Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
R021XY204OR SHALLOW STONY 10-20 PZ
R021XY208OR SANDY 10-14 PZ
R021XY300OR SOUTH SLOPES 10-14 PZ
R021XY302OR NORTH SLOPE 10-14 PZ
Similar sites
R021XY302OR NORTH SLOPE 10-14 PZ
Slopes greater than 30%
R021XY210OR LOAMY 14-18 PZ
Higher precipitation
R021XY402OR ROCKY RIDGES 14+ PZ
Shallow soils
R021XY208OR SANDY 10-14 PZ
Coarser soil textures
R021XY300OR SOUTH SLOPES 10-14 PZ
Slopes greater than 30%
R021XY206OR DEEP LOAMY 10-14 PZ
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This site typically occurs on lake terraces, hills and fans adjacent to lake basins. Slopes range from 1 to 35 percent, but are typically 2 to 20 percent.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Lake terrace
(2) Hill
(3) Fan
Elevation 4100 – 4800 ft Slope 1 – 35 % Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The annual precipitation ranges from 10 to 14 inches, but may range to 16 inches on soils which have low water holding capacities. Most of the precipitation occurs in the form of snow during the months of October through April. The soil temperature regime is mesic with a mean annual air temperature of about 47 degrees F. Temperature extremes range from 110 to -30 degrees F. The frost free period ranges from 70 to 120 days. The optimum period for plant growth is from late April to June.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 120 days Freeze-free period (average) 0 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils of this site are shallow to moderately deep over bedrock, an indurate pan, or a restrictive layer and are well drained. Root restrictive layers or horizons are absent within the upper 20 inches of the soil profile. The available water holding capacity is 2 to 4 inches. Runoff is slow to medium. Erosion hazard by water is slight to moderate.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Drainage class Well drained Soil depth 60 in Available water capacity
(0-40in)2 – 4 in Ecological dynamics
If the condition of the site deteriorates as a result of overgrazing, big sagebrush and rabbitbrush will become dominant on the site. Sandberg bluegrass and unplalatable forbs will increase in the understory. Cheatgrass and annual forbs will invade the site. Western juniper may establish on the site in the absence of periodic fire.
This site is typically dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass. Idaho fescue will increase in proportion at the upper end of the precipitation range and Thurber needlegrass may increase in proportion at the drier end of the range or where gravels increase in the soil.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
HCPC, PSSP6-FEID/PUTR2-ARTRW8Community 1.1
HCPC, PSSP6-FEID/PUTR2-ARTRW8The potential native plant community is dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass and Idaho fescue. Antelope bitterbrush, basin big sagebrush, and green rabbitbrush are common. Vegetative composition of the plant community is approximately 80% grasses, 5% forbs, and 15% shrubs.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 336 438 540 Shrub/Vine 48 105 162 Forb 24 45 66 Tree 12 21 30 Total 420 609 798 Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). OR5511 , D21 Low Elev., NA, Good Condition. RPC Growth Curve.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 15 30 50 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 Dominant deep rooted perennial grasses 300–450 bluebunch wheatgrass PSSP6 Pseudoroegneria spicata 240–360 – Idaho fescue FEID Festuca idahoensis 60–90 – 2 Sub-dominant deep rooted perennial grasses 12–30 Thurber's needlegrass ACTH7 Achnatherum thurberianum 12–30 – 4 Sub-dominant shallow rooted perennial grasses 12–30 Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 12–30 – 5 Other perennial grasses 12–30 squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 0–5 – prairie Junegrass KOMA Koeleria macrantha 0–5 – melicgrass MELIC Melica 0–5 – Forb7 Dominant perennial forbs 18–36 tapertip hawksbeard CRAC2 Crepis acuminata 6–12 – buckwheat ERIOG Eriogonum 6–12 – lupine LUPIN Lupinus 6–12 – 9 Other perennial grasses 6–30 milkvetch ASTRA Astragalus 0–5 – fleabane ERIGE2 Erigeron 0–5 – aster EUCEP2 Eucephalus 0–5 – desertparsley LOMAT Lomatium 0–5 – ragwort SENEC Senecio 0–5 – deathcamas ZIGAD Zigadenus 0–5 – Shrub/Vine12 Sub-dominant evergreen shrubs 12–60 Wyoming big sagebrush ARTRW8 Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis 12–60 – 13 Dominant deciduous ( or 1/2 shrubs) shrubs 30–90 antelope bitterbrush PUTR2 Purshia tridentata 30–90 – 14 Sub-dominant deciduous (or 1/2 shrubs) shrubs 6–12 green rabbitbrush ERTE18 Ericameria teretifolia 6–12 – Tree16 Dominant evergreen trees 12–30 western juniper JUOC Juniperus occidentalis 12–30 – Interpretations
Animal community
This site offers forage for pronghorn antelope and mule deer and limited cover for various bird species.
Hydrological functions
The soils are in hydrologic groups C and D.
Other products
This site is suited to livestock grazing during all seasons under a planned grazing system.
Other information
Increase in western juniper and the subsequent competition for moisture will lead to a reduction of soil cover and accelerated soil loss. Improving infiltration and permeability, and reducing runoff should be the immediate goal of juniper control.
Supporting information
Contributors
Barrett, Carlson
E Ersch (OSU)
K.KennedyRangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Jeff Repp Contact for lead author Oregon NRCS State Rangeland Management Specialist Date 08/21/2012 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None, slight to moderate sheet & rill rosion hazard -
Presence of water flow patterns:
None -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
10-15% -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None, slight wind erosion hazard -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine - limited movement -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Significantly to moderately resistant to erosion: aggregate stability = 4-6 -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Shallow to moderately deep, well drained sandy loams, loams, and silty clay loams with significant rock content: Low to moderate OM (1-3%) -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Adequate cover (60-70%) and level to gentle slopes (1-20%) effectively limit rainfall impact and overland flow -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Bluebunch wheatgrass > Idaho fescue > Antelope bitterbrush > Wyoming big sagebrush > other grasses > other forbs > dominant forbs = Green rabbitbrushSub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Normal decadence and mortality expected -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Favorable: 800, Normal: 600, Unfavorable: 450 lbs/acre/year at high RSI (HCPC) -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial brush species will increase with deterioration of plant community. Western Juniper readily invades the site. Cheatgrass and Medusahead invade sites that have lost deep rooted perennial grass functional groups. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species should be capable of reproducing annually
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement