Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R025XY004NV
LOAMY SLOPE 16+ P.Z.
Last updated: 4/24/2024
Accessed: 09/21/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 025X–Owyhee High Plateau
MLRA Notes 25—Owyhee High Plateau
This area is in Nevada (56 percent), Idaho (30 percent), Oregon (12 percent), and Utah (2 percent). It makes up about 27,443 square miles. MLRA 25 is characteristically cooler and wetter than the neighboring MLRAs of the Great Basin. The western boundary is marked by a gradual transition to the lower and warmer basins of MLRA 24. The boundary to the south-southeast, with MLRA 28B, is marked by gradual changes in geology marked by an increased dominance of singleleaf pinyon and Utah juniper and a reduced presence of Idaho fescue. The boundary to the north, with MLRA 11, is a rapid transition from the lava plateau topography to the lower elevation Snake River Plain.
Physiography:
All of this area lies within the Intermontane Plateaus. The southern half is in the Great Basin section of the Basin and Range province. This part of the MLRA is characterized by isolated, uplifted fault-block mountain ranges separated by narrow, aggraded desert plains. This geologically older terrain has been dissected by numerous streams draining to the Humboldt River.
The northern half of the area lies within the Columbia Plateaus province. This part of the MLRA forms the southern boundary of the extensive Columbia Plateau basalt flows. Most of the northern half is in the Payette section, but the northeast corner is in the Snake River Plain section. Deep, narrow canyons draining into the Snake River have been incised into this broad basalt plain. Elevation ranges from 3,000 to 7,550 feet on rolling plateaus and in gently sloping basins. It is more than 9,840 feet on some steep mountains. The Humboldt River crosses the southern half of this area
Geology:
The dominant rock types in this MLRA are volcanic. They include andesite, basalt, tuff, and rhyolite. In the north and west parts of the area, Cretaceous granitic rocks are exposed among Miocene volcanic rocks in mountains. A Mesozoic igneous and metamorphic rock complex dominates the south and east parts of the area. Upper and Lower Paleozoic calcareous sediments, including oceanic deposits, are exposed with limited extent in the mountains. Alluvial fan and basin fill sediments occur in the valleys.
Climate:
The average annual precipitation in most of this area is typically 11 to 22 inches. It increases to as much as 49 inches at the higher elevations. Rainfall occurs in spring and sporadically in summer. Precipitation occurs mainly as snow in winter. The precipitation is distributed fairly evenly throughout fall, winter, and spring. The amount of precipitation is lowest from midsummer to early autumn. The average annual temperature is 33 to 51 degrees F. The freeze-free period averages 130 days and ranges from 65 to 190 days, decreasing in length with elevation. It is typically less than 70 days in the mountains.
Water:
The supply of water from precipitation and streamflow is small and unreliable, except along the Owyhee, Bruneau, and Humboldt Rivers. Streamflow depends largely on accumulated snow in the mountains. Surface water from mountain runoff is generally of excellent quality and suitable for all uses. The basin fill sediments in the narrow alluvial valleys between the mountain ranges provide some ground water for irrigation. The alluvial deposits along the large streams have the most ground water. Based on measurements of water quality in similar deposits in adjacent areas, the basin fill deposits probably contain moderately hard water. The water is suitable for almost all uses. The carbonate rocks in this area are considered aquifers, but they are little used. Springs are common along the edges of the limestone outcrops.
Soils:
The dominant soil orders in this MLRA are Aridisols and Mollisols. The soils in the area dominantly have a mesic or frigid temperature regime and an aridic, aridic bordering on xeric, or xeric moisture regime. Soils with aquic moisture regimes are limited to drainage or spring areas, where moisture originates or runs on and through. These soils are of a very limited extent throughout the MLRA. They generally are well drained, clayey or loamy, and shallow or moderately deep. Most of the soils formed in mixed parent material. Volcanic ash and loess mantle the landscape. Surface soil textures are loam and silt loam with ashy texture modifiers in some areas. Argillic horizons occur on the more stable landforms. They are exposed nearer the soil surface on convex landforms, where ash and loess deposits are more likely to erode. Soils that formed in carbonatic parent material in areas that receive less than 12 inches of precipitation are characterized by calcic horizons throughout the profile, while soils in areas that receive more than 12 inches of precipitation do not have calcic horizons in the upper part of the profile. Soils that formed on stable landforms at the lower elevations are dominated by ochric horizons. Soils that formed at the middle and upper elevations are characterized by mollic epipedons. Soils in drainage areas at all elevations that receive moisture running on or through them are characterized by thicker mollic epipedons.
Biological Resources:
This MLRA supports shrub-grass vegetation. Lower elevations are characterized by Wyoming big sagebrush associated with bluebunch wheatgrass, western wheatgrass, and Thurber’s needlegrass. Other important plants include bluegrass, squirreltail, penstemon, phlox, milkvetch, lupine, Indian paintbrush, aster, and rabbitbrush. Black sagebrush occurs but is less extensive. Singleleaf pinyon and Utah juniper occur in limited areas. With increasing elevation and precipitation, vast areas characterized by mountain big sagebrush or low sagebrush/early sagebrush in association with Idaho fescue, bluebunch wheatgrass, needlegrasses, and bluegrass become common. Snowberry, curl-leaf mountain mahogany, ceanothus, and juniper also occur. Mountains at the highest elevations support whitebark pine, Douglas-fir, limber pine, Engelmann spruce, subalpine fir, aspen, and curl-leaf mountain mahogany.
Major wildlife species include mule deer, bighorn sheep, pronghorn, mountain lion, coyote, bobcat, badger, river otter, mink, weasel, golden eagle, red-tailed hawk, ferruginous hawk, Swainson’s hawk, northern harrier, prairie falcon, kestrel, great horned owl, short-eared owl, long-eared owl, burrowing owl, pheasant, sage grouse, chukar, gray partridge, and California quail. Reptiles and amphibians include western racer, gopher snake, western rattlesnake, side-blotched lizard, western toad, and spotted frog. Fish species include bull, red band, and rainbow trout.Ecological site concept
The Loamy Slope 16+ P.Z. site is on steep mountain slopes of northerly exposures. Slopes range from 4 to over 75 percent. Elevations range from 6,500 to 10,000 feet (1,981 to 3,048 meters).
The soils associated with this site are formed in residuum and colluvium from mixed rock sources. The soils of this site are deep or very deep and are well drained. Available water capacity is moderate to high. The surface layer is moderately coarse to medium textured and is 20 inches or more in thickness to the subsoil or underlying material. Subsoils are moderately coarse to moderately fine textured and may be slightly acidic. Some soils have high volumes of rock fragments through their profile. The soils typically have a mollic epipedon. This site provides a cool, moist environment for plant growth because of the elevations and/or steep northerly exposures where it occurs. Soil temperatures and evaporation potentials are limited during the growing season due to reduced insolation.
The representative plant community is dominated by mountain brome, slender wheatgrass and Idaho fescue, in association with a variety of mountain brush species. Potential vegetative composition is about 50 percent grasses, 15 percent forbs and 35 percent shrubs and trees. Approximate ground cover (basal and crown) is 40 to 55 percent. Bare ground is approximately 25 percent.Associated sites
F025XY065NV Backslope Aspen
R025XY002NV ASPEN THICKET
R025XY010NV STEEP NORTH SLOPE
R025XY016NV SOUTH SLOPE 14-18 P.Z.
R025XY028NV SNOWPOCKET
Similar sites
R025XY029NV DEEP LOAMY 14+ P.Z.
LECI4 dominant grass
R025XY056NV LOAMY 14-16 P.Z.
FEID dominant grass
R025XY012NV LOAMY SLOPE 12-16 P.Z.
FEID-PSSPS codominant grasses; less productive site
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Juniperus
(2) PinusShrub (1) Artemisia tridentata subsp. vaseyana
(2) Symphoricarpos oreophilusHerbaceous (1) Bromus marginatus
(2) Elymus trachycaulusPhysiographic features
The Loamy Slope 16+ P.Z. site is on steep mountain slopes of northerly exposures. Slopes range from 4 to over 75 percent, with slope gradients of 30 to 50 representing the majority of the site. Elevations are 6500 to 10000 feet (1981 to 3048 meters).
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Mountain slope
Runoff class Medium to very high Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 6500 – 10000 ft Slope 4 – 75 % Ponding depth 0 – 84 in Water table depth 0 – 84 in Aspect NW, N, NE Climatic features
The climate associated with this ecological site is semiarid, characterized by cold, moist winters and hot, dry summers.
The average annual precipitation ranges from 14 to 17 inches (36 to 43cm). Average annual air temperature is around 44 Degrees F.
Frost free period for this site is 54 days while the freeze free period is 92 days.
Monthly mean precipitation in inches: January 1.3 (3cm); February 1.2 (3cm); March 1.9 (5cm); April 2.1 (5cm); May 2.0 (5cm); June 1.2 (3cm); July 0.6 (1.5cm); August 0.5 (1.2cm); September 0.9 (2.2cm); October 1.0 (2.5cm); November 1.45 (3.6cm); December 1.3 (3.3cm).
Monthly average high temperature in Degrees F: January 37; February 40; March 48; April 55; May 65; June 74; July 85; August 84; September 74; October 60; November 46; December 37.
Monthly average low temperature in Degrees F: January 16; February 18; March 24; April 29; May 35; June 42; July 48; August 47; September 39; October 30; November 23; December 16.
Average snowfall is 106 inches.
*The above data is averaged from the Jarbridge 4N and Lamoille PH WRCC climate stations.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 50-60 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 80-90 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 10-20 in Frost-free period (actual range) 50-60 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 80-90 days Precipitation total (actual range) 10-20 in Frost-free period (average) 50 days Freeze-free period (average) 90 days Precipitation total (average) 20 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) LAMOILLE YOST [USC00264394], Spring Creek, NV
-
(2) JARBIDGE 7 N [USC00264039], Jackpot, NV
">Influencing water features
There are no influencing water features for this site.
Soil features
The soils associated with this site are formed in residuum and colluvium from mixed rock sources. The soils of this site are deep or very deep and are well drained. Available water capacity is moderate to high. The surface layer is moderately coarse to medium textured and is 20 inches (51cm) or more in thickness to the subsoil or underlying material. Subsoils are moderately coarse to moderately fine textured and may be slightly acidic. Some soils have high volumes of rock fragments through their profile. The soils typically have a mollic epipedon. This site provides a cool, moist environment for plant growth because of the elevations and/or steep northerly exposures where it occurs. Soil temperatures and evaporation potentials are limited during the growing season due to reduced insolation. The potential for sheet and rill erosion is moderate to high. The soil series associated with this site are: Aycab, Belsac, Coffepot, Earcree, Fez, Foxvire, Gravier, Hapgood, Harcany, Krenka, McIvey, Snopoc and Tusel.
A representative soil series is Hapgood, classified as a loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Pachic Haplocryoll. This soil is a deep, well drained soil that formed mainly in colluvium and residuum derived from mixed rocks with a component of loess and volcanic ash. Reaction is slightly acid or neutral. Diagnostic horizons include a mollic epipedon that occurs from the soil surface to 36 inches (91cm). Clay content in the particle-size control section averages 18 to 27 percent. Rock fragments range from 35 to 50 percent, dominantly gravel. Lithology of fragments is mixed.Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Residuum – quartzite
Surface texture (1) Ashy loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Well drained Permeability class Very slow to moderately rapid Depth to restrictive layer 60 – 84 in Soil depth 60 – 84 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 5 – 40 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 – 5 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)3 – 5.1 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)0 – 5 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)Not specified Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)Not specified Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.6 – 7 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)5 – 55 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)2 – 30 % Ecological dynamics
An ecological site is the product of all the environmental factors responsible for its development. Each ecological site has a set of key characteristics that influence a site’s resistance and resilience. Key characteristics include 1) climate (precipitation and temperature), 2) topography (aspect, slope, elevation, and landform), 3) hydrology (infiltration and runoff), 4) soils (depth, texture, structure, and organic matter), 5) plant communities (functional groups and productivity), and 6) natural disturbance regime (fire, herbivory, etc.) (Caudle 2013). Biotic factors that influence resilience include site productivity, species composition, population regulation, and population regeneration (Chambers et al 2013).
This ecological site is dominated by deep-rooted cool season, perennial bunchgrasses and long-lived shrubs (50+ years). The dominant shrubs usually root to the full depth of the winter-spring soil moisture, which ranges from 40 inches to over 120 inches (Dobrowolski et al. 1990). Root length of mature sagebrush plants was measured to a depth of 80 inches in Utah alluvial soils (Richards and Caldwell 1987). Sagebrush have a flexible, generalized root system with deep taproots and laterals near the surface (Comstock and Ehleringer 1992).
The perennial bunchgrasses that are co-dominant with the shrubs include mountain brome, slender wheatgrass, Idaho fescue, spike fescue and grass like plants such as sedges. These species generally have somewhat shallower root systems than the shrubs, but root densities are often as high as or higher than those of shrubs in the upper 20 inches of the soil profile. The root systems of short lived perennial grasses such as Sandberg bluegrass and mountain brome penetrate only the upper 15 inches of the soil, whereas longer lived perennial bunchgrasses can reach depths up to 80 inches (Spence 1937). General differences in root depth distributions between grasses and shrubs results in resource partitioning in these shrub/grass systems.
Periodic drought influences sagebrush ecosystems throughout this ecological site. Shifts away from historical precipitation patterns have the greatest potential to alter ecosystem form and function. Species composition and productivity can be altered by the timing of precipitation and water availability within the soil profile (Bates et al. 2006).
The great basin sagebrush communities have high spatial and temporal variability in precipitation, both among years and within growing seasons. Nutrient availability is typically low but increases with elevation and closely follows moisture availability. The susceptibility of invasive plant communities is often linked to resource availability. The invasion of sagebrush communities by cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) has been linked to disturbances (fire, abusive grazing) that have resulted in resource fluctuation (Chambers et al. 2007).
Singleleaf pinyon (Pinus monophylla) may occur where these sites are adjacent to woodlands. An extended fire return interval and/or inappropriate grazing can facilitate pinyon invasion. Eventually, singleleaf pinyon will dominate the site and out-compete sagebrush for water and sunlight, severely reducing both the shrub and herbaceous understory (Lett and Knapp 2005, Miller and Tausch 2000). Bluegrasses may remain underneath trees on north-facing slopes.
As ecological conditions decline, mountain big sagebrush and snowberry become more prevalent. Nevada bluegrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, and arrowleaf balsamroot increase in the understory as conditions deteriorate. Potential invasive/noxious weeds are cheatgrass, rabbitbrush, annual mustards, knapweeds and Utah juniper.
This ecological site has moderate to high resilience to disturbance and resistance to invasion. Resilience increases with elevation, aspect, increased precipitation and nutrient availability. Two possible stable states have been identified for the Loamy Slope 16+P.Z. ecological site.
Fire Ecology:
Pre-settlement fire return intervals in mountain big sagebrush communities varies from 15 to 25 years (Burkhardt and Tisdale 1969, Houston 1973, Miller 2000). Mountain big sagebrush is killed by fire (Neuenschwander 1980, Blaisdell et al. 1982, Blaisdell 1953). Post-fire regeneration occurs from seed and will vary depending on site characteristics, seed source, and fire characteristics. Mountain big sagebrush seedlings can grow rapidly and may reach reproductive maturity within 3 to 5 years (Bunting et al. 1987). Mountain big sagebrush may return to pre-burn density and cover within 15-20 years following fire, but establishment after severe fires may proceed more slowly and can take up to 50 years (Bunting et al. 1987, Ziegenhagen 2003, Miller and Heyerdahl 2008, Ziegenhagen and Miller 2009). The introduction of annual weedy species such as cheatgrass may cause an increase in fire frequency and would eventually lead to an annual dominated community. Conversely, sagebrush will increase along with pinyon and juniper encroachment. The herbaceous understory will also be reduced; Idaho fescue may remain underneath trees on north facing slopes. The potential for soil erosion increases as the woodland matures and the understory plant community cover declines. Severe wildfire in tree dominated sites may lead to an annual weed dominated state.
Mountain snowberry is top-killed by fire and will sprout after fire from rhizomes (Leege and Hickey 1971, Noste and Bushey 1987). It has also been noted to regenerate well and exceed pre-burn biomass in the third season after fire (Merrill et al. 1982). Currant, a minor component of this site, is known as a weak reproducer from the root crown but usually regenerates from seeds that were stored in the soil before the burn. If mule-ears or balsamroot is common before fire, these plants will increase after fire or with heavy grazing disturbance (Wright 1985).
The effect of fire on bunchgrasses relates to culm density, culm-leaf morphology, and the size of the plant. The initial condition of bunchgrasses within the site along with seasonality and intensity of the fire all factor into the individual species response. For most forbs and grasses the growing points are located at or below the soil surface providing relative protection from disturbances which decrease above ground biomass, such as grazing or fire. Thus, fire mortality is more correlated to duration and intensity of heat which is related to culm density, culm-leaf morphology, size of plant and abundance of old growth (Wright 1971, Young 1983).
The effect of fire on bunchgrasses relates to culm density, culm-leaf morphology, and the size of the plant. The initial condition of bunchgrasses within the site, along with seasonality and intensity of the fire all factor into the species response. For most forbs and grasses, the growing points are located at or below the soil surface and provides relative protection from disturbances which decrease above ground biomass, such as grazing or fire. Thus, fire mortality is more correlated to the duration and intensity of heat produced during the burning period. (Wright 1971, Young 1983).
Mountain brome, the dominant grass found on this site, is a robust, coarse-stemmed, short lived perennial bunchgrass that can grow from 1 to 5 feet in height (Dayton 1937, Tilley et al. 2004). It is commonly seeded by land managers following wildfires because of its ability to quickly establish and reduce erosion (Tilley et al. 2004). Mountain brome density significantly decreases after burning (Nimir and Payne 1978).
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), a minor component of this ecological site, has been found to increase following fire likely due to its low stature and productivity (Daubenmire 1975). Sandberg bluegrass may retard reestablishment of deeper rooted bunchgrasses.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
Figure 7. T Stringham 3/2015
Figure 8. Legend
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference StateThe Reference State 1.0 is a representative of the natural range of variability under pristine conditions. The reference state has three general community phases: a shrub-grass dominant phase, a perennial grass-dominant phase and a shrub-dominant phase. State dynamics are maintained by interactions between climatic patterns and disturbance regimes. Negative feedbacks enhance ecosystem resilience and contribute to the stability of the state. These include the presence of all structural and functional groups, low fine fuel loads, and retention of organic matter and nutrients. Plant community phase changes are primarily driven by fire, periodic drought and/or insect or disease attack.
Community 1.1
Mountain big sagebrush/perennial bunchgrassesThe representative plant community is dominated by mountain brome, slender wheatgrass and Idaho fescue, in association with a variety of mountain brush species. Potential vegetative composition is about 50 percent grasses, 15 percent forbs and 35 percent shrubs and trees. Approximate ground cover (basal and crown) is 40 to 55 percent. Bare ground is approximately 25 percent. Dead branches within individual shrubs are common. Standing-dead shrub canopy material is approximately 10 percent of total woody canopy; some of the mature bunchgrasses (
Figure 9. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 600 900 1400 Shrub/Vine 420 630 980 Forb 180 270 420 Tree 9 18 54 Total 1209 1818 2854 Community 1.2
Perennial bunchgrasses/sprouting shrubsThis community phase is characteristic of a post-disturbance, early to mid-seral community phase. Perennial bunchgrasses, such as; mountain brome, slender wheatgrass and Idaho fescue dominate. Sagebrush is killed by fire and may be a minor component and present in unburned patches. Mountain snowberry, Utah serviceberry, black chokecherry, elderberry and rabbitbrush may be sprouting. Forbs may increase post-fire but will likely return to pre-burn levels within a few years. Bluegrass is stable within the community.
Community 1.3
Mountain big sagebrush
Figure 10. Loamy Slope 16+” (R025XY004NV) Phase 1.3 T. K. Stringham August 2012
Mountain big sagebrush and other woody shrubs increase in the absence of disturbance. Singleleaf pinyon may be present. Decadent sagebrush dominates the overstory and the deep-rooted perennial bunchgrasses in the understory are reduced either from competition with shrubs or from grazing management. Sandberg bluegrass will likely increase in the understory and may be the dominant grass on the site. Balsamroot and other perennial forbs may also increase on the site.
Pathway 1.1a
Community 1.1 to 1.2Fire would decrease or eliminate the overstory of sagebrush and allow for the perennial bunchgrasses to dominate the site. Fires would typically be low severity resulting in a mosaic pattern due to low fuel loads. A fire following an unusually wet spring may be more severe and reduce sagebrush cover to trace amounts.
Pathway 1.2b
Community 1.1 to 1.3Time and lack of disturbance such as fire allows for sagebrush to increase and become decadent. Long-term drought, herbivory, or combinations of these would cause a decline in perennial bunchgrasses and fine fuels leading to a reduced fire frequency allowing big sagebrush to dominate the site.
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.1Time and lack of disturbance over time allows for the sagebrush and other woody shrubs to recover and increase in size and density.
Pathway 1.3a
Community 1.3 to 1.2Fire would decrease or eliminate the overstory of sagebrush and allow for the perennial bunchgrasses to dominate the site. Fires would typically be small and patchy due to low fine fuel loads. A fire following an unusually wet spring or a change in management may be more severe and reduce sagebrush cover to trace amounts.
State 2
Current PotentialThis state is similar to the Reference State 1.0 with three similar community phases. Ecological function has not changed, however the resiliency of the state has been reduced by the presence of invasive weeds. Non-natives may increase in abundance but will not become dominant within this State. These non-natives can be highly flammable and can promote fire where historically fire had been infrequent. Negative feedbacks enhance ecosystem resilience and contribute to the stability of the state. These feedbacks include the presence of all structural and functional groups, low fine fuel loads and retention of organic matter and nutrients. Positive feedbacks decrease ecosystem resilience and stability of the state. These include the non-natives’ high seed output, persistent seed bank, rapid growth rate, ability to cross pollinate and adaptations for seed dispersal. Additionally, the presence of highly flammable, non-native species reduces State resilience because these species can promote fire where historically fire has been infrequent leading to positive feedbacks that further the degradation of the system.
Community 2.1
Mountain big sagebrush-perennial bunchgrasses/non-native speciesThis community phase is similar to the Reference State Community Phase 1.1, with the presence of non-native species in trace amounts. The plant community is dominated by mountain brome, slender wheatgrass and Idaho fescue, in association with a variety of mountain brush species such as mountain big sagebrush, Utah serviceberry, chokecherry and mountain snowberry. Perennial forbs are a minor component of this plant community. Leafy spurge and cheatgrass may occur in minor amounts.
Community 2.2
Perennial bunchgrasses/sprouting shrubs/non-native speciesThis community phase is characteristic of a post-disturbance, early seral community where annual non-native species are present. Perennial bunchgrasses are dominant along with sprouting shrubs. Depending on fire severity patches of intact big sagebrush may remain. Mountain snowberry, Utah serviceberry, chokecherry, elderberry and rabbitbrush may be sprouting. Forbs may increase post-fire but will likely return to pre-burn levels within a few years. Bluegrass is stable within the community.
Community 2.3
Mountain big sagebrush
Figure 11. Loamy Slope 16+” (R025XY004NV) Phase 2.3 T. K. Stringham August 2012
Figure 12. Loamy Slope 16+” (R025XY004NV) Phase 2.3 T. K. Stringham August 2012. Some singleleaf pinyon present.
Big Sagebrush dominates the overstory and perennial bunchgrasses in the understory are reduced, either from competition with shrubs or from inappropriate grazing, or from both. Singleleaf pinyon may be present and without management will likely increase. Annual non-natives species may be stable or increasing due to lack of competition with perennial bunchgrasses. This site is susceptible to further degradation from grazing, drought, and fire.
Pathway 2.1a
Community 2.1 to 2.2Fire would reduce the shrub overstory and allow for perennial bunchgrasses to dominate the site. Fires would typically be low severity resulting in a mosaic pattern due to low fuel loads. A fire following an unusually wet spring or a change in management may be more severe and reduce sagebrush cover to trace amounts. Annual non-native species are likely to increase after fire.
Pathway 2.1b
Community 2.1 to 2.3Time and lack of disturbance allows for sagebrush to increase and become decadent. Long-term drought would reduce fine fuels and lead to a reduced fire frequency allowing big sagebrush to dominate the site. Inappropriate grazing management would reduce the perennial bunchgrass understory; conversely Sandberg bluegrass may increase in the understory depending on grazing management. Perennial forbs such as arrowleaf balsamroot may also increase in the understory.
Pathway 2.2a
Community 2.2 to 2.1Time and lack of disturbance and/or grazing management that favors the establishment and growth of sagebrush allows the shrub component to recover. The establishment of big sagebrush can take many years.
Pathway 2.3a
Community 2.3 to 2.2A change in grazing management that decreases shrubs would allow for the perennial bunchgrasses in the understory to increase. Heavy fall grazing may cause mechanical damage and subsequent death to sagebrush, facilitating an increase in the herbaceous understory. Brush treatments with minimal soil disturbance would also decrease sagebrush and release the perennial understory. Annual non-native species are present and may increase in the community.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2Trigger: This transition is caused by the introduction of non-native annual plants, such as cheatgrass, mustards and leafy spurge. Slow variables: Over time the annual and perennial non-native species will increase within the community, reducing organic matter inputs. Threshold: Any amount of introduced non-native species causes an immediate decrease in the resilience of the site. Annual and perennial non-native species cannot be easily removed from the system and have the potential to significantly alter disturbance regimes from their historic range of variation.
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Primary Perennial Grasses 342–918 mountain brome BRMA4 Bromus marginatus 180–360 – slender wheatgrass ELTR7 Elymus trachycaulus 90–270 – Idaho fescue FEID Festuca idahoensis 36–144 – Cusick's bluegrass POCU3 Poa cusickii 18–72 – 2 Secondary Perennial Grasses 90–270 Letterman's needlegrass ACLE9 Achnatherum lettermanii 9–90 – Columbia needlegrass ACNE9 Achnatherum nelsonii 9–90 – western needlegrass ACOC3 Achnatherum occidentale 9–90 – sedge CAREX Carex 9–90 – spike fescue LEKI2 Leucopoa kingii 9–90 – melicgrass MELIC Melica 9–90 – bluebunch wheatgrass PSSPS Pseudoroegneria spicata ssp. spicata 9–90 – Forb3 Perennial 180–360 sedge CAREX Carex 9–90 – yarrow ACHIL Achillea 9–54 – nettleleaf giant hyssop AGUR Agastache urticifolia 9–54 – balsamroot BALSA Balsamorhiza 9–54 – tapertip hawksbeard CRAC2 Crepis acuminata 9–54 – geranium GERAN Geranium 9–54 – helianthella HELIA Helianthella 9–54 – carrotleaf biscuitroot LODIM Lomatium dissectum var. multifidum 9–54 – lupine LUPIN Lupinus 9–54 – ragwort SENEC Senecio 9–54 – clover TRIFO Trifolium 9–54 – Shrub/Vine4 Primary Shrubs 162–774 mountain snowberry SYOR2 Symphoricarpos oreophilus 36–270 – mountain big sagebrush ARTRV Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana 90–270 – Utah serviceberry AMUT Amelanchier utahensis 36–144 – black chokecherry PRVIM Prunus virginiana var. melanocarpa 0–90 – yarrow ACHIL Achillea 9–54 – nettleleaf giant hyssop AGUR Agastache urticifolia 9–54 – balsamroot BALSA Balsamorhiza 9–54 – tapertip hawksbeard CRAC2 Crepis acuminata 9–54 – geranium GERAN Geranium 9–54 – helianthella HELIA Helianthella 9–54 – carrotleaf biscuitroot LODIM Lomatium dissectum var. multifidum 9–54 – lupine LUPIN Lupinus 9–54 – ragwort SENEC Senecio 9–54 – clover TRIFO Trifolium 9–54 – 5 Secondary Shrubs 90–270 quaking aspen POTR5 Populus tremuloides 9–54 – antelope bitterbrush PUTR2 Purshia tridentata 9–54 – elderberry SAMBU Sambucus 9–54 – Table 7. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 11. Community 2.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock/Wildlife Grazing Interpretations:
This site is suited to grazing by domestic livestock. Sheep will make good use of the shrub component on this site. Livestock water is usually adequate as this site occurs in mountainous areas where flowing streams and springs are common. Considerations for grazing management include timing, intensity and duration of grazing. Grazing management should be keyed to mountain brome, slender wheatgrass and other annual grass production. Attentive grazing management is required on steeper slopes due to high erosion potential.
Mountain brome furnishes an abundance of herbage that remains palatable and nutritious through the growing season. New plants are established from seed and grazing practices should allow for ample seed production and establishment. This species is ranked as excellent forage for both cattle and horses and good for domestic sheep, though domestic animals will graze mountain brome only when it is fairly succulent. Mountain brome increases with grazing (Leege et al. 1981). A study by Mueggler (1967) found that with clipping, mountain brome increased in herbage production when clipped in June. When clipped in July, mountain brome increased due to reduced competition from forb species. The study also found that after three successive years of clipping, however, mountain brome started to exhibit adverse effects.
Slender wheatgrass is a perennial bunchgrass that tends to be short-lived, though it spreads well by natural reseeding. It is widely used in restoration seedings (Monsen et al. 2004). It is palatable and nutritious for livestock. Slender wheatgrass tends to persist longer than other perennial grasses when subjected to heavy grazing (Monsen et al. 1996, Monsen et al. 2004).
Idaho fescue provides important forage for many types of domestic livestock as well as pronghorn and deer in ranges of northern Nevada. The foliage cures well and is preferred by livestock in the late fall and winter. Idaho fescue tolerates light to moderate grazing (Ganskopp and Bedell 1980) and is moderately resistant to trampling (Cole 1987). Heavy grazing may lead to replacement of Idaho fescue with non-native species such as cheatgrass (Mueggler 1984).
Nevada bluegrass is a widespread forage grass. It is one of the earliest grasses in the spring and is sought by domestic livestock and several wildlife species. Nevada bluegrass is a palatable species, but its production is closely tied to weather conditions. It produces little forage in drought years, making it a less dependable food source than other perennial bunchgrasses. Nevada bluegrass is preferred by both domestic livestock and wildlife during the spring and early summer, with reported crude protein levels of over 17% (Monson et al. 2004). Nevada bluegrass and Sandberg bluegrass are no longer differentiated taxonomically, however the grasses typically grow in different ecological niches; Nevada bluegrass prefers locations with greater soil moisture during the growing season. Nevada bluegrass exhibits the characteristic of early spring growth, however in locations with sufficient soil moisture the growing season may be extended allowing the plant to increase in stature.
Depending on soil moisture availability along with intensity, frequency and season of use, Nevada bluegrass may decrease under grazing pressure. Conversely, Sandberg bluegrass has been found to increase under grazing pressure due to its early dormancy and short stature (Tisdale and Hironaka 1981). Sandberg bluegrass increases under grazing pressure (Tisdale and Hironaka 1981) and is capable of co-existing with cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum). Excessive sheep grazing favors Sandberg bluegrass; however, where cattle are the dominant grazers, cheatgrass often dominates (Daubenmire 1970). Thus, depending on the season of use, the grazer and site conditions, either Sandberg bluegrass or cheatgrass may become the dominant understory with inappropriate grazing management.
Cusick's bluegrass makes up only a small proportion of the biomass of the sagebrush communities in which it lives, but it is often taken preferentially by cattle, especially early in the season.
Snowberry is readily eaten by all classes of livestock, particularly domestic sheep. It is frequently one of the first species to leaf out, making it a highly sought after food in the early spring.
Chokecherry is moderately palatable to all classes of livestock, although it is more heavily browsed by domestic sheep than by cattle. Because of its toxicity, poisoning sometimes occurs. Livestock normally do not eat fatal quantities except when other forage is scarce. Chokecherry provides important cover and habitat for livestock.
Serviceberry branches and leaves are consumed by both domestic livestock and wildlife, particularly in late winter and early spring. Serviceberry can tolerate moderate to heaving browsing when adequate precipitation is received.
Mountain big sagebrush is eaten by domestic livestock but has long been considered to be of low palatability, and a competitor to more desirable species.
Wildlife Interpretations:
Mountain big sagebrush is a highly preferred winter forage for mule deer: In a study by Personius et al. (1987), mountain big sagebrush was the most preferred sagebrush species. Fecal samples from ungulates in Montana showed that bighorn sheep, mule deer, and elk all consumed mountain big sagebrush in small amounts in winter, while cattle showed no sign of sagebrush use. Reliance on the big sagebrush ecosystem by many wild animals for both food and cover has been documented and reviewed extensively. Sagebrush-grassland communities provide critical sage-grouse breeding and nesting habitats. Meadows surrounded by sagebrush may be used as feeding and strutting grounds. Sagebrush is a crucial component of their diet year-round, and sage-grouse select sagebrush almost exclusively for cover. Sage-grouse prefer mountain big sagebrush and Wyoming big sagebrush communities to basin big sagebrush communities.
Deer, elk, and mountain goat utilize both Nevada and Cusick's bluegrass early in the season. The value of Cusick's bluegrass as cover for small animals has been rated as poor to fair.
Slender wheatgrass is grazed by sage grouse, deer, elk, moose, bighorn sheep, mountain goat, pronghorn, various rodents, and all classes of livestock. The seeds are eaten by various seed predators. Slender wheatgrass provides hiding and thermal cover for songbirds, upland game birds, waterfowl, and small mammals.
Serviceberry provides excellent forage for small animals and birds. Birds also utilize the shrub for nesting and cover.
Mountain brome seedheads and seeds also provide food for many birds and small mammals. Pronghorn antelope will consume mountain brome primarily in the spring. The palatability of mountain brome is excellent for deer, particularly during the late spring and early summer. Mountain brome is ranked as highly valuable as elk winter forage (Kufeld 1973).
Black chokecherry is preferred browse by game species such as mule deer, birds and small mammals which consume both fruits and leaves (Plummer et al. 1968) sometimes to the exclusion of other forages (Gullion 1964).
Hydrological functions
Rills and waterflow patterns are typically non-existent. Water flow patterns (of short length) may rarely be observed on steeper slopes in areas recently subjected to summer convection storms or rapid spring snowmelt. Gullies are non-existent in areas of this site that occur on stable landforms. Fine litter (foliage from grasses and annual and perennial forbs) is expected to move the distance of slope length during intense summer convection storms or rapid snowmelt events. Persistent litter (large woody material) will remain in place except during catastrophic events. Perennial herbaceous plants (especially deep-rooted bunchgrasses) slow runoff and increase infiltration. Shrub canopy and associated litter break raindrop impact and provide opportunity for snow catch and accumulation on site.
Recreational uses
Aesthetic value is derived from the diverse floral and faunal composition and the colorful flowering of wild flowers and shrubs during the spring and early summer. Steeper slopes inhibit many forms of recreation. This site offers rewarding opportunities to photographers and for the nature study. There is potential for deer and upland game hunting.
Wood products
Although aspen is associated with this site, it is too sparse to furnish harvestable wood products.
Other products
Native peoples used big sagebrush leaves and branches for medicinal teas, and the leaves as a fumigant. Bark was woven into mats, bags and clothing. Utah serviceberry fruits were used by Native Americans and early European explorers in North America for food and medicine. Indigenous peoples gathered chokecherries and used them to make pemmican and treat cold sores. The Paiutes made a medicinal tea from the leaves and twigs to treat colds and rheumatism. Mountain brome is an excellent native bunchgrass for seeding alone or in mixtures in disturbed areas, including depleted rangelands, burned areas, roadways, mined lands, and degraded riparian zones.
Other information
Mountain snowberry is useful for establishing cover on bare sites and has done well when planted onto roadbanks. Mountain big sagebrush is easily propagated from seed under greenhouse, nursery, and common garden conditions and has been successfully seeded directly into field sites. Utah serviceberry has been used to revegetate big game winter range and for surface stabilization. It grows slowly from seed and therefore transplanting may be more successful than seeding for revegetation projects. Chokecherry has been selected as a revegetation species for wildlife habitat, shelterbelts, mine spoils and soil stabilization. Slender wheatgrass is widely used for revegetating disturbed lands. Slender wheatgrass is a short-lived perennial with good seedling vigor. It germinates and establishes quickly when seeded making it a good choice for quick cover on disturbed sites. It persists long enough for other, slower developing species to establish. It is especially valuable for use in saline soils. It has been used for rehabilitating mine spoils, livestock ranges, and wildlife habitat and watershed areas.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Soils and Physiographic features were gathered from NASIS.
Type locality
Location 1: Elko County, NV Township/Range/Section T37N R51E S17 General legal description Approximately 2 miles north of Beaver Creek, Tuscarora Mountains, Elko County, Nevada. This site also occurs in Humboldt County, Nevada. Other references
Akinsoji, A. 1988. Postfire vegetation dynamics in a sagebrush steppe in southeastern Idaho, USA. Vegetatio 78:151-155.
Bates, J. D., T. Svejcar, R. F. Miller, and R. A. Angell. 2006. The effects of precipitation timing on sagebrush steppe vegetation. Journal of Arid Environments 64: 670-697
.
Bentz, B., D. Alston, and T. Evans. 2008. Great Basin insect outbreaks. In: J. Chambers, N. Devoe, A. Evenden [eds]. Collaborative management and research in the Great Basin - Examining the issues and developing a framework for action Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-204. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. p. 45-48
Blaisdell, J.P. 1953. Ecological effects of planned burning of sagebrush-grass range on the Upper Snake River Plains. Tech. Bull. 1975. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 39 p.
Blaisdell, J.P. R.B. Murray, and E.D. McArthur. 1982. Managing intermountain rangelands - sagebrush-grass ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-134. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 41 p.
Bradley, A. F., N. V. Noste, and W. C. Fischer. 1992. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-287: Fire Ecology of forest and woodlands in Utah. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.
Bunting, S.C., B.M. Kilgore, and C.L. Bushey. 1987. Guidelines for prescribed burning sagebrush-grass rangelands in the northern Great Basin. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-231. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 33 p.
Burkhardt, J. W. and E. W. Tisdale. 1969. Nature and successional status of western juniper vegetation in Idaho. Journal of Range Management 22: 264-270.
Caudle, D., J. DiBenedetto, M. Karl, H. Sanchez, and C. Talbot. 2013. Interagency Ecological Site Handbook for Rangelands. Available at: http://jornada.nmsu.edu/sites/jornada.nmsu.edu/files/InteragencyEcolSiteHandbook.pdf. Accessed 4 October 2013.
Chambers, J., B. Bradley, C. Brown, C. D’Antonio, M. Germino, J. Grace, S. Hardegree, R. Miller, and D. Pyke. 2013. Resilience to stress and disturbance, and resistance to Bromus tectorum L. invasion in cold desert shrublands of western North America. Ecosystems 17: 1-16.
Chambers, J. C., B. A. Roundy, R. R. Blank, S. E. Meyer, and A. Whittaker. 2007. What makes Great Basin sagebrush ecosystems invasible by Bromus tectorum? Ecological Monographs 77:117-145.
Comstock, J. P. and J. R. Ehleringer. 1992. Plant adaptation in the Great Basin and Colorado Plateau. Western North American Naturalist 52: 195-215.
Conrad, E. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated ecosystems of Southern California. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 87 p.
Cook, J. G., T. J. Hershey, and L. L. Irwin. 1994. Vegetative response to burning on Wyoming mountain-shrub big game ranges. Journal of Range Management 47: 296-302.
Daubenmire, R. 1970. Steppe vegetation of Washington. Technical Bulletin 62. Washington State University, College of Agriculture, Washington Agriculture Experiment Station, Pullman, WA.
Dayton, W. A., et al. 1937. Range Plant Handbook. U.S. Govt. Printing Off., Washington, D.C. See G33, G4p.
Dobrowolski, J. P., M. M. Caldwell, and J. H. Richards. 1990. Basin hydrology and plant root systems. In: C. B. Osmand, L. F. Pitelka, G. M. Hildy [eds]. Plant biology of the basin and range. Ecological Studies. 80: 243-292.
Frischknecht, N. C. and A. P. Plummer. 1955. A comparison of seeded grasses under grazing and protection on a mountain brush burn. Journal of Range Management 8: 170-175.
Furniss, M. M. and W. F. Barr. 1975. Insects affecting important native shrubs of the northwestern Affecting United States. General Technical Report INT-19. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Ogden, UT. p. 68.
Fire Effects Information System (online http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis)
Guillon, G. W. 1964. Wildlife uses of Nevada plants. Contributions toward a flora of Nevada No. 49. National Arboretum Crops Research Division. Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Plant Industry Station. 170 p.
Hallsten, G.P., Q.D. Skinner, A.A. Beetle. 1987. Grasses of Wyoming. 3d ed. Laramie: University of Wyoming, Agricultural Experiement Station. 432 p.
Houghton, J.G., C.M. Sakamoto, and R.O. Gifford. 1975. Nevada’s weather and climate, special publication 2. Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, Mackay School of Mines, University of Nevada, Reno, NV.
Houston, K. E., W. J. Hartung, and C. J. Hartung. 2001. A field guide for forest indicator plants, sensitive plants, and noxious weeds of the Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-84. Page 184. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.
Houston, D. B. 1973. Wildfires in Northern Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 54:1111-1117.
Jensen, M. E. 1990. Interpretation of environmental gradients which influence sagebrush community distribution in northeastern Nevada. Journal of Range Management 43: 161-167.
Kasworm, W. F., L. R. Irby, and H. B. I. Pac. 1984. Diets of ungulates using winter ranges in northcentral Montana. Journal of Range Management 37: 67-71.
Kuenzi, A. M., P. Z. Fulé, and C. H. Sieg. 2008. Effects of fire severity and pre-fire stand treatment on plant community recovery after a large wildfire. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 855-865.
Kufeld, R. C. 1973. Foods eaten by the Rocky Mountain elk. Journal of Range Management 26: 106-113.
Kuntz, D.E. 1982. Plant response following spring burning in an Artemisia tridentata subsp. vaseyana/Festuca idahoensis habitat type. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho. 73 p. Thesis.
Leege, T. A., D. J. Herman, and B. Zamora. 1981. Effects of cattle grazing on mountain meadows in Idaho. Journal of Range Management 34: 324-328.
Lett, M. S., and A. K. Knapp. 2005. Woody plant encroachment and removal is mesic grassland: Production and composition responses of herbaceous vegetation. American Midland Naturalist 153: 217-231.
Miller, R. F. and E. K. Heyerdahl. 2008. Fine-scale variation of historical fire regimes in sagebrush-steppe and juniper woodland: An example from California, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17: 245-254.
Miller, R. F. and R. J. Tausch. 2000. The role of fire in juniper and pinyon woodlands: A descriptive analysis. Pages p. 15-30 in Proceedings of the invasive species workshop: The role of fire in the control and spread of invasive species. Tallahassee, Florida.
Monsen, S. B., R. Stevens, S. C. Walker, and N. E. West. 1996. The competitive influence of seeded smooth brome (Bromus inermis) and intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyron intermedium) within aspen-mountain brush communities of central Utah. In: Rangelands in a sustainable biosphere: Proceedings of the fifth international rangeland congress, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 23-28 July, 1995. Volume 1.
Monsen, S. B., R. Stevens, and N. L. Shaw. 2004. Grasses. Pp. 295-424 In: S.B. Monsen, R. Stevens [eds.] Restoring western ranges and wildlands, vol. 2. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-136-vol-2. USDA: Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
Mueggler, W. F. 1967. Response of mountain grassland vegetation to clipping in southwestern Montana. Ecology 48: 942-949.
Mueggler, W. F. 1988. Aspen community types of the intermountain region. Page 135. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.
Neuenschwander, L.F. 1980. Broadcast burning of sagebrush in the winter. Journal of Range
Management (33)3: 233-236.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2004. The North American Monsoon. Reports to the Nation. National Weather Service, Climate Prediction Center. Available online: http://www.weather.gov/
Nimir, M. B. and G. F. Payne. 1978. Effects of spring burning on a mountain range. Journal of Range Management 31:259-263.
Noste, N.V. and C.L. Bushey. 1987. Fire response of shrubs of dry forest habitat types in Montana and Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-239. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,Intermountain Research Station. 22 p.
Plummer, A., D. R., Christensen and S. B. Monsen. 1968. Restoring big game range in Utah. Publication No. 68-3. Utah Division of Fish and Game. Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Funds. 183 p.
Richards, J. H. and M. M. Caldwell. 1987. Hydraulic Lift: Substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Artemisia tridentata roots. Oecologia 73:486-489.
Sheehy, D. P. and A. Winward. 1981. Relative Palatability of seven Artemisia taxa to mule deer and sheep. Journal of Range Management: 397-399.
Smith, J. K. and W. C. Fischer. 1997. Fire ecology of the forest habitat types of northern Idaho. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
Spence, L. E. 1937. Root studies of important range plants of the Boise river watershed. Journal of Forestry 35: 747-754.
Tilley, D. J., D. Ogle, L. St. John, L. Holzworth, W. Crowder, and M. Majerus. 2004. Mountain Brome. USDA NRCS Plant Guide. USDA NRCS Plant Materials Center. USDA NRCS Idaho State Office, Idaho. p. 5.
Tilley, D., Ogle, D., and L. St. John. 2011. Plant Guide for Slender Wheatgrass (Elymus trachycaulus ssp. trachycaulus). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Idaho Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, ID.
Tisdale, E. W. and M. Hironaka. 1981. The sagebrush-grass region: A review of the ecological literature. University of Idaho, Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station.
USDA-NRCS Plants Database (online http://plants.usda.gov/)
Wright, H.A. 1971. Why quirreltail is more tolerant to burning than needle-and-thread. Journal of Range Management 24: 277-284.
Wright, H. A., and A. W. Bailey. 1982. Fire ecology: United States and southern Canada. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA. 301p.
Wright, H.A.; Klemmedson, J.O. 1965. Effect of fire on bunchgrasses of the sagebrush-grass region in southern Idaho. Ecology 46:680-688.
Young, R.P. 1983. Fire as a vegetation management tool in rangelands of the intermountain region. In: Monsen, S.B. and N. Shaw (compilers). Managing intermountain rangelands - Improvement of range and wildlife habitats: Proceedings; 1981 September 15-17; Twin Falls, ID; 1982 June 22-24; Elko, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: Pgs 18-31.
Ziegenhagen, L. L. 2003. Shrub reestablishment following fire in the mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. vaseyana (Rydb.) Beetle) alliance. Thesis. Oregon State University.
Ziegenhagen, L. L. and R. F. Miller. 2009. Postfire recovery of two shrubs in the interiors of large burns in the intermountain west, USA. Western North American Naturalist 69: 195-205.Contributors
RK/GKB
T. Stringham
P NovakEchenique
Trevor CrandallApproval
Kendra Moseley, 4/24/2024
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) GK BRACKLEY Contact for lead author State Rangeland Management Specialist Date 06/22/2006 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rills are typically non-existent. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water flow patterns are typically non-existent. Water flow patterns (of short length) may rarely be observed on steeper slopes in areas recently subjected to summer convection storms or rapid spring snowmelt. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Pedestals are none to rare. Occurrence is limited to areas of water flow patterns. Frost heaving of shallow rooted plants should not be considered a "normal" condition. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare Ground ± 25%; surface rock fragments ±25%; shrub canopy 15 to 25%; foliar cover of perennial herbaceous plants ± 40%. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine litter (foliage from grasses and annual & perennial forbs) is expected to move the distance of slope length during intense summer convection storms or rapid snowmelt events. Persistent litter (large woody material) will remain in place except during large rainfall events. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil stability values should be 3 to 6 on most soil textures found on this site. (To be field tested.) -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Surface structure is typically thin to thick platy, subangular blocky or massive. Soil surface colors are dark and the soils are typified by a thick mollic epipedon. Organic matter of the surface 2 to 4 inches is typically more than 3.5 percent. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Perennial herbaceous plants (especially deep-rooted bunchgrasses [i.e., Idaho fescue & bluebunch wheatgrass] slow runoff and increase infiltration. Shrub canopy and associated litter break raindrop impact and provide opportunity for snow catch and accumulation on site. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Compacted layers are not typical. Platy or massive sub-surface horizons, subsoil argillic horizons or hardpans shallow to the surface are not to be interpreted as compacted. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Reference Plant Community: Deep-rooted, cool season, perennial bunchgrasses = tall shrubs (mountain big sagebrush & mixed mountain browse species). (By above ground production)Sub-dominant:
Deep-rooted, cool season, perennial forbs > shallow-rooted, cool season, perennial grasses and grass-like plants = fibrous, shallow-rooted, cool season, perennial and annual forbs. (By above ground production)Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Dead branches within individual shrubs are common. Standing-dead shrub canopy material ± 10% of total woody canopy; some of the mature bunchgrasses (<10%) have dead centers. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Between plant interspaces (± 35%) and litter depth is ± ½ inch. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
For normal or average growing season (through mid-June) ± 1800 lbs/ac; Spring moisture significantly affects total production. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Potential invaders include cheatgrass, annual mustards, and knapweeds. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All functional groups should reproduce in average (or normal) and above average growing season years.
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
