Ecological site R030XB126NV

R030XB074NV	COBBLY LOAM 5-7 P.Z.

R030XB109NV	GYPSIC BARREN 3-5 P.Z. ATCO may occur but a minor spp.; less productive site
R030XB124NV	SHALLOW HILL 3-5 P.Z. ATCO absent to rare
R030XB131NV	CALCAREOUS PEDIMENT 3-5 P.Z. AMDU2-ATCO codominant; ENAR codominant
R030XB026NV	GYPSIC LOAM 3-5 P.Z. ATHY codominant shrub; much less productive site
R030XB010NV	LOAMY SLOPE 5-7 P.Z. ACSP12 dominant plant; PSFR minor shrub
R030XB125NV	CHANNERY HILL 3-5 P.Z. ATCO-ATCO codominant; PSFR minor shrub
R030XB106NV	GRAVELLY SLOPE 5-7 P.Z. PLRI3 dominant plant; more productive site
R030XB117NV	GYPSIC SAND 3-5 P.Z. ATCO rare to absent; ATCA2 and PEPA13 important shrubs

Tree	Not specified
Shrub	(1) Psorothamnus fremontii (2) Ambrosia dumosa
Herbaceous	Not specified

Landforms	(1) Hill (2) Pediment
Elevation	610 – 762 m
Slope	4 – 30 %

Frost-free period (average)	300 days
Freeze-free period (average)
Precipitation total (average)	180 mm

Drainage class	Well drained
Permeability class	Slow

Ecological dynamics

Please refer to group concept R030XB086CA to view the provisional STM.

As ecological condition deteriorates, big galleta and other perennial grasses decrease and interspaces between shrubs increase. In a deteriorated condition, annual grasses and forbs will probably invade this site.

Fire ecology:
Fires in the Mojave desert are infrequent and of low severity because production of annual and perennial herbs seldom provides a fuel load capable of sustaining fire. Fire generally kills white bursage. However, most white bursage plants burned because their canopies contained numerous small branches in proximity to herbaceous fuels. Shadscale communities are usually unaffected by fire because of low fuel loads, although a year of exceptionally heavy winter rains can generate fuels by producing a heavy stand of annual forbs and grasses. The mean fire return interval for shadscale communities range from 35 to 100 years. Increased presence of non-native annual grasses, such as cheatgrass, can alter fire regimes by increasing fire frequency under wet to near-normal summer moisture conditions. Range ratany is top-killed by fire. Range ratany resprouts from the root crown after fire. Fires in creosotebush scrub were an infrequent event in pre-settlement desert habitats, because fine fuels from winter annual plants were probably sparse, only occurring in large amounts during exceptionally wet winters. Fire kills many creosotebush. Creosotebush is poorly adapted to fire because of its limited sprouting ability. Creosotebush survives some fires that burn patchily or are of low severity.

State and transition model

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

Ecosystem states

1. Reference Plant Community

State 1 submodel, plant communities

1.1. Reference Plant Community

State 1
Reference Plant Community

Community 1.1
Reference Plant Community

The reference plant community is dominated by Fremont dalea, white bursage, and shadscale.
Potential vegetative composition is about 5% grasses, 10% annual and perennial forbs, and 85% shrubs. Approximate ground cover (basal and crown) is 10 to 15 percent.

Figure 3. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)

Table 5. Annual production by plant type

Plant type	Low (kg/hectare)	Representative value (kg/hectare)	High (kg/hectare)
Shrub/Vine	191	381	572
Forb	22	45	67
Grass/Grasslike	11	22	34
Total	224	448	673

Additional community tables

Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition

Group	Common name	Symbol	Scientific name	Annual production ()	Foliar cover (%)
Grass/Grasslike
1	Perennial grasses			1–22
	low woollygrass	DAPU7	Dasyochloa pulchella	2–13	–
	big galleta	PLRI3	Pleuraphis rigida	2–13	–
2	Annual Grasses			1–22
Forb
3	Perennial forbs			1–22
	desert globemallow	SPAM2	Sphaeralcea ambigua	2–13	–
4	Annual forbs			1–22
	desert trumpet	ERIN4	Eriogonum inflatum	2–13	–
Shrub/Vine
5	Primary shrubs			278–507
	Fremont's dalea	PSFR	Psorothamnus fremontii	90–135	–
	burrobush	AMDU2	Ambrosia dumosa	67–112	–
	shadscale saltbush	ATCO	Atriplex confertifolia	67–112	–
	woody crinklemat	TICA3	Tiquilia canescens	22–45	–
	creosote bush	LATR2	Larrea tridentata	9–36	–
6	Secondary shrubs			22–90
	Fremont's chaffbush	AMFR2	Amphipappus fremontii	4–22	–
	hedgehog cactus	ECHIN3	Echinocereus	4–22	–
	brittlebush	ENFA	Encelia farinosa	4–22	–
	Nevada jointfir	EPNE	Ephedra nevadensis	4–22	–
	California barrel cactus	FECY	Ferocactus cylindraceus	4–22	–
	beavertail pricklypear	OPBA2	Opuntia basilaris	4–22	–

Location 1: Clark County, NV
Township/Range/Section	T19S R66E S16
General legal description	Bitter Spring Valley area, about 20 miles south of Moapa, Nevada.

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)
Contact for lead author
Date	04/17/2026
Approved by
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production

Indicators

Number and extent of rills:
Presence of water flow patterns:
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):

Dominant:

Sub-dominant:

Other:

Additional:
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial plant reproductive capability:

Download reference sheet

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Ecological site R030XB126NV

GRAVELLY PEDIMENT 5-7 P.Z.

Last updated: 3/10/2025 Accessed: 04/17/2026

Search

General information

Ecological site concept

Associated sites

Similar sites

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Last updated: 3/10/2025
Accessed: 04/17/2026