Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Draft. A draft ecological site description is either incomplete or has not undergone quality control and quality assurance review.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Pinus ponderosa var. scopulorum
Shrub (1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana
Herbaceous (1) Poa fendleriana
Physiographic features
This forest site occurs on stream terraces. Slopes range from 2 to over 15 percent, but slope gradients of 2 to 4 percent are typical. Elevations are 6000 to about 8500 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Stream terrace
Flooding duration Extremely brief (0.1 to 4 hours) to brief (2 to 7 days) Flooding frequency Rare to occasional Elevation 6000 – 8500 ft Slope 50 – 75 % Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The climate associated with this site is arid, characterized by cold, moist winters and warm, dry summers. Average annual precipitation is 16 to over 20 inches. Mean annual air temperature is 42 to 46 degrees F. The average frost-free period is 80 to 100 days. There is no climate station associated with this site.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 100 days Freeze-free period (average) 0 days Precipitation total (average) 20 in BarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
This ecological site is associated with inset fans and small drainage ways and thereby receives additional run-in moisture from the surrounding uplands.
Soil features
These soils are well drained, sandy-skeletal, formed in alluvium from predominately volcanic rocks and have a relatively high volcanic glass content. The mollic epipedon is from the soil surface to 10 inches (25cm). The soil series associated with this site is Cabinpine a sandy-skeletal, mesic, Fluventic Haplustolls.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Extremely stony sandy loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Well drained Permeability class Rapid Soil depth 72 – 84 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 50 – 70 % Surface fragment cover >3" 19 – 20 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)1.5 – 3 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)Not specified Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)Not specified Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)Not specified Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.1 – 6.5 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)51 – 55 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)22 – 28 % Ecological dynamics
Ecological dynamics:
The plant communities of this site are dynamic in response to changes in disturbance regimes and weather patterns. Fire plays an important role in all forest ecosystems. Important processes that are regulated by fire include regeneration and reproduction, seedbed preparation, competition reduction and thinning to maintain stand health (Spurr and Barnes 1964). Rocky Mountain ponderosa pine is found throughout the West and grows on discontinuous mountains, plateaus, and canyons. A possible explanation for its limited and spotty distribution is correlated to the distribution of sites that receive summer rainfall (Oliver and Ryker 1992). Ponderosa pine seedlings are able to grow taproots that extend greater than 20 inches within a few months of germination (Oliver and Ryker 1992). This ability is essential for survival in desert ecosystems. Rocky Mountain ponderosa pine differs from typical ponderosa pine with its shorter needles, fewer needles per fascicle, germination rate and root growth capacity (Krugman and Jenkinson 2008). Investigation to the vast genetic diversity of P. ponderosa suggests there are five major geographic races, including two distinct races in variety scopulorum. Northern sources of variety scopulorum are characterized by relatively good growth and frost resistance. The southern sources, which occur in Nevada, are slower growing but also frost resistant (Krugman and Jenkinson 2008). Rocky Mountain ponderosa pine has migrated into the Great Basin following the ice ages by way of the Southern Rocky Mountains. Rocky Mountain ponderosa pines never attain the size of the typical variety (P. ponderosa var. ponderosa).
Soils provide physical support, moisture and nutrients to the forest community. Trees have reciprocating effects on the soil. Since they tend to exist on site for extended periods of time, their roots typically extend deep into the subsoil and even into fractured bedrock influencing the rate of soil development. Considerable amounts of organic material are returned to the soil in the form of fallen litter and decaying roots. Increased organic matter on the soil surface, or litter layer, helps to keep moisture conditions more uniform. Insulation provided the tree canopy and litter layer also reduces the temperature fluctuation from day to night (Fisher and Binkley 2002). Seedlings of ponderosa pine grow best with warm days and warm nights. Root growth of ponderosa pine is highly dependent on soil temperature. Low soil temperatures result in low metabolic activity and membrane permeability which limit water and nutrient uptake (Spurr and Barnes 1964).
Biogeochemical cycling in semi-arid forest system is controlled by moisture availability and fire. The role of water is more important in humid systems, which are largely affected by leaching. A review of the literature shows the pos-fire nitrogen fixation is more important than atmospheric deposition and leaching in semi-arid systems. Fire affects the nitrogen pool of a forest in two ways: 1) volatilization during the fire and 2) the influx of nitrogen fixing vegetation following the fire. Increases of nitrogen immediately after fire are attributed to the release of ammonium (NH4+) which takes place at temperatures above 100°C (Johnson et al. 1998). Nitrogen is considered to be a limiting nutrient in this system and the plant community will rapidly respond to inputs of nitrogen. Temporary increases in available nitrogen decrease to pre-burn levels within 5 to 12 years after fire (Johnson et al. 1998).
Ponderosa pine is shade intolerant and becomes more shade intolerant with age. The successional status of Ponderosa pine can be expressed in terms of its successional role, which ranges from seral to climax depending on specific site conditions. It plays a climax role on sites toward the extreme limits of its environmental range and becomes increasingly seral with more favorable conditions. On sites with more favorable moisture, pine encounters greater competition and must establish itself opportunistically. On such sites, establishment is likely to be highly dependent upon the cyclical nature of large seed crops and favorable weather conditions.
Fire Ecology:
Rocky Mountain ponderosa pine is considered very resistant to fire. Fire adaptations include self pruning branches, thick bark, thick bud scales, widely spaced branches that do not favor combustion and a deep rooting habit (Howard 2003). This species has evolved with frequent fires of mixed severity. Surface fires reoccurred every 5 to 30 years, this maintained open-growth, park-like stands. Stand replacing fires were less common, estimates range from 60 to 160 years.
Under pristine conditions fire creates openings for seedling establishment, thus maintaining its persistence. These fires also thinned saplings and maintained the relatively open understories. Ponderosa pine is fire-adapted in all stages of its life history and is especially well adapted to light, regular surface fires. The seeds prefer openings with mineral soil usually prepared by fire for seedbed. For the seedlings and young trees, early development of insulative bark, shielded meristems, high moisture content in living needles, and rapid extension of taproots reduce their mortality from fire. For mature trees, thick bark, deep roots, and low- flammability crown structures help them survive most fires.
Mountain big sagebrush is highly susceptible to injury from fire. It is often top-killed by fire and will not resprout. Utah serviceberry may be slightly harmed by fire, depending on moisture conditions, but is generally considered to be fire tolerant. Antelope bitterbrush is considered a weak sprouter and is often killed by summer or fall fires. Antelope bitterbrush in some areas may sprout after light-severity spring fires. High fuel consumptions increase antelope bitterbrush mortality and therefore favors seedling establishment. Rubber rabbitbrush is top killed by fire, but recovers rapidly and is often one of the first species to return following fire. Greenleaf manzanita is top killed by low to moderate severity fire. It can reestablish by sprouting from dormant buds in the root burl or from fire-stimulated germination of residual seeds in the soil. Desert snowberry is generally top killed by fire, but sprouts from the root crown and rhizomes. Gambel’s oak is fire adapted and sprouts from the lignotuber and rhizomes. Muttongrass is unharmed to slightly harmed by light-severity fall fires. Muttongrass appears to be harmed by and slow to recover from severe fire. Needleandthread is top-killed by fire. It may be killed if the aboveground stems are completely consumed. Needleandthread is slightly to severely damaged by fire. Needleandthread sprouts from the caudex following fire, if heat has not been sufficient to kill underground parts. Recovery usually takes 2 to 10 years. Blue grama has variable fire tolerance; it has fair tolerance when dormant but experiences some damage if burned during active growth, especially during drought. Fire generally favors blue grama, generally increasing its occurrence, production, and percent cover. Indian ricegrass can be killed by fire, depending on severity and season of burn. Indian ricegrass reestablishes on burned sites through seed dispersed from adjacent unburned areas.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
Figure 3. STM
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
Communities 1, 5 and 6 (additional pathways)
Communities 2, 5 and 6 (additional pathways)
State 1
Reference StateThe reference state is representative of the natural range of variability under pristine conditions. It is dominated by Rocky Mountain ponderosa pine with possible traces of Utah juniper and singleleaf pinyon pine in the canopy. Primary natural disturbance mechanisms affecting this ecological site are wildfire, disease, insect attack and periodic drought. Timing of fire combined with weather events determine the community dynamics. Increased mortality following drought is likely, caused by a combination of insect attack and disease.
Community 1.1
Mature Forest (Reference Plant Community)
Figure 4. Mature Forest
This community phase is dominated by ponderosa pine that have reached or are near maximal heights for the site. Tree canopy cover ranges from 15 to 25 percent. The dominant crown class ranges from 75 to 90 feet in height and from 100 to 150 years in age. Infill consists of co-dominant and suppressed crown classes which are typically less than 75 feet tall and less than 100 years. Understory vegetation is strongly influenced by tree competition, overstory shading, duff accumulation, etc. Infrequent, yet periodic, wildfire is presumed to be a natural factor influencing the understory of mature ponderosa pine woodlands. Mature ponderosa pine are relatively resistant to cool, slow burning, wildfires through the understory because of their thick, insulating bark. Ground fires in these forests affect understory vegetal structure and composition leaving an open grass-forb community with scattered mountain big sagebrush and associated mountain browse species. This stage of community development is assumed to be representative of this ecological site in a pristine environment.
Forest overstory.An overstory canopy cover of about 20-25 percent is assumed to be representative of tree dominance on this site in a pristine environment. Wildfire is recognized as a natural disturbance that strongly influences the structure and composition of the climax vegetation on this site.<br /> Overstory tree canopy composition is 100 percent ponderosa pine. Where this site associates with singleleaf pinyon and Utah juniper communities, these trees may compose up to 5 percent of the overstory.
Forest understory. Understory vegetative composition is about 25 percent grasses/grasslikes, 20 percent forbs and 55 percent shrubs and young trees when the average overstory canopy is medium (15 to 30 percent). Average understory production ranges from 500 to 800 pounds per acre with a medium canopy cover. Understory production includes the total annual production of all species less than 13 feet in height, including tree seedlings.
Figure 5. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Shrub/Vine 250 300 400 Grass/Grasslike 125 150 200 Forb 100 120 160 Tree 25 30 40 Total 500 600 800 Community 1.2
HerbaceousVegetation of this plant community phase is dominated by grasses and forbs under full sunlight. This stage is experienced after a major disturbance such as crown fire. Skeleton forest (dead trees) remaining after fire or residual trees left following harvest have little or no affect on the composition and production of herbaceous vegetation. Shrubs capable of sprouting from the root crown following fire or other disturbance quickly recover.
Community 1.3
Shrub-HerbaceousHerbaceous vegetation and woody shrubs dominate this plant community phase. Sprouting shrubs readily recover following disturbance and quickly dominate plant community composition. Various amounts of tree seedlings (less than 20 inches in height) may be present up to the point where they are an obvious component of the vegetal structure.
Community 1.4
SaplingThis plant community phase is characterized by ponderosa pine saplings with a canopy cover of about 5 to 10 percent. Vegetation is dominated by grasses, forbs and shrubs in association with tree saplings. Large shrubs dominate vegetative component and rarely experience decreased vigor from increased competition by tree seedlings in this plant community phase.
Community 1.5
Immature ForestThe visual aspect and vegetal structure of this plant community phase is dominated by ponderosa pine greater than 4.5 feet in height. The young ponderosa pines are still very susceptible to fire at this stage. Seedlings and saplings of ponderosa pine are common in the understory. Dominants are the tallest trees on the site; co-dominants are 65 to 85 percent of the highest of dominant trees. Understory vegetation is moderately influenced by a tree overstory canopy of about 15 percent.
Community 1.6
Over-mature ForestThis community phase is dominated by ponderosa pine that have reached maximal heights for the site. Understory vegetation is reduced due to tree competition, overstory shading, duff accumulation, etc. Few seedlings or saplings of ponderosa pine are found in the understory.
Pathway 1.1a
Community 1.1 to 1.2Standing replacing fire or other major disturbance (to plant community 1.2).
Pathway 1.1c
Community 1.1 to 1.5Thinning or partial harvest, partial mortality from pest attack or other small scale disturbance (to plant community 1.5)
Pathway 1.1b
Community 1.1 to 1.6Time and absence of disturbance allows canopy cover to increase (to plant community 1.6).
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.3Absence from disturbance and natural regeneration over time (to plant community 1.3).
Pathway 1.3b
Community 1.3 to 1.2Stand replacing fire or other large scale disturbance (to plant community 1.2).
Pathway 1.3a
Community 1.3 to 1.4Absence from disturbance and natural regeneration over time (to plant community 1.4).
Pathway 1.4b
Community 1.4 to 1.2Stand replacing fire or other large disturbance (to plant communtiy 1.2).
Pathway 1.4a
Community 1.4 to 1.5Absence from disturbance and natural regeneration over time (to plant community 1.5).
Pathway 1.5a
Community 1.5 to 1.1Absence from disturbance, seedling and sapling growth and natural regeneration over time (to plant community 1.1).
Pathway 1.5b
Community 1.5 to 1.2Large scale disturbance such as, stand replacing fire, total harvest, insect attack (to plant community 1.2).
Pathway 1.6a
Community 1.6 to 1.2Stand replacing fire, severe insect attack or other large disturbance (to plant community 1.6).
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Primary Perennial Grasses 110–200 Indian ricegrass ACHY Achnatherum hymenoides 30–54 – blue grama BOGR2 Bouteloua gracilis 30–54 – needle and thread HECO26 Hesperostipa comata 30–54 – muttongrass POFE Poa fendleriana 30–54 – 2 Secondary Perennial Grasses/Grasslikes 10–40 Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 6–30 – sedge CAREX Carex 1–6 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 1–6 – thickspike wheatgrass ELLAL Elymus lanceolatus ssp. lanceolatus 1–6 – Forb3 Perennial 6–120 white sagebrush ARLU Artemisia ludoviciana 1–20 – maiden blue eyed Mary COPA3 Collinsia parviflora 1–20 – cushion buckwheat EROV Eriogonum ovalifolium 1–20 – lupine LUPIN Lupinus 1–20 – beardtongue PENST Penstemon 1–20 – phlox PHLOX Phlox 1–20 – Shrub/Vine4 Primary Shrubs 210–400 mountain big sagebrush ARTRV Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana 150–300 – antelope bitterbrush PUTR2 Purshia tridentata 30–54 – Utah serviceberry AMUT Amelanchier utahensis 30–54 – 5 Secondary Shrubs 40–150 Gambel oak QUGA Quercus gambelii 6–30 – greenleaf manzanita ARPA6 Arctostaphylos patula 6–20 – rubber rabbitbrush ERNA10 Ericameria nauseosa 6–20 – threadleaf snakeweed GUMI Gutierrezia microcephala 6–20 – antelope bitterbrush PUTR2 Purshia tridentata 6–20 – Gambel oak QUGA Quercus gambelii 6–20 – Woods' rose ROWO Rosa woodsii 6–20 – desert snowberry SYLO Symphoricarpos longiflorus 6–20 – Tree6 Evergreen 25–40 ponderosa pine PIPOS Pinus ponderosa var. scopulorum 18–60 – Utah juniper JUOS Juniperus osteosperma 6–18 – singleleaf pinyon PIMO Pinus monophylla 6–18 – Table 7. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 1.4 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 1.5 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 11. Community 1.6 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock Interpretations:
This site is suited to cattle and sheep grazing during the summer and fall. Grazing management should be keyed to palatable shrub and grass production. Muttongrass is highly nutritious and remains palatable throughout the grazing season. New plants of these grasses are established entirely from seed and grazing practices should allow for ample seed production and seedling establishment. Livestock will often concentrate on this site taking advantage of the shade and shelter offered by the tree overstory. Many areas are not used because of steep slopes or lack of adequate water. Attentive grazing management is required due to steep slopes and erosion hazards.
Harvesting trees under a sound management program for can open up the tree canopy to allow increased production of understory species desirable for grazing.
Stocking rates vary with such factors as kind and class of grazing animal, season of use and fluctuations in climate. Actual use records for individual sites, a determination of the degree to which the sites have been grazed, and an evaluation of trend in site condition offer the most reliable basis for developing initial stocking rates. Selection of initial stocking rates for given grazing units is a planning decision. This decision should be made ONLY after careful consideration of the total resources available, evaluation of alternatives for use and treatment, and establishment of objectives by the decision maker.
The forage value rating is not an ecological evaluation of the understory as is the range condition rating for rangeland. The forage value rating is a utilitarian rating of the existing understory plants for use by specific kinds of grazing animals.
Wildlife Interpretations:
This site has moderate value for mule deer during the summer and fall. Upland game species include rabbits, sage grouse, blue and ruffed grouse. Various songbirds, rodents, reptiles and associated predators natural to the area are also common. Feral horses will use this site during the summer and fall.
Hydrological functions
Runoff is high and soils are well drained.
Recreational uses
The trees on this site provide a welcome break in an otherwise open landscape. It has potential for hiking, cross-country skiing, camping, and deer and upland game hunting.
Wood products
This woodland community is of low site quality for tree production. Site Index (SI) ranges from 55 to 75 (Minor 1964)
Productivity Class: 5
CMAI*: 42 to 64 ft3/ac/yr;
2.9 to 4.5 m3/ha/yr.
Culmination is estimated to be at 100 years.
*CMAI: is the culmination of mean annual increment or highest average growth rate of the stand in the units specified.
Basal Area/ Acre:
Site Index 55 = 50ft2/ac
Site Index 75 = 115 ft2/ac
Fuelwood Production: 48 to 50 cords per acre for stands averaging 60 to 90 feet in height and 110 years of age with a medium canopy cover. There are about 213,750 gross British Thermal Units (BTUs) heat content per cubic foot of ponderosa pine wood. Solid wood volume in a cord varies but usually ranges from 65 to 90 cubic feet. Assuming an average of 75 cubic feet of solid wood per cord, there are about 16 million BTUs of heat value in a cord of ponderosa pine wood.
Posts (7 foot): 15 to 25 per acre in stands of medium canopy.Other information
Rocky Mountain ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa var. scopulorum has migrated into the Great Basin following the ice ages by way of the Southern Rocky Mountains. Rocky Mountain ponderosa pine never attain the size of the typical variety (P. ponderosa var. ponderosa). The fascicles of this tree tend to have only two needles and the needles are shorter than the typical variety. The cones of Rocky Mountain ponderosa pine are also smaller then the typical variety (Lanner, 1984).
Table 12. Representative site productivity
Common name Symbol Site index low Site index high CMAI low CMAI high Age of CMAI Site index curve code Site index curve basis Citation ponderosa pine PIPOS 65 77 38 50 – – – Supporting information
Type locality
Location 1: Lincoln County, NV Latitude 37° 24′ 33″ Longitude 114° 15′ 55″ General legal description Pine Wash in the Clover Mountains, Lincoln County, Nevada. Approximately .5 miles from the mouth of Sheep Canyon, in Fife Mountain 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle. Other references
Fisher, R. and D. Binkley. 2002. Ecology and Management of Forest Soils. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Howard, J. L. 2003. Pinus ponderosa var. scopulorum. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer) Available:http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/
Johnson, D.W., R.B. Susfalk, R.A. Dahlgren and J.M. Klopatek. 1998. Fire is more important than water for nitrogen fluxes in semi-arid forests. Environmental Science and Policy. 1:79-86.
Krugman, S.L. and J.L. Jenkinson. 2008. Pinus L. Woody Plant Seed Manual. USDA FS Agriculture Handbook 727. P819.
Lanner, R.M. 1984. Trees of the Great Basin. University of Nevada Press, Reno NV.
Meyer, W.H. 1961. Yield of even-aged stands of ponderosa pine. USDA Tech Bull 630. (revised 1961).
Minor, C.O. 1964. Site-Index curves for young-growth Ponderosa pine in northern Arizona. US Forest Service Research Note RM-37.
Oliver, W.W. and R.A. Ryker. 1992. Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws. FS INFO-Intermoutain Monthly Alert. April 1992. No 131:413-423.
Spurr, S.H. and B.V. Barnes. 1964. Forest Ecology. John Wiley and Sons. New York, N.Y.
USDA-NRCS. 2004. National Forestry Handbook.
Contributors
RWA
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement