Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site F097XA030MI
Mucky Depression
Last updated: 1/16/2024
Accessed: 04/20/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Approved. An approved ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model, enough information to identify the ecological site, and full documentation for all ecosystem states contained in the state and transition model.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 097X–Southwestern Michigan Fruit and Vegetable Crop Belt
Physiography consists of sandy lake plains and dunes along the western side adjacent to Lake Michigan, and moderately sloping fine-loamy moraine from the Lake Michigan lobe of the Wisconsin Ice Sheet.
Vegetation is mostly mesophytic forests of central and northern hardwood and conifer species with prairie and oak savanna to the south. Compared to inland locations, cold sensitive hardwood species extend further north due to milder winters, and conifers extend further south due to cooler summers, heavier snowfall, and sandier soils. Lake effect snow and delayed spring warm up dampen the fire frequency relative to similar inland sites, except along the south side of Lake Michigan. The northern extent is defined by a major floristic boundary where several central hardwoods species drop out. The southern boundary is defined by fine-loamy moraines with predominantly prairie vegetation.
The ecological site inference area for MLRA 97 is subdivided along a floristic/climatic break roughly from New Buffalo, Michigan to Portage, Indiana. This corresponds to the heaviest lake effect snow belt (>160 cm) south and east of this line and is associated lower historic fire frequencies. The snow belt portion “A”, has more frequent conifer and beech, while the less snowy portion “B” has more prairie and savanna elements. Although differing in precise boundary location, both USFS and EPA ecoregions support a climatic/floristic break at the next higher rank in their respective hierarchies.Classification relationships
Among the USFS ecoregional framework (Cleland et al, 2007), most of MLRA 97 is represented by the Humid Temperate Domain (200), Hot Continental Division (220), Midwest Broadleaf Forest Province (222), South Central Great Lakes Section (222J), subsections 222Ja and 222Jb. Similar sites within the southern portion of MLRA 97 that overlap and Southwestern Great Lakes Morainal Section (222K), subsection 222Ki are treated as separate ecological sites.
Among the EPA ecoregional framework (Omernik and Griffith, 2014), most of MLRA 97 falls within Eastern Temperate Forests (Level I: 8), Mixed Wood Plains (Level II: 8.1), Southern Michigan/Northern Indiana Drift Plains (Level III: 56), and Level IV: 56d and 56f. Similar sites within the southern portion of MLRA 97 that overlap the Central USA Plains (Level II: 8.2) and Central Corn Belt Plains (Level III: 54) are treated as separate ecological sites.Ecological site concept
The modal concept of the Mucky Depressions is organic soils (typically muck) of intermediate pHs (5-7). Small delineations occur as base slope seeps. May occur on former lake beds as organic flats with minerotrophic ground water influence, and some may have accumulated carbonates (limnic materials) early in development (generally lower in profile). Vegetation tends to reflect moderate to high fertility in moderately acid sites, but strongly acidic and alkaline, marly sites are very low in fertility have bog-like and fen-like species compositions, respectively.
The distinction between acidic and circumneutral mucks and carbonate rich mucks needs more investigation. Sometimes a lens of oligotrophic rainwater dominates near the surface soil chemistry and vegetation composition, without a strong relationship with marl presence below. Conversely, marl presence is not a necessary indicator of calcareous groundwater dominated soil chemistry or species composition. Intermediate pH reaction classes may be needed to properly delineate soil map units that better reflect species composition.Associated sites
F097XA008MI Wet Sandy Flatwoods
Mucky Depressions form on any landscape position with a hydrology capable of allowing muck formation. There isn't a clearly associated site, and can occur with little transition from well drained sites or sometimes poorly drained mineral sites lacking a histic epipedon.
Similar sites
F098XA006MI Mucky Depressions
Mucky Depression in MLRA 98 to the east may be the same as Mucky Depression in MLRA 98, with the main difference being less snowfall and more severe winter temperatures, not expected to differentiate the range of vegetation types possible. Often the same map units are used across MLRA boundaries.
R097XB051IL Chicago Mucky Depression
Chicago Mucky Depressions occur in a slightly warmer climate to the south and have a somewhat more open prairie vegetation. May share the same map units as Mucky Depressions.
F097XA031MI Acidic Peaty Depression
Acidic Peaty Depressions are more acidic than Mucky Depressions, but have similar very poorly drained mucky or peaty substrates.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree (1) Acer rubrum
(2) Pinus strobusShrub Not specified
Herbaceous (1) Onoclea sensibilis
(2) Saururus cernuusPhysiographic features
Mucky Depressions ecological site occupies old lakebeds and depressions in sandy ice-contact terrain, pitted outwash plains, base slope seeps, and outwash channel flats, wherever the land intersects the water table, especially in porous substrates.
Figure 2. Physiographic context of mucky soils.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Geomorphic position, flats (1) Dip
Geomorphic position, hills (1) Base Slope
Slope shape up-down (1) Concave
Hillslope profile (1) Toeslope
Landforms (1) Outwash plain > Pitted outwash plain
(2) Outwash plain > Channel
(3) Ice-margin complex > Depression
Runoff class Negligible to low Flooding frequency None Ponding duration Very brief (4 to 48 hours) to very long (more than 30 days) Ponding frequency Rare to frequent Elevation 180 – 300 m Slope 0 – 2 % Ponding depth 0 – 30 cm Water table depth 0 cm Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The southeastern Lake Michigan lake plain and adjacent lake influenced moraines have a humid warm continental climate with cold winters and warm summers.
Just over half of the precipitation is distributed during the warmer half of the year with a significant portion of the precipitation occurring as heavy downpours during thunderstorms. Thunderstorm activity is enhanced inland by lake breeze fronts, while it is diminished near the lakeshore by the stabilizing effect of the cooler lake waters. Occasionally, thunderstorm microbursts cause localized high winds which open single tree gaps in forest canopies, or more rarely, tornados and derechos (severe straight-line winds) open larger gaps. Fall storms bring more frequent strong winds, but with impacts moderated by the lack of leaves (wind resistance) in the canopy. During July, average precipitation lags potential evapotranspiration, resulting in droughty conditions in the upper soil horizons of upland sites. During dry years, this droughty period is extended into August and September, resulting in dry fuels and potential for wildfire over oak and pine dominated areas.
Winter precipitation is enhanced by lake effect snows, with 1.6 to 2.4 m (40-95 inches) falling annually within the snow belt. Peak snowfall occurs at intermediate distances from the lake where topography enhances uplift. The combination of heavier winter snowfall, lake-delayed spring warm up, and frequent wetlands all contribute to relatively lower fire frequencies relative to inland locations with similarly droughty soils.
The area falls within USDA Hardiness zones 6a and 6b and has delayed spring warm up until after the last killing frosts, allowing for a wide range of fruit crops to be grown.Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) 120-140 days Freeze-free period (characteristic range) 150-180 days Precipitation total (characteristic range) 890-990 mm Frost-free period (actual range) 120-150 days Freeze-free period (actual range) 140-200 days Precipitation total (actual range) 840-1,040 mm Frost-free period (average) 130 days Freeze-free period (average) 160 days Precipitation total (average) 940 mm Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 3. Monthly precipitation range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 4. Monthly minimum temperature range
Characteristic rangeActual rangeBarLineFigure 5. Monthly maximum temperature range
BarLineFigure 6. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 7. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 8 Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) EAU CLAIRE 4 NE [USC00202445], Dowagiac, MI
-
(2) GRAND HAVEN FIRE DEPT [USC00203290], Grand Haven, MI
-
(3) HOLLAND WTP [USC00203858], Holland, MI
-
(4) GRAND RAPIDS [USW00094860], Grand Rapids, MI
-
(5) ALLEGAN 5NE [USC00200128], Allegan, MI
-
(6) BLOOMINGDALE [USC00200864], Bloomingdale, MI
-
(7) MUSKEGON CO AP [USW00014840], Muskegon, MI
-
(8) BENTON HARBOR AP [USW00094871], Benton Harbor, MI
">Influencing water features
Site remains saturated for most of the year, and may be seasonally ponded to shallow depths.
Wetland description
Mucky Depressions are a generally a function of groundwater seepage and are mostly classified as hydrogeomorphic slope wetlands. Groundwater is generally a stable source of water creating a more or less constant level of saturation. These are usually minerotrophic sources of water that are low in phosphorus and nitrates. Portions of the depression that are isolated from both surface run off and groundwater is subject to mostly rain water, and is lower in minerals (ombrotrophic). Surface runoff near the edges of depression and where ground water sources are shallow can be high in macronutrients (nitrates and phosphates), and is more vulnerable to the eutrophic impacts of fertilizer from adjacent farmlands. Some are influenced by fluctuating lake levels (hydrogeomorphic lacustrine) if adjacent to lakes.
Figure 9.
Soil features
Soils of the Mucky Depressions are very poorly drained organic Histosols or Histic subgroups (peat or muck surface greater than or equal to 20 cm thick), with moderate pH levels. They are commonly classified as Typic Haplosaprists, Terric Haplosaprists, Limnic Haplosaprists, and Histic Humaquepts, and commonly are mapped as Houghton, Carlisle, Adrian, Palms, Edwards, and Martisco series.
Figure 10. Muck and peat over sand.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material (1) Organic material
(2) Marl
Surface texture (1) Muck
(2) Mucky peat
(3) Marl
Drainage class Very poorly drained Permeability class Moderately slow to moderately rapid Soil depth 201 cm Surface fragment cover <=3" Not specified Surface fragment cover >3" Not specified Available water capacity
(0-100.1cm)35 – 54.99 cm Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-50cm)5.5 – 8 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-150.1cm)Not specified Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-150.1cm)Not specified Table 5. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class Very poorly drained Permeability class Not specified Soil depth 201 cm Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 % Surface fragment cover >3" 0 % Available water capacity
(0-100.1cm)0 cm Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-50cm)0 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(0-150.1cm)0 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(0-150.1cm)0 % Ecological dynamics
Mucks form where net primary productivity greatly exceeds the rate of decomposition due to the lack of oxygen under seasonally or semipermanently saturated conditions. Fens occur under semipermanently saturated conditions, whereas wet meadows prevail under seasonally saturated conditions. Peat accumulation in fens is mostly from dead sedges (Cyperaceae) and brown mosses (Scorpidium scorpioides), while in acid bog sites it is due to peat mosses (Sphagnum spp.). More seasonal hydrology allows more decomposition of brown peat into black muck, and a greater production of plant cover. The thickness of peat and muck is directly related to the duration of non-saturated conditions, whereas longer periods of dryness would tend to result in more thorough decay of organic matter, and a thinner veneer of muck over mineral soil. However, hydrology may change over time, and current muck thickness is as much a legacy of historic hydrology as it is an indicator of current hydrology. Thus, the relationship to present vegetation is only loosely related to muck thickness.
In submergent areas high in dissolved calcium, the green algal genus Chara precipitates calcium carbonate within its cell walls. Over time, dead Chara contributes to the accumulation of marl, which may later become buried in peat and muck.
Michigan Natural Features Inventory (Kost et al., 2010) describes a range of communities that occupy Mucky Depressions, which are arrayed along hydrologic, nutrient, and structural development gradients. Succession from open communities to shrub-dominated through forested communities is kept in check or reversed by fire, beaver activity, and windthrow. However, the rate of succession is slow in the wettest areas, and in areas with more extreme alkalinities or acidities that inhibit nutrient availability.
Fire frequency generally is greatest where adjacent upland sites are oak savanna and prairie rather than closed forest, which was historically the case in the southern half of the MRLA, where prairie fens and wet meadows were most common. Fire has the effect of killing aboveground biomass, and thus conferring an advantage of herbaceous plants over woody species. Graminoids in these open communities provide the main fuels, presuming that standing dead biomass is dry enough to sustain fire. Once a site becomes forested, low understory graminoid cover and thin leaf litter that quickly integrates into the substrate tend to reduce the potential for fire to carry.
The lack of fire adaptation among the dominant tree species is evident from the generally thin bark among the maples.
Beavers (Castor canadensis) affect succession in two distinct ways. First, beavers directly remove trees and shrubs both as a food source and as building materials. Second, beavers may inundate an area via dam building, causing mortality in species of trees and shrubs that are less flood-tolerant. Mucks that occur adjacent to flowing water have the greatest opportunity for beavers to modify water levels.
Windthrow mostly creates single tree gaps. However, swamp forests are more susceptible to large blowdowns than upland sites, because high water tables limit rooting depth and organic substrates are structurally less stable.
The interaction among all these disturbance regimes, including fire, is summarized in the narratives for the broadly defined Central Interior and Appalachian Swamp Systems, and Central Interior and Appalachian Shrub-Herbaceous Wetland Systems Landfire models (USGS, 2008). The ecosystems assignable to swamps were modeled to have a mean fire return interval (probability) of 1,000 years, a beaver flooding interval of 300 years, a patch windthrow interval of 100 years, and a catastrophic windthrow of 600 years. The systems assignable to fens and wet meadows, were modeled to have a fire return interval of 10 years, and a beaver flooding interval of 200 years. A 1,000 year return interval isn’t intended to imply an event taking place regularly every 1,000 years, but rather the probability of 1 out of 1,000 (0.1%) for the event to take place in any given year. As such different patches of the site may not experience the same event simultaneously such that across a large enough area in can be expected that 0.1% of the area could experience the event during an average year. But processes of species dispersal, minimum viable population size, and the species composition of the surrounding landscape (e.g., Driscoll, et al., 2013) must be considered in context of fragmented habitat.
Zonation along a hydrologic gradient is responsible for the maintenance of contrasting plant communities in relative proximity. This also allows for vegetation to respond to short-term changes in climate given the immediate seed source for species in adjacent communities. Several years of increased potential evapotranspiration and lower precipitation can lower local water tables and thereby move the boundaries between zones. These drier conditions are represented by community pathways toward less hydric communities such as from marsh to wet meadows. Likewise, several years with decreased potential evapotranspiration and higher precipitation can raise local water tables, resulting in a shift toward more hydric communities.
The wettest sites are represented by submergent marsh (Nuphar advena - Nymphaea odorata Aquatic Vegetation), but aquatic vegetation such as this are more representative of subaqueous ecological sites rather than Mucky Depressions. Nevertheless, the elements of aquatic vegetation may occur locally among emergent communities.
The emergent marsh (Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani - Typha spp. - (Sparganium spp., Juncus spp.) Marsh, Typha spp. Midwest Marsh) community represents the wettest sites normally found in Mucky Depressions, which are dominated by cattails and bulrushes. Marshes are typically ponded to at least 15 cm during part of the growing season. At higher macronutrient (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings, cattail productivity may overwhelm the dominance of all other species. Native cattail (Typha latifolia) is outcompeted by non-native cattail (Typha angustifolia) and its hybrid (Typha ×glauca), particularly in higher nutrient or saline conditions. Factors that increase nutrient runoff include agriculture, while road salt is the main cause of saline conditions. The green alga, Chara, is an important submergent component of calcareous marshes. Chara is intolerant of high phosphate or nitrate concentrations, and may disappear when water becomes polluted (Lambert and Davy, 2011).
In areas that are seasonally saturated, southern wet meadow (Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet Meadow) may form. Wet meadows are dominated by grasses and sedges like Carex stricta, Carex lacustris, Calamagrostis canadensis, but also have a diversity of forbs, including joe pye weed(Eutrochium maculatum), swamp aster (Symphyotrichum puniceum), rough-leaf goldenrod (Solidago patula), and mountain-mint (Pycnanthemum virginianum).
Without beaver activity and occasional fire spilling over from the uplands maintaining the open conditions, trees and shrubs come to dominate the site within 10 to 60 years (USGS, 2011). Marshy sites within Mucky Depression may succeed to a buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) dominated inundated shrub swamp (Cephalanthus occidentalis / Carex spp. Northern Shrub Swamp) without sufficient disturbance. Wet meadows succeed to shrub-carr (Cornus sericea - Salix spp. - (Rosa palustris) Shrub Swamp).
In the absence of beaver flooding, trees become established and the community succeeds to hardwood swamp (Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus spp. - Ulmus americana Swamp Forest) after about 80 years. Fluctuating water table favors flood-tolerant silver maple (Acer saccharinum) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and is convergent with floodplain forest in species composition. This community has relatively high fertility in terms of macronutrients like nitrogen and phosphorous. The circumstances responsible for higher fertility in this community relates to pH and hydrology. Having intermediate pH levels (6-7) results in greater nutrient availability, while seasonal fluctuation in water table (oxygenation) can allow a greater turnover in macronutrients accumulated within the substrate. Sites with stable water tables tend to be dominated by red maple (Acer rubrum) and black ash (Fraxinus nigra), and is similar to other peatland communities
in species composition, being relatively nutrient poor. Areas with stable water tables along the northern and western borders may have conifers such as white pine (Pinus strobus) and eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) for hardwood-conifer swamp (Pinus strobus - (Acer rubrum) / Osmunda spp. Swamp Forest). Tree and shrub establishment is most favored in less frequently inundated areas such as on microtopographic highs, which develop later in succession from upturned root masses of wind-toppled trees. Therefore, the wettest portions of a site require longer times for forest to become established.
The prairie fen (Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda / Carex sterilis - Andropogon gerardi - Arnoglossum plantagineum Fen, Cladium mariscoides - (Carex lasiocarpa, Hypericum kalmianum, Oligoneuron riddellii, Eleocharis elliptica) Fen) occupies areas in which groundwater maintains an almost constant soil saturation without ponding. Topographically elevated sites within the basin may have exposed marl that is more seasonally saturated. Fens support a unique short-statured flora of calcium specialists (calciphiles). The low nutrient environment is driven in part by the high pH levels; the extremely high levels of calcium limits the solubility of phosphorous and iron. The constant hydroperiod from a flow of groundwater maintains anoxic conditions that prevent the release organically stored nutrients.
Without disturbance, fens may succeed through shrub swamp phases to rich tamarack swamp (Larix laricina - Acer rubrum / (Rhamnus alnifolia, Vaccinium corymbosum) Swamp Forest). Continued succession will result in shade-intolerant tamarack (Larix laricina) to be replaced with shade-tolerant red maple (Acer rubrum), and potentially to a version of hardwood swamp. Under prior cooler climatic periods, northern whitecedar (Thuja occidentalis) would succeed tamarack as rich conifer swamp (Thuja occidentalis - Acer rubrum / Cornus sericea Swamp Forest). Rich Conifer Swamp was formerly infrequent in MLRA 98 prior to being cutover, but is more prevalent in adjacent MLRAs to the north (MLRAs 94A and 96). Relict stands of northern whitecedar do still exist in this MLRA, but after widespread logging excessive browse due to increased populations of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) has severely limited its ability to regenerate.
More acidic conditions are transitional to peat bog (Chamaedaphne calyculata / Carex oligosperma - Eriophorum virginicum Acidic Peatland), and poor conifer swamp (Picea mariana / Ledum groenlandicum / Carex trisperma / Sphagnum spp. Open Bog Woodland), or another version of hardwood swamp (Acer rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus spp. - Ulmus americana Swamp Forest) with acid indicators like Quercus palustris, Nyssa sylvatica, and Vaccinium corymbosum.
Rare areas with brackish groundwater influenced by Paleozoic salt deposits may be recognized as the Inland Salt Marsh ecological site represented by the Schoenoplectus maritimus - Atriplex patula - Eleocharis parvula Saline Marsh association. However, at present these saline sites have not been delineated as their own map units.
Unconverted stands of wet meadows, marshes, and swamps can be degraded by the addition of excess nutrient runoff, altering species composition; or through the introduction of Eurasian exotics such as purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), common reed (Phragmites australis ssp. australis), and glossy buckthorn (Frangula alnus).
Conversion to cropland involves the drainage of the land, followed by removal of vegetation, plowing the upper 20 to 30 cm of soil, and introduction of fertilizer. Results of an unpublished dynamic soil properties study conducted in 2015 by the Grand Rapids Soil Survey Office (in cooperation with the National Soil Science Lab in Lincoln, NE), suggests that farming mucky soils can result in soil becoming heavily compacted, high in nitrates and low in carbon-to-nitrogen ratios. Sites restored with native plants and with the hydrology partially restored, retained the higher nutrient levels and compaction characteristic of actively cultivated sites. Despite restoration with native plants, formerly cultivated sites may have significant coverage of invasive reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Although opportunities of seed dispersal and disturbances are factors in invasive species presence, other studies suggest a connection with the high nutrient loads (Green and Galowitch, 2002).
The emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) is causing a major transition in plant composition through the mortality of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) and black ash (Fraxinus nigra) from silver maple-green ash hardwood swamp to red maple-tamarack swamp phases respectively. The introduced pest causes 100 percent mortality of stems greater than 2.5 cm in diameter within five to ten years of infestation. This mortality will reduce the frequency of reproductively mature trees and thereby severely limit new seed production. As of 2020, many former ash stands have no living ash stems greater than 10 cm, but have vigorous seedling and sapling layers, and some basal sprouts from adult trees. There are some signs of success from biocontrol studies using introduced parasitoid wasps, but models of worst-case scenarios show the potential extirpation of ash populations within the next 30 years (Kappler et al., 2019).State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textState 1 submodel, plant communities
Communities 2, 5, 6 and 7 (additional pathways)
Communities 3 and 7 (additional pathways)
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference StateThe Reference State consists of a spontaneous wild condition wherein non-native species are of low abundance and all native species retain viable populations. Structure and function of communities vary according to natural processes and disturbance regimes, with human influences limited to drivers that have the similar outcomes as natural processes. Communities range from marshes and fens to hardwood swamps. Dominant natural processes and disturbance regimes include fire, wind, and beaver activities.
Community 1.1
Hardwood Swamp: Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus spp. - Ulmus americana Swamp Forest
Figure 11. Silver Maple Swamp
This phase can be relatively fertile, sometimes occurring on sites with a more variable hydrology.
Forest overstory.The overstory is dominated by silver maple (Acer saccharinum) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) with a broad assortment of other hardwoods.
Forest understory. Understory vegetation ranges from sparse in ponded areas to dense where the overstory canopy opens up. The species composition is variable, yet in some cases can form monocultures.
Dominant plant species
-
silver maple (Acer saccharinum), tree
-
green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), tree
-
common buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), shrub
-
smallspike false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica), other herbaceous
-
lizard's tail (Saururus cernuus), other herbaceous
-
jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), other herbaceous
Table 6. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 40-80% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 0.5-35.0% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 0.3-11.0% Forb foliar cover 2.5-25.0% Non-vascular plants 0.3-1.5% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 7. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana basal cover 0% Grass/grasslike basal cover 0% Forb basal cover 0% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0.2-90.0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 8. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (m) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.15 0-8% 0-6% 0-1% 0-10% >0.15 <= 0.3 0-8% 0-6% 0-1% 0-10% >0.3 <= 0.6 0-8% 1-55% 0-5% 5-40% >0.6 <= 1.4 0-7% 0-55% 0-20% 1-30% >1.4 <= 4 5-13% 0-55% – – >4 <= 12 60-95% 0% – – >12 <= 24 55-95% – – – >24 <= 37 10-95% – – – >37 – – – – Community 1.2
Wet Meadow: Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet Meadow
Figure 12. Wet Meadow
This phase represents open vegetation that is moderately fertile and has a high diversity of species. It is created through tree and shrub mortality due to beaver activity and is maintained by fire. Fire every ten years or so is required to maintain this phase without tree and shrub encroachment. Larger patches with interiors more distant from potential tree seed sources may persist for greater periods. After about 60 years after disturbance, vegetation succeeds to shrub swamp.
Forest overstory.The overstory is mostly less than 5 percent tree cover.
Forest understory. Understory vegetation is dense and graminoid dominated with various species of grasses, sedges, and forbs.
Dominant plant species
-
upright sedge (Carex stricta), grass
-
bluejoint (Calamagrostis canadensis), grass
-
sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), other herbaceous
-
spotted joe pye weed (Eutrochium maculatum), other herbaceous
Table 9. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 0-10% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 0.2-35.0% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 30-70% Forb foliar cover 2.5-70.0% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 10. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (m) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.15 0% 0-2% 0-3% 5-85% >0.15 <= 0.3 0% 0-1% 0-5% 5-85% >0.3 <= 0.6 0% 0-7% 0-7% 5-85% >0.6 <= 1.4 0-1% 0-55% 45-90% 1-35% >1.4 <= 4 0-1% 0-55% – – >4 <= 12 0-5% – – – >12 <= 24 0-1% – – – >24 <= 37 – – – – >37 – – – – Community 1.3
Shrub-carr: Cornus sericea - Salix spp. - (Rosa palustris) Shrub Swamp
Figure 13. Winterberry thicket with understory of skunk cabbage.
This phase is dominated by a range of large shrub species that tolerate saturated conditions, but is not frequently inundated. This phase may be intermediate in succession between swamp forest and wet meadow.
Forest overstory.The overstory has less than 5 percent tree cover. Occasionally, speckled alder (Alnus rugosa) may approach tree size, forming thick groves.
Forest understory. Understory vegetation is dense and dominated by shrubs of several species, including redosier dogwood (Cornus sericea), winterberry (Ilex verticellata), and swamp rose (Rosa palustris).
Dominant plant species
-
redosier dogwood (Cornus sericea), shrub
-
swamp rose (Rosa palustris), shrub
-
common winterberry (Ilex verticillata), shrub
-
speckled alder (Alnus incana ssp. rugosa), shrub
Table 11. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (m) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.15 – – – – >0.15 <= 0.3 – – – – >0.3 <= 0.6 – – 0-50% 0-50% >0.6 <= 1.4 – 10-95% – – >1.4 <= 4 – 10-95% – – >4 <= 12 0-5% – – – >12 <= 24 0-5% – – – >24 <= 37 0-5% – – – >37 – – – – Community 1.4
Hardwood-Conifer Swamp: Pinus strobus - (Acer rubrum) / Osmunda spp. Swamp Forest
Figure 14. Hardwood-Conifer Swamp
This phase represents a later successional (forested) outcome of a stable saturated hydrology and low fertility.
Forest overstory.The overstory cover can vary from open tamarack (Larix laricina) woodland to red maple (Acer rubrum) forest. Areas to the north may have large patches dominated by relict northern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis).
Forest understory. Understory vegetation is variable and can consist of shade-tolerant species like skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus) similar to the hardwood swamp phase or some species components of the shrub-carr (e.g., winterberry) and fen phases.
Dominant plant species
-
red maple (Acer rubrum), tree
-
eastern white pine (Pinus strobus), tree
-
common winterberry (Ilex verticillata), shrub
-
highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), shrub
-
poison sumac (Toxicodendron vernix), shrub
-
skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus), other herbaceous
-
cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), other herbaceous
Table 12. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 10-40% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 10-40% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 0-30% Forb foliar cover 20-60% Non-vascular plants 0.5-25.0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 13. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana basal cover 0% Grass/grasslike basal cover 0% Forb basal cover 0% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0-30% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0-60% Bare ground 0% Table 14. Woody ground cover
Downed wood, fine-small (<0.40" diameter; 1-hour fuels) – Downed wood, fine-medium (0.40-0.99" diameter; 10-hour fuels) – Downed wood, fine-large (1.00-2.99" diameter; 100-hour fuels) 0-1% Downed wood, coarse-small (3.00-8.99" diameter; 1,000-hour fuels) 0-0% Downed wood, coarse-large (>9.00" diameter; 10,000-hour fuels) 0-1% Tree snags** (hard***) – Tree snags** (soft***) – Tree snag count** (hard***) 0 per hectare Tree snag count** (hard***) 0 per hectare * Decomposition Classes: N - no or little integration with the soil surface; I - partial to nearly full integration with the soil surface.
** >10.16cm diameter at 1.3716m above ground and >1.8288m height--if less diameter OR height use applicable down wood type; for pinyon and juniper, use 0.3048m above ground.
*** Hard - tree is dead with most or all of bark intact; Soft - most of bark has sloughed off.
Table 15. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (m) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.15 0-1% 0-5% 0-3% 4-35% >0.15 <= 0.3 0-2% 0-4% 0-3% 7-60% >0.3 <= 0.6 0-2% 6-45% 2-45% 30-80% >0.6 <= 1.4 3-15% 9-50% 0-30% 4-30% >1.4 <= 4 10-50% 9-50% – – >4 <= 12 12-60% 0-1% – – >12 <= 24 0-25% – – – >24 <= 37 – – – – >37 – – – – Community 1.5
Fen: Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda / Carex sterilis - Andropogon gerardi - Arnoglossum plantagineum Fen
Figure 15. Prairie Fen
This phase represents open conditions with a stable calcareous hydrology or exposed marl. Species composition and low stature strongly reflect the low nutrient availability.
Forest overstory.Overstory is mostly treeless, but scattered tamarack (Larix laricina) may approach 5 percent cover. Poison sumac (Toxicodendron vernix) occasionally approaches tree size.
Forest understory. Understory consists of dwarf shrubs like shrubby cinquefoil (Dasiphora fruticosa) and Kalm’s St. Johnswort (Hypericum kalmianum), and graminoids like twigrush (Cladium mariscoides), wooly sedge (Carex pellita), and yellow sedge (Carex flava). Many of the species are calciphiles (calcium indicators). The wax-myrtle (Morella pensylvanica) is a locally rare nitrogen-fixing shrub found in the margins of large fens.
Dominant plant species
-
shrubby cinquefoil (Dasiphora fruticosa), shrub
-
woollyfruit sedge (Carex lasiocarpa), grass
-
smooth sawgrass (Cladium mariscoides), grass
Table 16. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 10-60% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 20-60% Forb foliar cover 4.5-30.0% Non-vascular plants 40-50% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 17. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana basal cover 0% Grass/grasslike basal cover 0% Forb basal cover 0% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0-20% Bare ground 0% Table 18. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (m) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.15 0-1% 0% 4-20% 1-2% >0.15 <= 0.3 0-1% 0% 0-20% 1-3% >0.3 <= 0.6 0-1% 11-75% 25-80% 10-50% >0.6 <= 1.4 0-2% 2-50% 7-75% 3-45% >1.4 <= 4 0-2% 0-50% 0-3% – >4 <= 12 – – – – >12 <= 24 – – – – >24 <= 37 – – – – >37 – – – – Community 1.6
Emergent Marsh: Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani - Typha spp. - (Sparganium spp., Juncus spp.) Marsh
Figure 16. Cattail (Typha latifolia).
This phase represents the open condition with shallow (approximately 15 cm) standing water.
Forest overstory.There is little or no tree cover in this phase.
Forest understory. Understory consists of emergent graminoids like cattails (Typha latifolia) and bulrushes (Schoenoplectus spp.), and a mix of marsh forbs. There is often a submergent substratum of aquatic plants and algae (e.g., Chara sp.).
Dominant plant species
-
broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia), grass
-
softstem bulrush (Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani), grass
-
swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata), other herbaceous
-
eastern marsh fern (Thelypteris palustris), other herbaceous
Table 19. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 0.5-4.0% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 0-10% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 70-80% Forb foliar cover 0.5-7.0% Non-vascular plants 0.4-2.0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 20. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana basal cover 0% Grass/grasslike basal cover 0% Forb basal cover 0% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 50-100% Bare ground 0% Table 21. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (m) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.15 – 0-3% 1-85% 2-14% >0.15 <= 0.3 – 0-3% 1-85% 2-14% >0.3 <= 0.6 – 0-20% 1-85% 2-15% >0.6 <= 1.4 0-1% 0-15% 5-95% 0-2% >1.4 <= 4 0-1% 0-15% – – >4 <= 12 0-6% – – – >12 <= 24 0-6% – – – >24 <= 37 – – – – >37 – – – – Community 1.7
Inundated Shrub Swamp: Cephalanthus occidentalis / Carex spp. Northern Shrub Swamp
Figure 17. Buttonbush Swamp
This phase represents the shrubby phase with shallow standing water. This shrubby often occurs on the nutrient rich edges of a wetland where the muck is more decomposed, and the substrate becomes submerged (no hummocks to stand on).
Forest overstory.Less than 5 percent tree cover associated with this phase, related to transitions from adjacent vegetation phases or is shaded from adjacent upland vegetation. Trees rooted within this zone most likely are willows (Salix spp.) that can tolerate longer hydroperiods.
Forest understory. Understory consists of emergent shrubs, mainly buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis).
Dominant plant species
-
common buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), shrub
Table 22. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (m) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.15 – – – – >0.15 <= 0.3 – – – – >0.3 <= 0.6 – – – – >0.6 <= 1.4 – 10-80% – – >1.4 <= 4 – 10-80% – – >4 <= 12 – – – – >12 <= 24 – – – – >24 <= 37 – – – – >37 – – – – Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2
Hardwood Swamp: Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus spp. - Ulmus americana Swamp Forest
Wet Meadow: Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet MeadowTemporary prolonged inundation or fire
Conservation practices
Prescribed Burning Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.3
Hardwood Swamp: Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus spp. - Ulmus americana Swamp Forest
Shrub-carr: Cornus sericea - Salix spp. - (Rosa palustris) Shrub SwampClearcut, blowdown, or fire
Conservation practices
Prescribed Burning Early Successional Habitat Development/Management Forest Stand Improvement Pathway 1.1C
Community 1.1 to 1.4
Hardwood Swamp: Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus spp. - Ulmus americana Swamp Forest
Hardwood-Conifer Swamp: Pinus strobus - (Acer rubrum) / Osmunda spp. Swamp ForestIncreased peat or marl thickness, and decreased nitrogen or phosphorus availability
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1
Wet Meadow: Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet Meadow
Hardwood Swamp: Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus spp. - Ulmus americana Swamp ForestSuccession
Conservation practices
Tree/Shrub Site Preparation Tree/Shrub Establishment Pathway 1.2B
Community 1.2 to 1.3
Wet Meadow: Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet Meadow
Shrub-carr: Cornus sericea - Salix spp. - (Rosa palustris) Shrub SwampSuccession
Conservation practices
Tree/Shrub Site Preparation Tree/Shrub Establishment Pathway 1.2C
Community 1.2 to 1.5
Wet Meadow: Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet Meadow
Fen: Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda / Carex sterilis - Andropogon gerardi - Arnoglossum plantagineum FenIncreased peat or marl thickness, and decreased nitrogen or phosphorus availability
Pathway 1.2D
Community 1.2 to 1.6
Wet Meadow: Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet Meadow
Emergent Marsh: Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani - Typha spp. - (Sparganium spp., Juncus spp.) MarshPermanent inundation
Pathway 1.2E
Community 1.2 to 1.7
Wet Meadow: Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet Meadow
Inundated Shrub Swamp: Cephalanthus occidentalis / Carex spp. Northern Shrub SwampPermanent inundation
Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.1
Shrub-carr: Cornus sericea - Salix spp. - (Rosa palustris) Shrub Swamp
Hardwood Swamp: Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus spp. - Ulmus americana Swamp ForestSuccession
Conservation practices
Tree/Shrub Site Preparation Tree/Shrub Establishment Pathway 1.3B
Community 1.3 to 1.2
Shrub-carr: Cornus sericea - Salix spp. - (Rosa palustris) Shrub Swamp
Wet Meadow: Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet MeadowTemporary prolonged inundation or fire
Conservation practices
Prescribed Burning Pathway 1.3C
Community 1.3 to 1.6
Shrub-carr: Cornus sericea - Salix spp. - (Rosa palustris) Shrub Swamp
Emergent Marsh: Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani - Typha spp. - (Sparganium spp., Juncus spp.) MarshPermanent inundation
Pathway 1.3D
Community 1.3 to 1.7
Shrub-carr: Cornus sericea - Salix spp. - (Rosa palustris) Shrub Swamp
Inundated Shrub Swamp: Cephalanthus occidentalis / Carex spp. Northern Shrub SwampPermanent inundation
Pathway 1.4A
Community 1.4 to 1.1
Hardwood-Conifer Swamp: Pinus strobus - (Acer rubrum) / Osmunda spp. Swamp Forest
Hardwood Swamp: Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus spp. - Ulmus americana Swamp ForestDecreased peat or marl thickness, and increased nitrogen or phosphorus availability
Pathway 1.4B
Community 1.4 to 1.5
Hardwood-Conifer Swamp: Pinus strobus - (Acer rubrum) / Osmunda spp. Swamp Forest
Fen: Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda / Carex sterilis - Andropogon gerardi - Arnoglossum plantagineum FenClearcut, blowdown, or fire
Conservation practices
Prescribed Burning Early Successional Habitat Development/Management Forest Stand Improvement Pathway 1.5A
Community 1.5 to 1.2
Fen: Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda / Carex sterilis - Andropogon gerardi - Arnoglossum plantagineum Fen
Wet Meadow: Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet MeadowDecreased peat or marl thickness, and increased nitrogen or phosphorus availability
Pathway 1.5B
Community 1.5 to 1.4
Fen: Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda / Carex sterilis - Andropogon gerardi - Arnoglossum plantagineum Fen
Hardwood-Conifer Swamp: Pinus strobus - (Acer rubrum) / Osmunda spp. Swamp ForestSuccession
Conservation practices
Tree/Shrub Site Preparation Tree/Shrub Establishment Pathway 1.5C
Community 1.5 to 1.6
Fen: Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda / Carex sterilis - Andropogon gerardi - Arnoglossum plantagineum Fen
Emergent Marsh: Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani - Typha spp. - (Sparganium spp., Juncus spp.) MarshPermanent inundation
Pathway 1.6A
Community 1.6 to 1.2
Emergent Marsh: Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani - Typha spp. - (Sparganium spp., Juncus spp.) Marsh
Wet Meadow: Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet MeadowLower water table
Pathway 1.6B
Community 1.6 to 1.5
Emergent Marsh: Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani - Typha spp. - (Sparganium spp., Juncus spp.) Marsh
Fen: Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda / Carex sterilis - Andropogon gerardi - Arnoglossum plantagineum FenLower water table
Pathway 1.6C
Community 1.6 to 1.7
Emergent Marsh: Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani - Typha spp. - (Sparganium spp., Juncus spp.) Marsh
Inundated Shrub Swamp: Cephalanthus occidentalis / Carex spp. Northern Shrub SwampTemporary drop in water table with shrub establishment
Conservation practices
Tree/Shrub Site Preparation Tree/Shrub Establishment Pathway 1.7A
Community 1.7 to 1.2
Inundated Shrub Swamp: Cephalanthus occidentalis / Carex spp. Northern Shrub Swamp
Wet Meadow: Carex stricta - Carex spp. Wet MeadowLower water table, and fire
Conservation practices
Prescribed Burning Pathway 1.7B
Community 1.7 to 1.3
Inundated Shrub Swamp: Cephalanthus occidentalis / Carex spp. Northern Shrub Swamp
Shrub-carr: Cornus sericea - Salix spp. - (Rosa palustris) Shrub SwampLower water table
Pathway 1.7C
Community 1.7 to 1.6
Inundated Shrub Swamp: Cephalanthus occidentalis / Carex spp. Northern Shrub Swamp
Emergent Marsh: Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani - Typha spp. - (Sparganium spp., Juncus spp.) MarshTemporary drought and fire with shrub mortality
Conservation practices
Brush Management Prescribed Burning State 2
Cultural StateThe cultural state is actively managed. The structure and composition of cultural vegetation is not self-sustaining without human inputs.
Community 2.1
Sustainable Crop, Pasture, or PlantationThe community phase is an undifferentiated placeholder representing any of a number of possible crops or other intensive land uses in which best available management practices are employed to ensure that a minimum amount of soil erosion and water pollution occurs.
Community 2.2
Unsustainable Cultural PhaseThe community phase is an undifferentiated placeholder representing any of a number of possible crops or other intensive land uses in which poor management practices are employed, resulting in an unacceptable amount of soil erosion and water pollution.
Community 2.3
Conservation FeatureThe community phase represents non-crop vegetation that is managed in association with cropland or other intensive land uses to reduce environmental impacts of the land use. The managed vegetation can be a grassed waterway, conservation reserve, a small patch pollinator garden, or other land taken out of crop production. The small size and adjacency to an intensive land uses limits the degree to which native biological community and associated ecosystem services can be restored, but in a landscape context it may provide buffers or connectivity with nearby wild ecosystems.
Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2Revert to unsustainable cultural practices
Pathway 2.1B
Community 2.1 to 2.3Establish conservation feature
Conservation practices
Conservation Cover Grassed Waterway Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1Implement sustainable cultural practices
Conservation practices
Conservation Crop Rotation Cover Crop Nutrient Management Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Pathway 2.2B
Community 2.2 to 2.3Establish conservation feature
Conservation practices
Conservation Cover Grassed Waterway Pathway 2.3A
Community 2.3 to 2.1Implement sustainable cultural practices
Conservation practices
Conservation Crop Rotation Cover Crop Nutrient Management Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Pathway 2.3B
Community 2.3 to 2.2Revert to unsustainable cultural practices
State 3
Seminatural Drained StateThe Seminatural Drained State is modified from reference conditions by draining the site, often followed by temporary cultivation of the site. The vegetation is spontaneously self-generated or self-sustaining in response to both human and natural drivers. However, species composition may no longer indicate wetland definitions, and may consist of a mix of native and introduced species. The degree of isolation from intact habitat and the degree of disturbance will dictate the species composition as vegetation recovers.
Community 3.1
Ruderal Drained Meadow & ShrubThis phase represents an undifferentiated open community with few trees, with a variable native and non-native species composition.
Dominant plant species
-
multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), shrub
-
reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), grass
-
eastern woodland sedge (Carex blanda), grass
-
rice cutgrass (Leersia oryzoides), grass
Community 3.2
Semi-Natural Drained Swamp ForestThis phase represents an undifferentiated forested community, with a variable native and non-native species composition.
Dominant plant species
-
American elm (Ulmus americana), tree
-
red maple (Acer rubrum), tree
-
American basswood (Tilia americana), tree
-
Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), shrub
-
multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), shrub
-
northern spicebush (Lindera benzoin), shrub
-
eastern bottlebrush grass (Elymus hystrix), grass
-
Canadian clearweed (Pilea pumila), other herbaceous
-
great ragweed (Ambrosia trifida), other herbaceous
-
jumpseed (Polygonum virginianum), other herbaceous
Table 23. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 30-70% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 2.5-30.0% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 0.5-15.0% Forb foliar cover 0.5-15.0% Non-vascular plants 0-0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 24. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana basal cover 0% Grass/grasslike basal cover 0% Forb basal cover 0% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 30-50% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 25. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (m) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.15 0-2% 2-30% 0-14% 70-85% >0.15 <= 0.3 0-2% 2-30% 0-14% 70-85% >0.3 <= 0.6 0-2% 6-50% 0-15% 70-95% >0.6 <= 1.4 0-3% 5-25% 0-5% 6-50% >1.4 <= 4 13-75% 5-30% – – >4 <= 12 45-85% 0-3% – – >12 <= 24 20-55% – – – >24 <= 37 – – – – >37 – – – – Pathway 3.1A
Community 3.1 to 3.2Succession
Pathway 3.2A
Community 3.2 to 3.1Blowdown or clearcut
Conservation practices
Early Successional Habitat Development/Management Forest Stand Improvement State 4
Seminatural StateThe Seminatural State is modified from reference conditions mainly in species composition due to some type of disturbance, but retains a wetland hydrology. The state might have been drained and under cultivation for a time, but subsequently, hydrology is at least partially restored. The vegetation is spontaneously self-generated or self-sustaining in response to both human and natural drivers. However, species composition consists of a mix of native and introduced species. The degree of isolation from intact habitat and the degree of disturbance will dictate the species composition as vegetation recovers.
Community 4.1
Ruderal Wet Meadow & Shrub Swamp: Phalaris arundinacea Eastern Ruderal Marsh
Figure 18. Reed canary grass.
This phase represents an undifferentiated open community with few trees, with a variable native and non-native species composition.
Dominant plant species
-
reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), grass
-
rice cutgrass (Leersia oryzoides), grass
Table 26. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 0-20% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 0.5-20.0% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 60-80% Forb foliar cover 0.5-12.0% Non-vascular plants 0-0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 27. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana basal cover 0% Grass/grasslike basal cover 0% Forb basal cover 0% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 40-50% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0-10% Bare ground 0% Table 28. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (m) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.15 – 0-1% – 0-6% >0.15 <= 0.3 – 0-1% – 0-6% >0.3 <= 0.6 0-1% 0-20% 25-100% 1-15% >0.6 <= 1.4 0-2% 0-35% 75-100% 0-15% >1.4 <= 4 0-20% 0-30% 0-4% 0-6% >4 <= 12 0-25% – – – >12 <= 24 0-25% – – – >24 <= 37 – – – – >37 – – – – Community 4.2
Exotic Ruderal Swamp Forest: Acer negundo Ruderal Floodplain ForestThis phase represents an undifferentiated forested community, with a variable native and non-native species composition.
Dominant plant species
-
boxelder (Acer negundo), tree
-
eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides), tree
Pathway 4.1A
Community 4.1 to 4.2Succession
Pathway 4.2A
Community 4.2 to 4.1Blowdown or clearcut
Conservation practices
Early Successional Habitat Development/Management Forest Stand Improvement Transition T1A
State 1 to 2Drained, cleared vegetation, then cultivated domesticated species
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3Drained, cleared vegetation, then invasive species introduced
Transition T1C
State 1 to 4Cleared vegetation, then invasive species introduced
Restoration pathway R2
State 2 to 1Restored hydrology, removed domesticated species, and restored native species
Conservation practices
Brush Management Restoration and Management of Rare and Declining Habitats Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management Wetland Restoration Herbaceous Weed Control Transition T2A
State 2 to 3Abandoned, then succession
Transition T2B
State 2 to 4Restored hydrology, controlled invasive species, then restored native species
Conservation practices
Wetland Restoration Restoration pathway R3
State 3 to 1Restored hydrology, controlled invasive species, then restored native species
Conservation practices
Brush Management Restoration and Management of Rare and Declining Habitats Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management Wetland Restoration Herbaceous Weed Control Transition T3A
State 3 to 2Cleared vegetation, then cultivated domesticated species
Transition T3B
State 3 to 4Restored hydrology
Conservation practices
Wetland Restoration Restoration pathway R4
State 4 to 1Controlled invasive species, then restored native species
Conservation practices
Brush Management Restoration and Management of Rare and Declining Habitats Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management Herbaceous Weed Control Transition T4A
State 4 to 2Drained, cleared vegetation, then cultivated domesticated species
Transition T4B
State 4 to 3Drained
Additional community tables
Table 29. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 30. Community 1.1 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height m Canopy cover (%) Diameter cm Basal area (square m/hectare) Treesilver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 10-30 20-95 20.1-70.1 0 green ash FRPE Fraxinus pennsylvanica Native 10-25 0-25 – 0 pin oak QUPA2 Quercus palustris Native 10-25 0-20 – 0 American elm ULAM Ulmus americana Native 5-10 0-9 – 0 red maple ACRU Acer rubrum Native 10-25 0-9 – 0 American elm ULAM Ulmus americana Native 10-20 0-5 30 0 silver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 5-15 0-5 – 0 swamp white oak QUBI Quercus bicolor Native 10-25 0-3 – 0 American beech FAGR Fagus grandifolia Native 5-15 0-1 – 0 red maple ACRU Acer rubrum Native 5-15 0-0.5 – 0 blackgum NYSY Nyssa sylvatica Native 5-15 0-0.3 – 0 shagbark hickory CAOV2 Carya ovata Native 10-25 0-0.3 – 0 American basswood TIAM Tilia americana Native 5-15 0-0.2 – 0 pin oak QUPA2 Quercus palustris Native 5-15 0-0.2 – 0 bur oak QUMA2 Quercus macrocarpa Native 10-25 0-0.1 – 0 Vine/LianaVirginia creeper PAQU2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Native 2-15 0-0.3 – 0 riverbank grape VIRI Vitis riparia Native 2-15 0-0.1 – 0 Table 31. Community 1.1 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (m) Canopy cover (%) Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)fowl mannagrass GLST Glyceria striata Native 1–1.5 0.2–20 sweet woodreed CIAR2 Cinna arundinacea Native 0.5–1 0–3.5 hairy sedge CALA16 Carex lacustris Native 1–1.5 0–1 crested sedge CACR7 Carex cristatella Native 0.5–1 0–0.5 brome-like sedge CABR14 Carex bromoides Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.5 hop sedge CALU4 Carex lupulina Native 1–1.5 0–0.5 Bebb's sedge CABE2 Carex bebbii Native 0.5–1 0–0.3 rice cutgrass LEOR Leersia oryzoides Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 sedge CAREX Carex Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 Gray's sedge CAGR5 Carex grayi Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.1 Forb/Herbsmallspike false nettle BOCY Boehmeria cylindrica Native 0.5–1 1–15 jewelweed IMCA Impatiens capensis Native 0.3–0.5 0–8 Canadian clearweed PIPU2 Pilea pumila Native 0.3–0.5 0–8 blue skullcap SCLA2 Scutellaria lateriflora Native 0.3–0.5 0.1–5 American water horehound LYAM Lycopus americanus Native 0.3–0.5 0–1 American bur-reed SPAM Sparganium americanum Native 0.5–1 0–0.5 devil's beggartick BIFR Bidens frondosa Native 0.5–1 0–0.5 threelobe beggarticks BITR Bidens tripartita Native 0.5–1 0–0.3 purpleleaf willowherb EPCO Epilobium coloratum Native 0.5–1 0–0.3 northern bugleweed LYUN Lycopus uniflorus Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.3 turion duckweed LETU2 Lemna turionifera Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.2 annual ragweed AMAR2 Ambrosia artemisiifolia Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 common cinquefoil POSI2 Potentilla simplex Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 swamp dock RUVE3 Rumex verticillatus Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 hemlock waterparsnip SISU2 Sium suave Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 American hogpeanut AMBR2 Amphicarpaea bracteata Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.1 beggarticks BIDEN Bidens Unknown 0.3–0.5 0–0.1 Fern/fern allyspinulose woodfern DRCA11 Dryopteris carthusiana Native 0.1–0.5 0–1.5 sensitive fern ONSE Onoclea sensibilis Native 0.1–0.5 0.1–1 ostrich fern MAST Matteuccia struthiopteris Native 0.5–1 0–0.5 eastern marsh fern THPA Thelypteris palustris Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.2 Shrub/Subshrubcommon buttonbush CEOC2 Cephalanthus occidentalis Native 0.5–2 0.1–40 common buttonbush CEOC2 Cephalanthus occidentalis Native 0–0.3 0–1 northern spicebush LIBE3 Lindera benzoin Native 0–0.3 0–1 white meadowsweet SPAL2 Spiraea alba Native 0.5–1 0–0.5 dwarf red blackberry RUPU Rubus pubescens Native 0–0.3 0–0.4 swamp rose ROPA Rosa palustris Native 0.5–2 0–0.3 common winterberry ILVE Ilex verticillata Native 0.5–2 0–0.2 Allegheny blackberry RUAL Rubus allegheniensis Native 0.5–2 0–0.1 swamp rose ROPA Rosa palustris Native 0–0.3 0–0.1 meadow willow SAPE5 Salix petiolaris Native 0.5–2 0–0.1 northern spicebush LIBE3 Lindera benzoin Native 0.5–2 0–0.1 Treegreen ash FRPE Fraxinus pennsylvanica Native – 0–8 silver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 0.1–0.5 0–5 pin oak QUPA2 Quercus palustris Native 0.1–0.5 0–1.5 silver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 1–5 0–1 pin oak QUPA2 Quercus palustris Native 1–5 0–0.3 blackgum NYSY Nyssa sylvatica Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.2 American hornbeam CACA18 Carpinus caroliniana Native 1–5 0–0.1 hawthorn CRATA Crataegus Unknown 1–5 0–0.1 green ash FRPE Fraxinus pennsylvanica Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 Vine/LianaVirginia creeper PAQU2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Native 0.1–0.5 0–1 eastern poison ivy TORA2 Toxicodendron radicans Native 0.1–0.5 0–1 riverbank grape VIRI Vitis riparia Native 1–5 0–0.2 riverbank grape VIRI Vitis riparia Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.2 NonvascularRIFL4 Riccia fluitans Native 0–0.1 0–0.5 thuidium moss THUID Thuidium Native 0–0.1 0–0.1 climacium moss CLIMA2 Climacium Native 0–0.1 0–0.1 Table 32. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 33. Community 1.2 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height m Canopy cover (%) Diameter cm Basal area (square m/hectare) Treequaking aspen POTR5 Populus tremuloides Native 5-15 0-6 – 0 quaking aspen POTR5 Populus tremuloides Native 10-25 0-1.5 – 0 silver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 10-25 0-0.4 – 0 Table 34. Community 1.2 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (m) Canopy cover (%) Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)upright sedge CAST8 Carex stricta Native 1–1.5 0.2–85 rice cutgrass LEOR Leersia oryzoides Native 1–1.5 4.5–45 hairy sedge CALA16 Carex lacustris Native 1–1.5 0–20 bluejoint CACA4 Calamagrostis canadensis Native 1–1.5 0–6 sedge CAREX Carex Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–2 common spikerush ELPA3 Eleocharis palustris Native 0.2–0.4 0–1.5 fringed brome BRCI2 Bromus ciliatus Native 0.5–1 0–1 fowl bluegrass POPA2 Poa palustris Native 0.5–1 0–1 woolgrass SCCY Scirpus cyperinus Native 1–1.5 0–0.4 woolly sedge CAPE42 Carex pellita Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.4 fowl mannagrass GLST Glyceria striata Native 1–1.5 0–0.4 awlfruit sedge CAST5 Carex stipata Native 0.5–1 0–0.3 crested sedge CACR7 Carex cristatella Native 0.5–1 0–0.3 prairie cordgrass SPPE Spartina pectinata Native 1–1.5 0–0.3 longhair sedge CACO8 Carex comosa Native 1–1.5 0–0.2 Bebb's sedge CABE2 Carex bebbii Native 0.5–1 0–0.2 green bulrush SCAT2 Scirpus atrovirens Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 bottlebrush sedge CAHY4 Carex hystericina Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 cockspur grass ECHIN4 Echinochloa Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 brownish sedge CABR15 Carex brunnescens Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 slender wheatgrass ELTR7 Elymus trachycaulus Native 0.5–1 0–0.1 Virginia wildrye ELVI3 Elymus virginicus Native 0.5–1 0–0.1 broadleaf cattail TYLA Typha latifolia Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 Forb/Herbpurplestem aster SYPU Symphyotrichum puniceum Native 0.1–0.5 1–95 spotted joe pye weed EUMA9 Eutrochium maculatum Native 1–1.5 0.2–25 flat-top goldentop EUGR5 Euthamia graminifolia Native 0.1–0.5 0–4.5 white panicle aster SYLA6 Symphyotrichum lanceolatum Native 0.1–0.5 0–3 marsh seedbox LUPA Ludwigia palustris Native 0–0.1 0–3 jewelweed IMCA Impatiens capensis Native 1–1.5 0.1–3 purpleleaf willowherb EPCO Epilobium coloratum Native 0.5–1 0–3 Canada goldenrod SOAL6 Solidago altissima Native 0.5–1 0–2.5 common boneset EUPE3 Eupatorium perfoliatum Native 0.1–0.5 0.3–2.5 swamp verbena VEHA2 Verbena hastata Native 0.1–0.5 0.1–2 stickywilly GAAP2 Galium aparine Native 0.1–0.3 0–1.5 Virginia mountainmint PYVI Pycnanthemum virginianum Native 0.1–0.5 0–1.5 ditch stonecrop PESE6 Penthorum sedoides Native 0.4–1 0–1.5 American hogpeanut AMBR2 Amphicarpaea bracteata Native 0.1–0.5 0–1 rough bedstraw GAAS2 Galium asprellum Native 1–1.5 0–1 roundleaf goldenrod SOPA2 Solidago patula Native 1–1.5 0–1 giant goldenrod SOGI Solidago gigantea Native 1–1.5 0.1–1 stinging nettle URDI Urtica dioica Native 0.1–0.5 0–1 American water horehound LYAM Lycopus americanus Native 0.3–0.5 0.1–1 wild mint MEAR4 Mentha arvensis Native 0.4–1 0–1 Virginia iris IRVI Iris virginica Native 0.5–1 0–1 giant sunflower HEGI Helianthus giganteus Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.5 swamp milkweed ASIN Asclepias incarnata Native 1–1.5 0–0.5 swamp thistle CIMU Cirsium muticum Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.5 wild bergamot MOFI Monarda fistulosa Native 1–1.5 0–0.5 devil's beggartick BIFR Bidens frondosa Native 0.5–1 0–0.5 purple meadow-rue THDA Thalictrum dasycarpum Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.3 purplestem angelica ANAT Angelica atropurpurea Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.3 American marshpennywort HYAM Hydrocotyle americana Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.3 groundnut APAM Apios americana Native 0.1–0.3 0–0.3 waterhorehound LYCOP4 Lycopus Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–0.3 duckweed LEMNA Lemna Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.2 Allegheny monkeyflower MIRI Mimulus ringens Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.2 smallspike false nettle BOCY Boehmeria cylindrica Native 0.5–1 0–0.2 scaldweed CUGR Cuscuta gronovii Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.2 Canada goldenrod SOCA6 Solidago canadensis Native 0.5–1 0–0.2 yellow avens GEAL3 Geum aleppicum Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 yellow marsh marigold CAPA5 Caltha palustris Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.1 skunk cabbage SYFO Symplocarpus foetidus Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.1 stiff marsh bedstraw GATI Galium tinctorium Native 0.1–0.2 0–0.1 blue skullcap SCLA2 Scutellaria lateriflora Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 great ragweed AMTR Ambrosia trifida Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 sweet white violet VIBL Viola blanda Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 clearweed PILEA Pilea Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 bittercress CARDA Cardamine Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 white turtlehead CHGL2 Chelone glabra Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 northern bedstraw GABO2 Galium boreale Native 0.5–1 0–0.1 northern bugleweed LYUN Lycopus uniflorus Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 buttercup RANUN Ranunculus Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 Pennsylvania buttercup RAPE2 Ranunculus pensylvanicus Native 0.5–1 0–0.1 marsh pea LAPA4 Lathyrus palustris Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 Shrub/Subshrubgray dogwood CORA6 Cornus racemosa Native 1–2 0.2–25 silky dogwood COOB9 Cornus obliqua Native 1–2 0–6 meadow willow SAPE5 Salix petiolaris Native 2–5 0–4.5 Missouri River willow SAER Salix eriocephala Native 2–5 0–4 black elderberry SANI4 Sambucus nigra Native 1.5–2.5 0–4 bayberry willow SAMY2 Salix myricoides Native 1–2 0–2.5 white meadowsweet SPAL2 Spiraea alba Native 0–0.3 0–2.5 American red raspberry RUID Rubus idaeus Native 1–2 0–2 pussy willow SADI Salix discolor Native 1–4 0–1.5 sandbar willow SAIN3 Salix interior Native 0.5–2 0–1 common ninebark PHOP Physocarpus opulifolius Native 2–3 0–1 white meadowsweet SPAL2 Spiraea alba Native 0.5–1.5 0–0.5 hairystem gooseberry RIHI Ribes hirtellum Native 0–0.3 0–0.5 willow SALIX Salix Unknown 0.5–1 0–0.3 hairystem gooseberry RIHI Ribes hirtellum Native 0.5–2 0–0.3 black elderberry SANI4 Sambucus nigra Native 0–0.3 0–0.2 Missouri River willow SAER Salix eriocephala Native 0–0.3 0–0.1 Treesilver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 0.1–0.3 0–3 American elm ULAM Ulmus americana Native 1–5 0–1 peachleaf willow SAAM2 Salix amygdaloides Native 1–5 0–0.2 eastern cottonwood PODE3 Populus deltoides Native 0.1–0.3 0–0.1 Vine/Lianadevil's darning needles CLVI5 Clematis virginiana Native 1–2.5 0–0.5 Virginia creeper PAQU2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Native 0–0.1 0–0.5 riverbank grape VIRI Vitis riparia Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 Table 35. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 36. Community 1.4 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 37. Community 1.4 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height m Canopy cover (%) Diameter cm Basal area (square m/hectare) Treered maple ACRU Acer rubrum Native 3.5-11 0.3-25 – 0 eastern white pine PIST Pinus strobus Native 10-25 2-15 – 0 green ash FRPE Fraxinus pennsylvanica Native 10-25 0-10 – 0 American elm ULAM Ulmus americana Native 5-15 0-5 – 0 yellow birch BEAL2 Betula alleghaniensis Native 5-15 0-4 – 0 black ash FRNI Fraxinus nigra Native 7-13 0-4 – 0 arborvitae THOC2 Thuja occidentalis Native 2-15 0-4 20.1-45 0 tamarack LALA Larix laricina Native 3-11 0-4 – 0 green ash FRPE Fraxinus pennsylvanica Native 5-15 0-2.5 – 0 swamp white oak QUBI Quercus bicolor Native 10-25 0-2.5 – 0 arborvitae THOC2 Thuja occidentalis Native 5-15 0-1.5 – 0 black ash FRNI Fraxinus nigra Native 10-25 0-1.5 – 0 yellow birch BEAL2 Betula alleghaniensis Native 10-25 0-1.5 10.9 0 silver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 10-25 0-1.5 – 0 quaking aspen POTR5 Populus tremuloides Native 10-20 0-1 10.9 0 tamarack LALA Larix laricina Native 5-15 0-1 10.9-20.1 0 red maple ACRU Acer rubrum Native 10-25 0-1 20.1 0 eastern white pine PIST Pinus strobus Native 5-15 0.1-1 – 0 swamp white oak QUBI Quercus bicolor Native 5-15 0-1 – 0 northern red oak QURU Quercus rubra Native 5-15 0-1 – 0 American beech FAGR Fagus grandifolia Native 5-15 0.2-0.4 – 0 quaking aspen POTR5 Populus tremuloides Native 5-9 0-0.3 – 0 paper birch BEPA Betula papyrifera Native 5-15 0-0.2 20.1 0 slippery elm ULRU Ulmus rubra Native 10-25 0-0.2 – 0 American hornbeam CACA18 Carpinus caroliniana Native 5-15 0-0.1 – 0 American basswood TIAM Tilia americana Native 10-25 0-0.1 – 0 poison sumac TOVE Toxicodendron vernix Native 2-6 0-0.1 – 0 Vine/Lianariverbank grape VIRI Vitis riparia Native 2-15 0-0.5 – 0 Virginia creeper PAQU2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Native 2-15 0-0.1 – 0 Table 38. Community 1.4 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (m) Canopy cover (%) Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)rice cutgrass LEOR Leersia oryzoides Native 0.3–0.5 1–25 fowl mannagrass GLST Glyceria striata Native 0.3–0.5 0.3–20 hairy sedge CALA16 Carex lacustris Native 0.5–1 0–15 broadleaf cattail TYLA Typha latifolia Native 0.5–1 0–4.5 longhair sedge CACO8 Carex comosa Native 0.4–1 0.1–2 mannagrass GLYCE Glyceria Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–1.5 bluejoint CACA4 Calamagrostis canadensis Native 1–1.5 0–0.5 water sedge CAAQ Carex aquatilis Native 0.5–1 0–0.5 awlfruit sedge CAST5 Carex stipata Native 0.4–1 0–0.5 bristlystalked sedge CALE10 Carex leptalea Native – 0–0.3 weak stellate sedge CASE6 Carex seorsa Native 0.1–0.5 0.1–0.3 pale false mannagrass TOPA6 Torreyochloa pallida Native 0.1–0.5 0.1–0.3 American mannagrass GLGR Glyceria grandis Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.2 sedge CAREX Carex Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 graceful sedge CAGR2 Carex gracillima Native 0.5–1 0–0.1 sweet woodreed CIAR2 Cinna arundinacea Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 Forb/Herbjewelweed IMCA Impatiens capensis Native 0.3–0.5 0–30 skunk cabbage SYFO Symplocarpus foetidus Native 0.2–0.3 3–15 lizard's tail SACE Saururus cernuus Native 0.1–0.5 0–6 spotted joe pye weed EUMA9 Eutrochium maculatum Native 1–1.5 0–5 purplestem aster SYPU Symphyotrichum puniceum Native 0.3–0.5 0–5 common boneset EUPE3 Eupatorium perfoliatum Native 0.1–0.5 0–4.5 roundleaf goldenrod SOPA2 Solidago patula Native 0.5–1 0.2–3 lesser clearweed PIFO Pilea fontana Native 0.1–0.5 0.2–2.5 groundnut APAM Apios americana Native 0.1–0.3 0.3–2.5 yellow marsh marigold CAPA5 Caltha palustris Native 0.1–0.3 0.1–2 cutleaf coneflower RULA3 Rudbeckia laciniata Native 0.5–1 0–2 American hogpeanut AMBR2 Amphicarpaea bracteata Native 0.5–1 0–1.5 bulblet-bearing water hemlock CIBU Cicuta bulbifera Native 0.1–0.3 0.2–1.5 common duckweed LEMI3 Lemna minor Native – 0.2–1 Canada mayflower MACA4 Maianthemum canadense Native – 0.1–1 wrinkleleaf goldenrod SORU2 Solidago rugosa Native 0.3–0.5 0.1–1 smallspike false nettle BOCY Boehmeria cylindrica Native 0.2–0.4 0.3–1 American golden saxifrage CHAM2 Chrysosplenium americanum Native 0.1–0.5 0–1 Jack in the pulpit ARTR Arisaema triphyllum Native 0.1–0.2 0–0.5 great blue lobelia LOSI Lobelia siphilitica Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.5 Virginia iris IRVI Iris virginica Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.4 spotted water hemlock CIMA2 Cicuta maculata Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.4 Canadian clearweed PIPU2 Pilea pumila Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.4 turion duckweed LETU2 Lemna turionifera Native – 0–0.3 golden ragwort PAAU3 Packera aurea Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.3 stickywilly GAAP2 Galium aparine Native 0.1–0.3 0.1–0.3 fringed loosestrife LYCI Lysimachia ciliata Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.2 parasol whitetop DOUM2 Doellingeria umbellata Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.2 violet VIOLA Viola Unknown – 0–0.1 swamp milkweed ASIN Asclepias incarnata Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 Shrub/Subshrubhighbush blueberry VACO Vaccinium corymbosum Native 0.5–2 0.5–15 common winterberry ILVE Ilex verticillata Native 1–3.5 1–12 northern spicebush LIBE3 Lindera benzoin Native 0.5–3 1.5–11 poison sumac TOVE Toxicodendron vernix Native 0.5–4 0–10 swamp rose ROPA Rosa palustris Native 0.5–1.5 0.3–6 gray dogwood CORA6 Cornus racemosa Native 0.5–2 0–2 black elderberry SANI4 Sambucus nigra Native 0.5–2 0–1 silky dogwood COOB9 Cornus obliqua Native 0.5–2 0–1 chokecherry PRVI Prunus virginiana Native 2–3 0–1 highbush blueberry VACO Vaccinium corymbosum Native 0–0.3 0–1 dwarf red blackberry RUPU Rubus pubescens Native 0–0.1 0.2–1 red elderberry SARA2 Sambucus racemosa Native 0.5–2 0–0.4 common winterberry ILVE Ilex verticillata Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.3 bristly dewberry RUHI Rubus hispidus Native 0–0.1 0.1–0.3 purple chokeberry ARPR2 Aronia ×prunifolia Native 0.5–2 0–0.2 bog birch BEPU4 Betula pumila Native 0.5–2 0–0.2 alderleaf buckthorn RHAL Rhamnus alnifolia Native 0.5–1 0–0.2 white meadowsweet SPAL2 Spiraea alba Native 0.5–1 0–0.2 pussy willow SADI Salix discolor Native 0.5–2 0–0.2 European cranberrybush VIOP Viburnum opulus Native 0.5–2 0–0.1 common pricklyash ZAAM Zanthoxylum americanum Native 0.5–2 0–0.1 American hazelnut COAM3 Corylus americana Native 0.5–1.5 0–0.1 poison sumac TOVE Toxicodendron vernix Native 0–0.3 0–0.1 gray dogwood CORA6 Cornus racemosa Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.1 silky dogwood COOB9 Cornus obliqua Native 0–0.5 0–0.1 TreeAmerican hornbeam CACA18 Carpinus caroliniana Native 1–3 0.1–7 black ash FRNI Fraxinus nigra Native 1–5 0–4.5 American elm ULAM Ulmus americana Native 1.5–2.5 0.1–2.5 swamp white oak QUBI Quercus bicolor Native 1–5 0–1.5 swamp white oak QUBI Quercus bicolor Native 0.1–0.3 0–1 common serviceberry AMAR3 Amelanchier arborea Native 1–3 0.1–1 eastern white pine PIST Pinus strobus Native 1–5 0.2–0.5 green ash FRPE Fraxinus pennsylvanica Native 1–3 0–0.5 green ash FRPE Fraxinus pennsylvanica Native 0.2–0.4 0–0.5 yellow birch BEAL2 Betula alleghaniensis Native 2–5 0–0.5 nannyberry VILE Viburnum lentago Native 2–4.5 0–0.4 gray alder ALIN2 Alnus incana Native 1.5–3.5 0.1–0.4 northern red oak QURU Quercus rubra Native 1–5 0–0.2 red maple ACRU Acer rubrum Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 blackgum NYSY Nyssa sylvatica Native 0.1–0.3 0–0.1 sassafras SAAL5 Sassafras albidum Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.1 eastern white pine PIST Pinus strobus Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 American elm ULAM Ulmus americana Native 0.2–0.4 0–0.1 nannyberry VILE Viburnum lentago Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 Vine/LianaVirginia creeper PAQU2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Native 0–0.2 0.2–1.5 eastern poison ivy TORA2 Toxicodendron radicans Native 0.1–1.5 0–0.5 eastern poison ivy TORA2 Toxicodendron radicans Native 0.1–0.2 0–0.4 riverbank grape VIRI Vitis riparia Native 0.1–0.2 0–0.3 Virginia creeper PAQU2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Native 1–5 0–0.3 common moonseed MECA3 Menispermum canadense Native 1–5 0–0.2 riverbank grape VIRI Vitis riparia Native 0.5–2 0–0.2 Table 39. Community 1.5 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 40. Community 1.5 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (m) Canopy cover (%) Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)woollyfruit sedge CALA11 Carex lasiocarpa Native 0.5–1 14–55 smooth sawgrass CLMA Cladium mariscoides Native 0.3–0.5 1.5–30 water sedge CAAQ Carex aquatilis Native 0.5–1 0–25 common threesquare SCPU10 Schoenoplectus pungens Native 0.1–0.5 0–8 yellow sedge CAFL4 Carex flava Native 0.4–1 0.5–8 hardstem bulrush SCAC3 Schoenoplectus acutus Native 0.5–1 0.5–4.5 needle beaksedge RHCA11 Rhynchospora capillacea Native – 0.3–4.5 woolly sedge CAPE42 Carex pellita Native 0.1–0.5 0–4 big bluestem ANGE Andropogon gerardii Native 0.5–1 0–2.5 common reed PHAU7 Phragmites australis Native 1–2 0.5–2 common spikerush ELPA3 Eleocharis palustris Native 0.2–0.4 0–2 bottlebrush sedge CAHY4 Carex hystericina Native 0.1–0.5 0–2 slimstem reedgrass CAST36 Calamagrostis stricta Native 0.5–1 0–1 elliptic spikerush ELEL4 Eleocharis elliptica Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.5 Dudley's rush JUDU2 Juncus dudleyi Native 0.1–0.5 0.1–0.5 bristlystalked sedge CALE10 Carex leptalea Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.4 northeastern sedge CACR9 Carex cryptolepis Native 0.1–0.2 0.1–0.4 smallhead rush JUBR2 Juncus brachycephalus Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.3 knotted rush JUNO2 Juncus nodosus Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.3 tapered rosette grass DIAC2 Dichanthelium acuminatum Native 0.1–0.3 0–0.2 fowl mannagrass GLST Glyceria striata Native 1–1.5 0–0.2 bulrush SCIRP Scirpus Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 spiked muhly MUGL3 Muhlenbergia glomerata Native 0.5–1 0–0.1 Forb/Herbdense blazing star LISP Liatris spicata Native 0.4–1 5–50 spotted joe pye weed EUMA9 Eutrochium maculatum Native 0.4–1 0.3–2 swamp milkweed ASIN Asclepias incarnata Native 0.4–1 0.1–1.5 Indianhemp APCA Apocynum cannabinum Native 0.3–0.5 0–1 palespike lobelia LOSP Lobelia spicata Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.4 purple meadow-rue THDA Thalictrum dasycarpum Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.4 fourflower yellow loosestrife LYQU Lysimachia quadriflora Native 0.1–0.3 0.1–0.4 Virginia mountainmint PYVI Pycnanthemum virginianum Native 0.3–0.5 0.1–0.3 American water horehound LYAM Lycopus americanus Native 0.1–0.3 0–0.3 common boneset EUPE3 Eupatorium perfoliatum Native 0.4–1 0–0.3 bog goldenrod SOUL Solidago uliginosa Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.2 flatleaf bladderwort UTIN2 Utricularia intermedia Native – 0–0.2 blackeyed Susan RUHI2 Rudbeckia hirta Native 0.2–0.4 0–0.2 groovestem Indian plantain ARPL4 Arnoglossum plantagineum Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.1 sticky tofieldia TRGL5 Triantha glutinosa Native 0.1–0.2 0–0.1 swamp thistle CIMU Cirsium muticum Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 giant goldenrod SOGI Solidago gigantea Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 Fern/fern allyeastern marsh fern THPA Thelypteris palustris Native 0.3–0.5 0.1–1.5 Shrub/Subshrubshrubby cinquefoil DAFR6 Dasiphora fruticosa Native 0.4–2 0–50 shrubby cinquefoil DAFR6 Dasiphora fruticosa Native 0.3–0.4 1–35 white meadowsweet SPAL2 Spiraea alba Native – 0–2 silky dogwood COOB9 Cornus obliqua Native 0.5–1 0.1–1.5 alderleaf buckthorn RHAL Rhamnus alnifolia Native 0.5–1 0–0.4 Missouri River willow SAER Salix eriocephala Native 0.5–2 0–0.4 meadow willow SAPE5 Salix petiolaris Native 0.5–2 0–0.4 poison sumac TOVE Toxicodendron vernix Native 0.5–1 0–0.2 Kalm's St. Johnswort HYKA Hypericum kalmianum Native 0–0.3 0–0.1 Treeeastern redcedar JUVI Juniperus virginiana Native 1–2 0.1–2 eastern redcedar JUVI Juniperus virginiana Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.5 tamarack LALA Larix laricina Native 0.1–0.3 0–0.1 Nonvascularscorpidium moss SCORP2 Scorpidium Native 0–0.1 0–25 Table 41. Community 1.6 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 42. Community 1.6 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height m Canopy cover (%) Diameter cm Basal area (square m/hectare) Treetamarack LALA Larix laricina Native 10-20 0.4-5 – 0 Table 43. Community 1.6 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (m) Canopy cover (%) Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)chairmaker's bulrush SCAM6 Schoenoplectus americanus Native 0.1–0.5 0–35 spikerush ELEOC Eleocharis Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–20 spikerush ELOB5 Eleocharis obtusetrigona Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–20 cattail TYPHA Typha Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–8 bulrush SCHOE6 Schoenoplectus Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–1 dwarf spikerush ELPA5 Eleocharis parvula Native 0.2–0.4 0–0.5 beaked spikerush ELRO2 Eleocharis rostellata Native 0.5–1 0–0.5 elliptic spikerush ELEL4 Eleocharis elliptica Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.4 grassleaf rush JUMA4 Juncus marginatus Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.4 little green sedge CAVI5 Carex viridula Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.1 common reed PHAU7 Phragmites australis Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 hardstem bulrush SCAC3 Schoenoplectus acutus Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 Forb/Herbwhite panicle aster SYLA6 Symphyotrichum lanceolatum Native 0.1–0.5 0–6 spotted joe pye weed EUMA9 Eutrochium maculatum Native 1–1.5 0–0.5 wild mint MEAR4 Mentha arvensis Native 0.4–1 0–0.5 rough cocklebur XAST Xanthium strumarium Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.3 earth loosestrife LYTE2 Lysimachia terrestris Native 0.1–0.5 0.1–0.2 wild cucumber ECLO Echinocystis lobata Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 lizard's tail SACE Saururus cernuus Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 swamp milkweed ASIN Asclepias incarnata Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 common boneset EUPE3 Eupatorium perfoliatum Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 swamp lousewort PELA2 Pedicularis lanceolata Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 skunk cabbage SYFO Symplocarpus foetidus Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.1 violet VIOLA Viola Unknown 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 Fern/fern allyeastern marsh fern THPA Thelypteris palustris Native 0.1–0.5 0.5–6 hidden spikemoss SEEC Selaginella eclipes Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 Shrub/SubshrubBebb willow SABE2 Salix bebbiana Native 0.5–2 0–4 pussy willow SADI Salix discolor Native 0.5–2 0–4 poison sumac TOVE Toxicodendron vernix Native 0.5–2 0.2–3 alderleaf buckthorn RHAL Rhamnus alnifolia Native 0–0.3 0–2 northern spicebush LIBE3 Lindera benzoin Native 0.5–2 0–0.4 swamp rose ROPA Rosa palustris Native 0.5–2 0–0.4 Treetamarack LALA Larix laricina Native 1–5 0–0.5 NonvascularAlga, Green 2AG Alga, Green Native 0–0.1 0.2–3 Table 44. Community 1.7 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 45. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 46. Community 2.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 47. Community 2.3 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 48. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 49. Community 3.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 50. Community 3.2 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height m Canopy cover (%) Diameter cm Basal area (square m/hectare) Treecommon hackberry CEOC Celtis occidentalis Native 5-15 3.5-55 – 0 American elm ULAM Ulmus americana Native 5-15 5-50 – 0 silver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 10-25 2.5-35 – 0 pin oak QUPA2 Quercus palustris Native 10-25 3-30 – 0 boxelder ACNE2 Acer negundo Native 5-15 5-20 – 0 American elm ULAM Ulmus americana Native 10-25 0-12 – 0 swamp white oak QUBI Quercus bicolor Native 10-25 0.3-11 – 0 swamp white oak QUBI Quercus bicolor Native 5-15 1-7 – 0 white mulberry MOAL Morus alba Introduced 5-15 0-7 – 0 red maple ACRU Acer rubrum Native 5-15 0-3.5 – 0 silver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 5-15 0-3 – 0 black cherry PRSE2 Prunus serotina Native 5-15 0.1-2.5 – 0 black willow SANI Salix nigra Native 10-25 0-0.1 – 0 Vine/Lianariverbank grape VIRI Vitis riparia Native 2-15 0.2-3 – 0 Virginia creeper PAQU2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Native 2-15 0-0.3 – 0 Table 51. Community 3.2 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (m) Canopy cover (%) Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)eastern bottlebrush grass ELHY Elymus hystrix Native 0.1–0.5 0.2–12 rosy sedge CARO22 Carex rosea Native 0.1–0.5 0–6 awlfruit sedge CAST5 Carex stipata Native 0.5–1 0.1–1 sweet woodreed CIAR2 Cinna arundinacea Native 1–1.5 0.1–1 broadleaf rosette grass DILA8 Dichanthelium latifolium Native 0.5–1 0–0.5 whitegrass LEVI2 Leersia virginica Native 0.5–1 0–0.5 Forb/HerbCanadian clearweed PIPU2 Pilea pumila Native 0.1–0.5 40–65 great ragweed AMTR Ambrosia trifida Native 0.1–0.5 2.5–50 American pokeweed PHAM4 Phytolacca americana Native 1–1.5 4.5–25 threelobe beggarticks BITR Bidens tripartita Native 0.5–1 0–20 white snakeroot AGAL5 Ageratina altissima Native 0.1–0.5 0.4–10 stinging nettle URDI Urtica dioica Native 0.1–0.5 1–8 lesser burdock ARMI2 Arctium minus Introduced 0.1–0.5 0.4–8 white avens GECA7 Geum canadense Native 0.5–1 0.5–7 devil's beggartick BIFR Bidens frondosa Native 0.5–1 0.4–5 clustered blacksnakeroot SAOD Sanicula odorata Native 0.1–0.5 0.4–5 Canadian woodnettle LACA3 Laportea canadensis Native 0.1–0.5 0–3.5 American hogpeanut AMBR2 Amphicarpaea bracteata Native 0.1–0.5 0–3 stickywilly GAAP2 Galium aparine Native 0.1–0.3 0–1.5 American bellflower CAAM18 Campanulastrum americanum Native 1–1.5 0.1–1 beggarslice HAVI2 Hackelia virginiana Native 0.1–0.5 0–1 Asiatic dayflower COCO3 Commelina communis Introduced 0.1–0.5 0–0.5 Canadian honewort CRCA9 Cryptotaenia canadensis Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.5 garlic mustard ALPE4 Alliaria petiolata Introduced 0.1–0.5 0–0.4 common yellow oxalis OXST Oxalis stricta Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.3 bristly buttercup RAHI Ranunculus hispidus Native 0.4–1 0–0.3 Fern/fern allyspinulose woodfern DRCA11 Dryopteris carthusiana Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.4 Shrub/Subshrubmultiflora rose ROMU Rosa multiflora Introduced 0.5–2 0.5–11 Morrow's honeysuckle LOMO2 Lonicera morrowii Introduced 0.5–2 1–10 northern spicebush LIBE3 Lindera benzoin Native 0.5–2 0.5–6 black raspberry RUOC Rubus occidentalis Native 0.5–2 0.5–5 Treecommon hackberry CEOC Celtis occidentalis Native 1–5 0.2–2 swamp white oak QUBI Quercus bicolor Native 1–5 0–1.5 swamp white oak QUBI Quercus bicolor Native 0.1–0.5 0–1.5 black cherry PRSE2 Prunus serotina Native 0.1–0.5 0–1 Vine/LianaVirginia creeper PAQU2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Native 0.1–0.5 4.5–30 eastern poison ivy TORA2 Toxicodendron radicans Native 0.1–0.5 0.2–2 eastern poison ivy TORA2 Toxicodendron radicans Native 1–5 0.1–1 Table 52. Community 4.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Table 53. Community 4.1 forest overstory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height m Canopy cover (%) Diameter cm Basal area (square m/hectare) Treeblack willow SANI Salix nigra Native 10-25 0-30 – 0 swamp white oak QUBI Quercus bicolor Native 20-25 0-8 80-89.9 0 silver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 2-20 0-5 24.9-35.1 0 black willow SANI Salix nigra Native 5-15 0-4.5 – 0 silver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 5-15 0-3.5 – 0 black walnut JUNI Juglans nigra Native 20-25 0-1.5 59.9 0 black walnut JUNI Juglans nigra Native 5-15 0-1.5 – 0 green ash FRPE Fraxinus pennsylvanica Native 10-25 0-1.5 – 0 green ash FRPE Fraxinus pennsylvanica Native 5-15 0-1 – 0 American elm ULAM Ulmus americana Native 5-15 0-0.3 – 0 black cherry PRSE2 Prunus serotina Native 5-15 0-0.1 – 0 Table 54. Community 4.1 forest understory composition
Common name Symbol Scientific name Nativity Height (m) Canopy cover (%) Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)reed canarygrass PHAR3 Phalaris arundinacea Native 0.5–1 25–100 hairy sedge CALA16 Carex lacustris Native 1–2 0.2–35 broadleaf cattail TYLA Typha latifolia Native 1–1.5 0–6 sweet woodreed CIAR2 Cinna arundinacea Native 1–1.5 0–1 broadwing sedge CAAL3 Carex alata Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 lesser panicled sedge CADI4 Carex diandra Native 0.5–1 0–0.1 cypress-like sedge CAPS Carex pseudocyperus Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 upright sedge CAST8 Carex stricta Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 softstem bulrush SCTA2 Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 rice cutgrass LEOR Leersia oryzoides Native 1–1.5 0–0.1 Forb/Herbspotted joe pye weed EUMA9 Eutrochium maculatum Native 1–2 0–9 jewelweed IMCA Impatiens capensis Native 1–2 0.5–7 smallspike false nettle BOCY Boehmeria cylindrica Native 0.5–1 0–6 purplestem aster SYPU Symphyotrichum puniceum Native 1–2 0–1 stinging nettle URDI Urtica dioica Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.5 turion duckweed LETU2 Lemna turionifera Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.4 swamp milkweed ASIN Asclepias incarnata Native 1–1.5 0–0.3 Virginia iris IRVI Iris virginica Native 0.5–1 0–0.3 marsh skullcap SCGA Scutellaria galericulata Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.2 Canada goldenrod SOAL6 Solidago altissima Native 0.5–1 0–0.2 threelobe beggarticks BITR Bidens tripartita Native 0.5–1 0–0.1 common boneset EUPE3 Eupatorium perfoliatum Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.1 common duckweed LEMI3 Lemna minor Native – 0–0.1 green arrow arum PEVI Peltandra virginica Native 0.3–0.5 0–0.1 Fern/fern allyeastern marsh fern THPA Thelypteris palustris Native 0.1–0.5 0–4 sensitive fern ONSE Onoclea sensibilis Native 0.3–0.5 0–2 Shrub/Subshrubsilky dogwood COOB9 Cornus obliqua Native 1–4 0–11 common buttonbush CEOC2 Cephalanthus occidentalis Native 0.5–2 0–8 sandbar willow SAIN3 Salix interior Native 0.5–2 0–4 black elderberry SANI4 Sambucus nigra Native 0.5–2 0–2 meadow willow SAPE5 Salix petiolaris Native 0.5–2 0–1 leatherleaf CHCA2 Chamaedaphne calyculata Native 0–0.3 0–0.4 bog birch BEPU4 Betula pumila Native 0–0.3 0–0.3 common winterberry ILVE Ilex verticillata Native 1–2 0–0.2 Allegheny blackberry RUAL Rubus allegheniensis Native 0–0.3 0–0.1 poison sumac TOVE Toxicodendron vernix Native 0–0.3 0–0.1 Treegreen ash FRPE Fraxinus pennsylvanica Native 0.5–4 0–2.5 swamp white oak QUBI Quercus bicolor Native 2–3 0–1 boxelder ACNE2 Acer negundo Native 1–5 0–0.4 silver maple ACSA2 Acer saccharinum Native 0–0.1 0–0.1 Vine/LianaVirginia creeper PAQU2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Native – 0–3 riverbank grape VIRI Vitis riparia Native – 0–0.3 riverbank grape VIRI Vitis riparia Native 0.1–0.5 0–0.3 NonvascularRINA2 Ricciocarpos natans Native 0–0.1 0–0.4 Table 55. Community 4.2 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Animal community
Mammals
Large Herbivores
The largest herbivore in the region is white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), a browser that occupies a wide range of cover phases in all but the most inundated habitats. Agricultural conversion and forest fragmentation, both of which are favorable to deer forage, and the extirpation of most natural predators has resulted in excess populations of deer across the entire area. Excess deer browse limits the continued recruitment of northern whitecedar (Thuja occidentalis) into the overstory and severely reduces the diversity of forbs in the understory.
Large Predators
Formerly, gray wolf (Canis lupus), American black bear (Ursus americanus), and cougar (Puma concolor), were among the top predators occupying adjacent uplands. By the late 1800s, these species were extirpated from the area through excess hunting and habitat conversion. Bobcat (Lynx rufus) and fisher (Pekania pennanti) ranked among the medium-sized predators until they also were extirpated by the late 1800s. However, bear and bobcats occasionally are present at the northern end of the MLRA.
At present, the only native carnivore capable of preying on deer is the coyote (Canis latrans), which occupies all community phases. Medium-sized mammalian predators include gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) and red fox (Vulpes vulpes), both of which occupy a wide range of community phases, but on balance, gray fox prefers more forested phases than red fox. Racoon (Procyon lotor) are ubiquitous mid-sized omnivores that spend a large amount of time in swampy habitat, hunting burrowing crayfish among other animals.
Small Mammals
Beaver (Castor canadensis) is a keystone species of swamp and marsh for its ecological engineering of landscapes. Beavers can be responsible for consuming trees and shrubs of the more woody community phases, converting them to marsh and meadow phases. They also, by damming streams, may increase the water table, and move from saturated swamp, wet meadow, and fen phases to phases to semipermanently ponded marsh and inundated shrub swamp phases. Cottonwood (Populus spp.), willows (Salix spp.), alder (Alnus rugosa), yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis), grasses (Poaceae), and smartweeds (Persicaria spp.).
Muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) construct dens using cattails and sedges in the marsh phase.
Bats (family Vespertilionidae) may forage at night in and around wetlands, which often are a hub for flying insects, many of which have aquatic larvae. Many bats roost in summer in cavities and under tree bark, thus requiring forests with some large mature trees and snags. A healthy population of bats provides an important ecosystem service by reducing crop pest populations and reducing the need for pesticide applications.
Birds
Commonly encountered birds foraging in marshy phases are Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) and Swamp Sparrow (Melospiza georgiana), which nest in shrubs. Tree Swallow (Hirundo rustica) are aerial predators over open water and nest in tree cavities. Green Heron (Butorides virescens) and Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias) hunt for small aquatic animals in shallow water and nest in trees.
Wood Duck (Aix sponsa) nest in cavities of larger trees and snags of swamp forests, and may patrol vernal pools within swamp forests or open marshes.
Common species foraging and nesting in shrubbier phases include Gray Catbird (Dumetella carolinensis), Common Yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas), and Yellow Warbler (Setophaga petechia).
Larger birds that nest in large trees and snags of swamp forests include Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus), Barred Owl (Strix varia) and Pileated Woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus). Generalist forest songbirds occurring in swamp forests include White-breasted Nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis), Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina), Eastern Wood-Pewee (Contopus virens), Rose-breasted Grosbeak (Pheucticus
ludovicianus), Black-capped Chickadee (Poecile atricapillus), and Baltimore Oriole (Icterus galbula). Forest and woodland songbirds with an affinity for swamp forest include Warbling Vireo (Vireo gilvus), Cerulean Warbler (Setophaga cerulea), Northern Waterthrush (Parkesia noveboracensis).
According to Neimi et al. (2009) the following birds are more tolerant of disturbed wetlands: Common Grackle (Quiscalus quiscula), American Robin (Turdus migratorius), European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), American Goldfinch (Carduelis tristis), Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura), Marsh Wren (Cistothorus palustris), Gray Catbird (Dumetella carolinensis), Baltimore oriole (Icterus galbula), Brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater), and Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus). Similarly, the following birds are associated with higher quality wetlands: Swamp Sparrow (Melospiza georgiana), Common Yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas), Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis), Sedge Wren (Cistothorus platensis), Alder Flycatcher (Empidonax alnorum), Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorous), American Redstart (Setophaga ruticilla), Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus), Brown Thrasher (Toxostoma rufum), and White-throated Sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis).
Reptiles
Common snakes such as ribbon and garter (Thamnophis spp.) prey upon soft invertebrates and amphibian among all cover types (community phases) on land and occasionally in the water. Eastern massasauga (Sistrurus catenatus catenatus), the region’s only significantly venomous species, occupies a mixture of cover types, but is frequently associated with open upland phases during cooler periods. Massaugas require the flowing groundwater to prevent their subterranean hibernacula from freezing over the winter. Kirtland's Snake (Clonophis kirtlandii) is a rare snake that occupies crayfish burrows in prairie fens, open tamarack swamps, and sedge meadows, mostly in the southern half of the MLRA.
Several species of turtles may transit through mucky depressions between upland nesting sites and aquatic environments. Spotted Turtle (Clemys guttata) has affinity to fens and tamarack swamps, and is of conservation concern. The mainly terrestrial box turtle (Terrapene carolina) can be found foraging within the non-inundated habitat within mucky depressions.
Amphibians
The seasonally ponded areas associated with Mucky Depressions ecological site provide potentially important fish-free pools for the development of amphibian larvae. Amphibians most frequently encountered in wooded community phases are Wood Frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) and gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor and H. chrysoscelis). Four-toed Salamander (Hemidactylium scutatum) can be seen breeding in the fall, and will lay their eggs along the banks of ponded areas in the spring. Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris crepitans blanchardi) is a rare frog found in the open community phases.
Invertebrates
Among the thousands of invertebrates that that occupy habitats within this ecological site, Hine's Emerald (Somatochlora hineana) and Tamarack tree cricket (Oecanthus laricis) have particular affinity for this type of habitat. Hine's Emerald is a dragonfly of note due to its habitat restriction to bogs and fens. The larvae of this dragonfly inhabit burrowing crayfish burrows. Tamarack tree cricket is a rare cricket found in the tamarack community phase.
Domesticated Livestock
This ecological site is not a significant host for domesticated livestock. The substrate is likely too wet unless drained.
The references consulted for wildlife habitat suitability are MNFI (2020), Harding (1997), Reid (2006), Van Dersal (1938), Roberts and Arner (1984), and Cornell Lab of Ornithology (2020).Hydrological functions
Mucky depressions function as hydrologic discharge areas.
Recreational uses
Recreational opportunities consist mainly of hunting, hiking, botanizing, and bird watching, assuming waterproof footwear. The saturated mucky substrate creates issues with camping. Abundant mosquitoes may compromise user experience during the warmer seasons.
Wood products
Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
Red maple is managed through a variety of silvicultural systems (including clearcutting) and regenerates by stump sprouting, but sometimes is suppressed with herbicide and fire where oak is more desired.
Wood is used for furniture and cabinetry. It makes a moderate-density firewood (dry specific gravity: 0.54).
Swamp White Oak (Quercus bicolor)
Swamp white oak is managed by shelterwood harvest.
Wood is grouped with other related white oaks, is used in furniture, and is uniquely suitable (above all other woods) for use as wine barrels. It makes a high-density firewood (dry specific gravity: 0.72).
Silver Maple (Acer saccharinum)
Silver maple readily regenerates from seed on moist soils of its natural habitat. Silver maple breaks easily due to brittle wood, and is not typically harvested for wood products. It makes a moderate-density firewood (dry specific gravity: 0.47).
Yellow Birch (Betula alleghaniensis)
Yellow birch naturally regenerates on rotting logs under moist, shaded conditions. After the roots reach soil below the log, which eventually decays, several roots may prop the tree over an empty space. Mechanical soil scarification or prescribed fire can be used to prepare a suitable seed bed in absence of advance regeneration. Yellow birch lumber and veneer is made into furniture, tool handles, and interior paneling and frames. It makes a high-density firewood (dry specific gravity: 0.62).
Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra)
Black ash naturally regenerates by seed in open moist soils of swamps. Trees suffer heavy mortality from emerald ash borer. Black ash is a slow-growing small tree not commonly used for wood products. It makes a moderate-density firewood (dry specific gravity: 0.49).
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
Green ash usually has advanced regeneration (seedling and saplings in understory prior to harvest), and is also able to stump sprout. Trees suffer heavy mortality from emerald ash borer. Green ash wood is well suited as tool handles and baseball bats due to its hardness and bending qualities. It makes a moderate-density firewood (dry specific gravity: 0.56).
Tamarack (Larix laricina)
Tamarack naturally regenerates by seed on open, moist soil. It is very intolerant of shade and drought, so artificial regeneration is most successful by planting seedlings germinated in a greenhouse for the first year. Most typical commercial uses of tamarack is wood pulp for making paper, but its rot resistance also makes it suitable for fence posts and railroad ties. It is a moderate-density firewood (dry specific gravity: 0.53).
Black Willow (Salix nigra)
Black willow naturally regenerates immediately by seed on open, moist soil (seeds have a short viability window). It usually is artificially regenerated by cuttings, which root easily in wet soil. Black willow wood is easily worked and doesn’t splinter. It typically is used for crates and boxes or small carvings. It makes a low-density firewood (dry specific gravity: 0.39).Table 56. Representative site productivity
Common name Symbol Site index low Site index high CMAI low CMAI high Age of CMAI Site index curve code Site index curve basis Citation black ash FRNI – 56 – – – – – green ash FRPE – 75 – – – – – tamarack LALA 38 55 – – – – – eastern white pine PIST – 41 – – – – – quaking aspen POTR5 – 30 – – – – – swamp white oak QUBI 57 74 – – – – – pin oak QUPA2 60 77 – – – – – arborvitae THOC2 – 37 – – – – – red maple ACRU 47 91 – – – – – silver maple ACSA2 68 92 – – – – – Supporting information
Inventory data references
Since 2011, the Grand Rapids Soil Survey Office has collected over 350 points with quantitative vegetation data throughout MLRAs 97, 98, and to a lesser extent 99, in coordination with soil survey projects, or opportunistically with incidental technical soil service requests (i.e. wetland redeterminations). Of these, 54 points (15%) represent sites on organic soils. Data were analyzed with R statistical software using numerical taxonomy tools. Several clustering methods were evaluated, and optimal groupings were arrived via Ward’s minimum variance method of agglomerative hierarchical clustering using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity among plots as input. We identified nine clusters, which corresponded with six phases of the reference state, and two phases of alternative states. The composition of plots within each of these clusters was aggregated to populate the species composition tables of those phases. Species abundance was down weighted (1/10X) for 2 plots representing MLRA 99, furthest from MLRA 97. Most of the plots sampled within MLRA 97 represented alternative community phases. A plot in Barry County, in MLRA 98, close to the MLRA 97 border, was selected as a type location and given higher weight (10X) for species abundances, because its species composition was considered more representative of MLRA 97. Phases not characterized with plot data were identified based on literature and undocumented field observations.
Type locality
Location 1: Barry County, MI Latitude 42° 37′ 48″ Longitude -85° 30′ 24″ Location 2: Kent County, MI Latitude 43° 11′ 2″ Longitude 85° 20′ 31″ Location 3: Clinton County, MI Latitude 42° 47′ 37″ Longitude -84° 23′ 1″ References
-
Burns, R.M., B.H. Honkala, and others. 1990. Silvics of North America. Volume 1: Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
-
Burns, R.M. and B.H. Honkala. 1990. Silvics of North America. Volume 2: Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
-
Cleland, D.T., J.A. Freeouf, J.E. Keys, G.J. Nowacki, C. Carpenter, and W.H. McNab. 2007. Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections of the Coterminous United States. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report WO-76. Washington, DC. 1–92.
-
Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2020 (Date accessed). All about birds. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide.
-
Driscoll, D.A., S.C. Banks, P.S. Barton, D.B. Lindenmayer, and A.L. Smith. 2013. Conceptual domain of the matrix in fragmented landscapes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28:605.
-
Green, E.K. and S.M. Galatowitsch. 2002. Effects of Phalaris arundinacea and nitrate-N addition on the establishment of wetland plant communities. Journal of Applied Ecology 39:134–144.
-
Harding, J. 1997. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Great Lakes Region. Univ. of Mich. Press.
-
Kappler, R., K. Knight, and K. Root. 2019. Evaluating the population viability of green ash trees (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) before and after the emerald ash borer beetle (Agrilus planipennis) invasion. Ecological Modelling 400:53.
-
Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2010. Natural communities of Michigan: classification and description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing, MI.
-
MNFI. 2020 (Date accessed). Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) Rare Species Explorer. https://mnfi.anr.msu.edu/species/explorer.
-
Miles, P.D. and W.B. Smith. 2009. Specific gravity and other properties of wood and bark for 156 tree species found in North America. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
-
Niemi, G.J., V.J. Brady, T.N. Brown, J.J. Ciborowski, N.P. Danz, D.M. Ghioca, J.M. Hanowski, T.P. Hollenhorst, R.W. Howe, L.B. Johnson, and others. 2009. Development of ecological indicators for the US Great Lakes coastal region: a summary of applications in Lake Huron. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 12:77–89.
-
Omernik, J.M. and G.E. Griffith. 2014. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework. Environmental Management 54:1249–1266.
-
Reid, F. 2006. A field guide to mammals of North America, north of Mexico. Peterson Field Guides. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
-
Roberts, T.H. and D.H. Arner. 1984. Food habits of beaver in east-central Mississippi. The Journal of wildlife management 48:1414.
-
USGS. 2008. LANDFIRE 1.1.0 Vegetation dynamics models: zone 51. U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey.
-
Van Dersal, W.R. 1938. Native woody plants of the United States: their erosion-control and wildlife values. US Government Printing Office.
Contributors
Greg Schmidt
Approval
Nels Barrett, 1/16/2024
Acknowledgments
Matt Bromley and Andy Henriksen reviewed the narratives. Matt Bromley reviewed associated soil map units.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 04/20/2026 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement