Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site F019XD044CA
Quercus agrifolia-Juglans californica/Artemisia californica-Ceanothus spinosus/Leymus condensatus
Accessed: 07/02/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Draft. A draft ecological site description is either incomplete or has not undergone quality control and quality assurance review.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Quercus agrifolia
(2) Juglans californicaShrub (1) Artemisia californica
(2) Ceanothus spinosusHerbaceous (1) Leymus condensatus
Physiographic features
This site occurs on mountains and hillslopes. Slopes range from 30 to 75 percent. Aspects are variable. Elevation ranges from 400 to 3000 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Hill
(2) Mountain
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 400 – 3000 ft Slope 30 – 75 % Climatic features
This site receives slightly more annual rainfall than the more coastal sites due to movement of hot and cold air masses and pressure systems influenced by the ocean and surrounding mountains. Roughly 94% of yearly precipitation falls form November through April. The driest months are June, July and August, with those months historically receiving trace amounts of rainfall. The average annual precipitation ranges from 18 to 24 inches. The mean annual air temperature ranges from 60 to 64 degrees F.
There are no reliable climate stations for this specific ecological site. The two stations listed (Oxnard and Los Angeles Civic Center) are on the extreme northwest and southwest of the area.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 350 days Freeze-free period (average) 0 days Precipitation total (average) 20 in BarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
This site is not influenced by wetland or riparian water features.
Soil features
This ecological site is associated with the Sapwi and Tongva soil series. The Sapwi soil series consists of moderately deep to bedrock, well drained soils that formed in residuum and colluvium derived from sandstone. The surface texture is a loam, with stony and very stony clay loam textures below. Very slightly fractured sandstone is encountered below 38 inches. The Tongva series consists of moderately deep, well drained soils that formed in alluvium and colluvium derived from weathered andesite and basalt. The surface and subsurface texture is loam. Between 20 and 40 inches highly fractured and weathered andesite bedrock is encountered.
The Sapwi and Tongva soils are both classified as Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, thermic Pachic Argixerolls.
This ecological site has been correlated with the following map units and soil components with in the Santa Monica Mountain Soil Survey Area (CA692).
Map Unit Component Percent
122 Sapwi 5
240 Tongva 45
241 Tongva 15
251 Tongva 20
290 Sapwi 15
300 Sapwi 10
301 Sapwi 10
304 Sapwi 20
450 Sapwi 85
451 Sapwi 20Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Well drained Permeability class Moderate to moderately slow Soil depth 20 – 40 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 1 – 10 % Surface fragment cover >3" 1 – 10 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)3.3 – 5.2 in Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.6 – 7.3 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)1 – 5 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)5 – 40 % Ecological dynamics
The interpretive plant community for this ecological site is the California live oak (Quercus agrifolia) woodland with mixed chaparral. Associated species include: redheart (Ceanothus spinosus), toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) and Southern California walnut (Juglans californica). The understory is mostly deep leaf litter, with sages in the canopy openings. This community is found more often on north facing slopes, on moderately deep loamy soils.
The climax community for this ecological site is a California live oak- Southern California walnut woodland. This ecological site is associated with a chaparral community commonly found on northern aspects which is dominated by redheart and toyon. This chaparral community is generally seral to the California live oak community. Patches of mature California life oak woodland are found often found within the chaparral community. The chaparral community is comprised of dense stands of shrubs that are structurally similar, with evergreen, sclerophyllous leaves. Depending on the combined influences of disturbance, elevation, aspect and soils, the mix of species within the mixed chaparral habitat will vary. Although soil and parent material have some influence on the variety of species, microclimatic differences in soil moisture, temperature, and aspect often dictate what species will be most dominant in a given location.
The primary elements that maintain this ecological site are drought and fire. The species associated with this site are physiologically adapted to droughty conditions and many are also well-adapted to fire. Some of these adaptations include: extensive rooting systems (taking advantage of water near the soil surface as well as water far into the soil profile); sclerophyllous leaves; specialized stomates; the shape of the canopies (dissipates radiation by convection); the height of the shrubs (keeping the leaves away from the hot soil surface); post-fire crown sprouting; and seeds that often require high temperatures before germination.
The successional patterns of chaparral are initiated by fire. The time between fires plays an important role in this ecological system. Until recently it was commonly perceived that chaparral needs to burn in order to maintain its vigor and heath. Many chaparral shrub species can live for more than 100 years without becoming decadent, and with out affecting their ability to regenerate after a fire (Keeley et al, 2005). Chaparral can develop into extremely dense, sometimes impenetrable stands of dead branches and heavy litter, however these shrubs can self thin over time. Fire can be detrimental to chaparral community if it becomes too frequent, however with longer fire frequencies fire is the natural cause for stand regeneration. When fire burns through chaparral it recharges the soil’s available nitrogen and carbon, and stimulate new growth and seed germination. Most of the dominant chaparral species are able to rapidly recover and grow after a fire. The common shrubs associated with this site Redheart (Ceanothus spinosus), toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia), and California live oak (Quercus agrifolia) can all resprout after a fire. These species are not dependent upon fire for seed scarification. They produce seed that is ready to germinate in the shade of the canopy. Redheart also stores seeds that will only germinate after heat scarification.
The historical fire regime for these mixed chaparral communities is difficult to determine prior to European settlers arrival, however there are indications of a fire-return interval that was probably greater than 70 years, with lightning being the primary ignition source (Keeley and Fotheringham 2001). Fire intervals may have been up to 200 years along the coast, but have generally increased to 40-50 year intervals with the increase in human caused fires.
State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
Figure 3. F020XD044CA Model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 5 submodel, plant communities
State 6 submodel, plant communities
State 1
California live oak mixed woodland 1.1Community 1.1
California live oak mixed woodland 1.1This chaparral community is the reference community and it is dominated by California live oak (Quercus agrifolia) and redheart (Ceanothus spinosus) with a fair mix of other associated species. Common species include; bigpod ceanothus (Ceanothus megacarpus), Southern California walnut (Juglans californica), valley oak (Quercus lobata), sugar sumac (Rhus ovata), California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), giant wildrye (Leymus condensatus), southern bush monkeyflower (Mimulus longiflorus), white sage (Salvia apiana), San Luis purple sage (Salvia leucophylla), blue elderberry (Sambucus nigra ssp. cerulea) and Pacific poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum).
This community has developed during the absence of fire for more than 60 years. California live oak has developed into a tree, standing above the shorter statured shade intolerant chaparral species. California live oak has at least 30 percent cover. Southern California walnut and valley oak are occasionally in the overstory. Under the tree canopy it is often open with a layer of dead leaves and very little vegetation; in contrast the areas with chaparral are still impenetrable due to the multi-stemmed shrub growth habit. Redheart is the dominant chaparral species present in between the woodland patches. The California live oak and chaparral communities have a high proportion of endemic species and both plant communities are considered threatened due to loss of habitat from development and an increase in fire frequency.
Most of the dominant trees and shrubs associated with these communities produce seeds that are ready to germinate and do not require fire, heat or charate to induce germination. Some species can develop in the shade of the canopy. The ability to produce new seedlings in the absence of fire is unique to this community compared to some of the nearby chaparral communities. Continual regeneration and long life spans allow this community to remain healthy for centuries with out needing fire for rejuvenation.
However this site is adapted for fire and when it occurs in this oak woodland and chaparral community, it usually burns the canopy of the entire stand, creating transition, T1.1a which leads to stand regeneration.
State 2
State 3Community 2.1
State 3When fire repeatedly burns through a chaparral community, before the species reach maturity, the presence of the chaparral species may decline. Since most of the dormant seeds in the seed bank germinate the first year after a fire, there are very few seeds left to germinate after subsequent fires. Time without disturbance is needed for the shrubs to mature and produce seeds. Frequent fires also affect the ability for the resprouting shrubs to send up new shoots by depleting the carbohydrate storage in the root systems. In the absence of shrub seedlings and resprouting lignotubers, non-native annual grasses become dominate and self-perpetuate the frequent fire cycle. The minimal amount of time needed for the chaparral species to recover is not known, but some reports say that less than 20 to 40 years is detrimental.
Non-native species that may be present during this phase are the common non-native grasses (Avena fatua, Bromus sp., Cynodon dactylon, Festuca sp., Hordeum murinum, etc.) and mustard (Brassica nigra), followed by a variety of thistles (Centaurea melitensis, Salsola iberica, etc.) (Daget, 1995).
Once the non-native species become established and the chaparral species have been eliminated it is extremely difficult to restore this area. Restoration efforts should focus on reintroducing native species, eliminating non-native species and reducing the fire frequency (R2a).State 3
Native perennials and annuals with regenerating shrubs and trees 1.2Community 3.1
Native perennials and annuals with regenerating shrubs and trees 1.2This community is dominated by native forbs and grasses, along with resprouting shrubs and shrub seedlings. This phase is short lived because the shrubs rapidly regain dominance in a couple of years. Data was not collected on this specific ecological site, but it is possible that many of the fire following species listed by Thanos and Rundel, 1995 and Daget, 2002 may be present. Some of these species are: whisperingbells (Emmenanthe penduliflora), largeflower phacelia (Phacelia grandiflora), black sage (Salvia mellifera), yellow bleeding heart (Ehrendorferia ochroleuca formerly Dicentra ochroleuca), bush poppy (Dendromecon rigida), Coulter's snapdragon (Sairocarpus coulterianus formerly Antirrhinum coulterianum), golden eardrops (Ehrendorferia chrysantha formerly Dicentra chrysantha), western poppy (Papaver californicum), and windpoppy (Stylomecon heterophylla). Many of the species listed above have stored dormant seeds in the soil, which will not germinate until heat from the fire, sunlight from the removal of the canopy, or nitrogen from the charred wood leachate cue germination. Most of these annual and perennial fire followers are only present the first year or two after a fire.
California live oak (Quercus agrifolia), Southern California walnut (Juglans californica), Toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) and sugar sumac (Rhus ovata), resprout after fire but do not reproduce abundantly from seed.
Bigpod ceanothus (Ceanothus megacarpus) is dependent upon fire for seed scarification. Redheart (Ceanothus spinosus) can resprout after fire, produces seeds that are ready to germinate and dormant seeds that require scarification. Ceanothus seedlings may be abundant the first year or two after a fire. Many seedlings die after the first year, and some do not grow well under the shade of resprouting shrubs.
In the absence of disturbance the chaparral species continue to grow and increase in cover. This is the natural community pathway (1.2a) in the state and transition model.
State 4
Young chaparral 1.3Community 4.1
Young chaparral 1.3This community is a young chaparral community still in the growth phase following a fire. The young and/or resprouting shrubs and trees are beginning to shade out the annual and perennial understory and begin to self thin.
The primary pathway for this community is 1.3a to continue with the growth and development of the shrub and tree species. This phase may last from 2 to 30 years.
If fire burns this community during this stage (initiating pathway 1.3b) it will return to the regeneration phase.State 5
Mixed chaparral and woodland 1.4Community 5.1
Mixed chaparral and woodland 1.4This chaparral community is dominated by redheart (Ceanothus spinosus), with bigpod ceanothus (Ceanothus megacarpus), and sugar sumac (Rhus ovata). California live oak (Quercus agrifolia) is present in a shrub form. California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), white sage (Salvia apiana), and San Luis purple sage (Salvia leucophylla) are present in open areas.
If enough time passes without disturbance some of these species become taller than the chaparral canopy and develop into more of a woodland type structure. Eventually this site may become a mix of woodlands and chaparral, (pathway 1.4a).
When fire does occur in this chaparral community, it usually burns the canopy of the entire stand, creating pathway, 1.1a which leads to stand regeneration.
State 6
State 2Community 6.1
State 2This state develops with an altered fire regime and/or with the introduction of non-native plant species. Increased fire frequencies and low intensity fires can be detrimental to chaparral and woodland regeneration. This altered state has similar plant communities to the reference state, but non-native species, particularly the annual grasses, such as oats (Avena spp.) and bromes (Bromus spp.) are present. The overall cover of the chaparral and woodland species has declined, with more openings in the canopy. The mature California live oak woodland may be less common in this altered state because the fire return interval has become too short to allow the oaks to develop into mature trees. Increases fire frequencies may favor fire dependent chaparral species such as bigpod ceanothus (Ceanothus megacarpus), shifting species composition away from the historic community.
The non-native species become established after a fire or other disturbances such as road building, grazing, or foot traffic.
The non-native grasses can alter the fire regime by creating an easily flammable and continuous fuel source. If the fire frequency becomes too frequent this state may loose the chaparral species and transition to state 3 (T2a).
Additional community tables
Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 6. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 7. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 4.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 5.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 6.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
The woodland community creates ideal habitat for dear, birds and small mammals. The shoots of many species are browsed and the acorns, walnuts, cherries, and other seeds are eaten.
The chaparral phase provides a denser habitat suitable for shelter and hiding for smaller mammals. The following birds prefer Chaparral communities for their habitat: Wrentit (Chamaea fasciata), Western Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma californica), California Towhee (Pipilo crissalis), Spotted Towhee (Pipilo crissalis), and the California Thrasher (Toxostoma redivivum). The gig-eared woodrat (Neotoma macrotis), Red diamond rattlesnake (Crotalus exsul) and the Mt. mahogany hairstreak butterfly (Satyrium tetra) are other animals associated with chaparral (Halsey, 2005).
Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), Rabbits, Coyote (Canis latrans), bobcat (Lynx rufus), and mountain lions (Puma concolor), also utilize chaparral and woodlands for bedding, cover and/or browse (Halsey, 2005).
Recreational uses
This area is suitable for trails and picnic areas if the slopes are not too steep. This area may provide shelter from the summer heat, because it is associated with north slopes and may have tree cover.
Wood products
California live oak wood is primarily used for firewood since the wood cracks and warps (Steinberg and Howard, 2002). There is abundant biomass in these communities that could be used for pulp or biofuels, but is probably not economically or environmentally feasible at this time.
Other products
The acorns from California live oak can and the walnuts from the Southern California walnut can be eaten after processing.
Supporting information
Other references
Burk, Jack H., 1978. Seasonal and Diurnal Water Potentials in Selected Chaparral Shrubs. American Midland Naturalist, Vol. 99, No. 1 (Jan., 1978), pp. 244-248
Dagit, Rosi 2002. Post-fire Monitoring of Coast Live Oaks (Quercus agrifolia) Burned in the 1993 Old Topanga Fire. USDA Forest Service. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-184.
Dagit, R. 1995. Recovery of Oaks (Quercus agrifolia) following the Old Topanga Fire, November 1993. In: Keeley, J.; Scott, T., eds. Brushfires in California: ecology and resource management. International Association of Wildland Fire. Fairfield, WA; 189-191.
Esser, Lora. 1993. Juglans californica. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2007, December 8].
Haidinger, Tori L. and Keeley Jon E. (1993). Role of High Fire Frequency in Destruction of Mixed Chaparral. Madrono, Vol. 40, No.3, pp. 141-147, 1993.
Keeley, Jon E. (2004). Impact of Antecedent Climate on Fire Regimes in Coastal California. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2004, 13, 173-182.
Keeley Jon E. (2002). Fire Management of California Shrubland Landscapes. Environmental Management Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 395-408.
Keeley, J.E. (2001). Fire and invasive species in Mediterranean-climate ecosystems of California. Pages 81–94 in K.E.M. Galley and T.P. Wilson (eds.). Proceedings of the Invasive Species Workshop: the Role of Fire in the Control and Spread of Invasive Species. Fire Conference 2000: the First National Congress on Fire Ecology, Prevention, and Management. Miscellaneous Publication No. 11, Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL.
Keeley, Jon E. (1992). Recruitment of Seedlings and Vegetative Sprouts in Unburned Chaparral. Ecology, Volume 73, Issue 4 (August, 1992), 1194-1208. The Ecological Society of America.
Keeley, Jon E. and Fotheringham C.J. (2001). Historic Fire Regime in Southern California shrublands. Conservation Biology, Volume 15, No. 6, December 2001. pp. 1536-1548.
Keeley, Jon E. and Fotheringham C.J. (1998). Mechanism of smoke-induced seed germination in a post-fire chaparral annual. Journal of Ecology, 1998, 86, 27-36. British Ecological Society.
Keeley, Jon E. and Fotheringham C.J. Role of Fire in Regeneration of seed. Chapter 13. Online at: http://www.werc.usgs.gov/seki/pdfs/regeneration.pdf
McMurray, Nancy E. 1990. Heteromeles arbutifolia. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [ 2005, June 29].
Meentemeyer, Ross K.; Moody, Aaron; and Franklin, Janet. 2001. Landscape-scale patterns of shrub-species abundance in California chaparral. The role of topographically mediated resource gradients. Plant Ecology 156: 19–41, 2001. © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
Riggan, Philip J.; Goode, Suzanne; Paula M. Jacks; and Lockwood,Robert N., 1988. Interaction of Fire and Community Development in Chaparral of Southern California. Ecological Monographs. Volume 58, Issue 3 (September 1988)Article: pp. 155–176
Steinberg, Peter D.; Howard, Janet L. (2002, December). Quercus agrifolia. In:Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/[].
Thanos, C. A., and Rundel, P. W. 1995. Fire-Followers in Chaparral: Nitrogenous Compounds Trigger Seed Germination. The Journal of Ecology, Vol. 83, No. 2 (Apr., 1995), pp. 207-216
Contributors
Loretta Metz, Marchel Munnecke
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement