Natural Resources
Conservation Service
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub Not specified
Herbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Alluvial fan
(2) Depression
Ponding duration Very long (more than 30 days) Ponding frequency Frequent Elevation 4000 – 6000 ft Slope 0 – 1 % Ponding depth 0 – 24 in Water table depth 0 – 60 in Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
This site is characterized by relatively short, hot summers and cold, snowy winters. The site receives approximately 20 inches of precipitation per year, the bulk of which is snowfall. There are frequent thunderstorms in the summer months. There may be ground fogs in the mornings during the growing season which affect stomatal gas exchange and photosynthetic activity,
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 20 days Freeze-free period (average) 50 days Precipitation total (average) 30 in BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
Soil features
Soils for this site typically have an organic layer over loams, layers of coarse pumice over heavy clay loams. There is an apparent water table present for most of the year. The soils are ponded for a significant time during the spring, summer, and early fall. These relatively young soils have been deposited over older, remnant fans and terraces. Variations and intergrades of soil characteristics are common.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Mucky silt loam
Family particle size (1) Loamy
Drainage class Poorly drained Permeability class Very slow Soil depth 48 – 61 in Surface fragment cover <=3" 2 – 0 % Surface fragment cover >3" 2 – 0 % Available water capacity
(0-40in)5.5 – 6.5 in Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-40in)Not specified Electrical conductivity
(0-40in)0 – 2 mmhos/cm Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-40in)1 – 0 Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-40in)2 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)2 – 0 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)2 – 0 % Ecological dynamics
This site is a highly variable transition site between Meadow Swale and Wet Marsh sites. The site is usually located in swales, old channels, oxbows, and deeper depressions. An apparent water table appears at or near the surface in all but the driest portions of the year. IN the same area there may be different plant communities on the same soils. this patchy variability may be due to slight differences in hydrology, position, and elevation (micro relief), or the mere fact that one of these plant communities pioneered and came to dominate the site. In the same area there may be almost pure stands of either of the dominant Carex species or, in lower seral stages, Eleocharis or Juncus will dominate the stand. The interpretative plant community for this site is the Historic Climax Plant Community (HCPC).
State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
Figure 4. Marshy Swale State & Transition Model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Additional community tables
Interpretations
Supporting information
Contributors
Jeffrey P. Repp
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement