Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
R023XY115OR WET MARSH
Wet Marsh
R023XY117OR BASIN WET MEADOW
Basin Wet Meadow
R023XY118OR BASIN DRY MEADOW
Basin Dry Meadow
Similar sites
R023XY115OR WET MARSH
Wet Marsh (ponding depth and duration longer)
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous (1) Typha
Physiographic features
This site occurs in basins and valley on the floodplains of perennial and drainage systems. Slopes range from 0 to 1 percent. Elevation varies from 4000 to 4500 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Flood plain
(2) Basin floor
(3) Valley floor
Ponding frequency Frequent Elevation 4000 – 4500 ft Slope 0 – 1 % Ponding depth 12 – 30 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The annual precipitation ranges from 8 to 12 inches, most of which occurs between the months of December through March. The mean annual air temperature is 48 degrees F. Temperature extremes range from 110 to -30 degrees F. The period of optimum plant growth is from the first of April through June.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 0 days Freeze-free period (average) 0 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils of this site are very deep and poorly drained. Ponding to depths of 1 to 2.5 feet above the soil surface is frequent from March to July. Textures are loams to silty clay loams over a heavy clay subsoil. At approximately 2 feet, textures become sandy. A seasonal water table is present.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Loam
(2) Silty clay loam
Family particle size (1) Clayey
Drainage class Poorly drained Ecological dynamics
Range in Characteristics:
Variation in plant composition and production results from depth and duration of surface ponding. Hardstem bulrush, a species that can withstand a longer period of inundation than cattail, increases in areas that are ponded for long periods or at greater depths. Cattails cannot withstand prolonged submergence at depths of 2.5 to 3 feet. In drier areas that have a short period of inundation, baltic rush increases in the stand.
Response to Disturbance:
If the extent and duration of ponding is reduced to critical levels through water regulation or drainage, extensive changes to dry site conditions will result. Under initial drying conditions, hardstem bulrush will disappear, cattails will decrease and baltic rush will increase. Reed canarygrass will strongly invade and with continued drying and/or disturbance, it will dominate the site. Perennial pepperweed, Canadian thistle, smartweeds, and foxtail barley will invade.
With prolonged ponding to depths of 2.5 to 3 feet or burning or clipping plus ponding, the amount of cattails will be reduced. This occurs because emerged cattail stems are necessary for air transport to submerged crowns and roots.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference StateCommunity 1.1
Reference Plant CommunityThe potential native plant community is strongly dominated by cattails. Broadleaf cattail usually dominates over narrowleaf cattail with integrades occurring. Hardstem bulrush is present along with minor amounts of sedge and baltic rush. The potential vegetative composition is approximately 75 percent cattails and 15 percent bulrush. The approximate ground cover is 90-120 percent (basal and crown).
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Forb 3000 3750 5250 Grass/Grasslike 1000 1250 1750 Total 4000 5000 7000 Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Perennial, deep-rooted, rhizomatous, bulrush 500–1000 hardstem bulrush SCAC3 Schoenoplectus acutus 500–1000 – 2 Perennial, deep-rooted, rhizomatous grass-like 250–650 sedge CAREX Carex 100–250 – 5 Other perennial grasses and grass-like 150–500 shortawn foxtail ALAE Alopecurus aequalis 0–150 – sloughgrass BECKM Beckmannia 0–150 – spikerush ELEOC Eleocharis 0–150 – teal lovegrass ERHY Eragrostis hypnoides 0–150 – Forb7 Perennial, erect, rhizomatous, monocot 3500–4000 cattail TYPHA Typha 3500–4000 – 9 Other perennial forbs 100–250 alkali buttercup RACY Ranunculus cymbalaria 0–100 – short-rayed alkali aster SYFR2 Symphyotrichum frondosum 0–100 – Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock Grazing:
This site is suitable for limited fall livestock use after it drys and the surface is firm. Ponding precludes use for the remainder of the year.
Native Wildlife Associated with the Potential Climax Community:
Various waterfowl and upland songbirds including mallards and marsh wrens use this site for nesting, food, and cover. The value of the site for waterfowl increases when it is adjacent to wet marshes and open water areas. In terms of preference for nesting, diving ducks prefer the safer Wet Marsh site while dabbling ducks prefer the drier Basin Dry Meadow site.Hydrological functions
The hydrologic cover condition is good when the ecological condition is high.
Other information
This site may be periodically burned (prescribed) to improve the vigor of the stand. As this site often occurs with a perched water table, care should be taken in constructing ponds to avoid late season water loss in the subsurface sand layers. An on-site soil investigation is needed prior to construction. This site is a Type 3 Wetland (Inland Shallow Fresh Marsh).
Supporting information
Contributors
A V Bahn
Bob Gillaspy
M. Parks (OSU)Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Jeff Repp Contact for lead author Oregon NRCS State Rangeland Management Specialist Date 08/09/2012 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None -
Presence of water flow patterns:
None to some -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
0-5% -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None, slight wind erosion hazard -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine to moderately coarse - limited movement -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Moderately to significantly resistant to erosion: aggregate stability = 4-6 -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Very deep poorly drained silt loam to muck: Moderate to high OM (3-6%) -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Significant ground cover (90-120%) and gentle slopes (0-1%) significantly limit rainfall impact and overland flow -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Cattails > Bulrushes > Grasses and grass-likes > other emergent forbsSub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Normal decadence and mortality expected -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Favorable: 7000, Normal: 5000, Unfavorable: 4000 lbs/acre/year at high RSI (HCPC) -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Rush species will increase with deterioration of plant community. Reed canarygrass, Meadow foxtail, Kentucky bluegrass, thistle, perennial pepperweed, and foxtail barley invade sites that have lost deep rooted perennial grass functional groups. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species should be capable of reproducing annually
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
