Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R030XA105AZ
Limy Fan
3-6" p.z.
Last updated: 10/21/2024
Accessed: 04/19/2026
-
Search
Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.
PreviousSectionsNextGeneral information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Click to explore map
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 030X–Mojave Basin and Range
This unit occurs within the Basin and Range Province and is characterized by broad basins, valleys, and old lakebeds. Widely spaced mountains trending north to south occur throughout the area. Isolated, short mountain ranges are separated by an aggraded desert plain. The mountains are fault blocks that have been tilted up. Long alluvial fans coalesce with dry lakebeds between some of the ranges.
LRU notes
AZ LRU 30-1 – Lower Mohave Desert
Elevations range from 400 to 2500 feet and precipitation averages 3 to 6 inches per year. Vegetation includes creosotebush, white bursage, Mormon tea, and brittlebush. The soil temperature regime is hyperthermic and the soil moisture regime is typic aridic.Ecological site concept
This ecological site is found on uplands with deep, calcareous soils. that are sandy loam to loam in texture throughout and non-skeletal.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree Not specified
Shrub (1) Larrea tridentata
(2) Ambrosia dumosaHerbaceous Not specified
Physiographic features
This ecological site is located in an upland position on summits and shoulders of stream terraces and fan terraces.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms (1) Stream terrace
Flooding frequency None Ponding frequency None Elevation 152 – 366 m Slope 1 – 7 % Aspect Aspect is not a significant factor Climatic features
The 30-1AZ Lower Mohave Desert Shrub land resource unit is characterized by a hot, dry climate. The average annual rainfall is 3 to 6 inches, but it can be extremely variable (e.g. from 0 to 11 inches). There can be long periods when little or no precipitation is received. Most of the precipitation for the year could arrive in just a couple of storms. The soil moisture regime is typic aridic and the soil temperature regime is hyperthermic. Winter precipitation from November through April occurs as gentle rains from storms coming out of the Pacific Ocean. Snow is very rare and only falls in the highest mountains. A seasonal drought occurs in May and June. Summer/fall precipitation from July through October comes from spotty, unreliable, and sometimes violent thunderstorms. The moisture originates in the Gulf of Mexico (and the Pacific Ocean in the fall) and flows into the state on the north end of the Mexican monsoon. Strong winds are common, especially during the spring.
Table 3 Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) 330 days Freeze-free period (average) 370 days Precipitation total (average) 150 mm BarLineFigure 2. Monthly precipitation range
BarLineFigure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
">Influencing water features
Soil features
The soil of this ecological site is deep. Surface textures are very gravelly loam and very gravelly loamy sand. Subsoil texture is sandy loam, gravelly sand and loamy sand. Parent material is stream alluvium and eolian sand. Geologic formation is varied. Available water capacity is moderate. Water erosion hazard is low to moderate; wind erosion hazard is low to high. Runoff is slow. Soils are non-saline, non-sodic with a mildly to moderately alkaline pH of 7.4-8.2. Soil moisture regime is typic Aridic; soil temerature is hyperthermic.
A typical soil profile is:
A-0 to 2 inches; gravelly loam
Bk1-2 to 8 inches; gravelly sandy loam
Bk2-8 to 29 inches; sand loam
Bk3-29 to 41 inches; sandy loam
2Bk4-41 to 60 inches; gravelly sand
Soils correlated to this ecological site include map unit 627039, Coolidge and Denure families, Mohave County, AZ, Southern Part SSA.Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture (1) Very gravelly loam
(2) Loamy sand
Family particle size (1) Sandy
Drainage class Well drained Permeability class Moderate to moderately rapid Soil depth 152 – 0 cm Surface fragment cover <=3" 0 – 20 % Surface fragment cover >3" Not specified Available water capacity
(0-101.6cm)10.67 – 19.81 cm Calcium carbonate equivalent
(0-101.6cm)2 – 30 % Electrical conductivity
(0-101.6cm)Not specified Sodium adsorption ratio
(0-101.6cm)Not specified Soil reaction (1:1 water)
(0-101.6cm)7.4 – 8.4 Subsurface fragment volume <=3"
(Depth not specified)20 – 45 % Subsurface fragment volume >3"
(Depth not specified)Not specified Ecological dynamics
Limy Fan, 3"-6" p.z., is a dispersed desert shrub dominated ecological site. Perennial grasses and forbs are present in natural depressions. Annual forbs and grasses flourish following rainfall. Natural disturbances are rare. After introduction of non-native annuals (forbs and/or grasses), the shift in total productivity with shift slightly toward seasonal herbaceous production following periods of rain. Dominant shrubs are creosote and white bursage. Assorted half-shrubs are widely scattered.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective textEcosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityCommunity 1.1
Historic Climax Plant CommunityThe dominant aspect of this site is a misture of desert shrubs with some grasses and forbs. Major shrubs include creosotebush, white bursage, and white ratany. Annual grasses and forbs are abundant during good moisture years.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type Low
(kg/hectare)Representative value
(kg/hectare)High
(kg/hectare)Shrub/Vine 118 129 143 Grass/Grasslike 25 28 34 Forb 9 11 17 Total 152 168 194 Table 6. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover 0% Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover 0-0% Grass/grasslike foliar cover 0% Forb foliar cover 0% Non-vascular plants 0% Biological crusts 0% Litter 0% Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" 0% Surface fragments >3" 0% Bedrock 0% Water 0% Bare ground 0% Table 7. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (m) Tree Shrub/Vine Grass/
GrasslikeForb <0.15 – – – 1-3% >0.15 <= 0.3 – – 0-2% – >0.3 <= 0.6 – 4-6% – – >0.6 <= 1.4 – – – – >1.4 <= 4 – – – – >4 <= 12 – – – – >12 <= 24 – – – – >24 <= 37 – – – – >37 – – – – Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3011 , 30.1 3-6" p.z. all sites. Growth begins in late winter, most growth occurs in the spring..
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 7 30 32 13 7 3 5 2 1 0 0 Figure 6. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3083 , 30.27 3-6" p.z. white bursage. Growth begins in early spring. Dormancy occurs during the hot summer months. With sufficient summer/fall precipitation, some plants may break dormancy and produce a flush of growth. Flowers and sets seed by July..
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 5 20 40 20 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 Figure 7. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3085 , 30.27 3-6" p.z. white ratany. Most growth occurs in the spring. Flowers and sets seed by July..
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 5 20 35 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 Figure 8. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3282 , 30.28 10-13" p.z. creosotebush. Growth occurs mostly in the spring using stored winter moisture. Flowers and sets seed by July..
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J F M A M J J A S O N D 0 0 10 20 50 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 State 2
Historic Native Plant Community plus Introduced AnnualsCommunity 2.1
Non-native Annuals UnderstoryThis plant community resembles the historic native plant community, but exotic annuals have been introduced. Non-native species include red brome, Mediterranean grass (Schismus spp.), and filaree. The flourish of non-native annuals that occurs following rainfalls may preclude native annuals.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2Wind or mechanical transport of non-native seed or propagules.
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1None known.
Additional community tables
Table 8. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Grass/Grasslike1 0–9 big galleta PLRI3 Pleuraphis rigida 0–9 – 2 2–3 low woollygrass DAPU7 Dasyochloa pulchella 2–3 – 3 2–4 sixweeks grama BOBA2 Bouteloua barbata 2–4 – 4 2–4 sixweeks fescue VUOC Vulpia octoflora 2–4 – 5 2–4 needle grama BOAR Bouteloua aristidoides 2–4 – 6 2–4 sixweeks threeawn ARAD Aristida adscensionis 2–4 – Forb7 2–4 desert Indianwheat PLOV Plantago ovata 2–4 – 8 2–3 desert lily HEUN2 Hesperocallis undulata 2–3 – 9 0–2 Gordon's bladderpod LEGO Lesquerella gordonii 0–2 – 10 2–9 Forb, annual 2FA Forb, annual 2–9 – Shrub/Vine11 67–76 creosote bush LATR2 Larrea tridentata 67–76 – 12 34–43 burrobush AMDU2 Ambrosia dumosa 34–43 – 13 17–25 white ratany KRGR Krameria grayi 17–25 – 14 0–3 pricklypear OPUNT Opuntia 0–3 – 15 0–9 Shrub, other 2S Shrub, other 0–9 – Table 9. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group Common name Symbol Scientific name Annual production () Foliar cover (%) Interpretations
Other information
Because of the low density of plants and the lack of desirable species for grazing, it is hard to measure degredation.
If for some reason shrubs are removed from the site, only annual grasses and forbs will remain.Supporting information
Contributors
Harmon Hodgkinson
HSH
Larry D. EllicottApproval
Kendra Moseley, 10/21/2024
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) Contact for lead author Date 04/19/2026 Approved by Approval date Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on Annual Production Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
AAAAOther
PrintThe Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Accessibility statement
