Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R028AY104UT
Desert Alkali Bench (Bud Sagebrush)
Last updated: 5/02/2025
Accessed: 08/14/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 028A–Ancient Lake Bonneville
MLRA 28A occurs in Utah (82%), Nevada (16%), and Idaho (2%). It encompasses approximately 36,775 square miles (95,246 square kilometers). A large area west and southwest of Great Salt Lake is a salty playa. This area is the farthest eastern extent of the Great Basin Section of the Basin and Range Province of the Intermontane Plateaus. It is an area of nearly level basins between widely separated mountain ranges trending north to south. The basins are bordered by long, gently sloping alluvial fans. The mountains are uplifted fault blocks with steep side slopes. Most of the valleys are closed basins containing sinks or playa lakes. Elevation ranges from 3,950 to 6,560 feet (1,204 to 2000 meters) in the basins and from 6,560 to 11,150 feet (1996 to 3398 meters) in the mountains. Much of the MLRA has alluvial valley fill and playa lakebed deposits at the surface from pluvial Lake Bonneville, which dominated this MLRA 13,000 years ago. A level line of remnant lake terraces on some mountain slopes indicates the former extent of this glacial lake. The Great Salt Lake is what remains of the pluvial lake.
Mountains in the interior of this MLRA consist of tilted blocks of marine sediments from Cambrian to Mississippian age with scattered outcrops of Tertiary continental sediments and volcanic rocks. The average annual precipitation is 5 to 12 inches (13 to 30 cm) in the valleys and ranges up to 49 inches (124 cm) in the mountains. Most of the rainfall in the southern LRU occurs as high-intensity, convective thunderstorms during the growing season (April through September). The driest period is from midsummer to early autumn in the northern LRU. Precipitation in winter typically occurs as snow. The average annual temperature is 39 to 53 °F (4 to 12 °C). The freeze-free period averages 165 days and ranges from 110 to 215 days, decreasing in length with increasing elevation. The dominant soil orders in this MLRA are Aridisols, Entisols, and Mollisols. Soils are dominantly in the mesic or frigid soil temperature regime, aridic or xeric soil moisture regime, and mixed mineralogy. They generally are well drained, loamy or loamy-skeletal, and very deep.LRU notes
The Basin and Range North LRU exhibits dry summer with stronger xeric patterns than the Basin and Range South LRU. Ranges in the north LRU are about 50 percent Paleozoic sedimentary/metasedimentary (limestone/quartzite dominant) and about 10 percent Tertiary volcanics. The basin floors are between 4,200 and 5,100 feet (1280 to 1554 meters) in elevation. Pinyon and juniper sites have a greater percentage of Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) in the plant community than pinyon pine (Pinus edulis or monophylla). The Basin and Range North have few semidesert ecological sites with Utah juniper. Cool season grasses, such as bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), are dominant in the plant community, while warm season grasses are largely absent or a small component of the plant community.
Classification relationships
MLRA 28A, LRU A, ecological zone desert.
Ecological site concept
This site occurs predominantly in the northern part of 28A. It is dominated by bud sagebrush in reference condition. It is typically found on alluvial fans and fan terraces on coarser textured soils.
Associated sites
R028AY124UT Desert Loam (Shadscale)
This site will occur on finer textured soils and is dominated by shadscale.
R028AY138UT Desert Shallow Loam (Shadscale)
This site occurs on shallow soils.
R028AY230UT Semidesert Shallow Hardpan (Black Sagebrush) North
This site occur on shallow soils.
R028AY134UT Desert Sand (Four-Wing Saltbush)
This site occurs on deep sandy soils.
R028AY119UT Desert Flat (Shadscale)
This site will occur on finer textured soils and is dominated by shadscale.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub (1) Picrothamnus desertorum
(2) Atriplex confertifoliaHerbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This site occurs on benches, gently sloping outwash fans, old lake terraces, lake plains, beach bars, and plateaus. It is typically found between 4300 to 5800 feet at 2 to 8 percent slopes.
Figure 2.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Alluvial fan
(2) Fan remnant
(3) Terrace
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 4300 – 5800 ft Slope 2 – 8 % Climatic features
The climate is cold and snowy in the winter and warm and dry in the summer. The average annual precipitation is 5 to 8 inches. Approximately 70 percent comes as rain from March through October. On the average, June through September are the driest months and March through May are the wettest months.
Mean Annual Air Temperature: 45-50
Mean Annual Soil Temperature: 52-54Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 80 days Freeze-free period (average) 120 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in BarLineFigure 3. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) GROUSE CREEK [USC00423486], Grouse Creek, UT
">Influencing water features
Water erosion hazard is slight.
Soil features
Characteristic soils in this site are over 60 inches deep and well or somewhat excessively drained.
They formed in alluvium and colluvium and lacustrine materials derived mainly from mixed by the wave action of ancient Lake Bonneville or by running water in streams or sheetflood. The surface horizon is gravelly loam to very gravelly sandy loam textures and 13 inches thick. About 60 percent of the soil surface is covered by rock fragments. These soils are moderately calcareous to very stongly calcareous, strongly alkaline or very strongly alkaline and slightly saline to strongly saline in some part of the profile. These soils are affected by sodium. Permeability is moderate to moderately rapid. Available water capacity is reduced by salinity and ranges from 2 to 5 inches. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight.
The available water capacity is 1.2 to 3.8 inches. Natural geologic erosions in potential is approximately 0.5 tons/acre/year.
This site is correlated in the following surveys (Survey name, component, mapunit)
UT601: Cliffdown (15, 18)
UT602: Cliffdown (CRP)
UT611: Cliffdown (27), Izamatch (28)
UT617: Dera (18), Goshute (26, 28, 29, 30), Swasey (78)
UT632: Goshute (GO), Swasey (SWC, UFC), Uffens (PU, UE, UFC, UH2, YUC), Yenrab (YeC, YUC)Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Alluvium – limestone and sandstone
Surface texture (1) Gravelly loam
(2) Very gravelly sandy loam
(3) Gravelly silt loam
Drainage class Somewhat excessively drained to well drained Permeability class Slow to moderately rapid Soil depth 60 – 0 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 – 38 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 – 5 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)1.2 – 3.8 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)1 – 40 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 16 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)0 – 30 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)7.9 – 11 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 35 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 3 % Ecological dynamics
As ecological condition deteriorates due to overgrazing, galleta, squirreltail, and Indian ricegrass decrease while snakeweed, horsebrush, and rabbitbrush increase.
When the potential natural plant community is burned, Indian ricegrass and galleta decrease while low rabbitbrush, horsebrush, and cheatgrass increase.
Annual forbs and annual grasses are most likely to invade this site.
This site is similar in soils and vegetation composition to 028AY016NV. The STM developed by Nevada (Stringham et al. 2015) is used for the Utah ESD.State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
SWAPAEHSWAPAEHSWAPAEHSWAPAEHState 1 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference StateThe Reference State 1.0 is a representative of the natural range of variability under pristine conditions. The Reference State has two general community phases: a shrub-grass dominate phase and a shrub dominant phase. State dynamics are maintained by interactions between climatic patterns and disturbance regimes. Negative feedbacks enhance ecosystem resilience and contribute to the stability of the state. These include the presence of all structural and functional groups, low fine fuel loads, and retention of organic matter and nutrients. This site is very stable, with little variation in plant community composition. Plant community changes would be reflected in production response to long term drought or herbivory. Wet years will increase grass production, while drought years will reduce production. Shrub production will also increase during wet years; however, extreme growing season wet periods has been shown to cause shadscale death.
Community 1.1
Bud sagebrush, shadscale, perennial grassThe dominant aspect of the plant community is bud sagebrush and shadscale. The composition by air dry weight is approximately 30 percent perennial grasses, 10 percent forbs, and 60 percent shrubs.
Figure 7. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Shrub/Vine 30 120 150 Grass/Grasslike 15 60 75 Forb 5 20 25 Total 50 200 250 Table 6. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 20-30% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 10-20% Forb foliar cover 0-10% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 7. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (ft) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.5 – – – – >0.5 <= 1 – 25-35% 10-20% 0-10% >1 <= 2 – – – – >2 <= 4.5 – – – – >4.5 <= 13 – – – – >13 <= 40 – – – – >40 <= 80 – – – – >80 <= 120 – – – – >120 – – – – Figure 8. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). UT1041 , PNC. Excellent Condition.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 5 25 50 10 0 0 5 5 0 0 Community 1.2
Bud sagebrush, shadscaleShrubs such as shadscale and bud sagebrush increase in the community. Perennial bunchgrasses decrease with drought and may become a minor component.
Pathway 1.1a
Community 1.1 to 1.2Long-term drought, extreme wet periods and/or herbivory. Drought will favor shrubs over perennial bunchgrasses. Extreme wet periods will reduce the shadscale component.
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.1Release from drought and/or herbivory would allow the vegetation to increase and bare ground would eventually decrease. Extreme growing season wet period may reduce shadscale.
State 2
Current Potential StateThis state is similar to the Reference State 1.0. with the addition of a shadscale and sprouting shrub dominated community phase. Ecological function has not changed, however the resiliency of the state has been reduced by the presence of invasive weeds. Non-natives may increase in abundance but will not become dominant within this State. These non-natives can be highly flammable and can promote fire where historically fire had been infrequent. Negative feedbacks enhance ecosystem resilience and contribute to the stability of the state. These feedbacks include the presence of all structural and functional groups, low fine fuel loads, and retention of organic matter and nutrients. Positive feedbacks decrease ecosystem resilience and stability of the state. These include the non-natives’ high seed output, persistent seed bank, rapid growth rate, ability to cross pollinate, and adaptations for seed dispersal.
Community 2.1
Bud sagebrush, shadscale, perennial grasses, non-native annualsThis community is compositionally similar to the Reference State Community Phase 1.1 with the presence of non-native species in trace amounts. This community is dominated by shadscale and Galleta grass. Indian ricegrass, bud sagebrush and Nevada ephedra are also important species on this site. Community phase changes are primarily a function of chronic drought or extreme wet periods. Fire is infrequent and patchy due to low fuel loads.
Community 2.2
Bud sagebrush, shadscale, non-native annualsShadscale and rabbitbrush increase while Indian ricegrass and bud sagebrush decline. Bare ground increases along with annual weeds. Prolonged drought may lead to an overall decline in the plant community. Galleta grass may increase. Wet periods will decrease the shadscale component.
Community 2.3
Shrub dominated, non-native annuals (At Risk)Shadscale and rabbitbrush dominates the overstory and perennial bunchgrasses, winterfat and bud sagebrush are reduced, either from competition with shrubs or from inappropriate grazing, chronic drought or both. Galleta may increase. Annual non-native species may be stable or increasing due to a lack of completion with perennial bunchgrasses. Bare ground may be significant. This community is at risk of crossing a threshold to either State 3.0 (shrub) or State 4.0 (annual).
Pathway 2.1a
Community 2.1 to 2.2Inappropriate growing season grazing favors unpalatable shrubs over bunchgrasses, winterfat and bud sagebrush. Prolonged drought will also decrease the perennial bunchgrasses in the understory.
Pathway 2.2a
Community 2.2 to 2.1Release from drought and/or appropriate grazing management that facilitates an increase in perennial grasses, winterfat and bud sagebrush Extreme growing season wet period may reduce shadscale.
Pathway 2.2b
Community 2.2 to 2.3Chronic drought and/or inappropriate grazing will significantly reduce perennial grasses, winterfat and bud sagebrush in favor of shadscale and rabbitbrush.
Pathway 2.3a
Community 2.3 to 2.2Release from drought and/or inappropriate grazing allows for bud sagebrush, winterfat and perennial grasses to increase. Extreme growing season wet period may reduce shadscale.
State 3
Shrub StateThis state has one community phase that is characterized by shadscale, bud sagebrush or a sprouting shrub overstory with very little to no understory. The site has crossed a biotic threshold and site processes are being controlled by shrubs. Shrub cover exceeds the site concept and may be decadent, reflecting stand maturity and lack of seedling establishment due to competition with mature plants. The shrub overstory dominates site resources such that soil water, nutrient capture, nutrient cycling and soil organic matter are temporally and spatially redistributed. Bareground has increased.
Community 3.1
Bud sagebrush, shadscale, non-native annualsDecadent shadscale and bud sagebrush dominate the overstory. Rabbitbrush and/or other sprouting shrubs may be a significant component or dominant shrub. Deep-rooted perennial bunchgrasses may be present in trace amounts or absent from the community. Annual non-native species increase. Bare ground is significant.
State 4
Annual StateThis state has one community phase. In this state, a biotic threshold has been crossed and state dynamics are driven by the dominance and persistence of the annual plant community which is perpetuated by a shortened fire return interval. The herbaceous understory is dominated by annual non-native species such as cheatgrass and halogeton. Bare ground may be abundant. Resiliency has declined and further degradation from fire facilitates a cheatgrass and sprouting shrub plant community. The fire return interval has shortened due to the dominance of cheatgrass in the understory and is a driver in site dynamics.
Community 4.1
Non-native annualsThis community is dominated by annual non-native species. Halogeton most commonly invades these sites. Trace amounts of shadscale and other shrubs may be present, but are not contributing to site function. Bare ground may be abundant, especially during low precipitation years. Soil erosion from wind and soil temperature are driving factors in site function.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2Trigger: This transition is caused by the introduction of non-native annual plants, such as halogeton, mustards and cheatgrass. Slow variables: Over time the annual non-native species will increase within the community. Threshold: Any amount of introduced non-native species causes an immediate decrease in the resilience of the site. Annual non-native species cannot be easily removed from the system and have the potential to significantly alter disturbance regimes from their historic range of variation.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3Trigger: Long-term inappropriate grazing and/or long-term chronic drought will decrease or eliminate deep rooted perennial bunchgrasses and favor shrub growth and establishment. Slow variables: Long term decrease in deep-rooted perennial grass density. Threshold: Loss of deep-rooted perennial bunchgrasses changes nutrient cycling, nutrient redistribution, and reduces soil organic matter.
Transition T2B
State 2 to 4Trigger: Fire and/or soil disturbing treatments such as drill seeding and plowing. An unusually wet spring may facilitate the increased germination and production of cheatgrass leading to its dominance within the community. Slow variables: Increased production and cover of non-native annual species. Threshold: Loss of deep-rooted perennial bunchgrasses and shrubs truncates, spatially and temporally, nutrient capture and cycling within the community. Increased, continuous fine fuels from annual non-native plants modify the fire regime by changing intensity, size and spatial variability of fires.
Transition T3A
State 3 to 4Trigger: Fire and/or soil disturbing treatments such as drill seeding and plowing. Slow variables: Increased production and cover of non-native annual species. Threshold: Increased, continuous fine fuels modify the fire regime by changing intensity, size and spatial variability of fires. Changes in plant community composition and spatial variability of vegetation due to the loss of perennial bunchgrasses and sagebrush truncate energy capture spatially and temporally thus impacting nutrient cycling and distribution.
Additional community tables
Table 8. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Shrub/Vine0 Primary Shrubs 128–153 bud sagebrush PIDE4 Picrothamnus desertorum 100–113 – shadscale saltbush ATCO Atriplex confertifolia 13–25 – green molly BAAM4 Bassia americana 8 – Nevada jointfir EPNE Ephedra nevadensis 8 – 3 Secondary Shrubs 8–13 spiny hopsage GRSP Grayia spinosa 3–8 – broom snakeweed GUSA2 Gutierrezia sarothrae 3–8 – winterfat KRLA2 Krascheninnikovia lanata 3–8 – shortspine horsebrush TESP2 Tetradymia spinosa 3–8 – Grass/Grasslike0 Primary Grasses 53–128 Indian ricegrass ACHY Achnatherum hymenoides 38–50 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 38–50 – James' galleta PLJA Pleuraphis jamesii 38–50 – 1 Seconary Grasses 13–25 King's eyelashgrass BLKI Blepharidachne kingii 3–8 – Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 3–8 – alkali sacaton SPAI Sporobolus airoides 3–8 – sand dropseed SPCR Sporobolus cryptandrus 3–8 – Forb0 Primary Forbs 8–13 scarlet globemallow SPCO Sphaeralcea coccinea 8–13 – 2 Seconary Forbs 13–25 Holboell's rockcress ARHO2 Arabis holboellii 3–8 – western tansymustard DEPI Descurainia pinnata 3–8 – shaggy fleabane ERPU2 Erigeron pumilus 3–8 – whitestem blazingstar MEAL6 Mentzelia albicaulis 3–8 – Table 9. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 11. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 12. Community 2.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 13. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 14. Community 4.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
--Threatened and Endangered Species--
This section will be populated as more information becomes available.
--Wildlife Interpretation--
This ecological site, in its reference state, produced large amounts of nutritious forage that was utilized by native herbivores including deer and antelope who lived here along their associated predators. Although much of this site is presently different from the reference state, it is still very important as wildlife habitat. Other wildlife commonly observed using this site include rabbit, coyote, badger, fox, and various waterfowl species.
--Grazing Interpretations--
This site provides good spring, fall, and winter grazing conditions for domestic livestock due to its accessibility and its supply of nutritious forage. When this site is stressed, cheatgrass, Russian thistle and halogeton are likely to invade.Hydrological functions
The soils are in hydrologic group B. The hydrologic curve number is 61 when the vegetation is in good condition.
Recreational uses
Resources that have special aesthetic and lancscape value are wildflowers. Some recreation uses of this sight are hiking and hunting.
Wood products
None
Other information
Threatened and endangered species include plants and animals.
Supporting information
Type locality
Location 1: Box Elder County, UT General legal description Box Elder West Soil Survey – Terrace Mountain Pigeon Mountain Lyon Mountain Warm Springs Soil Survey Pit - No. 6-4 Pit No. 23-1 Location Ferguson Desert Contributors
David J. Somorville
DJSApproval
Jamin Johanson, 5/02/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) V. Keith Wadman (Ret. NRCS), Shane Green (NRCS) Contact for lead author shane.green@ut.usda.gov Date 01/05/2009 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Minor rill development may be evident in the reference community following significant storm or snow melt events. The appearance of rills may be more apparent on steeper slopes or where run-on from adjacent upland sites or exposed bedrock concentrate flows. Any rill development will be short (< 3’) and widely spaced (6’ – 8’). Evidence of rills will disappear in the months following major weather events. Potential rill development may be masked by large concentrations (70% - 80% or greater) of coarse fragments on the soil surface. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Evidence of water flow is not apparent in the reference community except slight flow activity may be observed following significant weather events. Surface coarse fragments and biological soil crusts typically protect surface soils from accelerated erosion in the reference state. Any flow patterns present are normally <10 feet long, follow natural contours, and are typically spaced 15 to 20 feet apart. There are no exposed roots around perennial grass clumps and surface coarse fragments show little sign of movement or redistribution. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Pedestals or terracettes caused by accelerated water erosion are not evident in the reference community. 1 – 3 inches of elevational mounding in James galleta clumps, Bud sage canopies and cryptogamic crusts are normal and may not be water erosion caused. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground ranges from 5% - 15% in the reference community. Ground cover (the inverse of bare ground) typically includes: coarse fragments – 50% to 70%; plant canopy – 10% to 20%; litter – 10% to 15%, and biologicsl soil crusts – 2% to 5%. Bud sage is deciduous and may appear to increase bare ground percentages following leaf drop. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Developed gully channels are a normal component of desert environments. Gullies will typically have stable, partially vegetated sides and bottoms with no evidence of recent head-cutting. Some evidence of disturbance may be evident following significant weather events or when gullies convey runoff from higher elevation rocky or naturally eroding areas -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Very minor evidence of wind generated soil movement may be present in reference communities. Slight depositional mounding in perennial grass clumps, Bud sage canopies and biological soil crusts is a normal characteristic of this site. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Most litter resides in place within or under plant canopies. Some movement of the finest material (< 1/8”) may move (1’ – 2’) in the direction of prevailing winds or down slope if being transported by water. Little accumulation is observed behind obstructions. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
This site should have a soil stability rating of 3 to 4. Surface textures are typically sandy loams containing 50 to 75% coarse fragments. Where surface soil is lost, increased clay and silt percentages are common in the remaining soil material. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Soil surface is 3 or 4 inches deep and structure varies from thin to thick platy. The A-horizon color varies from 10YR 6/2 to 10YR 7/2. It is normally deeper and better developed under plant canopies. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
The presence of rhizomatous grasses such as James galleta or Alkali sacaton combined with healthy perennial bunchgrass and Bud sage in the reference community provides for the best infiltration and least runoff from storm events and snow melt. As perennial vegetation decreases and bare ground increases, runoff increases and soil loss is accelerated. Coarse fragments can increase as a percentage of total cover sealing the soil surface and slowing infiltration. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None. Soils are mostly very deep, but a few may have bedrock at 25 – 30 inches. Increases in clay or silt content in subsoil layers should not be mistaken for compaction. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Dominant: Non-sprouting shrubs (e.g. Bud sage and Shadscale) 40 – 60%, >> warm season perennial grasses (e.g. James galleta, Alkali sacaton, dropseeds) 10 – 20%, > cool season grasses (e.g. Bottlebrush squirreltail and Indian ricegrass) 5 – 10%.Sub-dominant:
Sub-dominant: Mixed shrubs (e.g. Nevada jointfir and Winterfat) 1-5% > Cool season grasses (e.g. Sandberg and Nevada bluegrasses) 1-3%.Other:
Others: Shrubs (e.g. Shortspine horsebrush and Spiny hopsage) 1-3%, perennial forbs (e.g. Scarlet globemallow and Holboell rockcress) 3-5%, biological soil crusts (e.g. lichens, mosses, cyanobacteria).Additional:
Moss and lichen communities will normally be found under plant canopies while the cyanobacteria will be found throughout the site. -
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Reference community populations should remain relatively stable during average or above average precipitation years. During extreme drought years Bud sage may die and cool season perennial grasses may appear stressed with little production. Broom snakeweed may temporarily increase in percent composition during years with favorable growing conditions for this plant. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Litter cover ranges from 10 to 15% with a spike when Bud Sage drops its leaves. Depth varies from ¼ - 1/2 inch with depth increasing near plant canopies. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
150 – 250 pounds on a typical year. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Broom snakeweed, Redstem storksbill and Halogeton are likely to increase in or invade this site. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All perennial plant species have the ability to reproduce in most years except drought years. During drought years new seedlings may be missing and principle shrubs may experience early and prolonged leaf drop.
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement