Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
R023XY212OR LOAMY 10-12 PZ
Loamy 10-12" PZ
R023XY216OR CLAYPAN 12-16 PZ
Claypan 12-16" PZ
R023XY301OR DROUGHTY SOUTH SLOPES 11-13 PZ
South Slopes 11-13" PZ
R023XY318OR LOAMY 12-16 PZ
Loamy 12-16" PZ
Similar sites
R023XY212OR LOAMY 10-12 PZ
Loamy 10-12" PZ (lower production, different composition)
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub (1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata
(2) Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyanaHerbaceous (1) Festuca idahoensis
(2) Achnatherum thurberianumPhysiographic features
This site occurs on plateaus and tablelands. Slopes range from 2 to 30%. Elevations range from 4200 to 5500 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Plateau
(2) Hill
(3) Alluvial fan
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 4200 – 5500 ft Slope 2 – 30 % Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The annual precipitation ranges from11 to 13 inches, most of which occurs in the form of snow during the months of December through March. Localized convectioin torms occasionally occur during the summer. The soil temperature regime is frigid with a mean annaul air temperature of 47 degrees F. Temperature extremes range from 100 to -30 degrees F. The frost free period for native plants is from mid-April through June.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 80 days Freeze-free period (average) 0 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils of this site are shallow or moderately deep to a duripan and/or bedrock. The soils have a dark colored medium textured surface 10 to 20 inches thick. The subsoil and/or substratum is typically medium to fine textured and free of coarse fragments. Permeabilty is moderate. The available water holding capacity (AWC) is about 2 to 5 inches for the profile. The potential for wind or water erosion is moderate.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Colluvium – basalt
(2) Residuum – andesite
Surface texture (1) Cobbly very fine sandy loam
(2) Cobbly loam
(3) Loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Well drained Permeability class Moderate to moderately slow Soil depth 16 – 40 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 – 25 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 – 16 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)1.5 – 4.8 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)Not specified Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 2 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)0 – 2 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.6 – 7.8 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 18 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 15 % Ecological dynamics
Range in Characteristics:
The reference native plant community is dominated by Idaho fescue and Thurber's needlegrass. Basin big sagebrush is prominent. Bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass are common. The vegetative composition of the community is approximately 85 percent grasses, 5 percent forbs, and 10 percent shrubs.
Variability in plant composition and production results from variation in soil depth, depth to a clay subsoil. and the percent clay in the subsoil. Idaho fescue, basin big sagebrush and production will increase as the soil depth and/or depth to a heavy clay subsoil increases. Thurber's needlegrass increases on a gravelly surface. Production decreases and Wyoming big sagebrush increases as the soil becomes shallower and at the lower end of the precipitation range.
Five states have been identified for this site: a reference state; a state with the presence of annuals; a state that has juniper dominating site resources; a state that is juniper dominant; and a state with annual dominance.
Reference State: Plant community phase change is driven by fire. Mountain and basin big sagebrush declines after fire while Idaho fescue, Thurber’s needlegrass and other grasses increase. May see a temporary increase in rabbitbrush after fire. Time facilitates the reintroduction of sagebrush. The introduction of invasive annual grasses and forbs transitions into state 2.
State 2: Compositionally similar to the reference state with a trace of cheatgrass and annual weeds. Ecological function has not changed, however the resiliency of the state has been reduced by the presence of invasive weeds. Prescribed grazing maintains state dynamics. Mismanagement of grazing favors sagebrush and Sandberg bluegrass. Cheatgrass increases. Prescribed grazing can reverse the trend. Reduction in fire frequency facilitates juniper encroachment in both poor and good condition communities. Fire reduces or eliminates juniper and with time sagebrush reestablishes. Juniper can out-compete sagebrush and the herbaceous plant community which brings the site to state 3.
State 3: Juniper dominates site resources. Sagebrush is dead or dying and bitterbrush lacks vigor. Sandberg bluegrass is the dominant species in the interspace and bare ground is significant. The perennial grass component is significantly reduced in both density and productivity. Idaho fescue may be present under the canopy of trees (north slope typically). Spatial and temporal energy capture and nutrient cycling has been truncated. Infiltration may be reduced due to lack of ground cover. Juniper woodland development is complete and soil loss and erosion drive site processes as the site goes into state 4.
State 4: Juniper dominated state. Soil loss is evident and erosion is active. All ecological processes, hydrologic cycle, nutrient cycle and energy capture have been significantly changed preventing the establishment of perennial plants. An abiotic threshold has been crossed. With catastrophic wildfire, state 5 is achieved.
State 5: Cheatgrass dominated plant community with limited to no shrub or perennial grass component. Soil erosion and redistribution along with changes in dynamic soil properties affect the hydrologic cycle and thus the nutrient cycle. Harsh environmental factors increase state resiliency to change.
Response to Disturbance:
If the condition of the site deteriorates as a result of overgrazing, Idaho fescue and other bunchgrasses will decrease while basin big sagebrush, bottle brush squirreltail and Sandberg bluegrass will increase. Idaho fescue is the preferred species during all seasons. With further deterioration, annuals will invade and bareground will markedly increase. Excessive erosion in the bare soil interspaces reduces the site productivity and contributes to downstream sedimentation.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 5 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference StateCommunity 1.1
Reference Plant CommunityThe potential native plant community is dominated by Idaho fescue and Thurbers needle grass. Basin big sagebrush is prominent. Bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass are common. The vegtative composition of the community is approximatley 85% grass, 5% forbs and 10% shrubs.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 595 765 935 Shrub/Vine 70 90 110 Forb 35 45 55 Total 700 900 1100 Community 1.2
Grass Dominated Plant CommunityThe potential native plant community is dominated by Idaho fescue and Thurber's needle grass. Bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass are common. The vegetative composition of the community is approximatley 93% grass, 5% forbs and 2% shrubs.
Figure 5. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 6. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 595 765 935 Shrub/Vine 70 90 110 Forb 35 45 55 Total 700 900 1100 Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2Basin big sagebrush declines after fire while Idaho fescue, Thurber’s needlegrass and other grasses increase.
Conservation practices
Prescribed Burning Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1Time facilitates the reintroduction of sagebrush.
State 2
Shrub - Steppe with AnnualsCompositionally similar to the reference state with a trace of cheatgrass and the annual weeds. Ecological function has not changed, however the resiliency of the state has been reduced by the presence of invasive weeds. Prescribed grazing maintains state dynamics. Overgrazing grazing (CP1) favors sagebrush and Sandberg’s bluegrass. Cheatgrass increases. Prescribed grazing can reverse the trend (CP2). Reduction in fire frequency facilitates juniper encroachment in both poor and good condition communities (CP3). Fire reduces or eliminates juniper and with time sagebrush reestablishes (CP4).
Community 2.1
Shrub Steppe Community with AnnualsThe plant community is dominated by Idaho fescue and Thurbers needle grass. Annual grasses and forbs are present. Basin big sagebrush is prominent. Bluebunch wheatgrass and Sandberg bluegrass are common. The vegtative composition of the community is approximatley 85% grass, 5% forbs and 10% shrubs.
Figure 6. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 7. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 595 765 935 Shrub/Vine 70 90 110 Forb 35 45 55 Total 700 900 1100 Community 2.2
Sagebrush DominantCommunity 2.3
Juniper over SagebrushIncreased time since fire allows western juniper to grow above the sagebrush. Sandberg bluegrass increases. Sagebrush and moderate-rooted bunchgrasses decrease.
Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2Overgrazing grazing favors sagebrush and Sandberg bluegrass. Cheatgrass increases.
Pathway 2.1B
Community 2.1 to 2.3Reduction in fire frequency facilitates juniper encroachment.
Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1Prescribed grazing can increase the herbaceous plant community and reduce the sagebrush dominance.
Conservation practices
Prescribed Grazing Pathway 2.2B
Community 2.2 to 2.3Reduction in fire frequency facilitates juniper encroachment.
Pathway 2.3A
Community 2.3 to 2.1Fire reduces or eliminates juniper and with time sagebrush reestablishes.
Conservation practices
Prescribed Burning State 3
Juniper DominantJuniper dominates site resources. Sagebrush is dead or dying and bitterbrush lacks vigor. Sandberg’s bluegrass is the dominant species in the interspace and bare ground is significant. The perennial grass component is significantly reduced in both density and productivity. Idaho fescue may be present under the canopy of trees (north slope typically). Spatial and temporal energy capture and nutrient cycling has been truncated. Infiltration may be reduced due to lack of ground cover.
Community 3.1
Juniper Dominated CommunityState 4
Juniper Dominant ErodedJuniper dominated state. Soil loss is evident and erosion is active. All ecological processes, hydrologic cycle, nutrient cycle and energy capture have been significantly changed preventing the establishment of perennial plants. An abiotic threshold has been crossed.
Community 4.1
Juniper-Sandberg-CheatgrassState 5
CheatgrassCheatgrass dominated plant community with limited to no shrub or perennial grass component. Soil erosion and redistribution along with changes in dynamic soil properties affect the hydrologic cycle and thus the nutrient cycle. Harsh environmental factors increase state resiliency to change.
Community 5.1
Cheatgrass dominantTransition T1A
State 1 to 2Introduction of annual weeds.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3Increased time since fire allows western juniper to dominate the site.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 2Rehabilitation involves mechanical and/or prescribed fire to remove juniper. Herbicide treatment of cheatgrass may be necessary. Seeding of desired species may be needed.
Conservation practices
Brush Management Prescribed Burning Range Planting Transition T3A
State 3 to 4Soil erosion decreases site production and changes plant composition.
Transition T3B
State 3 to 5Catastrophic wildfire causes annual grasses to dominate the site. This is mainly a problem on the warmer areas of this site. The frigid soil temperatures limit the ability of annual grasses to maintain dominance.
Transition T4A
State 4 to 5Catastrophic wildfire allows annual grasses to dominate the site. This is mainly a problem on the warmer areas of this site. The frigid soil temperatures limit the ability of annual grasses to maintain dominance.
Additional community tables
Table 8. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Perennial, bunch grass, deep-rooted 270–360 Idaho fescue FEID Festuca idahoensis 270–360 – 2 Perennial, bunch grass, moderately deep-rooted 180–270 Thurber's needlegrass ACTH7 Achnatherum thurberianum 180–270 – 3 Perennial, bunch grass, deep-rooted 90–180 bluebunch wheatgrass PSSPS Pseudoroegneria spicata ssp. spicata 90–180 – 4 Perennial, tall bunch grass, deep-rooted 18–45 basin wildrye LECI4 Leymus cinereus 18–45 – 5 Perennial, bunch grass, shallow-rooted 18–45 Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 18–45 – 6 Perennial 18–90 Indian ricegrass ACHY Achnatherum hymenoides 0–18 – Ross' sedge CARO5 Carex rossii 0–18 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 0–18 – prairie Junegrass KOMA Koeleria macrantha 0–18 – Cusick's bluegrass POCU3 Poa cusickii 0–18 – Forb10 Perennial 9–18 buckwheat ERIOG Eriogonum 9–18 – 11 Perennial 9–18 milkvetch ASTRA Astragalus 9–18 – 12 Perennial 9–18 lupine LUPIN Lupinus 9–18 – 13 Perennial, all 9–45 common yarrow ACMI2 Achillea millefolium 0–9 – agoseris AGOSE Agoseris 0–9 – onion ALLIU Allium 0–9 – pussytoes ANTEN Antennaria 0–9 – arrowleaf balsamroot BASA3 Balsamorhiza sagittata 0–9 – tapertip hawksbeard CRAC2 Crepis acuminata 0–9 – larkspur DELPH Delphinium 0–9 – fleabane ERIGE2 Erigeron 0–9 – Lava aster IOAL Ionactis alpina 0–9 – granite prickly phlox LIPU11 Linanthus pungens 0–9 – stoneseed LITHO3 Lithospermum 0–9 – desertparsley LOMAT Lomatium 0–9 – phacelia PHACE Phacelia 0–9 – phlox PHLOX Phlox 0–9 – ragwort SENEC Senecio 0–9 – deathcamas ZIGAD Zigadenus 0–9 – Shrub/Vine15 Evergreen 45–135 basin big sagebrush ARTRT Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata 45–90 – mountain big sagebrush ARTRV Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana 18–45 – 16 Deciduous 0–18 antelope bitterbrush PUTR2 Purshia tridentata 0–18 – 17 Evergreen 0–18 Wyoming big sagebrush ARTRW8 Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis 0–9 – yellow rabbitbrush CHVI8 Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus 0–9 – Tree20 Evergreen 0–9 western juniper JUOC Juniperus occidentalis 0–9 – Table 9. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Perennial, bunch grass, deep-rooted 270–360 Idaho fescue FEID Festuca idahoensis 270–360 – 2 Perennial, bunch grass, moderately deep-rooted 180–270 Thurber's needlegrass ACTH7 Achnatherum thurberianum 180–270 – 3 Perennial, bunch grass, deep-rooted 90–180 bluebunch wheatgrass PSSPS Pseudoroegneria spicata ssp. spicata 90–180 – 4 Perennial, tall bunch grass, deep-rooted 18–45 basin wildrye LECI4 Leymus cinereus 18–45 – 5 Perennial, bunch grass, shallow-rooted 18–45 Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 18–45 – 6 Perennial 18–90 Indian ricegrass ACHY Achnatherum hymenoides 0–18 – Ross' sedge CARO5 Carex rossii 0–18 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 0–18 – prairie Junegrass KOMA Koeleria macrantha 0–18 – Cusick's bluegrass POCU3 Poa cusickii 0–18 – Forb10 Perennial 9–18 buckwheat ERIOG Eriogonum 9–18 – 11 Perennial 9–18 milkvetch ASTRA Astragalus 9–18 – 12 Perennial 9–18 lupine LUPIN Lupinus 9–18 – 13 Perennial, all 9–45 common yarrow ACMI2 Achillea millefolium 0–9 – agoseris AGOSE Agoseris 0–9 – onion ALLIU Allium 0–9 – pussytoes ANTEN Antennaria 0–9 – arrowleaf balsamroot BASA3 Balsamorhiza sagittata 0–9 – tapertip hawksbeard CRAC2 Crepis acuminata 0–9 – larkspur DELPH Delphinium 0–9 – fleabane ERIGE2 Erigeron 0–9 – Lava aster IOAL Ionactis alpina 0–9 – granite prickly phlox LIPU11 Linanthus pungens 0–9 – stoneseed LITHO3 Lithospermum 0–9 – desertparsley LOMAT Lomatium 0–9 – phacelia PHACE Phacelia 0–9 – phlox PHLOX Phlox 0–9 – ragwort SENEC Senecio 0–9 – deathcamas ZIGAD Zigadenus 0–9 – Shrub/Vine15 Evergreen 0–36 basin big sagebrush ARTRT Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata 0–18 – mountain big sagebrush ARTRV Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana 0–18 – 16 Deciduous 0–18 antelope bitterbrush PUTR2 Purshia tridentata 0–18 – 17 Evergreen 10–20 yellow rabbitbrush CHVI8 Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus 10–20 – Wyoming big sagebrush ARTRW8 Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis 0–9 – Tree20 Evergreen 0–9 western juniper JUOC Juniperus occidentalis 0–9 – Table 10. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Perennial, bunch grass, deep-rooted 180–270 Idaho fescue FEID Festuca idahoensis 180–270 – 2 Perennial, bunch grass, moderately deep-rooted 90–180 Thurber's needlegrass ACTH7 Achnatherum thurberianum 90–180 – 3 Perennial, bunch grass, deep-rooted 90–180 bluebunch wheatgrass PSSPS Pseudoroegneria spicata ssp. spicata 90–180 – 4 Perennial, tall bunch grass, deep-rooted 18–45 basin wildrye LECI4 Leymus cinereus 18–45 – 5 Perennial, bunch grass, shallow-rooted 18–45 Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 18–45 – 6 Perennial 18–90 Indian ricegrass ACHY Achnatherum hymenoides 0–18 – Ross' sedge CARO5 Carex rossii 0–18 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 0–18 – prairie Junegrass KOMA Koeleria macrantha 0–18 – Cusick's bluegrass POCU3 Poa cusickii 0–18 – 7 Annual Grasses 90–180 cheatgrass BRTE Bromus tectorum 90–180 – Forb10 Perennial 9–18 buckwheat ERIOG Eriogonum 9–18 – 11 Perennial 9–18 milkvetch ASTRA Astragalus 9–18 – 12 Perennial 9–18 lupine LUPIN Lupinus 9–18 – 13 Perennial, all 9–45 common yarrow ACMI2 Achillea millefolium 0–9 – agoseris AGOSE Agoseris 0–9 – onion ALLIU Allium 0–9 – pussytoes ANTEN Antennaria 0–9 – arrowleaf balsamroot BASA3 Balsamorhiza sagittata 0–9 – tapertip hawksbeard CRAC2 Crepis acuminata 0–9 – larkspur DELPH Delphinium 0–9 – fleabane ERIGE2 Erigeron 0–9 – Lava aster IOAL Ionactis alpina 0–9 – granite prickly phlox LIPU11 Linanthus pungens 0–9 – stoneseed LITHO3 Lithospermum 0–9 – desertparsley LOMAT Lomatium 0–9 – phacelia PHACE Phacelia 0–9 – phlox PHLOX Phlox 0–9 – ragwort SENEC Senecio 0–9 – deathcamas ZIGAD Zigadenus 0–9 – Shrub/Vine15 Evergreen 45–135 basin big sagebrush ARTRT Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata 45–90 – mountain big sagebrush ARTRV Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana 18–45 – 16 Deciduous 0–18 antelope bitterbrush PUTR2 Purshia tridentata 0–18 – 17 Evergreen 0–18 Wyoming big sagebrush ARTRW8 Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis 0–9 – yellow rabbitbrush CHVI8 Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus 0–9 – Tree20 Evergreen 0–9 western juniper JUOC Juniperus occidentalis 0–9 – Table 11. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 12. Community 2.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 13. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 14. Community 4.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 15. Community 5.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock Grazing:
This site is suitable for use by cattle, sheep and hroses in late spring, summer and fall under a planned grazing system. Use should be postponed until the soils are firm enough to avoid trampling damageand soil compaction.
Wildlife:
This stie will offer food and cover for antelope, mule deer, rodents and a variety of birds. It is important wintering area for antelope and mule deer.
Native Wildlife Associatied With The Potentail Climax Community:
Deer, Antelope, Hawks, Songbirds, and Rodents.Hydrological functions
The soils of this site have moderatly high runoff potentail. The hydrologic soil group is C.
Supporting information
Contributors
BG
Bob Gillaspy
Justin Gredvig
SCS/BLM ESI Team, Hines, ORRangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Jeff Repp, Bruce Franssen Contact for lead author State Rangeland Management Specialist Date 01/01/2004 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None -
Presence of water flow patterns:
None -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
5 - 15% -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine - limited movement -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Moderately resistant to erosion: aggregate stability = 3-5 -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
weak fine granular structure to weak thin platy structure, 6-10 inches thick; Low OM (1-2%) -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Significant ground cover (60-80%) and gentle to moderate slopes (2-15%) effectively limit rainfall impact and overland flow -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Perennial, deep-rooted bunchgrasses >> perennial, shallow to moderately deep-rooted bunchgrassesSub-dominant:
Evergreen shrubsOther:
Perennial forbsAdditional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Normal decadence and mortality expected -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
900 lbs/acre -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Western Juniper readily invades the site. Cheatgrass and Medusahead invade sites that have lost deep rooted perennial grass functional groups -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species should be capable of reproducing annually
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
