Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Draft. A draft ecological site description is either incomplete or has not undergone quality control and quality assurance review.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub (1) Ceanothus crassifolius
(2) Adenostoma fasciculatumHerbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This site occurs on mountains and hillslopes. Slopes range from 15 to 75 percent. Aspects are variable. Elevation ranges from 1200 to 2400 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Mountain slope
(2) Hill
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 1200 – 1400 ft Slope 15 – 75 % Aspect S, SW, W Climatic features
This site receives slightly more annual rainfall than the more coastal sites due to movement of hot and cold air masses and pressure systems influenced by the ocean and surrounding mountains. Roughly 94% of yearly precipitation falls form November through April. The driest months are June, July and August, with those months historically receiving trace amounts of rainfall. The average annual precipitation ranges from 14 to 24 inches. The mean annual air temperature ranges from 60 to 64 degrees F.
There are no reliable climate stations for this specific ecological site. The two stations listed (Oxnard and Los Angeles Civic Center) are on the extreme northwest and southwest of the area.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 350 days Freeze-free period (average) 0 days Precipitation total (average) 20 in BarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
This site is not influenced by wetland or riparian water features.
Soil features
This ecological site is associated with the Gaviota soil series. The Gaviota series consists of very shallow or shallow, well drained soils that formed in material weathered from hard sandstone or meta-sandstone. They are classified as Loamy, mixed, superactive, nonacid, thermic Lithic Xerorthents. The surface texture is a gravelly loam. Hard meta-sandstone is encountered between 6 to 20 inches.
This ecological site has been correlated with the following map units and soil component with in the Santa Monica Mountain Soil Survey Area (CA692).
Map Unit Component Percent
302 Gaviota 10
303 Gaviota 10
305 Gaviota 3
310 Gaviota, very steep 7
310 Gaviota 85Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Very gravelly loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Well drained to excessively drained Permeability class Moderately rapid Soil depth 6 – 20 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 15 – 25 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)0.94 – 1.18 in Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.8 – 7 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)15 – 25 % Ecological dynamics
This chaparral ecological site is dominated by chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum) and hoaryleaf ceanothus (Ceanothus crassifolius). Other plants include coastal buckwheat (Eriogonum cinereum), laurel sumac (Malosma laurina), and black sage (Salvia mellifera). This chaparral community is comprised of dense stands of shrubs that are all structurally similar, with evergreen, sclerophyllous leaves. Depending on the combined influences of disturbance, elevation, aspect and soils, the mix of species within the mixed chaparral habitat will vary. Although soil and parent material have some influence on the variety of species, microclimatic differences in soil moisture, temperature, and aspect often dictate what species will be most dominant in a given location. This ecological site is associated with shallow soils over hard bedrock, this favors hoaryleaf ceanothus (Ceanothus crassifolius) which is a shallow rooted over the deeper rooted chaparral species such chamise ( Adenostoma fasciculatum) (Burk, 1978). This ecological site is also associated with southern aspects low soil moisture, some of the drier areas within the chaparral zone.
The primary elements that maintain this ecological site are drought and fire. Chaparral species are physiologically adapted to droughty conditions and many are also well-adapted to fire. Some of these adaptations include: extensive rooting systems (taking advantage of water near the soil surface as well as water far into the soil profile); sclerophyllous leaves; specialized stomates; the shape of the canopies (dissipates radiation by convection); the height of the shrubs (keeping the leaves away from the hot soil surface); post-fire crown sprouting; and seeds that often require high temperatures before germination.
The successional patterns of chaparral are initiated by fire. The time between fires plays an important role in the chaparral system. Old growth chaparral is a natural and healthy community, but it is becoming rare due to an increased fire frequency (Halsey, 2005). Until recently it was commonly perceived that chaparral needs to burn in order to maintain its vigor and heath. Many chaparral shrub species can live for more than 100 years without becoming decadent, and with out affecting their ability to regenerate after a fire (Keeley et al, 2005). Chaparral can develop into extremely dense, sometimes impenetrable stands of dead branches and heavy litter, however these shrub can self thin over time. Fire can be detrimental to chaparral community if it becomes too frequent, however with longer fire frequencies fire is the natural cause for stand regeneration. When fire burns through chaparral it recharges the soil’s available nitrogen and carbon, and stimulate new growth and seed germination. Most of the dominant chaparral species are able to rapidly recover and grow after a fire. Chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum) produces large amounts of seed that accumulate over the years and lie dormant in the soil until a fire stratifies the seed coat for germination, and it resprouts vigorously after fire. The presence of hoaryleaf ceanothus may be in part due to the shallow soils associated with this site, but it may also be an indicator of a fire. Hoaryleaf ceanothus is considered a short lived chaprarral shrub, with a life span of 20 to 30 years, and it is a fire dependent obligate seeder (Keeley and Fotheringham, ?). Meaning that if fire does not occur in this area, the presence of hoaryleaf ceanothus will decline, and chamise will become dominant.
The historical fire regime for these mixed chaparral communities is difficult to determine prior to European settlers arrival, however there are indications of a fire-return interval that was probably greater than 70 years, with lightning being the primary ignition source (Keeley and Fotheringham 2001). Fire intervals may have been up to 200 years along the coast, but have generally increased to 40-50 year intervals with the increase in human caused fires.
Chaparral is important habitat for many species of birds, reptiles, rodents and mammals. Some deep-habitat dwellers rely almost entirely on chaparral for food, shelter, and reproduction sites, whereas others occupy the ecotonal zones between the chaparral and woodland, chaparral and grassland or chaparral and riparian habitats to satisfy their various needs. As the chaparral becomes more and more dense, it becomes too dense for many of these species to properly utilize the habitat and thus fires are necessary to open up the canopy, which provides better movement through the site. It also stimulates new growth of the shrubs as well as the understory herbaceous species, providing more food and shelter for a greater variety of species.
State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
Figure 3. Dry Inland Chaparral Model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 5 submodel, plant communities
State 6 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Hoaryleaf ceanothus mixed chaparral 1.4Community 1.1
Hoaryleaf ceanothus mixed chaparral 1.4This community is the reference community for this state, because it is the most common community present of this state at this time. It is dependent upon fire. The shorter lived hoaryleaf ceanothus is co-dominant at this point. Canopy closure is almost 90 percent, and there is very little understory vegetation. The understory species that are present are found in the canopy gaps. Production data was not collected on this site.
This community may exist for 40 years or more, then the shorter lived species become decadent and chamise becomes dominant (pathway 1.4a) developing into the climax chamise community 1.1.
If fire returns to this community at this point (pathway 1.4b) stand regeneration is initiated.
If a low intensity fire occurs during this phase, this stand could follow pathway 1.4c to the young chaparral community. This pathway is uncommon, and could eventually cause a transition to state 2. The transition to state (T1.1a) 2 may happen if the low intensity fires are not hot enough to scarify the hoaryleaf ceantohus seeds, and allow other species such as Eastern Mojave buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum) and black sage (Salvia mellifera) to become dominant. If these species become dominant, they create lower fuel loads and compact litter which burn at lower intensities. This continues to inhibit the germination of some chaparral shrub seeds.
State 2
Regeneration 1.2Community 2.1
Regeneration 1.2This community is dominated by native forbs and grasses, along with resprouting shrubs and shrub seedlings. This phase is short lived because the shrubs rapidly regain dominance in a couple of years. Many of the species present during this phase have stored dormant seeds in the soil, which will not germinate until heat from the fire, sunlight from the removal of the canopy, or nitrogen from the charred wood leachate cue germination. In the first year after a fire thousands of chamise and hoaryleaf ceanothus seedlings will be present. Most of these die by the second year. Chamise will increase in cover from the new shoots sprouting from the surviving lignotubers. There are several annual and perennial fire followers that may be present at this stage, such as: whisperingbells (Emmenanthe penduliflora), largeflower phacelia (Phacelia grandiflora), black sage (Salvia mellifera), yellow bleeding heart (Ehrendorferia ochroleuca formerly Dicentra ochroleuca), bush poppy (Dendromecon rigida), Coulter's snapdragon (Sairocarpus coulterianus formerly Antirrhinum coulterianum), golden eardrops (Ehrendorferia chrysantha formerly Dicentra chrysantha), western poppy (Papaver californicum), and windpoppy (Stylomecon heterophylla) (Thanos and Rundel, 1995; Dagit, 2002). Many of these fire followers are only present the first year or two after a fire.
In the absence of disturbance and the growth of the chaparral shrubs the primary pathway 1.2a in the state and transition model is followed.
If fire frequency is too high then this community may transition to (T1a) State 2 or eventually to (T2a) State 3.
State 3
Chamise chaparral 1.1Community 3.1
Chamise chaparral 1.1This community is the historic plant community and it was most likely dominated by chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), with some hoaryleaf ceanothus (Ceanothus crassifolius). Other common plants may have included: coastal buckwheat (Eriogonum cinereum), laurel sumac (Malosma laurina), and black sage (Salvia mellifera). NRCS plant composition and production data is lacking on this community partly because this unaltered historic community is difficult to find since fires are now more frequent than they were historically, and non-native plant species are almost always present.
This chaparral community develops after at least 60 years without fire. After enough time has passed without disturbance, the shorter lived fire dependent chaparral species, such as hoaryleaf ceanothus, will become decadent and be replaced by chamise in this area. Chamise is a longer living chaparral species and can continue to produce new shoots from the root crown, even in the absence of fire. Until recently it was believed that frequent fires were needed for fuel reduction and for regeneration of the chaparral species. Fuel studies indicate that just fire five years after a stand replacing fire; the chaparral species have recovered enough to create a fire hazard. Recent studies on shrub regeneration suggest that chaparral communities can exist for 100 years or more without disturbance and still reproduce well after fire, and that short interval fires are actually detrimental to shrub sustainability.
An inherent property of chaparral communities is the high volumes of dead branches and dead woody debris and litter on the ground. The structure and volume of this litter is actually essential for the survival of chaparral. Many chaparral species require high severity fires to initiate break seed dormancy. This heavy fuel load and the flammability of the live plant material create ideal conditions for a fast spreading, high intensity, crown fire (Howard, 1993).
The fire frequency and season of burn may affect the species composition. Shorter fire returns intervals of 30 to 40 years may favor hoaryleaf ceanothus, while longer intervals of 100 years or more favor the longer lived chamise. Fires in spring and summer have a higher mortality rate for chamise than in fall. This is because the carbohydrate storage in the lignotuber has been depleted due to the spring growth, and there is insufficient energy to send up new shoots. The carbohydrates are replenished during the summer, replenishing the carbohydrate storage by fall (McMurray, 1990). Some studies suggest that fires used to be in the summer months and would burn slowly in relatively small areas. Only occasionally would these fires last until fall and be fanned by the Santa Anna winds, which cause the fires to race across the mountains burning thousands of hectares a day (Keeley and Fotheringham, 2001).
When fire does occur in this chaparral community, it usually burns the canopy of the entire stand, creating transition, T1.1a which leads to stand regeneration.
State 4
Young chaparral 1.3Community 4.1
Young chaparral 1.3This community is a young chamise and hoaryleaf ceanothus chaparral community still in the growth phase following a fire. The young shrubs are beginning to shade out the understory and are beginning the self thinning process.
The primary pathway for this community is 1.3a to continue with the growth and development of the shrub species. This phase may last from 2 to 30 years, before regaining its potential cover and composition.
If fire burns this community during this stage (initiating pathway 1.3b) it will return to the regeneration phase.State 5
Degraded chaparral State 2Community 5.1
Degraded chaparral State 2This state develops with an altered fire regime and/or with the introduction of non-native plant species. Increased fire frequencies and low intensity fires can be detrimental to chaparral regeneration. This altered state has similar plant communities to the reference state, but native subshrubs such as black sage (Salvia mellifera) and Eastern Mojave buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum) may have increased in cover and non-native species such as oats (Avena spp.) and bromes (Bromus spp.) are present. The overall cover of the chaparral and woodland species has declined, with more openings in the canopy. It is difficult to determine the effect on the chaparral species composition during this state, but some species may be better adapted to shorter fire intervals than others.
The non-native species become established after a fire or other disturbances such as road building, grazing, or foot traffic. The non-native grasses can alter the fire regime by creating an easily flammable and continuous fuel source. When the fire frequency increases this state may loose the chaparral species and transition to state 3 (T2a).
Once the non-native species become established it is extremely difficult to eliminate them from the area. Restoration efforts should focus on eliminating non-native species, and if possible keep the fire return interval to greater than 70 years (R2a).
State 6
Non-native grassland State 3Community 6.1
Non-native grassland State 3When fire repeatedly burns through a chaparral community, before the species reach maturity, the presence of the chaparral species may decline. Since most of the dormant seeds in the seed bank germinate the first year after a fire, there are very few seeds left to germinate after subsequent fires. Time without disturbance is needed for the shrubs to mature and produce seeds. Frequent fires also affect the ability for the resprouting shrubs to send up new shoots by depleting the carbohydrate storage in the root systems. In the absence of shrub seedlings and resprouting lignotubers, non-native annual grasses become dominate and self-perpetuate the frequent fire cycle. The time interval needed for the chaparral species to recover and produce enough seed for sufficient regeneration after a fire is variable. Some reports say that a 20 to 40 year fire free interval may be too short.
Non-native species listed by Dagit are the common non-native grasses (Avena fatua, Bromus sp., Cynodon dactylon, Festuca sp., Hordeum murinum, etc.) and mustard (Brassica nigra), followed by a variety of thistles (Centaurea melitensis, Salsola iberica, etc.).
Once the non-native species become established and the chaparral species have been eliminated it is extremely difficult to restore this area. Restoration efforts should focus on reintroducing native species, eliminating non-native species, and reducing the fire frequency (R2a).
Additional community tables
Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 6. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 7. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 4.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 5.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 6.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
The following birds prefer Chaparral communities for their habitat: Wrentit (Chamaea fasciata), Western Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma californica), California Towhee (Pipilo crissalis), Spotted Towhee (Pipilo crissalis), and the California Thrasher (Toxostoma redivivum). The gig-eared woodrat (Neotoma macrotis), Red diamond rattlesnake (Crotalus exsul) and the Mt. mahogany hairstreak butterfly (Satyrium tetra) are other animals associated with chaparral (Halsey, 2005). Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), Rabbits, Coyote (Canis latrans), bobcat (Lynx rufus), and mountain lions (Puma concolor), also utilize chaparral for bedding, cover and/or browse. The new shoots of chamise are much more nutritious browse than the older shoots.
Recreational uses
This area is suitable for trails for hiking, biking, and horse riding as long as the slopes are not too steep. Flatter areas are suitable for campgrounds.
Wood products
The chaparral shrubs do not provide wood products in the form of lumber or true construction material. However, they could provide pulp and sawdust for things such as paper, wood pellets or biofuels. This is most likely not an economical choice at this time.
Other products
Native Americans made infusions from the bark and leaves of chamise to treat syphilis. Chamise oils were used to treat skin infections. A binding agent for arrows and baskets was made from scale insects found on chamise plants (McMurray, 1990).
Supporting information
Other references
Burk, Jack H., 1978. Seasonal and Diurnal Water Potentials in Selected Chaparral Shrubs. American Midland Naturalist, Vol. 99, No. 1 (Jan., 1978), pp. 244-248
Dagit, Rosi 2002. Post-fire Monitoring of Coast Live Oaks (Quercus agrifolia) Burned in the 1993 Old Topanga Fire. USDA Forest Service. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-184.
Haidinger, Tori L. and Keeley Jon E. (1993). Role of High Fire Frequency in Destruction of Mixed Chaparral. Madrono, Vol. 40, No.3, pp. 141-147, 1993.
Howard, Janet L. 1993. Adenostoma sparsifolium. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2007, October 16].
Keeley, Jon E. (2004). Impact of Antecedent Climate on Fire Regimes in Coastal California. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2004, 13, 173-182.
Keeley Jon E. (2002). Fire Management of California Shrubland Landscapes. Environmental Management Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 395-408.
Keeley, J.E. (2001). Fire and invasive species in Mediterranean-climate ecosystems of California. Pages 81–94 in K.E.M. Galley and T.P. Wilson (eds.). Proceedings of the Invasive Species Workshop: the Role of Fire in the Control and Spread of Invasive Species. Fire Conference 2000: the First National Congress on Fire Ecology, Prevention, and Management. Miscellaneous Publication No. 11, Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL.
Keeley, Jon E. (1992). Recruitment of Seedlings and Vegetative Sprouts in Unburned Chaparral. Ecology, Volume 73, Issue 4 (August, 1992), 1194-1208. The Ecological Society of America.
Keeley, Jon E. and Fotheringham, C.J. (2001). Historic Fire Regime in Southern California shrublands. Conservation Biology, Volume 15, No. 6, December 2001. pp. 1536-1548.
Keeley, Jon E. and Fotheringham, C.J. (1998). Mechanism of smoke-induced seed germination in a post-fire chaparral annual. Journal of Ecology, 1998, 86, 27-36. British Ecological Society.
Keeley, Jon E. and Fotheringham, C.J (?). Role of Fire in Regeneration of seed. Chapter 13. Online at: http://www.werc.usgs.gov/seki/pdfs/regeneration.pdf
McMurray, Nancy E. 1990. Heteromeles arbutifolia. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [ 2005, June 29].
McMurray, Nancy E. 1990. Adenostoma fasciculatum. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [ 2005, June 29].
Meentemeyer, Ross K.; Moody, Aaron; and Franklin, Janet. 2001. Landscape-scale patterns of shrub-species abundance in California chaparral. The role of topographically mediated resource gradients. Plant Ecology 156: 19–41, 2001. © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
Riggan, Philip J.; Goode, Suzanne; Paula M. Jacks; and Lockwood,Robert N., 1988. Interaction of Fire and Community Development in Chaparral of Southern California. Ecological Monographs. Volume 58, Issue 3 (September 1988)Article: pp. 155–176
Thanos, C. A., and Rundel, P. W. 1995. Fire-Followers in Chaparral: Nitrogenous Compounds Trigger Seed Germination. The Journal of Ecology, Vol. 83, No. 2 (Apr., 1995), pp. 207-216
Uchytil, Ronald J. 1991. Cercocarpus betuloides. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [ 2005, June 29].
Contributors
Curtis Talbot, Marchel Munnecke
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement