95-100 F and, on occasion, exceed 105F. Winter air temperatures can regularly go below 15 F and have been recorded below -15 F.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 220 days Freeze-free period (average) 150 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in BarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils charicterized on this site are deep to very deep. They are slightly effervescent on the surface, increasing to strongly effervescent in the subsoil at and below 2 inches. The surface texture is stratified loam. The subsurface textures range from stratified loam to stratified fine sandy loam.
Soils mapped on this site include:
SSA623 Shivwits Area MU 41 Ives.Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Alluvium – sandstone
Surface texture (1) Stony loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Well drained Permeability class Moderate Soil depth 40 – 60 in Surface fragment cover <=3" Not specified Surface fragment cover >3" Not specified Available water capacity
(0-40in)7.8 – 10.2 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)5 – 20 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 2 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)Not specified Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)7.9 – 8.4 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)Not specified Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)Not specified Ecological dynamics
The plant communities found on an ecological site are naturally variable. Composition and production will vary with yearly conditions, location, aspect, and the natural variability of the soils. The historical climax plant community represents the natural potential plant communities found on relict or relatively undisturbed sites. Other plant communities described here represent plant communities that are known to occur when the site is disturbed by factors such as grazing, fire, or drought.
Production data provided in this site description is standardized to air-dry weight at the end of the summer growing season. The plant communities described in this site description are based on near normal rainfall years.
NRCS uses a Similarity Index to compare existing plant communities to the plant communities described here. Similarity Index is determined by comparing the production and composition of a plant community to the production and composition of a plant community described in this site description. To determine Similarity Index, compare the production (air-dry weight) of each species to that shown in the plant community description. For each species, count no more than the maximum amount shown for the species, and for each group, count no more than the maximum shown for the group. Divide the resulting total by the total normal year production shown in the plant community description. If rainfall has been significantly above or below normal, use the total production shown for above or below normal years. If field data is not collected at the end of the summer growing season, then the field data must be corrected to the end of the year production before comparing it to the site description. The growth curve can be used as a guide for estimating production at the end of the summer growing season.
State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityCommunity 1.1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityThe historic Climax Plant Community for this site has not been described.
State 2
Heavy, Long-Term GrazingCommunity 2.1
Heavy, Long-Term GrazingThe plant community described for this state has been heavily influenced by livestock grazing. This ecological site was probably one of the earliest to be grazed by domestic livestock. It is also where many of the earliest ponds were constructed to provide water for homesteads and livestock. The plant community is dominated by introduced annual grasses and forbs, with remnants of the more grazing tolerant native perennial grasses and forbs.
Figure 3. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Forb 240 – 270 Grass/Grasslike 30 – 60 Total 270 – 330 Figure 4. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ0002 , 35.4 7-11" p.z. sand dropseed. Some growth in spring, most growth in summer rainy season..
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 0 0 5 5 25 50 15 0 0 0 Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3541 , 35.4 7-11" p.z. all sites. Most growth occurs in the spring and during the summer rainy season..
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 1 9 20 15 5 16 25 6 2 1 0 Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 7. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Common Native Perennial Summer Grasses 30–60 sand dropseed SPCR Sporobolus cryptandrus 30–60 – 2 Occasional Native Perennial Summer Grasses 0–3 James' galleta PLJA Pleuraphis jamesii 0–3 – 3 Common Introduced Annual Grasses 0–60 Grass, annual 2GA Grass, annual 0–60 – Forb4 Occasional Native Perennial Forbs 0–6 globemallow SPHAE Sphaeralcea 0–6 – 5 Common Introduced Annual Forbs 240–270 Russian thistle SALSO Salsola 240–270 – 6 Occasional Introduced Annual Forbs 0–6 Forb, annual 2FA Forb, annual 0–3 – redstem stork's bill ERCI6 Erodium cicutarium 0–3 – Interpretations
Animal community
Physically, this site is very well suited to livestock grazing. Deferment and/or rest from grazing will benefit this site.
Ponds developed on this site provide water for antelope and other wildlife species.Supporting information
Type locality
Location 1: Mohave County, AZ Township/Range/Section T40 N. R11 W. S35 General legal description Arizona, Mohave County, Hole-N-Wall Canyon, AZ 7 1/2 min. quad., NE 1/4, Sec. 35, T. 40 N., R. 11 W., Dutchman Flat. Contributors
Larry D. Ellicott
Stephen Cassady
Steve CassadyRangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement