Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 035X–Colorado Plateau
This ecological site occurs in Common Resource Area 35.8 - the Colorado Plateau Ponderosa Pine Forests
The Common Resource Area occurs within the Colorado Plateau Physiographic Province. Elevations range from 6800 to 8500 feet and precipitation averages 17 to 25 inches per year. Vegetation includes ponderosa pine, white fir, aspen, pinyon, juniper, Gambel oak, big sagebrush, ceanothus, blue elderberry, muttongrass, upland sedge, and big wildrye, mountain muhly, Arizona fescue, pine dropseed, and blue grama. The soil temperature regime ranges from mesic to frigid and the soil moisture regime is typic ustic. This unit occurs within the Colorado Plateau Physiographic Province and is characterized by a sequence of flat to gently dipping sedimentary rocks eroded into plateaus, valleys and deep canyons. Sedimentary rock classes dominate the plateau with volcanic fields occurring for the most part near its margin.
Associated sites
DX035X03B811 Sandy Loam Upland 17-25" p.z. (PIPO)
DX035X03B827 Sandstone Hills 17-25" p.z. (PIPO)
R035XH821AZ Meadow 17-25" p.z.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Pinus ponderosa
(2) Quercus gambeliiShrub (1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis
(2) Mahonia repensHerbaceous (1) Bouteloua gracilis
(2) Muhlenbergia montanaLegacy ID
F035XH826AZ
Physiographic features
This ecological site occurs on plateaus and mesas. Soils are typically shallow to sandstone with argillic horizons. The site can have small inclusions of moderately deep soils, or very shallow soils associated with rock outcrop. Slopes on the site range from 1 to 15 percent. The site is well drained and does not benefit significantly from run-on moisture from adjacent sites.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Plateau
(2) Mesa
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 7300 – 8500 ft Slope 0 – 15 % Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
Winter-summer moisture ratios are typically 70:30 on the west side of this LRU and shift to 60:40 on the east side. Late spring is usually the driest period, and early fall moisture can be sporadic. Summer rains fall from June through September; moisture originates in the Gulf of Mexico and creates convective, usually brief, intense thunderstorms. Cool season moisture from October through May tends to be frontal; It originates in the Pacific Ocean and the Gulf of California and falls in widespread storms with longer duration and lower intensity. Precipitation generally comes as snow from October into April. Snowpack can persist for 3-4 months, although it may disappear in exposed areas during prolonged dry weather. Summer daytime temperatures are typically 80-90 but can exceed 95 degrees F. Winter temperatures of around 0 degrees F are common and can reach -25 degrees F.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 100 days Freeze-free period (average) 130 days Precipitation total (average) 30 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
The soil moisture on this ecological site comes from precipitation. The site does not benefit significantly from run-on moisture. Shallow bedrock areas will concentrate water in deeper soil pockets, where most of the vegetation production occurs. Because of the shallow soils, larger rainfall events will not be entirely captured by the site. This site contributes runoff to other ecological sites.
Soil features
The soils on this site are shallow to sandstone; They have formed in place from alluvium, residuum and eolian deposits derived from sandstone and shale. The surface textures of the mineral soil are sandy loam to fine sandy loam. Subsurface textures are loam, very fine sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and clay loam. An argillic horizon is usually present, although in some cases it has been lost.
Soil survey map unit components that have been correlated to this ecological site include:
SSA-713 Chinle Area MU 21 Flutedrock;
SSA-715 Fort Defiance Area AZ/NM MU 130 Verite.Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Alluvium – sandstone and shale
Surface texture (1) Fine sandy loam
(2) Sandy loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Well drained Permeability class Moderately slow to moderate Soil depth 10 – 20 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 1 – 15 % Surface fragment cover >3" 5 – 40 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)2 – 2.5 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)Not specified Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)Not specified Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.6 – 7.3 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)1 – 20 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)5 – 40 % Ecological dynamics
An ecological site is not a precise assemblage of species for which the proportions are the same from place to place or from year to year. In all plant communities, variability is apparent in productivity and occurrence of individual species. Spatial boundaries of the communities; however, can be recognized by characteristic patterns of species composition, association, and community structure. The historic climax plant community for this ecological site has been described by sampling relict or relatively undisturbed sites and/or reviewing historic records. The historic climax plant community is the plant community that evolved over time with the soil forming process and long term changes in climatic conditions of the area. It is the plant community that was best adapted to the unique combination of environmental factors associated with the site.
Natural disturbances, such as drought, fire, grazing of native fauna, and insects, are inherent in the development and maintenance of these plant communities. The effects of these disturbances are part of the range of characteristics of the ecological site. Fluctuations in plant community structure and function caused by the effects of natural disturbances help establish the boundaries and characteristics of an ecological site. They are accounted for as part of the range of characteristics of the ecological site. Recognizable plant community phases are identified in the reference state of the ecological site. Some sites may have a small range of variation, while others have a large range. Some plant community phases may exist for long periods of time, while others may only occur for a couple of years after a disturbance.
Deterioration of the plant community, hydrology, or soil site stability on an ecological site can result in crossing a threshold or potentially irreversible boundary to another state, or equilibrium. This can occur as a result of the loss of soil surface through erosion, the loss of the stability of the site due to disturbances that cause active erosion on the site, increases in the amounts and/or patterns or runoff from rainstorms, changes in availability of surface and subsurface water, significant changes in plant structural and functional types, or the introduction of non-native species. When these thresholds are crossed, the potential of the ecological site to return to the historic climax plant community can be lost, or restoration will require significant inputs . There may be multiple states possible for an ecological site, determined by the type and or severity of disturbance.
The known states and transition pathways for this ecological site are described in the state and transition model. Within each state, there may be one or more known plant community phases. These community phases describe the different plant community that can be recognized and mapped across this ecological site. The state and transition model is intended to help land users recognize the current plant community on the ecological site, and the management options for improving the plant community to the desired plant community.
Plant production information in this site description is standardized to the annual production on an air-dry weight basis in near normal rainfall years.
State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
Figure 4. STM - F035XH826AZ
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference StateCommunity 1.1
Reference Plant CommunityThis plant community is dominated by mature ponderosa pine - 20 to 35% canopy cover, with light scattered cover (1-15%)in shorter ponderosa pine, pinyon pine, Douglas fir and Gambel oak in understory. Shrubs are small, scattered and make up less than cover (2-5%). These includes Fendler ceanothus and creeping barberry. Grass and forb species range from 5 to 30% cover. Being lower in areas of dense tree canopy cover and/or bedrock. Grasses are dominated by mountain muhly, blue grama, with patches of pine dropseed, little bluestem, muttongrass and Arizona fescue. Forbs are secondary to grasses and are dominated by trailing fleabane, bahia, New Mexico groundsel.
Forest overstory.Overstory is dominated by mature Ponderosa Pine.
Forest understory. Understory is sparse, with some smaller trees (PIPO & QUGA) and very few shrubs. Grasses and forbs dominate the understory.
Figure 5. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 360 400 480 Forb 60 100 120 Tree 25 50 100 Shrub/Vine 5 25 50 Total 450 575 750 Table 6. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover 10-40% Shrub/vine/liana basal cover 0-10% Grass/grasslike basal cover 20-40% Forb basal cover 10-10% Non-vascular plants 0-0% Biological crusts 0-0% Litter 40-70% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 10-10% Surface fragments >3" 10-10% Bedrock 10-30% Water 0% Bare ground 0-10% Table 7. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (ft) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.5 0-1% 0-5% 5-30% 1-5% >0.5 <= 1 0-1% 0-1% 0-10% 0-5% >1 <= 2 0-1% – 0-5% 0-1% >2 <= 4.5 0-1% – – – >4.5 <= 13 0-1% – – – >13 <= 40 1-5% – – – >40 <= 80 10-30% – – – >80 <= 120 1-5% – – – >120 – – – – Figure 6. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3581 , 35.8 17-25" p.z. all sites. Growth begins in the spring, most growth occurs during the summer rainy season..
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 0 4 10 24 21 23 13 5 0 0 Figure 7. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3901 , 35.8 17-25" p.z. muttongrass. Growth begins in the spring and extends through the summer rainy season..
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 0 5 10 30 20 20 10 5 0 0 Figure 8. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3902 , 35.8 17-25" p.z. Arizona fescue. Growth begins in the late spring and extends through the summer rainy season..
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 0 0 5 20 30 30 10 5 0 0 Figure 9. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3903 , 35.8 17-25" p.z. western wheatgrass. Growth begins in the spring, most growth occurs in the summer. Seed set occurs in the fall..
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 0 5 10 15 25 30 10 5 0 0 Community 1.2
Light Ponderosa Pine OverstoryThis community has a light overstory of mature ponderosa pine with a scattered secondary overstory of other trees. The understory has a high cover of grasses and forbs and scattered shrubs.There may be pockets of Gambel's oak.
Community 1.3
Dense Ponderosa OverstoryThis community has a dense overstory of ponderosa pine. The main and secondary overstory canopy are dominated by ponderosa pine with a scattered canopy of mature Gambel oaks. The underostory is light with only scattered with short and midgrasses, forbs with patches of shrubs.
Pathway 1.1a
Community 1.1 to 1.2Partial removal of mature PIPO canopy through timber harvest, or Bark beetle infestation. This results in higher production on the forest floor of grass, forb and to some extent shrubs.
Pathway 1.1b
Community 1.1 to 1.3Openings are filled in by natural regeneration of Ponderosa pine, forming an even aged tight canopy of sapling to pole size PIPO
Pathway 1.2b
Community 1.2 to 1.1Trees thinned through droughts coupled with patchy fire or beetle kills or natural mortality forming a patchy and mature canopy. Selective timber harvesting/woodcutting can also can thin the overstory.
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.3Openings are filled in by natural regeneration of Ponderosa pine, forming an even aged tight canopy of sapling to pole size PIPO
Pathway 1.3a
Community 1.3 to 1.1Trees mature and are thinnned either naturally or through Pre-commercial thining forming a mature canopy.
Pathway 1.3b
Community 1.3 to 1.2Trees mature and are thinnned more heavily than 1.3a pathway, through fire or timber harvest forming a patchy and mature canopy.
State 2
Herbaceous Vegetation Dominated StateCommunity 2.1
Severly Reduced Canopy - Grass and Forb DominatedHot fire, logging or Beetle Kill severely reduced tree canopy and site becomes dominated by Grasses Forbs and shrubs. There is not adequate regeneration of Ponderosa Pine on this site. The return pathway would return the plant community to a site similar to plant community 1.2, a low even-aged overstory dominated by pole-size ponderosa and other young trees
Transition T1
State 1 to 2This transition occurs with a significant event that severly reduces the tree canopy. This can occur through thru a prolonged drought and coupled with widespread beetle kill and/or catastrophic wildfire.
Restoration pathway R1
State 2 to 1This return pathway can be achieved thru tree plantings to accelerate tree regeneration.
Additional community tables
Table 8. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Common Grasses 360–480 mountain muhly MUMO Muhlenbergia montana 100–200 – blue grama BOGR2 Bouteloua gracilis 50–100 – Arizona fescue FEAR2 Festuca arizonica 10–60 – muttongrass POFE Poa fendleriana 10–60 – little bluestem SCSC Schizachyrium scoparium 5–50 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 10–40 – pine dropseed BLTR Blepharoneuron tricholepis 5–25 – western wheatgrass PASM Pascopyrum smithii 0–25 – Grass, annual 2GA Grass, annual 0–20 – Grass, perennial 2GP Grass, perennial 0–20 – sedge CAREX Carex 0–15 – Forb2 Common Forbs 60–120 Forb, perennial 2FP Forb, perennial 0–30 – Forb, annual 2FA Forb, annual 0–25 – trailing fleabane ERFL Erigeron flagellaris 10–20 – yellow hawkweed HIFE Hieracium fendleri 0–10 – Wright's deervetch LOWR Lotus wrightii 0–10 – New Mexico groundsel PANE7 Packera neomexicana 0–10 – nodding onion ALCE2 Allium cernuum 0–10 – Carruth's sagewort ARCA14 Artemisia carruthii 0–10 – tarragon ARDR4 Artemisia dracunculus 0–10 – spreading fleabane ERDI4 Erigeron divergens 0–10 – Shrub/Vine3 Common Shrubs 5–50 Subshrub (<.5m) 2SUBS Subshrub (<.5m) 0–20 – Fendler's ceanothus CEFE Ceanothus fendleri 0–15 – creeping barberry MARE11 Mahonia repens 0–15 – Stansbury cliffrose PUST Purshia stansburiana 0–10 – big sagebrush ARTR2 Artemisia tridentata 0–10 – hairy false goldenaster HEVI4 Heterotheca villosa 0–10 – whitemargin pussytoes ANMA5 Antennaria marginata 0–5 – small-leaf pussytoes ANPA4 Antennaria parvifolia 0–5 – Tree4 Tree Saplings/Young Trees 25–100 ponderosa pine PIPO Pinus ponderosa 50–100 – Gambel oak QUGA Quercus gambelii 5–50 – Douglas-fir PSME Pseudotsuga menziesii 0–20 – twoneedle pinyon PIED Pinus edulis 0–20 – Utah juniper JUOS Juniperus osteosperma 0–10 – Rocky Mountain juniper JUSC2 Juniperus scopulorum 0–10 – Table 9. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 11. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
Site is favorable for grazing throughout most of the year except when snow cover restricts availability of forage. Planned grazing systems adapt well to use on this site.
The potential plant community produced by this site provides food for those species of wildlife that utilize grass as a major portion of their diet.
Recreational uses
This site has a variety of spring and summer flowers which are particularly noticeable after good moisture periods. It has good aesthetic appeal when not severely disturbed.
Winters are cold, however, relatively mild spring, fall and summer months are attractive to recreationists. Recreational activities most likely to occur are hunting, cross-country riding, photography and wildlife observation.
Wood products
All kinds of equipment are suitable for harvesting, site preparation, tree planting and pre-commercial thinning. Slopes are non-restrictive. Un-surfaced roads limit equipment when wet. Water erosion is slight to moderate in bare areas; wind erosion is moderate to high.
Compaction potential is good, but soils will rut when wet. Re-vegetation potential is good.
Harvest fully grown trees on a sustained yield basis. Final removal cuts and intermediate cuts are desirable. Thick stands need thinned to improve growth rates of trees left. Periodic ground fires will reduce dense understory vegetation competing for moisture. Slopes are gentle and soils are deep, so mechanical tree removal is not limited. Control unwanted pests to limit tree damage and loss. Fire hazard becomes extreme as understory fuel load builds. Site is good for replanting. There is slight limitation to seedling mortality; expected mortality rate is less than 25%. Natural regeneration is slightly limited; low end of productive pine sites. Seedlings need protection from grazing. Plant competition is moderately limited due to dense grass cover and grazing that may impede regeneration. Wind throw hazard: slight limitation, rooting depth greater than 30".
Supporting information
Other references
Updates and revisions for this ESD were conducted as part of a 2007-2012 Interagency Technical Assistance Agreement between the Bureau of Indian Affairs–Navajo Region and the NRCS-Arizona
Contributors
Dan Carroll
Dean SchlichtingRangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
