Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R034AY266WY
Shallow Sandy
Foothills and Basins West (SwSy)
Accessed: 04/16/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
R034AY222WY Loamy Foothills and Basins West (Ly)
Loamy
R034AY250WY Sandy Foothills and Basins West (Sy)
Sandy
Similar sites
R034AY262WY Shallow Loamy Foothills and Basins West (SwLy)
Shallow Loamy (SwLy) 10-14 West has finer soil texture and more diverse plant species.
R034AY166WY Shallow Sandy Green River and Great Divide Basins (SwSy)
Shallow Sandy (SwSy) 7-9GR has lower production.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This site usually occurs in an upland position on south and west facing slopes, but may be found on all slopes and positions. Elevations are mostly above 7000 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Hill
(2) Ridge
(3) Escarpment
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 6500 – 7500 ft Slope 0 – 45 % Ponding depth 0 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
Annual precipitation ranges from 10-14 inches per year. Wide fluctuations may occur in yearly precipitation and result in more dry years than those with more than normal precipitation. Temperatures show a wide range between summer and winter and between daily maximums and minimums. This is predominantly due to the high elevation and dry air, which permits rapid incoming and outgoing radiation. Cold air outbreaks in winter move rapidly from northwest to southeast and account for extreme minimum temperatures. Extreme storms may occur during the winter, but most severely affect ranch operations during late winter and spring.
Daytime winds are generally stronger than nighttime and occasional strong storms may bring brief periods of high winds with gusts to more than 50 mph.
Growth of native cool season plants begins about April 15 and continues to about August 15. Some green up of cool season plants usually occurs in September depending upon fall moisture occurrences.
The following information is from the “Pinedale” climate station:
Minimum Maximum 5 yrs. out of 10 between
Frost-free period (days): 18 67 July 5 – August 15
Freeze-free period (days): 53 97 June 15 – August 24
Annual Precipitation (inches): <7.18 >13.94 (2 years in 10)
Average annual precipitation: 11.29 inches
Average annual air temperature: 35.9 F (20.4 F Avg. Min. to 51.4 F Avg. Max.)
For detailed information visit the Natural Resources Conservation Service National Water and Climate Center at http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/cgibin/state.pl?state=wy website. Other climate stations representative of this precipitation zone include ”Border 3 N ” and Kemmerer Wtr Trtmt” in Lincoln County; “Evanston 1 E” in Uinta County; and “Merna” in Sublette County.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 70 days Freeze-free period (average) 100 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils of this site are shallow (10 to 20 inches to hard or soft bedrock, or less commonly, sandy-skeletal material), well-drained soils formed in residuum or eolian deposits. These soils have moderate to rapid permeability and may occur on all slopes.
Major Soil Series correlated to this site include: Abarca, Blackhall, Byrnie, and Tigon series.
Other Soil Series in MLRA 34A correlated to this site include: Cheadle, Blackhall, Quealy, Rentsac, Crestman, and Onason series.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Fine sandy loam
(2) Sandy loam
(3) Loamy fine sand
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Well drained to somewhat excessively drained Permeability class Moderate to rapid Soil depth 10 – 20 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 – 15 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 – 5 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)1.3 – 2.5 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)0 – 5 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 4 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)0 – 5 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.6 – 8.4 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 15 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 10 % Ecological dynamics
As this site deteriorates from improper grazing management, species such as fringed sagewort, Sandberg bluegrass, needleleaf sedge, and unpalatable forbs will increase. Bunchgrasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass, needleandthread, and Indian ricegrass will decrease in frequency and production.
The Historic Climax Plant Community (description follows the plant community diagram) has been determined by study of rangeland relic areas, or areas protected from excessive disturbance. Trends in plant communities going from heavily grazed areas to lightly grazed areas, seasonal use pastures, and historical accounts have also been used.
The following is a State and Transition Model Diagram that illustrates the common plant communities (states) that can occur on the site and the transitions between these communities. The ecological processes will be discussed in more detail in the plant community narratives following the diagram.
State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Needleandthread/Indian Ricegrass Plant Community (HCPC)Community 1.1
Needleandthread/Indian Ricegrass Plant Community (HCPC)The interpretive plant community for this site is the Historic Climax Plant Community. Potential vegetation is about 70% grasses or grass-like plants, 15% forbs, and 15% woody plants.
The major grasses include needleandthread, Indian ricegrass, thickspike wheatgrass, and bluebunch wheatgrass. Other grasses include Letterman needlegrass, Sandberg, Canby, and mutton bluegrass, prairie junegrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, plains reedgrass, and needleleaf sedge. Wyoming big sagebrush, green rabbitbrush, and winterfat are the major woody plants.
A typical plant composition for this state consists of needleandthread 10-20%, Indian ricegrass 5-20%, thickspike wheatgrass 5-15%, bluebunch wheatgrass 5-15%, other grasses and grass-like plants 10-20%, perennial forbs 5-15%, Wyoming big sagebrush 1-10%, up to 5% green rabbitbrush, and up to 5% winterfat. Ground cover, by ocular estimate, varies from 15-25%.
The total annual production (air-dry weight) of this state is about 900 pounds per acre, but it can range from about 700 lbs./acre in unfavorable years to about 1200 lbs./acre in above average years.
The state is stable and well adapted to the Cool Central Desertic Basins and Plateaus climatic conditions. The diversity in plant species allows for high drought resistance. This is a sustainable plant community (site/soil stability, watershed function, and biologic integrity).
Transitions or pathways leading to other plant communities are as follows:
• Nonuse and No Fire will convert this plant community to the Big Sage/Bunchgrass State.
• Heavy Continuous Season-long Grazing will convert this plant community to the Fringed Sagewort/Rhizomatous Wheatgrass State.Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). WY0301 , 34AC, Upland Sites. All Upland Sites.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 5 40 50 5 State 2
Big Sage/Bunchgrass Plant CommunityCommunity 2.1
Big Sage/Bunchgrass Plant CommunityThis plant community is the result of nonuse and lack of fire. The understory of grass includes Indian ricegrass, needleandthread, and rhizomatous wheatgrass. Wyoming big sagebrush is dominant, often exceeding 20% of the annual production. Green rabbitbrush will also increase, lowering herbaceous production.
The total annual production (air-dry weight) of this state is about 800 pounds per acre, but it can range from about 600 lbs./acre in unfavorable years to about 1100 lbs./acre in above average years.
The state is stable and protected from excessive erosion. The biotic integrity of this plant community is usually intact, however forage value will decrease and wildlife values will shift toward different species. The watershed is functioning.
Transitional pathways leading to other plant communities are as follows:
• Brush Management followed by deferment for 1 to 2 years as part of a Prescribed Grazing plan will return this state to near Historic Climax Plant Community (Needleandthread/Indian Ricegrass State). Care should be taken when planning brush management to consider wildlife habitat and critical winter ranges.Figure 6. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). WY0301 , 34AC, Upland Sites. All Upland Sites.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 5 40 50 5 State 3
Fringed Sagewort/Rhizomatous Wheatgrass Plant CommunityCommunity 3.1
Fringed Sagewort/Rhizomatous Wheatgrass Plant CommunityThis plant community is the result of frequent and severe grazing. With sagebrush removed, it is dominated by fringed sagewort. Thickspike wheatgrass, Letterman needlegrass, needleleaf sedge, and unpalatable annual and perennial forbs dominate the herbaceous understory. There is a substantial amount of bare ground.
The total annual production (air-dry weight) of this state is about 400 pounds per acre, but it can range from about 200 lbs./acre in unfavorable years to about 700 lbs./acre in above average years.
The soil is not protected and erosion will increase if management is not changed. The biotic integrity may be reduced due to low vegetative production and blowing sand. The watershed is functioning at risk.
Transitional pathways leading to other plant communities are as follows:
• Chemical Brush Management followed by deferment for 1 to 2 years as part of a Prescribed Grazing plan will return this state to near Historic Climax Plant Community (Needleandthread/Indian Ricegrass State). Care should be taken when planning brush management to consider wildlife habitat and critical winter ranges.Figure 7. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). WY0301 , 34AC, Upland Sites. All Upland Sites.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 5 40 50 5 Additional community tables
Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 90–180 needle and thread HECO26 Hesperostipa comata 90–180 – 2 45–180 Indian ricegrass ACHY Achnatherum hymenoides 45–180 – 3 45–135 Montana wheatgrass ELAL7 Elymus albicans 45–135 – bluebunch wheatgrass PSSP6 Pseudoroegneria spicata 45–135 – 4 45–135 thickspike wheatgrass ELLAL Elymus lanceolatus ssp. lanceolatus 45–135 – 5 90–180 Grass, perennial 2GP Grass, perennial 0–45 – Letterman's needlegrass ACLE9 Achnatherum lettermanii 0–45 – needleleaf sedge CADU6 Carex duriuscula 0–45 – plains reedgrass CAMO Calamagrostis montanensis 0–45 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 0–45 – prairie Junegrass KOMA Koeleria macrantha 0–45 – muttongrass POFE Poa fendleriana 0–45 – Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 0–45 – Forb6 45–135 Forb, perennial 2FP Forb, perennial 0–45 – yarrow ACHIL Achillea 0–45 – rosy pussytoes ANRO2 Antennaria rosea 0–45 – prairie sagewort ARFR4 Artemisia frigida 0–45 – milkvetch ASTRA Astragalus 0–45 – Indian paintbrush CASTI2 Castilleja 0–45 – tapertip hawksbeard CRAC2 Crepis acuminata 0–45 – fleabane ERIGE2 Erigeron 0–45 – buckwheat ERIOG Eriogonum 0–45 – aster EUCEP2 Eucephalus 0–45 – granite prickly phlox LIPU11 Linanthus pungens 0–45 – nailwort PARON Paronychia 0–45 – beardtongue PENST Penstemon 0–45 – phacelia PHACE Phacelia 0–45 – spiny phlox PHHO Phlox hoodii 0–45 – stemless mock goldenweed STAC Stenotus acaulis 0–45 – clover TRIFO Trifolium 0–45 – violet VIOLA Viola 0–45 – Shrub/Vine7 45–90 big sagebrush ARTR2 Artemisia tridentata 45–90 – 8 45–90 yellow rabbitbrush CHVI8 Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus 0–45 – winterfat KRLA2 Krascheninnikovia lanata 0–45 – Table 6. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 7. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
Animal Community – Wildlife Interpretations
Needleandthread/Indian Ricegrass Plant Community (HCPC): Suitable thermal and escape cover for most wildlife is limited due to the low height and density of woody plants. However, sagebrush, which can approach 15% protein and 40-60% digestibility, provides important winter forage for mule deer and antelope. Open and bare ridges are suitable locations for sage grouse leks. Year-round habitat is provided for sage grouse and many other sagebrush obligate species such as the sage sparrow, Brewer’s sparrow, sage thrasher, pygmy rabbit, sagebrush vole, horned lizard, and pronghorn antelope. Other birds that would frequent this plant community include horned larks and golden eagles.
Big Sage/Bunchgrass Plant Community: This plant community may be useful for the same wildlife that would use the Historic Climax Plant Community.
Fringed Sagewort/Rhizomatous Wheatgrass Plant Community: These communities provide limited forage for antelope and mule deer due to low production. Generally, these are not target plant communities for wildlife habitat management.
Animal Community – Grazing Interpretations
The following table lists suggested stocking rates for cattle under continuous season-long grazing under normal growing conditions. These are conservative estimates that should be used only as guidelines in the initial stages of the conservation planning process. Often, the current plant composition does not entirely match any particular plant community (as described in this ecological site description). Because of this, a field visit is recommended, in all cases, to document plant composition and production. More precise carrying capacity estimates should eventually be calculated using this information along with animal preference data, particularly when grazers other than cattle are involved. Under more intensive grazing management, improved harvest efficiencies can result in an increased carrying capacity.
Plant Community Production Carrying Capacity*
(lb./ac) (AUM/ac)
Needleandthread/Indian Ricegrass (HCPC) 700-1200 .2
Big Sage/Bunchgrass 600-1100 .17
Fringed Sagewort/Rhizomatous Wheatgrass 200-700 .1
* - Continuous, season-long grazing by cattle under average growing conditions.
Grazing by domestic livestock is one of the major income-producing industries in the area. Rangeland in this area may provide yearlong forage for cattle, sheep, or horses. During the dormant period, the forage for livestock use needs to be supplemented with protein because the quality does not meet minimum livestock requirements.
Hydrological functions
Water is the principal factor limiting forage production on this site. This site is dominated by soils in hydrologic group D. Infiltration is low when soils are wet due to shallow depth to bedrock and/or impervious subsurface layer. Runoff potential for this site varies from high to moderate depending on soil depth, bedrock type (impervious vs. permeable) and ground cover (refer to Part 630, NRCS National Engineering Handbook for detailed hydrology information).
Rills and gullies should not typically be present. Water flow patterns should be barely distinguishable if at all present. Pedestals are only slightly present in association with bunchgrasses. Litter typically falls in place, and signs of movement are not common. Chemical and physical crusts are rare to non-existent. Cryptogrammic crusts are present, but only cover 1-2% of the soil surface.
Recreational uses
This site provides hunting opportunities for upland game species.
Wood products
No appreciable wood products are present on the site.
Other products
None noted.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Inventory Data References (narrative) Information presented here has been derived from NRCS clipping data and other inventory data. Field observations from range trained personnel were also used. Those involved in developing this site include: Bill Christensen, Range Management Specialist, NRCS; Karen Clause, Range Management Specialist, NRCS; and Everet Bainter, Range Management Specialist, NRCS. Other sources used as references include: USDA NRCS Water and Climate Center, USDA NRCS National Range and Pasture Handbook, and USDA NRCS Soil Surveys from various counties. Inventory Data References Data Source Number of Records Sample Period State County SCS-RANGE-417 15 1966-1988 WY Sublette & others
Contributors
K. Clause
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) K. Clause, E. Bainter Contact for lead author karen.clause@wy.usda.gov or 307-367-2257 Date 03/16/2007 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rare to nonexistent. Where present, short and widely spaced. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Barely observable. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Rare to nonexistent. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground can range from 25-55%. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Active gullies should not be present. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Rare to nonexistent. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Rare to nonexistent. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil Stability Index ratings range from 1 (interspaces) to 6 (under plant canopy), but average values should be 2.7 or greater. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Soil data is limited for this site. Described A-horizons vary from 1-10 inches (3-25 cm) with OM of .5 to 1.5%. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Plant community consists of 65-80% grasses, 15% forbs, and 5-20% shrubs. Evenly distributed plant canopy (30-60%) and litter plus slow to moderately rapid infiltration rates result in minimal runoff. Basal cover is typically less than 5% for this site and does very little to effect runoff on this site. Surface rock fragments of 10-20% provide stability to the site, but reduce infiltration. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None. A coarse, dry subsurface will often refuse a probe, causing misidentification of a compaction layer. Most soil profiles must be described by hand dug holes. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
Mid-size, cool season bunchgrasses>> perennial shrubs>cool season rhizomatous grasses=perennial forbs>short, cool season bunchgrasses -
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Minimal decadence, typically associated with shrub component. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Litter ranges from 10-25% of total canopy measurement with total litter (including beneath the plant canopy) from 20-50% expected. Herbaceous litter depth typically ranges from 3-10mm. Woody litter can be up to a couple inches (4-6 cm). -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
English: 700-1200 lb/ac (900 lb/ac average); Metric 784-1344 kg/ha (1008 kg/ha average). -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Bare ground greater than 75% is the most common indicator of a threshold being crossed. Rabbitbrush, granite prickly phlox, Sandberg bluegrass, buckwheat, and phlox are common increasers. Annual weeds such as kochia, mustards, lambsquarter, and Russian thistle are common invasive species in disturbed sites. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species are capable of reproducing, except in drought years.
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
