Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
R021XY308OR SOUTH SLOPES 14-18 PZ
South Slopes 14-18" PZ
R021XY312OR NORTH SLOPES 14-18 PZ
North Slopes 14-18" PZ
R021XY410OR DEEP LOAMY 16-20 PZ
Deep Loamy 14-18" PZ
Similar sites
R021XY410OR DEEP LOAMY 16-20 PZ
Deep Loamy 14-18" PZ (thicker surface)
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This site occurs predominately on terraces in Goose Lake Valley. Slopes range from 0 to 30%. Elevations range from 4000 to 6000 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Terrace
Elevation 4000 – 6000 ft Slope 0 – 30 % Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The annual precipitation ranges from 14 to 18 inches, most of which occurs in the form of snow during the months of October through May. The soil tmeperature regime is mesic. Temperature extremes range from 90 to -30 degrees F. The frost free period ranges from 70 to 140 days. The optimum period for plant growth is from mid-April through late June.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 140 days Freeze-free period (average) 0 days Precipitation total (average) 20 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils of this site are very deep and well drained. The subsoil is loamy to clayey and may contain up to 35% coarse fragments. Permeability is moderate to moderately slow. The available water holding capacity is about 6 to 8 inches. The erosion hazard for water is slight to moderately severe.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Well drained Permeability class Moderately slow to moderate Available water capacity
(0-40in)6 – 8 in Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)0 – 35 % Ecological dynamics
This site is typically dominated by Idaho fescue, particularly at theupper end of the precipitation range and bluebunch wheatgrass may increase in proportion on the drier end of the range or where gravels increase in the soil.
If the condition of the site deteriorates as a result of overgrazing, Idaho fescue and bluebunch wheatgrass decrease in the stand to be replaced by needlegrass and Sandberg bluegrass. If deterioration continues, shrubs such as big sagebrush and rabbitbrush will dominate the stand. In the absence of periodic fire, western juniper will invade the site.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
HCPC, FEID/ARTRV-PUTR2Community 1.1
HCPC, FEID/ARTRV-PUTR2The potential native plant community is dominated by Idaho fescue. Mountain big sagebrush and antelope bitterbrush often dominate the aspect. Vegetative composition of the community is approximately 75% grasses, 10% forbs, and 15% shrubs.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 588 810 1032 Shrub/Vine 156 228 300 Forb 60 108 156 Total 804 1146 1488 Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). OR5551 , D21 Mid Elev., NA, Good Condtion. RPC Growth Curve.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 0 10 40 45 5 0 0 0 0 0 Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Dominant deep rooted perennial grasses 480–780 Idaho fescue FEID Festuca idahoensis 360–600 – bluebunch wheatgrass PSSP6 Pseudoroegneria spicata 120–180 – 2 Sub-dominant deep rooted perennial grasses 48–120 Thurber's needlegrass ACTH7 Achnatherum thurberianum 24–60 – basin wildrye LECI4 Leymus cinereus 24–60 – 4 Sub-dominant shallow rooted perennial grasses 36–72 Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 36–72 – 5 Other perennial grasses 24–60 western needlegrass ACOC3 Achnatherum occidentale 0–5 – prairie Junegrass KOMA Koeleria macrantha 0–5 – Forb7 Dominant perennial forbs 48–96 milkvetch ASTRA Astragalus 12–24 – desertparsley LOMAT Lomatium 12–24 – lupine LUPIN Lupinus 12–24 – phlox PHLOX Phlox 12–24 – 9 Other perennial forbs 12–60 tapertip hawksbeard CRAC2 Crepis acuminata 0–5 – fleabane ERIGE2 Erigeron 0–5 – buckwheat ERIOG Eriogonum 0–5 – flax LINUM Linum 0–5 – woolly plantain PLPA2 Plantago patagonica 0–5 – Shrub/Vine12 Sub-dominant evergreen shrubs 24–60 mountain big sagebrush ARTRV Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana 24–60 – 13 Dominant deciduous (or 1/2shrubs) shrubs 120–180 antelope bitterbrush PUTR2 Purshia tridentata 120–180 – 15 Other shrubs 12–60 Saskatoon serviceberry AMAL2 Amelanchier alnifolia 0–5 – Klamath plum PRSU2 Prunus subcordata 0–5 – chokecherry PRVI Prunus virginiana 0–5 – wax currant RICE Ribes cereum 0–5 – rose ROSA5 Rosa 0–5 – mountain snowberry SYOR2 Symphoricarpos oreophilus 0–5 – horsebrush TETRA3 Tetradymia 0–5 – Interpretations
Animal community
This site provides forage for deer, sage grouse and pronghorn antelope and cover for various bird species.
Hydrological functions
The soils are in hydrologic groups A, B, and C.
Recreational uses
This site provides opportunity for observing and hunting mule deer, pronghorn antelope and various game birds.
Other products
This site is suited to livestock grazing in late spring, summer and fall under a planned grazing system.
Supporting information
Type locality
Location 1: Klamath County, OR Township/Range/Section T38S R12E S23 General legal description Keno Springs Ranch NE of Bonanza: T38S, R12E, Sec 23 Location 2: Klamath County, OR Township/Range/Section T36S R12E S22 General legal description Southwest edge of Beatty: T36S, R12E, Sec 22 (NE) Location 3: Lake County, OR Township/Range/Section T39S R19E S28 General legal description Western side of Goose Lake Valley on many high terraces such as T39S, R19E, Sec 28 (SE), Sec 22 (NE, NE, NE). Contributors
Barrett, Carlson
E Ersch
K KennedyRangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Jeff Repp Contact for lead author Oregon NRCS State Rangeland Management Specialist Date 08/21/2012 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None, slight to moderately severe sheet & rill erosion hazard -
Presence of water flow patterns:
None to few in interspaces -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
5-10% -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None, slight wind erosion hazard -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine - limited movement -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Moderately resistant to erosion: aggregate stability = 4-5 -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Deep and very deep, well drained loams and sandy loams (containing up to 35% coarse fragments): Moderate OM (1-3%) -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
High amount of plant cover (70-90%) and rock fragments and moderate slopes (0-30%) effectively limit rainfall impact and overland flow; infiltration is moderate to moderately slow -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Idaho fescue > Bluebunch wheatgrass = Antelope bitterbrush > dominant grasses > Mountain big sagebrush = dominant forbs = other grasses > other forbs = other shrubsSub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Normal decadence and mortality expected -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Favorable: 1500, Normal: 1200, Unfavorable: 900 lbs/acre/year at high RSI (HCPC) -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial brush species will increase with deterioration of plant community. Western Juniper readily invades the site. Cheatgrass and Medusahead invade sites that have lost deep rooted perennial grass functional groups. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species should be capable of reproducing annually
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
