Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This site occurs on low hills, benches, dissected high terraces and fans of large valleys and basins. Slopes typically range from 1 to 25%. Elevations range from 4500 to 5200 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Hill
(2) Plateau
Elevation 4800 – 5100 ft Slope 2 – 15 % Water table depth 60 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
Hot dry summers and cold wet (rain or snow) winters characterize this site. This site receives between 16-20 inches of precipitation annually. It occurs mainly between the months of November and June as both rain and snow. The soil temperature regime is typically frigid. the average annual air temperature is 43-46 degrees F with extreme temperatures ranging from 85 to -30 degrees F. The frost free period is 40 to 70 days. The optimum period for plant growth is from late April through July.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 70 days Freeze-free period (average) 90 days Precipitation total (average) 20 in BarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils of this site range from moderate to deep (40+ inches), they are well drained and have loamy surface textures and clayey subsoils. They are sometimes stony or gravelly on the surface and throughout the profile. Parent materials are generally tuff, basalt or diatomite (sediments) and may contain a small amount of ash. Permeability is slow. The potential for water erosion is low to moderate, depending on slope.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Gravelly loam
(2) Stony loam
Family particle size (1) Clayey
Drainage class Well drained to somewhat excessively drained Permeability class Moderately slow to moderately rapid Soil depth 45 – 60 in Available water capacity
(0-40in)Not specified Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)2 % Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)Not specified Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)Not specified Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.3 – 7.4 Ecological dynamics
The potential plant community is dominated by mountain big sagebrush and antelope bitterbrush. Idaho fescue dominates the understory, but bluebunch wheatgrass is sometimes common. The interpretative plant community for this site is the Historic Climax Plant Community.
Bluebunch wheatgrass is more abundant in the driest climatic areas and more droughty positions. Bitterbrush is more common sandy inclusions. Idaho fescue is more abundant in moist locations, and an occasiaonal ponderosa pine or juniper is present when this site is near tree covered areas. Locations with very high surface stones/bolders have lower production and less plant cover. Some basin big sagbrush naturally occurs on the site in warmer areas.
Big sagebrush and bitterbrush are easily damaged or killed by high intensity fires and are slow to return after burning. Sustained heavy grazing pressure by livestock or poor grazing management may reduce wheatgrass, fescue, needlegrass and bitterbrush, depending on season of use and growing conditions. Rabbitbrush and cheatgrass invade after fires and ground disturbance along with annual fescue, mustard and other weeds. Western juniper may increase with fire exclusion.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
HCPC, FEID/PUTR2-ARTRVCommunity 1.1
HCPC, FEID/PUTR2-ARTRVHCPC: Dominated by antelope bitterbrush, mountain big sagebrush, Idaho fescue, bluebunch wheatgrass, and bluegrasses.
Figure 3. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 663 969 1274 Shrub/Vine 234 364 494 Forb 39 98 156 Tree 26 46 65 Total 962 1477 1989 Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Dominant deep rooted perennial grasses 455–650 Idaho fescue FEID Festuca idahoensis 455–650 – 2 Sub-dominant deep rooted perennial grasses 52–117 bluebunch wheatgrass PSSP6 Pseudoroegneria spicata 26–65 – Thurber's needlegrass ACTH7 Achnatherum thurberianum 13–26 – basin wildrye LECI4 Leymus cinereus 13–26 – 4 Sub-dominant shallow rooted perennial grasses 65–130 Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 65–130 – 5 Other perennial grasses 16–65 western needlegrass ACOC3 Achnatherum occidentale 0–5 – Ross' sedge CARO5 Carex rossii 0–5 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 0–5 – prairie Junegrass KOMA Koeleria macrantha 0–5 – Forb7 Dominant perennial forbs 26–52 milkvetch ASTRA Astragalus 13–26 – lupine LUPIN Lupinus 13–26 – 9 Other perennial forbs 13–104 common yarrow ACMI2 Achillea millefolium 0–5 – agoseris AGOSE Agoseris 0–5 – sandwort ARENA Arenaria 0–5 – balsamroot BALSA Balsamorhiza 0–5 – mariposa lily CALOC Calochortus 0–5 – Indian paintbrush CASTI2 Castilleja 0–5 – pincushion CHAEN Chaenactis 0–5 – tapertip hawksbeard CRAC2 Crepis acuminata 0–5 – Trinity buckwheat ERAL6 Eriogonum alpinum 0–5 – fleabane ERIGE2 Erigeron 0–5 – buckwheat ERIOG Eriogonum 0–5 – western stoneseed LIRU4 Lithospermum ruderale 0–5 – desertparsley LOMAT Lomatium 0–5 – phacelia PHACE Phacelia 0–5 – spreading phlox PHDI3 Phlox diffusa 0–5 – Oregon checkerbloom SIOR Sidalcea oregana 0–5 – deathcamas ZIGAD Zigadenus 0–5 – Shrub/Vine11 Dominant evergreen shrubs 65–195 mountain big sagebrush ARTRV Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana 65–195 – 13 Dominant deciduous (or 1/2 shrubs) shrubs 130–195 antelope bitterbrush PUTR2 Purshia tridentata 130–195 – 15 Other shrubs 39–104 Saskatoon serviceberry AMAL2 Amelanchier alnifolia 0–5 – curl-leaf mountain mahogany CELE3 Cercocarpus ledifolius 0–5 – Klamath plum PRSU2 Prunus subcordata 0–5 – chokecherry PRVI Prunus virginiana 0–5 – desert gooseberry RIVE Ribes velutinum 0–5 – rose ROSA5 Rosa 0–5 – snowberry SYMPH Symphoricarpos 0–5 – Tree16 Dominant evergreen trees 26–65 western juniper JUOC Juniperus occidentalis 13–39 – ponderosa pine PIPO Pinus ponderosa 13–26 – Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock Grazing- This site is suited to use under a planned grazing system by cattle in the late spring, summer or fall. Care should be taken to avoid use until soils are sufficiently dry and stable to reduce the impacts of trampling and root reserves have been established. Excessive early use or season long use are the primary factors in the deterioration of this site.
Wildlife- This site provides nesting and feeding cover to a variety of wildlife species. It is particularly important in fall and winter for deer which feed heavily on the bitterbrush. Use should be managed in such a manner as to maintain or improve conditions for wildlife populations. This site is seasonally utilized by native ungulates (mule deer, elk, and antelope). Other animals that use this site are quail, coyotes, bobcats, and rabbits.Wood products
This site has limited potential for fence posts and firewood.
Supporting information
Contributors
BLM ESI Team
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Jeff Repp Contact for lead author Oregon NRCS State Rangeland Management Specialist Date 08/22/2012 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None, slight to moderate sheet & rill erosion hazard -
Presence of water flow patterns:
None -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
1-5% -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None, slight wind erosion hazard -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine - limited movement -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Significantly resistant to erosion: aggregate stability = 4-6 -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Moderately deep to deep, well drained and somewhat excessively drained loams and ashy silt loams: Low OM (1-2%) -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Relatively high vegetative cover (60-80%) and moderate slopes (0-25%) effectively limit rainfall impact and overland flow; infiltration is moderately slow to moderately rapid -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Idaho fescue > Antelope bitterbrush > Mountain big sagebrush > Sandberg bluegrass > other grasses > other shrubs > forbs > treesSub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Normal decadence and mortality expected -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Favorable: 1500, Normal: 1300, Unfavorable: 1000 lbs/acre/year at high RSI (HCPC) -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial brush secies will increase with deterioration of plant community. Western Juniper readily increases on the site. Cheatgrass and Medusahead invade sites that have lost deep rooted perennial grass functional groups. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
all species should be capable of reproducing annually
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
