Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Legacy ID
R035XH001NM
Physiographic features
This site occurs on basins and valleys and below seeps and springs and may be from 0.25 to 20 acres in area. It receives runoff water from adjacent sites. It may be inundated for very short periods of time in the spring from snowmelt. Drainages associated with the site are not dissected and allow the water to fan out. This results in a high water table and even some surface water in the spring and summer. Slopes average three percent, but may range up to 10 percent when associated with springs and seeps. Elevation ranges from 7,400 to 9,500 feet above sea level.
Wetlands of the United States, Circular 39, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1954, classifies these sites as wetlands. Type 1 is seasonally blooded basins while type 2 is inland fresh meadows with saturated soils but without standing water during most of the growing season.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Depression
(2) Mountain valley
Flooding duration Brief (2 to 7 days) to long (7 to 30 days) Flooding frequency Occasional to frequent Ponding duration Brief (2 to 7 days) to long (7 to 30 days) Ponding frequency Rare to occasional Elevation 7400 – 9500 ft Slope 0 – 5 % Ponding depth 1 – 4 in Water table depth 1 – 40 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The average annual precipitation ranges from 18 to 25 inches. Forty percent occurs during the months of June to September. Most of the summer precipitation comes in the form of high intensity-short duration thunderstorms. Many of these storms are accompanied by hail. Snow accumulation typically occurs from November to March. Typically, depths range from 1 to 4 feet.
The average annual air temperature is about 43 degrees F. However, there are wide ranges in both yearly and daily temperatures. Temperatures may fluctuate as much as 75 degrees F in any 24-hour period. The frost-free period ranges from 80 to 100 days. The last killing frost is in June and the first killing frost is in September.
Climate data was obtained from http://www.wrcc.sage.dri.edu/summary/climsmnm.html web site using 50% probability for freeze-free and frost-free seasons using 28.5 degrees F and 32.5 degrees F respectively.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 170 days Freeze-free period (average) 200 days Precipitation total (average) 20 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
This site is influenced by water from seeps and springs
Soil features
The soils of this site are moderately deep to deep and are typically very poorly drained to somewhat poorly drained. Some areas may be moderately well drained. They are formed from mixed alluvium and have varying surface textures. The soils are non-saline and have high organic content. Available water-holding capacity is high to very high.
Soil Series
Inclusion
Polich
Saladon
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Clay loam
(2) Silt loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Poorly drained to somewhat poorly drained Permeability class Very slow Soil depth 60 – 72 in Available water capacity
(0-40in)9 – 12 in Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 2 mmhos/cm Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.1 – 8.4 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)15 – 30 % Ecological dynamics
This highly productive site is suited to late spring through mid-fall livestock grazing use under a planned grazing scheme. Sub-irrigation reduces the fluctuations in forage production.
This site provides forage for grazing and browsing animals.
Over utilization results in a reduction and eventual elimination of the preferred grass and forb components. Tufted hairgrass, muhly spp., wheatgrass spp., prairie junegrass and native bluegrasses will decrease. Excessive browsing of willows during the growing season will also result in their reduction and eventual elimination. Grass and grass-likes that will increase are Kentucky bluegrass, sages and rushed. Shrubby cinquefoil, rabbitbrush and forbs will also increase.
Redtop and timothy may invade the site and become naturalized. Their production may exceed that of the native species.
Elimination of the preferred components may allow the formation of gullies, which lower the water table. Once the water table has been lowered Arizona fescue and mountain muhly along with Kentucky bluegrass become predominant. Ponderosa pine will move onto the site from surrounding areas. In these instances the site index for ponderosa pine is 85+.
Mechanical manipulation and removal of the vegetation will substantially increase the hazard of water erosion and therefore, lead to gutting the meadow. Management alternatives will reduce water erosion. Constructing rock and brush dams or utilizing beaver may revitalize small gutted meadows.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityCommunity 1.1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityCool-season grasses with a sparse overstory of shrubs dominate the overall physiognomy. Western wheatgrass, tufted hairgrass, sedges, rushed and bluegrasses are predominant. Sedges and rushes are most conspicuous in areas where there is surface water. Major forbs include clovers, iris and western yarrow. The very sparse shrub and half-shrub layer consists of willows and shrubby cinquefoil. Wildrose and water hemlock may be present.
This highly productive site is suited to late spring through mid-fall livestock grazing use under a planned grazing scheme. Sub-irrigation reduces the fluctuations in forage production.
This site provides forage for grazing and browsing animals.
Over utilization results in a reduction and eventual elimination of the preferred grass and forb components. Tufted hairgrass, muhly spp., wheatgrass spp., prairie junegrass and native bluegrasses will decrease. Excessive browsing of willows during the growing season will also result in their reduction and eventual elimination. Grass and grass-likes that will increase are Kentucky bluegrass, sages and rushed. Shrubby cinquefoil, rabbitbrush and forbs will also increase.
Redtop and timothy may invade the site and become naturalized. Their production may exceed that of the native species.
Elimination of the preferred components may allow the formation of gullies, which lower the water table. Once the water table has been lowered Arizona fescue and mountain muhly along with Kentucky bluegrass become predominant. Ponderosa pine will move onto the site from surrounding areas. In these instances the site index for ponderosa pine is 85+.
Mechanical manipulation and removal of the vegetation will substantially increase the hazard of water erosion and therefore, lead to gutting the meadow. Management alternatives will reduce water erosion. Constructing rock and brush dams or utilizing beaver may revitalize small gutted meadows.
Other species that could appear on this site include: alpine timothy, sheep fescue, prairie junegrass, red fescue, muttongrass, bluejoint reedgrass, muhly spp., meadow barley, false hellebore, thistle and water hemlock. Redtop, timothy and Kentucky bluegrass may have become naturalized to the site.Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 1913 2231 2550 Forb 180 210 240 Shrub/Vine 68 79 90 Total 2161 2520 2880 Table 6. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 0% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 50% Forb foliar cover 10-10% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 40-40% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0-0% Surface fragments >3" 0-0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 20% Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM1001 , R035XH001NM-Meadow-HCPC. Cool-season grassland with sparse shrub overstory in AN1.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 3 5 10 10 25 30 12 5 0 0 State 2
Drained meadowCommunity 2.1
Drained meadowAdditional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Tufted Hairgrass 131–394 2 Spike Muhly 131–394 spike muhly MUWR Muhlenbergia wrightii 131–394 – 3 Oatgrass 79–131 timber oatgrass DAIN Danthonia intermedia 79–131 – 4 western wheatgrass slender wheatgrass 131–525 slender wheatgrass ELTR7 Elymus trachycaulus 131–525 – western wheatgrass PASM Pascopyrum smithii 131–525 – 5 nebraska sedge 263–394 Nebraska sedge CANE2 Carex nebrascensis 263–394 – 6 rush spp. 131–263 rush JUNCU Juncus 131–263 – 7 Bluegrass Species 131–263 bluegrass POA Poa 131–263 – 8 Arizona Fescue 0–53 Arizona fescue FEAR2 Festuca arizonica 0–53 – 9 Mountain Muhly 0–53 mountain muhly MUMO Muhlenbergia montana 0–53 – Forb10 clover spp. mountain iris yarrow 184–263 milfoil wattle ACMI Acacia millefolia 184–263 – Rocky Mountain iris IRMI Iris missouriensis 184–263 – clover TRIFO Trifolium 184–263 – pullup muhly MUFI2 Muhlenbergia filiformis 26–131 – Shrub/Vine12 willow mountain peachleaf 26–131 clover TRIFO Trifolium 26–131 – peachleaf willow SAAM2 Salix amygdaloides 26–131 – false mountain willow SAPS Salix pseudomonticola 26–131 – 13 shrubby cinqufoil wildrose 26–131 yarrow ACHIL Achillea 131–263 – thistle CIRSI Cirsium 131–263 – sunflower HELIA3 Helianthus 131–263 – iris IRIS Iris 131–263 – rose ROSA5 Rosa 26–131 – Table 8. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
Habitat for Wildlife:
Because of their size and distribution throughout the range, these sites provide important habitat components for mule deer, turkey and elk. Elk utilize this site for feeding and wallowing. Deer utilize this site for browsing. Turkey feed along the edges of the meadow.
Where permanent or semi-permanent aquatic habitats occur, these sites are used by mallard, teal, snipe, killdeer and blackbirds.
Animal which utilize this ecosite for feeding, shelter or reproduction include: elk, mule deer, brown bear, coyote, gray fox meadow vole, Merriam’s turkey, green horned owl, red winged-blackbird, mallard, green wing teal, snipe, killdeer, western bluebird, vesper sparrow violet-green swallow, leopard frog and western chorus frog.
Hydrological functions
Soil Series Hydrologic Group
Inclusion D
Polich C
Saladon D
Recreational uses
The visual qualities of the site are very pleasing, especially against a setting of coniferous trees. Due to the wetness, recreational uses are limited.
Wood products
Under normal conditions this site provides no wood products. Only when the meadow has become gutted will the site produce species that can be utilized.
Other products
Grazing:
This highly productive site is suited to late spring through mid-fall livestock grazing use under a planned grazing scheme. Sub-irrigation reduces the fluctuations in forage production.
This site provides forage for grazing and browsing animals.
Over utilization results in a reduction and eventual elimination of the preferred grass and forb components. Tufted hairgrass, muhly spp., wheatgrass spp., prairie junegrass and native bluegrasses will decrease. Excessive browsing of willows during the growing season will also result in their reduction and eventual elimination. Grass and grass-likes that will increase are Kentucky bluegrass, sages and rushed. Shrubby cinquefoil, rabbitbrush and forbs will also increase.
Redtop and timothy may invade the site and become naturalized. Their production may exceed that of the native species.
Elimination of the preferred components may allow the formation of gullies, which lower the water table. Once the water table has been lowered Arizona fescue and mountain muhly along with Kentucky bluegrass become predominant. Ponderosa pine will move onto the site from surrounding areas. In these instances the site index for ponderosa pine is 85+.
Mechanical manipulation and removal of the vegetation will substantially increase the hazard of water erosion and therefore, lead to gutting the meadow. Management alternatives will reduce water erosion. Constructing rock and brush dams or utilizing beaver may revitalize small gutted meadows.
If fences must cross meadows, ballasting posts may be required to keep posts from sinking into the soil. The high water table precludes vehicles from crossing these soils. Roads will have to be ballasted to provide reliable trafficabililty.
Other information
Meadow
Guide to Suggested Initial Stocking Rate Acres per Animal Unit Month
Similarity Index Ac/AUM
100 - 76 .75 – 1.5
75 – 51 1.0 – 2.0
50 – 26 1.5 – 3.5
25 – 0 3.5+
Gutted Meadow
Guide to Suggested Initial Stocking Rate Acres per Animal Unit Month
Similarity Index Ac/AUM
100 - 76 4.4 – 5.7
75 – 51 5.6 – 8.6
50 – 26 8.5 – 17.0
25 – 0 17.0+
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Data collection for this site was done in conjunction with the progressive soil surveys within the Arizona and New Mexico Mountains 39 Major Land Resource Area of New Mexico. This site has been mapped and correlated with soils in the following soil surveys. McKinley and Cibola Soil Surveys
Type locality
Location 1: McKinley County, NM Location 2: Cibola County, NM Contributors
Don Sylvester
Elizabeth Wright
Joe May
John TunbergRangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
