Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R023XY666OR
STIPA FESCUE PLAINS
8-10 PZ
Last updated: 4/10/2025
Accessed: 04/20/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Ecological site concept
Currently there is only a draft of the initial concept for this ecological site. The initial concept for this site places it within the Ashy or Loamy Skeletal Mod Deep 10-20 PZ High-Resilience Mountain Big Sagebrush and Idaho Fescue Ecological Site Group. To view the General STM and other information available for this ESG please go to https://edit.jornada.nmsu.edu/catalogs/esg/023X/R023XY906NV
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This site occurs on Hills and Tablelands at elevations from 4300 to 4800 feet with slopes from 0-5%.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Tableland > Lava plain
(2) Hills > Lava plain
Elevation 4300 – 4800 ft Slope 0 – 5 % Climatic features
This site is characterized by hot dry summers and cold wet (rain or snow) winters. This site
receives between 8-10 inches of precipitation annually, averaging 9. 7 inches.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 10 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 30 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 10 in Frost-free period (actual range) 10 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 30 days Precipitation total (actual range) 10 in Frost-free period (average) 10 days Freeze-free period (average) 30 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) BROTHERS [USC00351067], Brothers, OR
">Influencing water features
No water features are associated with this site.
Soil features
The soils of this site are mod deep, well drained to excessively well drained with a loamy fine sand texture . They are formed from eolian sand over residuum. Permeability is moderately rapid.
Soils correlated to this site are Wegert.Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Eolian sands
(2) Residuum – basalt
Surface texture (1) Loamy fine sand
Drainage class Well drained to somewhat excessively drained Permeability class Moderately rapid Depth to restrictive layer 22 – 28 in Ecological dynamics
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Community 1.1
HCPCThis site is dominated by Mountain big sagebrush with 10% cover and an understory of perennial grasses with 40% needle-and-thread and 15% Idaho fescue.
State 2
At Risk StateMountain big sagebrush dominates site with 10% cover. Squirreltail becomes dominant and displaces Idaho fescue. Needle-and-thread remains but has dropped to
Characteristics and indicators. FEID has decreased and been replaced by ELEL4
State 3
Disturbed Undesirable Grass StateThis site has mountain big sagebrush with 10% cover. Desirable perennial grasses have been replaced by bottlebrush squirreltail
Transition T1
State 1 to 2Improper levels of grazing cause a decrease in desired perennial grasses.
Restoration pathway R1
State 2 to 1Transition T
State 2 to 3Additional community tables
Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Supporting information
Contributors
Kyle Hansen
Approval
Kendra Moseley, 4/10/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 04/20/2026 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement