Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site AX001X04X001
Mesic Udic Riparian Forest
Last updated: 1/23/2025
Accessed: 04/21/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 001X–Northern Pacific Coast Range, Foothills, and Valleys
This long and narrow resource area stretches along the Pacific Border Province of the Pacific Mountain System in Oregon and Washington. The area is bounded by the Olympic Mountains on the north and the Klamath Mountains on the south. Most of the area consists of hills and low mountains with gentle to steep slopes. The parent materials are composed primarily of young Tertiary sedimentary rocks with some minor volcanic rocks. Glacial till and outwash deposits are found in the northern half of the area within Washington. In the far southern portion of the area, near the Klamath Mountains, the sedimentary rocks are older and some have been metamorphosed. The average annual precipitation ranges from 60 to 200 inches, increasing with elevation.
The dominant soil orders in this MLRA are Andisols, Inceptisols, and Ultisols. Soil depth ranges from shallow to very deep. While most soils in the area are well drained and occur on foothills, mountain slopes and ridges, floodplain and depressional soils can range from well drained to very poorly drained. Soil textures are typically medial, loamy, or clayey. The dominant soils in the area have a mesic or frigid soil temperature regime and a udic soil moisture regime; however, soils with an aquic soil moisture regime or cryic soil temperature regime do occur.LRU notes
The Southern Pacific Coast Range land resource unit (LRU 4) of MLRA 1 is located in central to southern Oregon State. The LRU extends from the Siletz River to the Rogue River and is bounded on the west by MLRA 4a Sitka Spruce Belt and MLRA 2 Willamette and Puget Sound Valleys to the east. Several major rivers carved valleys through the landscape depositing more recent alluvium. These include the Alsea, Coos, Coquille, Green, Yachats, Siletz, Siuslaw, Umpqua, and Rogue Rivers.
Ecological site concept
This ecological site is found on the western Coast Range in the Pacific Northwest from central to southern Oregon. It is found at low to middle elevations in narrow to wide riparian corridors on moderate to steeper gradient streams. These areas are subject to stream overflow. Riparian ecological sites typically differ in topography, vegetation, geomorphology, and microclimate from the surrounding uplands of the forest ecosystem (Dwire, 2003).
The most common overstory species are bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), red alder (Alnus rubra), and cascara (Frangula purshiana). California laurel (Umbellularia californica), tanoak (Notholithocarpus desiflorus), and California live oak (Quercus chrysolepis) occur south of the Alsea River, at times quite prolifically (Pabst, 1999). Black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera spp. trichocarpa) is not present, or less than 5% cover. Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) is the most common conifer component, but typically limited to less than 25% cover (Hibbs, 2000). Regeneration is restricted by canopy cover and often limited to gaps where sunlight is most available and mineral soil is exposed from scouring (Pabst, 1999). Understory species diversity is greatest near the streams as a result of erosion and deposition creating openings for opportunistic species as well as the abundance of microsites which create unique environments (Spies, et. al, 2002). Common understory species include salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), stink currant (Ribes bracteosum), thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus), elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), vine maple (Acer circinatum), western swordfern (Polystichum munitum), and Oregon oxalis (Oxalis oregana).
The most common natural disturbance is flooding, with the volume and longevity of the flooding determining the effect on the dynamics of the forest. Although wildfire is uncommon in this ecological site (greater than 450-year return interval) when it does occur, it may be stand replacing (Balian, 2005). Fallen trees with exposed root systems and large woody debris is common.Associated sites
AX001X04X002 Mesic Udic Flood Plain Forest
Mesic Udic Flood Plain Forest is located in broad flood plain corridors of large river systems. Mesic Udic Riparian Forest is often found along the tributaries that lead to Mesic Udic Flood Plain Forest river systems.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Acer macrophyllum
(2) Alnus rubraShrub (1) Rubus spectabilis
(2) Rubus parviflorusHerbaceous (1) Polystichum munitum
(2) Oxalis oreganaLegacy ID
F001XD001OR
Physiographic features
This ecological site is found at low to middle elevations in narrow to wide riparian corridors on moderate to steeper gradient streams.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) River valley > Flood plain
(2) River valley > Stream terrace
Flooding frequency Rare to frequent Ponding frequency None Elevation 10 – 1200 ft Slope 0 – 3 % Water table depth 0 – 72 in Aspect W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW Climatic features
The climate has hot, moist summers and warm, wet winters. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 60 to 130 inches. Snowfall is rare, but when it does occur, is not persistent. Mean annual temperatures range from 44 to 54 degrees F (PRISM Climate Group, 2019). The mild temperatures, abundant precipitation, and long growing season result in highly productive forestlands.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 150-270 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) Precipitation total (characteristic range) 60-130 in Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) ALSEA FH (FALL CREEK) [USC00350145], Alsea, OR
-
(2) POWERS [USC00356820], Powers, OR
-
(3) ELKTON 3 SW [USC00352633], Elkton, OR
">Influencing water features
This site does not experience ponding. Flooding frequency is rare to frequent, and 100 or 500-year floods may dramatically alter the landscape.
Soil features
Soils that support this ecological site occur in the mesic soil temperature regime and the udic soil moisture regime. They are formed in alluvium on flood plain step and steam terrace positions. Soil moisture is not a limiting factor to forest growth due to the abundance of precipitation and summer fog. These soils are typically subject to flood events from November to April. The smaller, more frequent flood events typically only cause minor scouring in comparison with greater-magnitude 100- to 500-year floods. Soils of this ecological site are weakly developed Inceptisols due to their young age and association with active floodplains.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Alluvium – sedimentary rock
(2) Alluvium – sandstone and siltstone
Surface texture (1) Silt loam
(2) Loam
Drainage class Poorly drained to well drained Soil depth 60 – 0 in Surface fragment cover <=3" Not specified Surface fragment cover >3" Not specified Clay content
(0-8in)11 – 24 % Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(1-60in)0 – 5 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(1-60in)Not specified Ecological dynamics
State and transition model
Custom diagramStandard diagram
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 1
ReferenceCommunity 1.1
Bigleaf Maple, Red Alder, Salmonberry, Thimbleberry, Western Swordfern, and Oregon Oxalis
Bigleaf maple – red alder / salmonberry – thimbleberry / western swordfern – Oregon oxalis
Structure: mature deciduous forest with a mix of shrubs in the understory
Bigleaf maple and red alder are the most dominant overstory species in the reference community. California laurel (Umbellularia californica), tanoak (Notholithocarpus desiflorus), and California live oak (Quercus chrysolepis) occur south of the Alsea River, at times quite prolifically (Pabst, 1999). Douglas-fir may also represent a portion of the overstory, however the frequency of flooding lends to hardwood regeneration. Conifer regeneration will increase in abundance further from the active stream channel (Wimberly, 2001). Regeneration is restricted by canopy cover and often limited to gaps where sunlight and exposed mineral soil is most available.
The reference community represents a lack of major flooding for at least 75 years, allowing the pioneering species to form a mature canopy. The lack of flooding also allows the growth of a robust understory of shrubs including salmonberry, vine maple, stink currant, thimbleberry, and snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus). Forbs such as western swordfern, false lily of the valley (Maianthemum dilatatum), ladyfern (Athyrium filix-femina), and Oregon oxalis are also common.
Common disturbances include small gap dynamics (1/2 acre openings or smaller) following the decline of the red alder canopy, minor scouring from flooding, and mass movement. Soil deposition following minor scouring from smaller scale and periodic flooding temporarily affects the understory community, but it does not alter the composition of the overstory. In addition, beaver (Castor canadensis) activity can by a significant driver in small scale disturbances, hydrologic morphology, and contribute to large woody debris in riparian edges and corridors.Dominant plant species
-
bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), tree
-
red alder (Alnus rubra), tree
-
California laurel (Umbellularia californica), tree
-
tanoak (Notholithocarpus densiflorus), tree
-
canyon live oak (Quercus chrysolepis), tree
-
Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), tree
-
Cascara buckthorn (Frangula purshiana), tree
-
salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), shrub
-
thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus), shrub
-
common snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus), shrub
-
vine maple (Acer circinatum), shrub
-
stink currant (Ribes bracteosum), shrub
-
red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), shrub
-
western swordfern (Polystichum munitum), other herbaceous
-
redwood-sorrel (Oxalis oregana), other herbaceous
-
common ladyfern (Athyrium filix-femina), other herbaceous
-
false lily of the valley (Maianthemum dilatatum), other herbaceous
Community 1.2
Red Alder, Salmonberry, and Coastal HedgenettleRed alder / salmonberry / coastal hedgenettle
Structure: Bare ground with scattered tree, shrub, and grass establishment
Community phase 1.2 represents a riparian forest that is undergoing regeneration or stand initiation immediately following flooding disturbance. The soil surface is gravelly and highly variable depending on the intensity, frequency, and aggradation of the flooding event (Fonda, 1974). There may be scattered remnant mature trees in some areas and an abundance of woody debris. Successful regeneration is dependent on the local seed source, adequate seed bed, and sufficient light and water (Nierenberg, 2000). Red alder has several competition advantages and can establish quickly, relative to conifers. Red alder can sprout and establish in full sunlight and fixes nitrogen in poorly developed alluvial soils providing an early competitive advantage (Villarin, 2009). In addition, the deciduous species seeds are light and can be transported long distances by wind and water, allowing for rapid recolonization. Salmonberry and coastal hedgenettle (Stacys chamissonis) are often established within this community phase.Dominant plant species
-
red alder (Alnus rubra), tree
-
salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), shrub
-
coastal hedgenettle (Stachys chamissonis), other herbaceous
Community 1.3
Red Alder, Bigleaf Maple, Salmonberry, Western Swordfern, and False Lily of the Valley
Red alder – bigleaf maple/ salmonberry / western swordfern – false lily of the valley
Structure: dense single story with diminished understory
Community phase 1.3 is an early seral forest in regeneration, possibly with scattered remnant mature trees. There is increased competition among individual trees for available water, light, and nutrients. Red alder tends to dominate the overstory, however red alder will begin to die between 40-70 years following disturbance and allow more light to penetrate the newly nitrogen rich soil (Naiman, 2009). If there is a presence of red alder regeneration within this community phase, it may be inferred that frequent minor flooding has been influencing site dynamics (Nierenberg, 2000). Shade tolerant forbs such as western swordfern and false lily of the valley establish during this phase.Dominant plant species
-
red alder (Alnus rubra), tree
-
bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), tree
-
salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), shrub
-
false lily of the valley (Maianthemum dilatatum), other herbaceous
-
western swordfern (Polystichum munitum), other herbaceous
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2This pathway represents a stand replacing wildfire, catastrophic windstorm, a major 100 or 500-year flood event, or mass movement which scours the stream channel, removes understory and overstory vegetation, and may alter the stream flow. This type of disturbance may completely reconfigure sediment loads and dramatically reduce or eliminate the forest overstory.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.3This pathway represents growth over time with no further major disturbance.
Pathway 1.3B
Community 1.3 to 1.1
Red Alder, Bigleaf Maple, Salmonberry, Western Swordfern, and False Lily of the Valley
Bigleaf Maple, Red Alder, Salmonberry, Thimbleberry, Western Swordfern, and Oregon OxalisThis pathway represents growth over time with no further major disturbance.
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.2This pathway represents a stand replacing wildfire, catastrophic windstorm, a major 100 or 500-year flood event, or mass movement which scours the stream channel, removes understory and overstory vegetation, and may alter the stream flow. This type of disturbance may completely reconfigure sediment loads and dramatically reduce or eliminate the forest overstory.
State 2
ConvertedCommunity 2.1
Managed Cropland or HaylandManaged Cropland or Hayland
Structure: Annual or perennial non-native species
Community Phase 2.1 may consist of a range of crops, including annually planted species, short-lived perennials, and more permanent shrubby crops. Hayland and grass-legume silage crops are also included in this community phase.Community 2.2
Non-Native Grassland and ShrublandNon-Native Grassland and Shrubland
Structure: Annual or perennial herbaceous or shrubby species
Community phase 2.2 is characterized by a low level of agronomic or management inputs such as added fertility, intensive grazing management, regular mowing or weed control. This plant community is often dominated by introduced weedy species. Sites with extremely low fertility or heavy grazing pressure will have a higher proportion of annual, stoloniferous or rhizomatous species. Wetland areas are often dominated by non-native rhizomatous grasses. This plant community can include remnants of commonly seeded introduced pasture species.Community 2.3
Managed GrasslandManaged Grassland
Structure: perennial herbaceous species
Community phase 2.3 receives regular agronomic inputs, including adding soil nutrients and other soil amendments such as lime, implementing grazing management plans, regular mowing, controlling weeds, and reseeding as needed. This plant community typically includes introduced perennial pasture and hay species that commonly are seeded. In areas of historic native grassland, mixtures of perennial and annual native species may be seeded and managed by appropriate agronomic and livestock management activities. Minor amounts of introduced species that commonly are in non-native grassland and shrubland communities (community phase 2.2) are in this phase.Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2In the absence of the following agronomic and livestock management activities, seeds from surrounding weedy plant communities will be transported to the site through factors such as wind, flood water, animals or vehicle traffic where adapted species will become established. Management activities could include tillage, addition of significant fertility or other soil amendments such as lime, mowing, burning, harvest or chemical control of vegetation, planting the site to desirable herbaceous species and implementation of grazing management plans.
Pathway 2.1B
Community 2.1 to 2.3Agronomic and livestock management activities such as tillage, addition of significant fertility or other soil amendments such as lime, mowing, burning, harvest or chemical control of vegetation, planting the site to desirable herbaceous species and implementation of grazing management plans.
Pathway 2.2B
Community 2.2 to 2.1Agronomic activities such as tillage, addition of significant fertility or other soil amendments such as lime, mowing, burning, harvest or chemical control of vegetation, and planting the site to desirable crop species.
Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.3Agronomic and livestock management activities such as tillage, addition of significant fertility or other soil amendments such as lime, mowing, burning, harvest or chemical control of vegetation, planting the site to desirable herbaceous species and implementation of grazing management plans.
Pathway 2.3A
Community 2.3 to 2.1Agronomic activities such as tillage, addition of significant fertility or other soil amendments such as lime, mowing, burning, harvest or chemical control of vegetation, and planting the site to desirable crop species.
Pathway 2.3B
Community 2.3 to 2.2In the absence of the following agronomic and livestock management activities, seeds from surrounding weedy plant communities will be transported to the site through factors such as wind, flood water, animals or vehicle traffic where adapted species will become established. Management activities could include tillage, addition of significant fertility or other soil amendments such as lime, mowing, burning, harvest or chemical control of vegetation, planting the site to desirable herbaceous species and implementation of grazing management plans.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2This pathway represents a change in land use. Land management changes include modifications to the hydrologic function to develop pasture and agriculture. Non-native seed disbursement is introduced (intentionally or unintentionally) which alters the reference community.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 1This pathway represents a transition to restore the natural hydrologic function and native plant habitat. Native seed sources are necessary to restore the community as well as extensive brush and invasive species management and mitigation.
Additional community tables
Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 6. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 7. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 8. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 9. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 10. Community 2.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Other Established Classifications for Ecological Site National Vegetation Classification Group: G851 North Central Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest and Woodland Group and the A3745 Bigleaf Maple – Red Alder Riparian Forest Alliance
Other references
Balian, E., Naiman, R. 2005. Abundance and Production of Riparian Trees in the Lowland Floodplain of the Queets River, Washington. Ecosystems, Vol 8 pg 841-861.
Christy, J., Kagan, J., Wiedemann, A. 1998. Plant Associations of the Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Technical Paper R6-NR-ECOL-TP-09-98
Fonda, R.W. 1974. Forest Succession in Relation to River Terrace Development in Olympic National Park, Washington. Ecology, 55(5): 927-942.
Franklin, J.F., and Dyrness C.T. 1973. Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University press, Corvallis, USA.
Dwire, K. and Kauffman, J. 2003. Fire and Riparian Ecosystems in Landscapes in the Western United States. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 178 pp 61-74.
Goheen, E.M. and Willhite, E.A. 2006. Field Guide to Common Diseases and Inspect Pests of Oregon and Washington Conifers. Portland, Oregon: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region R6-NR-FID-PR-01-06.
Griffith, Randy Scott. 1992. Picea sitchensis. Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory.
Naiman, R., Bechtold, S., Beechie, T., Latterell, J., Van Pelt, R. 2009. A Process-Based View of Floodplain Forest Patterns in Coastal River Valleys of the Pacific Northwest. Ecosystems, Vol 13 pp 1-31.
Hemstrom, M., Logan, S. 1986. Plant Association and Management Guide: Siuslaw National Forest. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Technical Paper R6-Ecol 220-1986a
Hibbs, D., Bower, A. (2000). Riparian forests in the Oregon Coast Range. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol 154 pp 201-213.
Pabst, R., Spies, T. (1999). Structure and composition of unmanaged riparian forest in the coastal mountains of Oregon, U.S.A. Canadian Journal for Forestry Research, Vol 29 pp 1557-1573.
Packee, E.C. 1990. Tsuga heterophylla. Silvics of North American [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area.
Pojar J., and MacKinnon. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Lone Pine, Vancouver, British Columbia. 528 pages.
PRISM Climate Group, Oregon State University, http://prism.orgeonstate.edu, visited Feb., 2015.
Roccio, J., Crawford, R. 2015. Ecological Systems of Washington State. A Guide to Identification. Washington Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Report 2015-04.
Spies, T., Hibbs, D., Ohmann, J., Reeves, G., Pabst, R., Swanson, F., Whitlock, C., Jones, J., Wemple, B., Parendes, L., Schrader, B. (2002). The ecological basis of forest ecosystem management in the Oregon Coast Range. Forest and Stream Management in the Oregon Coast Range. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. Pp 31-67.
Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th ed. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. 2nd ed. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436.
Steinberg, Peter D. 2001. Populus balsamifera subsp. trichocarpa. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory
Stolnack, S., Naiman, R. 2010. Patterns of Conifer establishment and Vigot on Montane River Floodplains in Olympic National Park, Washington, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Resources, Vol. 40, pp 410-422.
United States National Vegetation Classification. 2016. United States National Vegetation Classification Database, V2.0. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee, Washington DC. (accessed 28, November, 2016.
Van Pelt, R., O’Keefe, T., Latterell, J., Naiman, R., 2006. Riparian forest stand development along the Queets River in Olympic National Park, Washington. Ecological Monographs, 76(2) pp. 277-298
Villarin, L., Chapin, D., Jones, J., 2009. Riparian forest structure and succession in second-growth stands of the central Cascade Mountains, Washington, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol 257 pp. 1375-1385
Washington Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program. 2015. Ecological Systems of Washington State. A Guide to Identification.
Wimberly, M., Spies, T. (2001). Influences of Environmental and Disturbance on Forest Patterns in Coast Oregon Watersheds. Ecology, Vol 82 pp. 1443-1459.Contributors
Erin Kreutz
Erik Dahlke
Marty Chaney
David Rand
Carri GainesApproval
Kirt Walstad, 1/23/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 12/16/2021 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement