Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site F015XI201CA
Valley oak/Santa Barbara sedge
17"-19" p.z.
Last updated: 5/08/2025
Accessed: 08/19/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Draft. A draft ecological site description is either incomplete or has not undergone quality control and quality assurance review.
Classification relationships
Valoak series - Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf, A Manual of CA Vegetation. 1995. California Native Plant Society.
Valley oak/grass association - Allen et al, A classification system for CA hardwood rangelands. 1991.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Quercus lobata
(2) Quercus wislizeniShrub Not specified
Herbaceous (1) Carex barbarae
Physiographic features
This ecological site is found along McCabe Canyon Creek, located in the valleys on alluvial upper floodplains and terraces, at elevations from 980 to 1640 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Valley
(2) Flood plain
(3) Terrace
Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The climate for Pinnacles National Monument is dry and hot in the summers, and cold, wet winters. The average annual precipitation is from 17 to 19 inches. Most of the precipitation is in the form of rainfall occurring at a low to moderate intensity, from Pacific frontal storms during the winter from October to May. The average annual temperature is from 41 to 77 degrees F. The average frost-free period is 200 days.
BarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
Soil features
These soils are well drained and have developed from alluvium derived from fanglomerate. They are deep, with an organic layer from 0-4 inches, surface textures of gravelly loamy sand and subsurface textures of loamy sands. The available water capacity is 2.3 - 3.1 in.
Soils that have been correlated to this ecological site include the following for the Pinnacles National Monument Soil Survey.
Mapunit Component
133 PinncampTable 3. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Gravelly loamy sand
Family particle size (1) Sandy
Soil depth 80 – 0 in Ecological dynamics
The valley oak (Quercus lobata) woodlands are a rapidly disappearing ecosystem in California. Valley oaks are common to higher floodplains along rivers and streams, often associated with riparian forests dominated by Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii). These areas were and are known to be extremely fertile land for agriculture crops and grazing lands, thus, much of the land suitable for valley oak regeneration has been lost to both habitatdestruction and soil moisture availability (Meyer 2002). The valley oak is one of the largest oaks in North America that can grow trunks up to 6 or 7 feet in diameter. They are deciduous trees that require large amounts of water at rooting depth and rich soil created by spring flooding (Pavlick et al 1993). Natural regeneration of these trees has been steadily declining, due primarily, to the loss of habitat and the removal of natural yearly flooding events (Sork et al 2002). Extensive research has been done to determine what can be done to restore valley oaks to riparian woodlands, however many have found that without major changes to current land uses, there is little chance of valley oak restoration success. Why the valley oaks are disappearing from Pinnacles National Monument is similar, if not the same, as the other valley oak habitats across the state.
Soil moisture, and in turn, soil texture, seem to be the major components in successful seedling germination and establishment for valley oaks (Adams et al 1992). The valley oak needs deep soil that is able to retain soil moisture from spring flood events, into the growing season, in order to ensure survival through the hot temperatures of summer. Flooding is especially important for valley oaks, since they prefer the higher parts of the floodplain, where the water table is further down so as not to saturate the roots, but still offers the soil moisture during the key part of the growing season (Griggs and Golet 2002). This also explains why soil texture is an important component as well. Loamy soil textures have a higher water holding capacity, and will hold water later into the year, whereas sandy soil textures have larger pore spaces, and allow water to flow through rather quickly, making the water-holding capacity very low. Thus, making floodplains with sandy soil textures a more difficult growing medium for new valley oak seedlings than loamy soil textures (Meyer 2002).
There are other factors that could play additional roles in the lack of regeneration of valley oaks in Pinnacles National Monument including; rodent and deer predation of seedlings, lack of open niche space for new seedlings to utilize, and shading created by the older valley oak canopy. Valley oak woodlands that are highly utilized by deer and rodents, and in Pinnacles in particular, feral pigs, will have a much more difficult time regenerating due to predation of their seedlings in the first year. It has been speculated in the research that this is also a factor that can be solved by replacing the natural flooding regimes because the rodents drown, thus reducing the number of seedling predators significantly (Meyer 2002).
Most valley oak woodlands that still remain throughout California are filled with tall, old trees, some 150 years old with an annual grassland understory. These annual grasses, such as bromes and wild oats, create problems for new oak seedlings because they tie up all the available nutrients and water, leaving nothing left for the oak seedlings to begin germination (Adams et al 1992). With the addition of the shade created by the large canopy of the oaks, the seedlings have lost virtually any chance for germination or survival (Griggs and Golet 2002).
The valley oaks in Pinnacles National Monument are more than likely being affected by all of these circumstances, which might explain why there is currently no regeneration of the valley oaks. The soils found throughout most of the park, and in particular, the valley oak woodlands along Chalone Creek, are from a granitic parent material, and thus are primarily course sandy loams and course sands. Because water-holding capacity in these soils is low, the spring flooding of Chalone Creek is necessary to assist in adding water to the system every year for the riparian species. Chalone Creek was probably a much larger body of water a hundred years ago, before the dam on Bear Creek (which flows into Chalone Creek) was constructed and other human land management occurred. Without the higher levels of flow every year, the floodplain for Chalone Creek in the valley oak woodlands has gotten more and more narrow, restricting the width of the riparian vegetation, and thus much of the area where the valley oaks still persist has become more upland influenced with annual grasses and buckwheat (Eriogonum fasiculatum). Unfortunately without restoring some of the natural flows to Chalone Creek, it is likely there will continue to be little to no regeneration of valley oaks in this park. With the rapid drainage of water through the sandy soils, in addition to a decreased floodplain, an increase in annual grass understory, and the increased shade created by the older remaining valley oaks, this valley oak woodland has become significantly altered.
Restoration of this ecosystem would be possible; however it would be costly and require fairly labor-intensive strategies. Without replacing the natural disturbance regime, it would be necessary to manually plant valley oak seedlings with an auger and protect them from predation either with wire-mesh cages or tubing, although tubing does constrict growth (Adams et al 1992). They would also require some sort of irrigation or additional watering, due to the sandy soil textures in the Park, in order to ensure they live through the hot summer season in the Central Valley (Griggs and Golet 2002).State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Valley oak WoodlandCommunity 1.1
Valley oak WoodlandValley oak - 48%
Live oak - 46%
S.B. sedge - 80%
Foothill pine - 0.07%Forest overstory.Valley oaks with live oaks and foothill pine.
Forest understory. Sedges with low cover of ripgut and soft chess.
Figure 3. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 4. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 8000 9200 10500 Forb 120 140 160 Total 8120 9340 10660 Table 5. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana basal cover 0-0% Grass/grasslike basal cover 80-90% Forb basal cover 0-0% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 10-20% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 6. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (ft) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.5 – – – 0-1% >0.5 <= 1 – – 80-90% – >1 <= 2 – – – – >2 <= 4.5 – – – – >4.5 <= 13 – 0-1% – – >13 <= 40 – – – – >40 <= 80 – – – – >80 <= 120 40-50% – – – >120 – – – – Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
Remaining valley oak riparian and woodland areas comprise habitat which is intensively used by wildlife. Collectively, valley oak
riparian forests support 67 nesting bird species, more than any other California habitat for which data are available. The
Swainson's hawk is closely associated with riparian habitat in the Central Valley, where these hawks use large valley oaks as nesting sites.
Valley oak is used by various cavity-nesting and cavity-storing birds and mammals. It supplies browse for livestock, black-tailed deer, lagomorphs, and various rodents. Pocket gopher, California ground squirrel, and deer mouse are heavy consumers of valley oak seedlings. Acorns are an important diet item of the California ground squirrel, pocket gopher, scrub jay, yellow-billed magpie, acorn woodpecker, black-tailed deer, feral pig, and of cattle. Roots are consumed by feral pigs and pocket gophers (Howard 1992).Hydrological functions
Water plays a key role for oaks in both valleys and savannas. Valley oaks are adapted to droughty conditions via an extensive taproot that accesses deep water tables. Where water is relatively close to the surface, there can be dense forests of valley oak. Here they thrive in poorly aerated soils with high water holding capacity, conditions similar to riparian habitats. Where water is more limited, valley oak landscapes become more open woodland and savanna communities. In this case, the oaks are scattered in a grassland matrix; a pattern typical of Sedgwick ranch, where data were collected (Olson 1998).
Wood products
Valley oak lumber has a propensity to crack and warp while drying, and is often stained by fungus. These problems, however, can be overcome, and there is a small commercial market for the lumber in the manufacture
of cabinets. The wood is occasionally used for wine barrels.
Historically, it was primarily used as firewood and as a source of commercial charcoal. Valley oak wood was also utilized in the construction of the steamboats that once ran the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, and as keel blocks during World War II (Howard 1992).
Other products
Native Americans used valley oak acorns for making meal. During the last century, domestic pigs were driven to Central Valley oak woodlands for mast feedings (Howard 1992).
Supporting information
Inventory data references
VALLEYOAK - %Cover VALLEYOAK - DWR
Other references
Adams Jr., T.E., P.B. Sands, W.H. Weitkamp, and N.K. McDonald. 1992. Oak Seedling Establishment on California Rangelands. Journal of Range Management. 45:93-98.
Griggs, F.T. and G.H. Golet. 2002. Riparian Valley Oak (Quercus lobata) Forest Restoration on the Middle Sacramento River, California. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. PSW-GTR-184.
Howard, J.L. 1992. Quercus lobata. Fire Information Effects System. Accessed June 30, 2006: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis.
Meyer, V.C. 2002. Soil Moisture Availability as a Factor Affecting Valley Oak (Quercus lobata Nee) Seedling Establishment and Survival in a Riparian Habitat, Cosmunes River Preserve, Sacramento County, California. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. PSW-GTR-184.
Olson, S.K. 1998. Hydrologic Relationships of Valley Oak (Q. lobata, Nee) and their Effect on Seedling Emergence and Seedling to Sapling Mortality, Humboldt State University. Accessed June 30, 2006: http://www.icess.ucsb.edu/esrg/ess_sum97/Students_ESS.1998/Sam_Olson/sam_report.html.
Pavlik, B., P. Muick, S. Johnson, and M. Popper. 1993. Oaks of California. Cachuma Press: 184 pp.
Sork, V.L., F.W. Davis, R.J. Dyer, and P.E. Smouse. 2002. Mating Patterns in a Savanna Population of Valley Oak (Quercus lobata Nee). USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. PSW-GTR-184.
Contributors
K. Moseley
Approval
Kendra Moseley, 5/08/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 08/19/2026 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement