Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R025XY048ID
SHALLOW CLAYPAN 11-13
Last updated: 4/25/2024
Accessed: 06/02/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Draft. A draft ecological site description is either incomplete or has not undergone quality control and quality assurance review.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 025X–Owyhee High Plateau
The Owyhee High Plateau, MLRA 25, lies within the Intermontane Plateaus physiographic province. The southern half is found in the Great Basin while the northern half is located in the Columbia Plateaus. The southern section of the Owyhee High Plateau is characterized by isolated, uplifted fault-block mountain ranges separated by narrow, aggraded desert plains. This geologically older terrain has been dissected by numerous streams draining to the Humboldt River. The northern section forms the southern boundary of the extensive Columbia Plateau basalt flows. Deep, narrow canyons drain to the Snake River across the broad volcanic plain.
This MLRA is characteristically cooler and wetter than the neighboring MLRAs of the Great Basin. Elevation ranges from 3,000 to 7,550 feet on rolling plateaus and in gently sloping basins. It is more than 9,840 feet on some steep mountains. The average annual precipitation in most of this area is typically 11 to 22 inches. It increases to as much as 49 inches at the higher elevations. Precipitation occurs mainly as snow in winter. The supply of water from precipitation and streamflow is small and unreliable, except along major rivers. Streamflow depends largely on accumulated snow in the mountains.
The dominant soil orders in this MLRA are Aridisols and Mollisols. The soils in the area dominantly have a mesic or frigid temperature regime and an aridic, arid bordering on xeric, or xeric moisture regime. Most of the soils formed in mixed parent material. Volcanic ash and loess mantle the landscape. Surface soil textures are loam and silt loam, and have ashy texture modifiers in some cases. Argillic horizons occur on the more stable landforms.Classification relationships
Artemisia arbuscula/ Agropyron spicatum ht. in “ Hironaka, M., M.A. Fosberg, A. H. Winward. 1983. Sagebrush- Grass Habitat Types of Southern Idaho". University of Idaho. Moscow, Idaho. Bulletin Number 35.
Ecological site concept
This ecological site is on gently sloping foothills and broad tablelands associated with volcanic plateau landscapes. Landscape positions are dominantly linear- linear. Elevations range from 3,200 to 5,400 feet (975 to 1,646 meters).
The soils associated with this site have a light-colored surface horizon (ochric epipedon) and depths of less than 39 inches (100 cm) to a soil horizon strongly cemented or indurated with silica and calcium carbonate (duripan).
Important abiotic factors contributing to this ecological site are gentle slopes (less than 20 percent), shallow effective rooting depth, and shallow depth to an abrupt boundary of clay resulting in wet non-satiated conditions.
Dominant vegetation in the reference state is low sagebrush and bluebunch wheatgrass.Associated sites
R025XY024ID LOAMY 12-16
LOAMY 12-16
R025XY019ID LOAMY 10-13
LOAMY 10-13
R025XY019ID LOAMY 10-13
LOAMY 10-13
R025XY040ID VERY SHALLOW STONY 8-12
VERY SHALLOW STONY 8-12
R025XY044ID VERY SHALLOW STONY LOAM 10-14
VERY SHALLOW STONY LOAM 10-14
R025XY010ID CLAYPAN 12-16
CLAYPAN 12-16
Similar sites
R025XY010ID CLAYPAN 12-16
found on low elevation hills and plateaus, soils are shallow to hard bedrock with an abrupt upper textural boundary within 11cm of the soil surface.
R025XY014ID CLAYEY 12-16
found on linear to slightly concave positions on plateaus, soils are shallow with greater than 35% RF volume, site dominated on early sagebrush
R025XY044ID VERY SHALLOW STONY LOAM 10-14
shallow soils on broadly convex foothills and plateaus, on slopes less than 30%, with greater than 60% rock fragments on soil surface
R025XY061OR SHALLOW CLAYPAN 8-11 PZ
soil characteristics, landform, production and species composition are not different from 48ID.
R025XY018NV CLAYPAN 10-12 P.Z.
found on fan remnants, linear-linear landform shape, >30percent clay throughout
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub (1) Artemisia arbuscula
Herbaceous (1) Pseudoroegneria spicata
Physiographic features
This ecological site is on gently sloping, linear-linear, hillslopes and tablelands on broad volcanic plateau landscapes. Elevations range from 3,200 to 5,400 feet (975 to 1,646 meters). Slopes are less than 20 percent. Permeability is slow to very slow and runoff is very high.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Lava plateau
(2) Tableland > Hillslope
Runoff class High to very high Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 3200 – 5400 ft Slope 0 – 20 % Water table depth 0 – 100 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The climate associated with this site is defined by hot dry summers and cold snowy winters.
There are 38 frost free-days and an 81day freeze-free period. Mean annual precipitation is 15 inches (38cm), with the highest rainfall occurring in May 2.2 inches (5.6cm) and the lowest in August 0.6 inches (1.5cm). Effective precipitation is lower, between 8 to 13 inches (20 to 33cm). Averages snowfall is around 35 inches (89cm) per year. Air temperatures average 26 degrees F in January (coldest) and 66 degrees F in July (warmest).
* The above and below data is averaged from the JACKPOT, and DANNER climate stations, the National Information System (NASIS) and the Western Regional Climate Center.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 80-120 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 110-130 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 10 in Frost-free period (actual range) 80-120 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 100-130 days Precipitation total (actual range) 10 in Frost-free period (average) 100 days Freeze-free period (average) 120 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) JACKPOT [USC00264016], Jackpot, NV
-
(2) DANNER [USC00352135], Jordan Valley, OR
">Influencing water features
This site is not influenced by adjacent wetlands, streams or run on.
Wetland description
N/A
Soil features
Soils associated with this site are shallow or moderately deep to duripan and formed in alluvium derived from volcanic rocks and ash. The soil profile typically has an abrupt textural change within the upper 11.8 inches (30cm), greater than 30 percent clay throughout, and a light-colored surface horizon (orchic epipedon). A soil horizon strongly cemented or indurated with silica and calcium carbonates (duripan) occurs 11.8 to 23.6 inches (30 to 60cm) from the soil surface.
Representative soil components associated with this ecological site include Bedstead, Bruncan, Bieber, and Catchell.Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Alluvium – volcanic rock
Surface texture (1) Gravelly loam
(2) Stony silt loam
Drainage class Well drained Permeability class Slow to moderately slow Depth to restrictive layer 20 – 40 in Soil depth 20 – 40 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 10 – 23 % Surface fragment cover >3" 2 – 10 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)1.4 – 4 in Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.6 – 7.3 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)7 – 20 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)4 – 25 % Ecological dynamics
The Reference Plant Community is dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass and little sagebrush. Subdominant species include basin big sagebrush, antelope bitterbrush and Sandberg bluegrass. Total annual production is 550 lbs/acre in a normal year, 800 lbs/acre in a favorable year, and 300 lbs/acre in a unfavorable year. Structurally, shallow rooted bunchgrasses are dominant, followed by shrubs, and perennial forbs. The dominant visual aspect of this site is sagebrush with mixed grasses. Composition by weight is approximately 65 percent grasses, 10 percent forbs and 25 percent shrubs.
Periodic drought regularly influences sagebrush ecosystems and drought duration and severity has increased throughout the 20th century in much of the Intermountain West. Major shifts away from historical precipitation patterns have the greatest potential to alter ecosystem function and productivity. Species composition and productivity can be altered by the timing of precipitation and water availability with the soil profile (Bates, 2006). Low sagebrush is fairly drought tolerant but also tolerates periodic wetness during a portion of the growing season.
Native insect outbreaks are also important drivers of ecosystem dynamics in sagebrush communities. Climate is generally believed to influence the timing of insect outbreaks, especially with regard to sagebrush defoliator Aroga moth (Aroga websteri). Aroga moth infestations have occurred throughout the Great Basin in the 1960s, early 1970s, and has been ongoing in Nevada since 2004 (Bentz, 2008). Low sagebrush is susceptible to Aroga moth, which can partially or entirely kill individual plants or entire stands of big sagebrush (Furniss, 1975), though the research is inconclusive of the damage sustained by low sagebrush populations.
Herbivory has historically occurred on the site at low levels of utilization. Native herbivores include pronghorn antelope, elk, mule deer, sage grouse, lagomorphs and rodents. Livestock grazing has become prevalent across this site. Overutilization of resources due to grazing (from livestock, wildlife, and feral horses) can degrade the site and decrease forage availability and quality. This will lead to a decrease in perennial bunch grasses and an increase of invasive species (Williamson, 2020). Annual and perennial invasive species compete with desirable plants for moisture and nutrients.
Wildfire frequency across this site has historically been low. Sagebrush evolved with low intensity wildfire that left a mosaic of burned and unburned patches (Baker, 2006). Prior to 1897, mean fire return intervals for low sagebrush communities have been estimated to be from 35 to over 100 years. Fire most often occurs during wet years with high forage production. Fire return intervals have recently been estimated at 100-200 years in black sagebrush-dominated sites (Kitchen and McArthur 2007) and likely is similar in the low sagebrush ecosystem.
Higher wildfire frequency following years with increased annual plant production can be expected due to a larger fuel load (Pilliod, 2017). Annual species such as cheatgrass and medusahead can be troublesome invaders on this site after wildfire, preventing perennial grass and shrub re-establishment. Invasive, annual plant communities increase wildfire frequency and intensity (Haubensak, 2009). Decreased infiltration, increased runoff, and increased erosion often occur when sagebrush is removed by frequent wildfires (Williams, 2018).State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
T1 - Introduction of annual non-native species. T3 - Repeated, widespread and severe fire. R2 - Seeding with native species/prescribed grazing State 1
Reference StateThe Reference State is a representative of the natural range of variability under pristine conditions. State dynamics are maintained by interactions between climatic patterns and disturbance regimes. Negative feedbacks enhance ecosystem resilience and contribute to the stability of the state. These include the presence of all structural and functional groups, low fine fuel loads, and retention of organic matter and nutrients. Plant community phase changes are primarily driven by fire, periodic drought and/or insect or disease attack.
Dominant plant species
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
Community 1.1
This community phase is characteristic of a mid-seral plant community and is dominated by low sagebrush and native perennial grasses. Potential vegetative composition by weight is about 65 percent grasses, 10 percent forbs and 25 percent shrubs. Total vegetative cover averages 45 percent.
This community phase is dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass and low sagebrush. Sandberg bluegrass is sub-dominant. Small amounts of Idaho fescue, bottlebrush squirreltail, Thurber’s needlegrass and Nevada bluegrass may be present. A large variety of forbs are present but each represents a small amount in the community. Other shrubs such as Alkali sagebrush, antelope bitterbrush, and several species of rabbitbrush can be present in small amounts.
Resilience management. Prior to 1897, mean fire return intervals for low sagebrush communities have been estimated to be from 35 to over 100 years. Fire most often occurs during wet years with high forage production. Fire return intervals have recently been estimated at 100-200 years in black sagebrush-dominated sites (Kitchen and McArthur 2007) and likely is similar in the low sagebrush ecosystem. Historically, however, fires were probably patchy due to the low productivity of these sites.
Figure 7. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 195 358 520 Shrub/Vine 75 137 200 Forb 30 55 80 Total 300 550 800 Community 1.2
This community phase is characteristic of a post-disturbance, early seral, plant community. Low sagebrush and other shrubs are reduced, or patchy. Perennial bunchgrasses and forbs dominate the visual aspect of the plant community. Bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass are common, with lesser amounts of Idaho fescue, Thurber’s needlegrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, a variety of forbs, and several species of rabbitbrush.
Disturbance tolerant shrubs will sprout from the root-crown following low and medium intensity wildfire and may begin to dominate the plant community 2 to 5 years post-disturbance.
Resilience management. Low sagebrush is killed by fire and does not sprout (Tisdale and Hironaka 1984). Establishment after fire is from seed, generally blown in and not from the seed bank (Bradley et al. 1992). Recovery time of low sagebrush following fire is variable (Young 1983). After fire, if regeneration conditions are favorable, low sagebrush recovers in 2 to 5 years; on harsh sites where cover is low to begin with and/or erosion occurs after fire, recovery may require more than 10 years (Young 1983). Slow regeneration may subsequently worsen erosion (Blaisdell et al. 1982).
Community 1.3
Absence of disturbance allows sagebrush to mature and dominate the plant community. Perennial bunchgrasses and forbs are reduced in both vigor and productivity due to competition for light, moisture and nutrient resources. This community phase is dominated by low sagebrush. Bluebunch wheatgrass and other deep-rooted perennial bunchgrasses are present but in reduced amounts and in low vigor.
Pathway 1.1a
Community 1.1 to 1.2Low severity wildfire creates a sagebrush/grass mosaic; higher intensity wildfires significantly reduce sagebrush cover and lead to early seral community dominated by grasses and forbs. Frequency and intensity of wildfire is primarily driven by cover and amount of herbaceous vegetation. Under the reference state conditions, wildfire return intervals are estimated to be greater than 100 years.
Pathway 1.1b
Community 1.1 to 1.3Time, absence of disturbance, and natural regeneration over time allows sagebrush to dominate site resources. This community phase pathway may be coupled with drought and/or herbivory further reducing herbaceous understory.
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.1Time, absence of disturbance and natural regeneration over time allows sagebrush to recover. Recovery of sagebrush depends on the availability of a local seed source (patches of mature shrubs) as well as precipitation patterns favorable for germination and seedling recruitment. Sagebrush seedlings are susceptible to less than favorable conditions for several years. Completion of this community phase pathways may take decades.
Pathway 1.3a
Community 1.3 to 1.1Low intensity, patchy wildfire or insect infestation would reduce sagebrush overstory creating a mosaic on the landscape. Perennial bunchgrasses and forbs dominate disturbed patches due to an increase in light, moisture and nutrient resources.
Pathway 1.3b
Community 1.3 to 1.2Widespread wildfire removes sagebrush and allows perennial bunchgrasses and forbs to dominate post fire.
State 2
Current PotentialThis state is similar to the Reference State 1.0. Ecological function has not changed, however the resiliency of the state has been reduced by the presence of invasive weeds. These non-natives can be highly flammable, and can promote fire where historically fire had been infrequent. Negative feedbacks enhance ecosystem resilience and contribute to the stability of the state. These include the presence of all structural and functional groups, low fine fuel loads and retention of organic matter and nutrients. Positive feedbacks decrease ecosystem resilience and stability of the state. These include the non-natives’ high seed output, persistent seed bank, rapid growth rate, ability to cross pollinate and adaptations for seed dispersal.
Resilience management. Best management actions include maintaining a high diversity of desired species to promote organic matter inputs and prevent the dispersal and seed production of the non-native invasive species.
Dominant plant species
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula), shrub
-
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), grass
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
Community 2.1
This community phase is similar to the Reference State Community Phase 1.1, with the presence of non-native species in trace amounts. Low sagebrush and bluebunch wheatgrass dominate the site. Forbs and other shrubs and grasses make up smaller components of this site.
Resilience management. The presence of non-native annuals has reduced site resilience. Management actions should focus on maintaining the presence of all functional and structural groups and minimizing wildfire and soil disturbing practices.
Community 2.2
This community phase is characteristic of a post-disturbance, early seral community with annual non-native species are present. Perennial bunchgrasses and forbs recover rapidly following wildfire. Annual non-native species are stable or increasing within the community. Depending on fire severity patches of intact sagebrush may remain. Rabbitbrush may be sprouting or dominant in the community. Disturbance tolerant shrubs typically recover 2 to 5 years post wildfire and may dominate the sites for many years.
Community 2.3
This community phase is characterized by decadent sagebrush, reduced perennial bunchgrass and increasing bare ground. Shallow-rooted bunchgrasses increase and may become co-dominate with remaining deep-rooted bunchgrasses. Annual non-natives species, cheatgrass and medusahead rye, are increasing. This site is susceptible to further degradation from grazing, drought, and fire.
Pathway 2.1a
Community 2.1 to 2.2Wildfire reduces the shrub overstory and allows for perennial bunchgrasses to dominate the site. Wildfire may be patchy, resulting in a mosaic pattern with patches of mature sagebrush remaining. Annual non-native species are likely to increase after wildfire.
Pathway 2.1b
Community 2.1 to 2.3Time and lack of disturbance allows for sagebrush to increase and become decadent. Long-term drought reduces fine fuels and leads to a reduced fire frequency. Mature sagebrush is controlling the spatial and temporal distribution of moisture, nutrient and light resources. Native perennial bunchgrasses are reduced due to competition for these resources. Non-native annuals are stable to increasing.
Context dependence.Inappropriate grazing management reduces the perennial bunchgrass understory; conversely Sandberg bluegrass may increase in the understory depending on grazing management.
Pathway 2.2a
Community 2.2 to 2.1Time, lack of disturbance and natural regeneration of sagebrush. The establishment of sagebrush depends on presence of seed source and favorable weather patterns. It may take decades for sagebrush to recover to pre-disturbance levels.
Pathway 2.3a
Community 2.3 to 2.1Low intensity wildfire, insect infestation, or brush management with minimal soil disturbance reduces sagebrush overstory and releases herbaceous understory. Annual non-native species are present and may increase in the community.
Context dependence.A change in grazing management that reduces shrubs will allow for the perennial bunchgrasses in the understory to increase. Heavy late-fall or winter grazing by sheep may cause mechanical damage and subsequent death to sagebrush, facilitating an increase in the herbaceous understory. Brush treatments with minimal soil disturbance will also decrease sagebrush and release the perennial understory.
Pathway 2.3b
Community 2.3 to 2.2Wildfire reduces or eliminates the overstory of sagebrush and allows for the understory perennial grasses and forbs to increase. Annual non-native species respond well to wildfire and may increase post-burn.
State 3
Eroded StateThis state characterized by dominance of annual non-natives. They control site productivity and the spatial and temporal distribution of soil moisture, soil nutrients and energy resources. Remaining patches of sagebrush and/or perennial bunchgrass suffer from increased competition and narrowed fire return intervals. Soil erosion may be significant.
Characteristics and indicators. This state experiences frequent fire due to increased cover and continuity of fine fuels. Fire is frequent enough to prevent the recovery of long-lived native perennials like sagebrush. Disturbance tolerant shrubs may be present or increasing depending on time since disturbance.
Dominant plant species
-
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), grass
Community 3.1
This community is dominated by Sandberg bluegrass, cheatgrass, medusahead rye and a variety of forbs. Some perennial forbs are present. Some soil loss has occured. Low sagebrush and deep-rooted perennial bunchgrasses are reduced or absent.
Community 3.2
This community phase is characteristic of a post-wildfire community where annual non-natives are controlling site resources. Depending on season and/or intensity of fire the visually aspect of the site in dominated annual non-natives and bare ground. Site may be experiencing soil loss.
Resilience management. This community phases is high susceptible to frequent and repeated wildfire. Best management practices prevent sites from reaching this community phase. Management options are extremely limited.
Pathway 3.1a
Community 3.1 to 3.2Fire reduces or eliminates the overstory shrubs and shallow-rooted perennials and allows for annual non-natives to increase
Context dependence.Fire return interval has shortened due to the dominance of cheatgrass in the understory and is a driver in site dynamics.
Pathway 3.2a
Community 3.2 to 3.1Time and lack of fire allows for sagebrush and other shrubs to establish. Probability of sagebrush establishment is very unlikely and dependent on a near-by seed source from unburned patches of sagebrush.
Context dependence.After fire, if regeneration conditions are favorable, low sagebrush recovers in 2 to 5 years; on harsh sites where cover is low to begin with and/or erosion occurs after fire, recovery may require more than 10 years (Young 1983). Slow regeneration may subsequently worsen erosion (Blaisdell et al. 1982).
Transition T1
State 1 to 2Trigger: Introduction of annual non-native species Slow variable: Over time the annual non-native plants increase within the community. Threshold: Any amount of introduced non-native species causes an immediate decrease in the resilience of the site. Annual non-native species cannot be easily removed from the system and have the potential to significantly alter disturbance regimes from their historic range of variation.
Transition T3
State 2 to 3Trigger: Repeated, widespread, and severe wildfire. Slow variables: Increased production and cover of non-native annual species over time. This transitions may be coupled with continued continued improper grazing. Threshold: Loss of deep-rooted perennial bunchgrasses and shrubs truncates, spatially and temporally, nutrient capture and cycling within the community. Site dynamics are driven by a narrowed fire return interval and active soil erosion.
Restoration pathway R2
State 3 to 2Seed with native species and reduce non-native biomass. Minimize soil disturbance and maximize non-native annual plant biomass removal during early spring. Combine prescribed grazing with seeding of native species. Continue to protect site from wildfire. Probability of success is very low.
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 195–520 bluebunch wheatgrass PSSP6 Pseudoroegneria spicata 145–395 – Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 20–50 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 10–25 – Thurber's needlegrass ACTH7 Achnatherum thurberianum 5–15 – thickspike wheatgrass ELLA3 Elymus lanceolatus 5–15 – Idaho fescue FEID Festuca idahoensis 5–10 – Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 5–10 – Forb2 30–80 phlox PHLOX Phlox 11–30 – arrowleaf balsamroot BASA3 Balsamorhiza sagittata 10–15 – tapertip hawksbeard CRACA Crepis acuminata ssp. acuminata 5–15 – bluebells MERTE Mertensia 1–5 – aster ASTER Aster 1–5 – lupine LUPIN Lupinus 1–5 – buckwheat ERIOG Eriogonum 1–5 – Shrub/Vine3 75–200 little sagebrush ARAR8 Artemisia arbuscula 70–190 – rabbitbrush CHRYS9 Chrysothamnus 4–8 – antelope bitterbrush PUTR2 Purshia tridentata 1–2 – Table 7. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 11. Community 2.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 12. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 13. Community 3.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
Wildlife Interpretations.
Pronghorn antelope, Mule deer, Sage grouse, lagomorphs and small rodents use the site.
Grazing Interpretations.
This site is suited for grazing by livestock in spring, early summer and fall. Early spring grazing should be avoided due to prolonged wetness in the soil.
Estimated initial stocking rate will be determined with the landowner or decision-maker. They will be based on the inventory which includes species, composition, similarity index, production, past use history, season of use and seasonal preference. Calculations used to determine estimated initial stocking rate will be based on forage preference ratings.Hydrological functions
The soils in this site are generally in hydrologic group D. They have high runoff potential.
Recreational uses
Colorful spring and early summer blooming forbs provide excellent opportunities for photography and nature study. Hunting opportunities for pronghorn antelope and sage grouse exist.
Wood products
None.
Other products
None.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Information presented here has been derived from NRCS clipping and other inventory data. Old SS Manuscripts, Range Site Descriptions, etc. Also, field knowledge of range-trained personnel was used. Those involved in developing this site description include: Dave Franzen, co-owner, Intermountain Rangeland Consultants, LLC Jacy Gibbs, co-owner, Intermountain Rangeland Consultants, LLC Jim Cornwell, State Rangeland Management Specialist, NRCS, Idaho (retired) Joe May, State Rangeland Management Specialist, NRCS, Idaho Leah Juarros, Resource Soil Scientist, NRCS, Idaho Lee Brooks, Assistant State Conservationist, NRCS, Idaho (retired)
Type locality
Location 1: Owyhee County, ID References
-
Baker, W.L. 2006. Fire and Restoration of Sagebrush Ecosystems. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34:177–185.
-
Bates, J.D., T. Svejcar, R.F. Miller, and R.A. Angell. 2006. The effects of precipitation timing on sagebrush steppe vegetation. Journal of Arid Environments 64:670–697.
-
Haubensak K. and D'Antonio C. 2009. Effects of fire and environmental variable on plant structure and composition in grazed salt desert shrublands of the Great Basin (USA). Journal of Arid Environment. Elsevier. 643–650.
-
Kitchen and McArthur. 2007. Big and black sagebrush landscapes. Pages in Fire Ecology and Management of the Major Ecosystems of Southern Utah. USDA, Fort Collins, CO Rocky Mountain Research Station.
-
Michael J. Falkowski and Jeffrey S. Evans. January 2017. Mapping Tree Canopy Cover in Support of Proactive Prairie Grouse Conservation in Western North America. Rangeland Ecology and Management 70:15–24.
-
Pilliod, D.S. and J.L. Welty. 2017. Refining the cheatgrass–fire cycle in the Great Basin: Precipitation timing and fine fuel composition predict wildfire trends. Ecology and Evolution. Wiley.
-
Williams, C.J. and F.B. Pierson. 2018. Effectiveness of prescribed fire to re-establish sagebrush steppe vegetation and ecohydrologic function on woodland-encroached sagebrush rangelands, Great Basin, USA: Part I: Vegetation, hydrology, and erosion responses.
-
Williamson, M.A. and E. Fleishman. 2019. Fire, livestock grazing, topography, and precipitation affect occurrence and prevalence of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in the central Great Basin, USA.
Other references
Hironaka, M., M.A. Fosberg, A. H. Winward. 1983. Sagebrush- Grass Habitat Types of Southern Idaho. University of Idaho. Moscow, Idaho. Bulletin Number 35.
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 2004. Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-136-vols. 1-3.
USDA, NRCS.2001. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.1 (http://plants.usda.gov.). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA
USDA, Forest Service, Fire Effects Information Database. 2004. www.fs.fed.us/database.
USDI Bureau of Land Management, US Geological Survey; USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Agricultural Research Service; Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health. Technical Reference 1734-6; version 4-2005.Contributors
Dave Franzen And Jacy Gibbs
Trevor Crandall/ Erin HourihanApproval
Kendra Moseley, 4/25/2024
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author USDA/NRCS 9173 W. Barnes Drive, Suite C Boise, ID 83709 208-378-5722 Date 07/03/2007 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rills can occur on this site. If rills are present, they are likely to occur on slopes greater than 10 percent and immediately following a wildfire or high intensity storm. Rills are most likely to occur on soils with silt loam or clay loam surface texture. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water-flow patterns can occur on this site. When they do occur, they are short and disrupted by cool season grasses, shrubs and surface stones. They are not extensive except on slopes greater than 15 percent. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Pedestals and/or terracettes are common on the site especially where flow patterns are present and the surface soils have a high clay content. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground ranges from 40-50 percent. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Wind-scoured, blowouts, and/or depression areas are usually not present in the HCPC. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine litter in the interspaces may move up to 3 feet following a significant run-off event. Coarse litter generally does not move. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Values should range from 4-6 but need to be tested. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
The surface horizon is typically 1 to 7 inches thick. Structure typically includes weak thin, moderate medium, strong thick platy, and moderate fine granular, and moderate fine to medium subangular blocky. Soil organic matter (SOM) ranges from 1 to 3 percent. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Bunchgrasses, especially deep-rooted perennials, slow runoff and increase infiltration. Medium height shrubs accumulate some snow in the interspaces. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Compaction Layer is not present. Due to the clay content of the subsoil, the site can develop a compaction layer if severe livestock use occurs when the soils are wet. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Cool season deep-rooted perennial bunchgrasses>> medium shrubsSub-dominant:
Perennial forbs>shallow rooted bunchgrassesOther:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Very little mortality or decadence is expected on this site. Mortality of shallow-rooted grasses may occur due to extended periods of drought. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Additional data is needed but is expected to be low and at a shallow depth. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual production is 550 pounds per acre (392 Kg/ha) in a year with normal precipitation and temperatures. Perennial grasses produce 45-65 percent of the total production, forbs 10-20 percent and shrubs 20-40 percent. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Invasive plants include cheatgrass, medusahead rye, Vulpia species, bulbous bluegrass, annual mustards and rush skeletonweed. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All functional groups have the potential to reproduce in favorable years.
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement