Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This site occurs on southerly exposures of low elevation terraces and canyon side slopes composed of early Cenezoic tuffaceous sediments. Slopes range from 15 to 90 percent with slopes of 30 to 60 percent being most typical. Elevation varies from 1300 to 2600 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Hill
(2) Mountain
(3) Plateau
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 1300 – 2600 ft Slope 15 – 90 % Water table depth 72 in Aspect S, SW, W Climatic features
Elevation and aspect affect precipitation and the relative effectiveness of the precipitation and temperatures. Temperature changes can occur rapdily. In addition, the topography also results in localized cold air drainages, along with occasional cold air entrapment and inversions in the valleys.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 140 days Freeze-free period (average) 180 days Precipitation total (average) 10 in BarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
Soil features
Soils on this site are typically shallow. The surface is predominantly loamy. These soils are well drained.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Very cobbly loam
(2) Stony coarse sandy loam
(3) Clay loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Well drained Permeability class Slow to rapid Soil depth 5 – 19 in Available water capacity
(0-40in)0.15 – 1.94 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)Not specified Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)Not specified Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)Not specified Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)6.6 – 8.4 Ecological dynamics
This site occurs on southerly exposures of low elevation terraces and canyon side slopes. Grasses dominate this plant community with forbs and shrubs making up a lesser component. Fluctuations in species composition and relative production may change from year to year depend upon abnormal precipitation or other climatic factors. Thurber needlegrass increases with a gravelly surface and decreases with a clay surface. Bluebunch wheatgrass increases with soil depth. The interpretive plant community for this site is the Historic Climax Plant Community (HCPC).
State and transiiton pathways: 1) Absence of fire combined with overgrazing.State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textState 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 1
HCPC: ACTH7-PSSP6Community 1.1
HCPC: ACTH7-PSSP6This site is dominated by Thurber needlegrass. Forbs and shrubs make up a minor component of this site.
Figure 3. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Grass/Grasslike 510 680 850 Shrub/Vine 60 80 100 Forb 30 40 50 Total 600 800 1000 Figure 4. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). OR4241 , B10 JD Droughty Shallow South 9-12 A. JD Droughty Shallow South 9-12 RPC Growth Curve.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 5 15 30 35 5 0 5 5 0 0 State 2
State B: Disturbance (Broom snakeweed/cheatgrass-eroded)Community 2.1
State B: Disturbance (Broom snakeweed/cheatgrass-eroded)This site is dominated by Broom snakeweed. Cheatgrass, China lettuce, Salsify, mustard and Juniper invade.
Figure 5. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 6. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(lb/acre)Representative value
(lb/acre)High
(lb/acre)Shrub/Vine 120 240 360 Grass/Grasslike 60 120 180 Forb 20 40 60 Total 200 400 600 Figure 6. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). OR4242 , B10 JD Droughty Shallow South 9-12 B. State B: Disturbance .
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 5 15 30 35 5 0 5 5 0 0 Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 25–90 Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 16–64 – sand dropseed SPCR Sporobolus cryptandrus 16–40 – 2 550–800 Thurber's needlegrass ACTH7 Achnatherum thurberianum 480–640 – bluebunch wheatgrass PSSPS Pseudoroegneria spicata ssp. spicata 80–160 – squirreltail ELEL5 Elymus elymoides 16–40 – Forb3 20–60 common yarrow ACMI2 Achillea millefolium 8–20 – milkvetch ASTRA Astragalus 8–20 – Bruneau mariposa lily CABR4 Calochortus bruneaunis 8–20 – buckwheat ERIOG Eriogonum 8–20 – desertparsley LOMAT Lomatium 8–20 – seep monkeyflower MIGU Mimulus guttatus 8–20 – phacelia PHACE Phacelia 8–20 – scarlet globemallow SPCO Sphaeralcea coccinea 8–20 – Shrub/Vine4 60–100 broom snakeweed GUSA2 Gutierrezia sarothrae 40–60 – basin big sagebrush ARTRT Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata 16–40 – rubber rabbitbrush ERNA10 Ericameria nauseosa 8–20 – purple sage SADOI Salvia dorrii ssp. dorrii var. incana 8–20 – Table 8. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 40–80 cheatgrass BRTE Bromus tectorum 60–80 – Sandberg bluegrass POSE Poa secunda 20–60 – 2 20–40 Thurber's needlegrass ACTH7 Achnatherum thurberianum 20–40 – bluebunch wheatgrass PSSPS Pseudoroegneria spicata ssp. spicata 10–30 – Forb3 40–60 mustard BRASS2 Brassica 10–20 – prickly lettuce LASE Lactuca serriola 10–20 – salsify TRPO Tragopogon porrifolius 10–20 – Shrub/Vine4 175–240 broom snakeweed GUSA2 Gutierrezia sarothrae 80–120 – western juniper JUOC Juniperus occidentalis 20–60 – basin big sagebrush ARTRT Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata 20–60 – rubber rabbitbrush ERNA10 Ericameria nauseosa 15–40 – purple sage SADOI Salvia dorrii ssp. dorrii var. incana 15–40 – Interpretations
Animal community
Grazing Livestock- Grazing is suitable for this site as long as management objectives include the improvement or maintenance of this site. It is easy to overuse this site and cause a shift in vegetation that is difficult to change. This site has the potential to produce a large amount of high quality forage. Management should be aimed at harvesting the forage as quickly as possible, letting the site recover from the grazing event prior to fall dormancy. Initial stocking rates will be determined with the landowner or decisionmaker. They will be based on past use histories and type and condition of the preference ratings.
Wildlife- The main wildlife species of concern on this site are large herbivores. These are mule deer and elk. These wildlife species can possibly overuse this site before the time cattle or sheep are planned to be grazed. Being an open grassland, this site is home to a variety of small herbivores, birds, and their associated predators. This site is mainly a foraging area for the larger wildlife. No threatened or endangered wildlife species rely on this site for any of their habitat requirements.Hydrological functions
The site has a high potential in low seral condition to produce significant run-off to receiving waters. The hydrology of this site is characterized by high intensity thunderstorms during the summer months and by low intensity frontal storms during the winter.
Wood products
No wood products are associated with this site.
Other information
Increase in western juniper and the subsequent competition for moisture will lead to a reduction of available forage. Overgrazing can easily reduce ground cover and accelerate soil loss. Improving infiltration and permeability, and reducing runoff should be the immediate goal of juniper control.
Supporting information
Type locality
Location 1: Wheeler County, OR Township/Range/Section T11S R20E S12 General legal description SE 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec 12 T11S R20E WM South of Painted Hills Unit (90% SI) Location 2: Wheeler County, OR Township/Range/Section T12S R26E S6 General legal description SW 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec 6 T12S R26E WM West boundary Sheep Rock Unit (90% SI) Location 3: Wheeler County, OR Township/Range/Section T11S R26E S5 General legal description SW 1/4 Sec 5 T11S R26E WM In Foree Unit (90% SI) Other references
Soil Conservation Service, Relative Forage Preference of Plants for Grazing Use by Season, Range Technical Note No. 16,j1982.
Western Regional Climate Center, NOAA, National Weather Service, Portland, OR
website-http://nimbo.wrh.noaa.gov/Portland/climate.html
Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington, Jerry F. Frankline and C.T. Dyrness.
The Ecological Provinces of Oregon, E. William Anderson, Michael M. Borman, and William C. Krueger.Contributors
Ed Petersen, Alan Bahn
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Jeff Repp and Bruce Frannsen Contact for lead author State Rangeland Management Specialist for NRCS – Oregon Date 08/06/2012 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None to some on steeper slopes, significant sheet & rill erosion hazard -
Presence of water flow patterns:
None to some on steeper slopes -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None to very few (pedestals) -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
10-20% -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None, moderate wind erosion hazard -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine - limited movement -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Moderately resistant to erosion: aggregate stability = 3-5 -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Shallow to very shallow, well drained very stony to cobbly loams, stony coarse sandy loams, or clay loams: moderate OM (1-3%) -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Moderate ground cover (50-60%) and steep slopes (30-60%) moderately limit rainfall impact and overland flow -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Thurber needlegrass > Bluebunch wheatgrass > other grasses > shrubs > forbsSub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Normal decadence and mortality expected -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Favorable: 1000, Normal: 800, Unfavorable: 600 lbs/acre/year at high RSI (HCPC) -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Western Juniper readily invades the site. Cheatgrass and Medusahead invade sites that have lost deep rooted perennial grass functional groups. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species should be capable of reproducing annually
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
